Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Resource
Management
• 360-degree feedback
• a performance appraisal system in which feedback is obtained
from multiple sources such as supervisors, subordinates, peers,
customers, and self.
• Primarily used as a source for training and employee development.
• Seldom used for determining salary increase, making promotion
and termination decisions.
STEP 3: Determine Who Will Evaluate Performance
Feedback Sources:
• Peers
• Research says that peer ratings are fairly reliable only when peers
who make the ratings are similar to and well acquainted with the
employee being rated.
• Research says high performers evaluate their peers more strictly
than do low performers.
• Research says employees tend to react worse to negative
feedback from peers than from experts.
STEP 3: Determine Who Will Evaluate Performance
Feedback Sources:
• Subordinates
• Also called upward feedback.
• An important component of the 360-degree feedback as
subordinates can provide a very different view about a
supervisor’s behavior.
• Difficult to obtain because employees fear a backlash if they
unfavorably rate their supervisors.
STEP 3: Determine Who Will Evaluate Performance
Feedback Sources:
• Subordinates
• Research says that feedback can be encouraged if:
• Supervisors appear open to employee comments;
• Ratings are made anonymously;
• Ratings are used for developmental purposes;
• Employee feels competent to make the rating;
• Employee feels there is no retaliation for making honest ratings; and
• Employee will somehow benefit by providing honest ratings.
• Research says that multisource feedback is most effective when:
• Employee needs to change his behavior;
• Employee perceives that the changes are feasible; and
• Employee is open to receiving constructive feedback.
STEP 3: Determine Who Will Evaluate Performance
Feedback Sources:
• Customers
• Informally acquired by asking customers to provide feedback on
employee performance by filling complaints or when
complimenting a supervisor about one of his employees.
• Formally acquired by asking customers to provide feedback by
completing evaluation cards.
• Secret shoppers
• Current customers who have been enlisted by a company to
periodically evaluate the service they receive (in exchange of
a freebie or a free meal).
STEP 3: Determine Who Will Evaluate Performance
Feedback Sources:
• Self
• Self-appraisal
• allowing an employee to evaluate his own behavior and
performance.
• Research says self-appraisal tends to suffer from leniency and
correlate only moderately with actual performance and
poorly with subordinate and management ratings, therefore,
is most biased thus, used by small percentage of organizations.
• Research says self-ratings of Japanese, Korean, and Taiwanese
workers suffer from modesty than leniency while the United
States, mainland China, India, Singapore and Hong Kong are
characterized by leniency.
STEP 3: Determine Who Will Evaluate Performance
Feedback Sources:
• Self
• Research says that self-appraisals are most accurate when:
• Self-appraisals are not to be used for salary raises or promotion
purposes;
• Criteria
• Ways of describing employee success.
• EX: attendance; quality of work
Note: Error can even be work quality that is higher than the standard.
STEP 4: Select the Best Appraisal Methods to
Accomplish your Goals
Decision 3: Use of Objective Measures
Attendance
Classified in 3 distinct criteria:
• Absenteeism
• Tardiness
• Tenure – as a criterion is used mostly for research
• Bonus systems can be given to reward long-tenure employees
Safety – as a criterion may also be used for research
• Any employee who follow safety rules and have no occupational
accidents do not cost an organization as much money as those who
break rules, equipment and own body.
• May be used for employment decisions such as promotions and
bonuses
STEP 4: Select the Best Appraisal Methods to
Accomplish your Goals
Decision 3: Use of Ratings
Subjective Ratings
Two most common rating scales:
1. Graphic Rating Scale
• A method of performance appraisal that involves rating employee
performance on an interval or ratio scale.
• Easy to construct and use but susceptible to rating errors:
Halo error – occurs when a rater allows either a single attribute or
an overall impression of an individual to affect the ratings for other
job dimensions.
Leniency error – a type of rating error in which a rater consistently
gives all employees high ratings, regardless of their actual levels of
performance.
Graphic Rating Scale
STEP 4: Select the Best Appraisal Methods to
Accomplish your Goals
Decision 3: Use of Ratings
Subjective Ratings
Two most common rating scales:
2. Behavioral Checklist
• Consist of a list of behaviors, expectations, or results for each
dimension.
• Are constructed by taking the task statements from a detailed job
description and converting them into behavioral performance
statements representing the level at which the behavior is expected
to be performed.
Behavioral Checklist
STEP 5: Train Raters
• Training raters is very important to ensure sound evaluation
system.
• Trained raters reduce rating errors, increase accuracy and
increase satisfaction of employees.
• There is a lack of training for raters.
• Frame-of-reference training
• A method of training raters in which the rater is provided with:
• job related information;
• a chance to practice ratings;
• examples of ratings made by experts; and
• the rationale behind the expert ratings.
STEP 6: Observe and Document Performance
• Critical incidents – a method of performance appraisal in which
the supervisor records employee behaviors that were observed on
the job and rates the employee on the basis of the record.