Professional Documents
Culture Documents
HC RC Cog Control Den Ouden Ch12 2223 - Part2
HC RC Cog Control Den Ouden Ch12 2223 - Part2
Part 2
§ Introduction
§ lessons from history on thinking about control
§ central issues
§ anatomy of the frontal lobe
§ deficits of cognitive control
§ Introduction
§ lessons from history on thinking about control
§ central issues
§ anatomy of the frontal lobe
§ deficits of cognitive control
§ 3 components
§ develop subgoals
§ anticipate consequences
§ identify requirements to achieve goals
107 Plan of action
§ 3 components
§ develop subgoals
§ anticipate consequences
§ identify requirements to achieve goals
Goals are
hierarchical!
108 Hierarchical organization of prefrontal cortex: 3 axes
Anterior-posterior PFC
§ posterior: more concrete
§ anterior: more abstract
§ uniquely human lateral frontal pole
Ventral-dorsal PFC
§ ventral: maintenance
§ dorsal: manipulation
Lateral-medial PFC
§ lateral: environment / context
medial personal / self oriented
Neubert et al Neuron 2014
What is the evidence for this
posterior-anterior hierarchy of abstraction?
110 Testing the hierarchy of abstraction
Task: learn to follow increasingly abstract rules
Stimuli Rule
no PFC lesion
evaluate expenditures
(need to eat, place to sleep)
Stay healthy
Live on a smaller
Have a home
budget
ve rate
e
pers
Hierarchical goal planning and definition of
appropriate sub-goals is disrupted
in PFC lesion patients
125 Control over complex actions require that we
§ be able to shift from one subgoal to another (e.g. saving money, but
also having a place to live)
But also
§ Introduction
§ lessons from history on thinking about control
§ central issues
§ anatomy of the frontal lobe
§ deficits of cognitive control
§ Menti code: 88 37 21 9
131 Filtering Demands - Thompson-Schill et al
§ Semantic generation
§ High filtering: numerous associates
§ Requires selection
§ Semantic generation
§ High filtering: numerous associates
§ Requires selection
Hypothesis:
Double
Dissociation!
one hipothesys
another hypothesis
Impaired selection process in PFC lesions leads to
openness to creative/ atypical solutions
Knight et al (1995)
144 Testing sensory input filtering in frontal lesions
Lesion patients:
§ Parietal: no difference
Knight et al (1995)
145 Testing sensory input filtering in frontal lesions
Lesion patients:
§ Parietal: no difference
Knight et al (1995)
146 Testing sensory input filtering in frontal lesions
Lesion patients:
§ Parietal: no difference
Knight et al (1995)
Frontal lobe minimises impact of irrelevant perceptual information
Prediction:
When we minimise interfering information,
this should help frontal lesion patients.
148 Inhibition of sensory input to suppress WM content interference
PFC lesion:
Improved performance!
151 Inhibition of task-irrelevant sensory input helps goal-directed control
à Go
Go RT
157 Testing inhibition of action: Stop signal task
Go Trial (75%)
à Go
Go RT
Succesful stop
à
Stop Signal Delay
158 Testing inhibition of action: Stop signal task
Go Trial (75%)
à Go
Go RT
STOP!
à
Stop Signal Delay
160 Inhibition action: Stop Signal Task (fMRI)
STOP!
à
Stop Signal Delay
Signals of the brain
161 Inhibition action: Stop Signal Task (fMRI)
STOP!
à
Stop Signal Delay
After 4 lectures by Hanneke, you now all shout in concert…:
“Ok, so lesioning the left IFG reduces your ability to inhibit action,
but what is the IFG actually doing when it is intact?”
163 Frontal cortex for stopping action
Go
Succesful stop
Failed stop (Go)
164 Frontal cortex for stopping action
Should stop
Go
Succesful stop
Failed stop (Go)
Should go
165
Hmm, so IFG activity does not tell us why you failed
Should stop
Go
Succesful stop
Failed stop (Go)
Should go
166 Inhibition action: Stop Signal Task (fMRI)
§ Motor cortex
§ failed stop: early high activation
§ when IFG couldn’t stop you anymore
Go
Succesful stop
Failed stop (Go)
167 Stopping network
§ Introduction
§ lessons from history on thinking about control
§ central issues
§ anatomy of the frontal lobe
§ deficits of cognitive control
3. Conflict Monitoring
4. Cost of Control
186 3. Conflict monitoring hypothesis
§ Response Conflict
§ Lateral cortex represents task goals
§ Medial frontal cortex monitors if that goal is achieved (not just errors)
§ Conflict: allocate resources…
§ especially when the automatic response is (likely) incorrect
187 Stroop task
§ Cue – long delay – stimulus
§ Measures: task selection vs response conflict
§ Difficulty: reading (easy) vs color naming (hard)
188 Stroop task
§ Cue – long delay – stimulus
§ Measures: task selection vs response conflict
§ Difficulty: reading (easy) vs color naming (hard)
§ Congruency: congruent vs incongruent
189 Stroop task: double dissociation ACC vs DLPFC
§ Instruction:
§ Stimulus:
190 Stroop task: double dissociation ACC vs DLPFC
§ Instruction: PFC as a function of task difficulty:
hard (name color) > easy (name word)
§ Stimulus:
191 Stroop task: double dissociation ACC vs DLPFC
§ Instruction: PFC as a function of task difficulty:
hard (name color) > easy (name word)
§ Medial frontal cortex detects conflict and raises alarm (pay attention, things are
harder than we thought!)
Problem
§ ACC activity seems more to reflect likelihood of errors than degree of conflict
195 4. Cost –Benefit analysis of Control hypothesis (Shenhav e.a. 2013)
§ Stroop task:
§ very cognitively ‘costly’ to
perform the colour naming
ued…
ntin
e co
to b
196 Summary overview
Lateral prefrontal cortex
§ working memory
§ filtering / inhibition
§ selective attention (activate posterior regions)
Frontal pole
§ abstract rule learning
§ hierarchical action goals
§ reasoning
§ Working Memory
§ Inhibition of Prepotent Responses
§ Selective Attention
201 Frontal Pole
§ Value computation
§ a.k.a. orbitofrontal cortex
§ Neurons in the PFC of monkeys show sustained activity throughout the delay
period in delayed-response tasks. These cells provide a neural correlate for
keeping a representation active after the triggering stimulus is longer visible
§ DA neurons also appear to code other variables that may be important for goal-
oriented behaviour and decision making, such as signaling the salience of
information in the environment.
208 Goal Planning (p544)
§ Successful execution of an action plan involves three components: (1)
identifying the goal and developing subgoals, (2) anticipating consequences
when choosing among goals, and (3) determining what is required to achieve
the goals.
§ Patients with prefrontal cortex damage lose inhibitory control. For example,
they cannot inhibit task-irrelevant information.
211 Mechanisms of goal-based selection II (p 553)
§ A network spanning prefrontal cortex and posterior cortex provides the neural
substrates for interactions between goal representations and perceptual
information.
§ The inhibition of action constitutes another form of cognitive control. The right
inferior frontal gyrus and the subthalamic nucleus are important for this form of
control.
§ Active video game playing has been hypothesised to improve some aspects of
cognitive function, such as task switching, perhaps because games require
coordinating multiple subgoals
212 Monitoring (p563)
§ The medial frontal cortex, including the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) is
thought to be a critical part of a monitoring system, identifying situations in
which cognitive control is required.
§ The medial frontal cortex is engaged when response conflict is high. Through its
interactions with lateral regions of the prefrontal cortex, a monitoring system
can regulate the level of cognitive control.
reserve slides