Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Om CH 2
Om CH 2
Introduction
There is an increasing recognition that operations should assist the firm achieve a
competitive position in the market place. Hence, apart from being a place to make
the firm’s products and services, operations should also lead to some competitive
strength to the business as well. This realization is being encouraged by increased
foreign competition, the need for improved productivity and increased customer
demands for improved quality. Gaining a competitive advantage through improved
operations performance requires a strategic response on the part of the operations
function. The focus of this unit is therefore on operations strategy, which specifies
how operations can help implement the firm’s corporate strategy. Here, you will
see how operations strategy links long and short operations decision.
2. 1 What is strategy?
Strategy can be defined as follows (Johnson et. al 2008)
‘Strategy is the direction and scope of an organization over the long term: ideally
which matches its resource to its changing environment and in particular its
markets, customers or clients so as to meet stakeholders’ expectations.’
Strategy can be seen to exist at 3 main levels of corporate, operation and functional
Corporate strategy
Defines long-range plan for the organization.
Operations strategy
Develop a plan for the operations function focusing on specific competitive
priorities.
Functional level strategy
Developed to focus on the identified competitive priorities.
A. Mission
Every organization has a mission. The mission is a statement that answers three
overriding (dominating) questions:
What business will the company be in?
Who will the customers be, and what is the expected customer attributes?
How will the company’s basic beliefs define the business?
The mission defines the company. In order to develop a long-term plan for a
business, you must first know exactly what business you are in, what
customers you are serving, and what your company’s values are.
If a company does not have a well-defined mission, it may pursue business
opportunities about which it has no real knowledge or that are in conflict
with its current pursuits, or it may miss opportunities altogether.
B. Environmental Scanning
A second factor to consider when developing business strategy is environmental
scanning. It is the monitoring of events and trends that present either threats or
opportunities for the organization.
Generally, these include:
competitors’ activities;
changing consumer needs;
legal, economic, political, and environmental issues;
The potential for new markets; and the like.
To remain competitive, companies have to continuously monitor their
environment and be prepared to change their business strategy, or long-range plan,
in light of environmental changes.
The organization also must take into account various internal factors that relate to
possible strengths or weaknesses. Among the key internal factors are the
following:
1. Human resources: These include the skills and abilities of managers and
workers; special talents (creativity, designing, problem solving); loyalty to
the organization; expertise; dedication; and experience.
2. Facilities and equipment: Capacities, location, age, and cost to maintain or
replace can have a significant impact on operations.
3. Financial resources: Cash flow, access to additional funding, existing debt
burden, and cost of capital are important considerations.
Compiled by SEBO (MBA) Rift Valley University Batu Campus Page 4
Operations Management: - Chapter two: Operations Strategy and competitiveness
C. Core competencies
oThe third factor that helps define a business strategy is an understanding of
the company’s strengths. These are called core competency.
In order to formulate a long-term plan, the company’s managers must know
the competencies of their organization.
Core competencies could include special skills of workers, such as expertise
in providing customized services or knowledge of information technology.
Another example might be flexible facilities that can handle the production
of a wide array of products.
To be successful, a company must compete in markets where its core
competencies will have value.
Figure 2.1 shows how the mission, environmental scanning, and core
competencies help in the formulation of the corporate strategy.
This is an ongoing process that is constantly allowed to change.
As environmental scanning reveals changes in the external environment,
the company may need to change its corporate/business strategy to
role of inventory in the process, and locating the process. The infrastructure
decision involve the logic associated with the planning and control systems, quality
assurance and control approaches, work payment structures, and the organization
of the operation function.
Figure 2.2 Operations strategy and the design of the operations function
2.2.1 Operations competitive priorities
Competitive priorities are the capabilities that the operations function can develop
in order to give a company a competitive advantage in its market. The major
competitive dimensions that form the competitive position of a company include
the following.
Note that a low-cost strategy can result in a higher profit margin, even at a
competitive price. Also, low cost does not imply low quality.
Let’s look at some specific characteristics of the operations function we
might find in a company competing on cost.
To develop this competitive priority, the operations function must focus
primarily on cutting costs in the system, such as costs of labor, materials,
and facilities.
Companies that compete based on cost study their operations system
carefully to eliminate all waste. They might offer extra training to
employees to maximize their productivity and minimize scrap. Also, they
might invest in automation in order to increase productivity.
Generally, companies that compete based on cost
offer a narrow range of products and product features,
allow for little customization, and
have an operations process that is designed to be as efficient as
possible.
2. Quality-“Make it good”
A competitive priority focusing on the quality of goods and services.
Many companies claim that quality is their top priority, and many customers
say that they look for quality in the products they buy.
Yet quality has a subjective meaning; it depends on who is defining it.
For example, to one person quality could mean that the product lasts a long
time, such as.
When companies focus on quality as a competitive priority, they are
focusing on the dimensions of quality that are considered important by their
customers.
Today’s customers don’t want to wait, and companies that can meet their
need for fast service are becoming leaders in their industries.
Making time a competitive priority means competing based on all time-
related issues, such as rapid delivery and on-time delivery.
Rapid delivery refers to how quickly an order is received;
On-time delivery refers to how often deliveries are made on time.
Another time-competitive priority is development speed, which is the time
needed to take an idea to the marketplace.
This is especially critical in technology and computer software fields.
When time is a competitive priority, the job of the operations function is to
critically analyze the system and combine or eliminate processes in order to
save time.
Often companies use technology to speed up processes, rely on a flexible
workforce to meet peak demand periods, and eliminate unnecessary steps in
the production process.
4. Flexibility “Change it”
A competitive priority focusing on offering a wide variety of goods or
services.
As a company’s environment changes rapidly, including customer needs and
expectations, the ability to readily accommodate these changes can be a
winning strategy.
There are two dimensions of flexibility.
Product flexibility: It is the ability to offer a wide variety of goods
or services and customize them to the unique needs of clients.
Volume flexibility is the ability to rapidly increase or decrease the
amount produced in order to accommodate changes in the demand.
One way that large facilities with multiple products can address the issue of
trade-offs is using the concept of plant-within-a-plant (PWP), introduced by
well-known Harvard professor Wickham Skinner.
These areas should be physically separated from one another and should
even have their own separate workforce. As the term suggests, there are
multiple plants within one plant, allowing a company to produce different
products that compete on different priorities.
scope, dealing primarily with the operations aspect of the organization. Operations
strategy relates to products, processes, methods, operating resources, quality, costs,
lead times, and scheduling.
Similarly, operations strategy must be consistent with the overall strategy of the
organization, and with the other functional units of the organization. This requires
that senior managers work with functional units to formulate strategies that will
support, rather than conflict with, each other and the overall strategy of the
organization. As obvious as this may seem, it doesn’t always happen in practice.
Instead, we may find power struggles between various functional units. These
struggles are detrimental to the organization because they pit functional units
against each other rather than focusing their energy on making the organization
more competitive and better able to serve the customer. Some of the latest
approaches in organizations, involving teams of managers and workers, may
reflect a growing awareness of the synergistic effects of working together rather
than competing internally.