Evaluation description

Criteria 0 1 2 3 4 Weight (1) Evaluation example

Hard to follow. Sequence of information
Precedent incosistent. No block diagram of the processes
Not delivering required content.
Analysis presented in the project/paper. Pertial delivery of
required content. Less than 300 words.
Literature and
less than 4 references and most of them
Not delivering required content.
Project Analysis inadequate.
Undeveloped dicsussion that weakly addresses
the selected topic.
Discussion Not delivering required content. Lack of reflective contribution that advances
discussion on the previous research of
background. Less than 500 words
Inadequate design project selected to be
upgraded during this course with the interactive
system components. Unclear overview of how
Design Intent Not delivering required content.
the project can upgraded. No or unclear
graphics (sketch, diagram) on the project
upgrade.
Design
Algorithm and
visualization
Reflection
Analysis of one project/paper with less clear Analysis of one project/paper with a clear
Analysis of one project/paper with a less clear
discussion on interactivity of the architecture. discussion on interactivity of the architecture.
discussion of interactivity of the architecture.
Understandable block diagram of the processes Understandable block diagram of the processes
Incomplete, but exisitng block diagram of the
presented in the project/paper (graphical presented in the project/paper (graphical
processes presented in the project/paper 15.00%
(graphical representation). Most of information
representation). Information presented in a logical representation). Information presented in a logical
and easy to follow sequence with references to the and easy to follow sequence with references to the
presented in logical sequence, according to
created figure. Good writing skills. Between 400 created figure. Good writing skills. Between 400
requirements. Between 300 and 400 words.
and 500 words (not exceeding 500) and 500 words (not exceeding 500) 4 0.15
8 or more references, but most of the references
less that 8 references, not all related to the topic are unrelated or outdated (more that 10 years
old) *exceptions can be
At least 8 references clearly related to the topic of
OR made in the filed
students work. At least half of the listed references 25.00%
OR
from the past 10 years.
where there is not
less than 8 references from which most are enough references
outdated less that 8 references related to the topic with at
least 5 references from the past 10 years 3 0.1875
Undeveloped discussion that filly addresses the Well developed discussion that filly addresses the Well developed discussion that filly addresses the
selected topic. selected topic. selected topic.
Reflective contribution that advances discussion Lack of reflective contribution that advances Reflective contribution that advances discussion 25.00%
on the previous research of background. 500 - 800 discussion on the previous research of on the previous research of background. 500 - 800
words (not exceeding 800) background. 500 - 800 words (not exceeding 800) words (not exceeding 800) 4 0.25
Clearly presented selected design project which Clearly presented selected design project which Clearly presented selected design project which
will be upgraded during this course with the will be upgraded during this course with the will be upgraded during this course with the
interactive system components. Unclear overview interactive system components. Clear overview of interactive system components. Clear overview of
of how the project can be upgraded. No or how the project can be upgraded. No or unclear how the project can be upgraded. Explanatory
35.00%
unclear graphics (sketch, diagram) on the project graphics (sketch, diagram) on the project graphics (sketch, diagram) on the project
upgrade. upgrade. upgrade. 2 0.175

Total: 100.00% Total: 76.25%

 Criteria
0 1
Hard to follow. Sequence of information
Precedent incosistent. No block diagram of the processes
Not delivering required content.
Analysis presented in the project/paper. Pertial delivery of
required content. Less than 300 words.
Literature and
less than 4 references and most of them
Not delivering required content.
Project Analysis inadequate.
Undeveloped dicsussion that weakly addresses
the selected topic.
Discussion Not delivering required content. Lack of reflective contribution that advances
discussion on the previous research of
background. Less than 500 words
Inadequate design project selected to be
upgraded during this course with the interactive
system components. Unclear overview of how
Design Intent Not delivering required content.
the project can upgraded. No or unclear
graphics (sketch, diagram) on the project
upgrade.
Inadequatly presented design (layouts, sections,
elevations) without interactive architecture
Design Not delivering required content.
elements. Concept poorly supported by literature
and solution is not using contemporary technology.
Algorithm Not delivering required content. Incorect algorithm with inadequate logic applied.
Prasentation that does not communicate the
Visualization Not delivering required content.
interactivity in architecture in clear and logical way.
Poorly developed reflection on the topic addressed
during the semester with no subjective opionon on
Reflection Not delivering required content.
the usefulnes of the interactive architecture and
methods presented
Evaluation description Weight
2 3 4
Analysis of one project/paper with less clear Analysis of one project/paper with a clear
Analysis of one project/paper with a less clear
discussion on interactivity of the architecture. discussion on interactivity of the architecture.
discussion of interactivity of the architecture.
Understandable block diagram of the processes Understandable block diagram of the processes
Incomplete, but exisitng block diagram of the
presented in the project/paper (graphical presented in the project/paper (graphical
processes presented in the project/paper
(graphical representation). Most of information
representation). Information presented in a logical representation). Information presented in a logical
and easy to follow sequence with references to the and easy to follow sequence with references to the
presented in logical sequence, according to
created figure. Good writing skills. Between 400 created figure. Good writing skills. Between 400
requirements. Between 300 and 400 words.
and 500 words (not exceeding 500) and 500 words (not exceeding 500) / Evaluation example
8 or more references, but most of the references
less that 8 references, not all related to the topic are unrelated or outdated (more that 10 years
old) *exceptions can be
At least 8 references clearly related to the topic of
OR made in the filed
students work. At least half of the listed references
OR
from the past 10 years.
where there is not
less than 8 references from which most are enough references
outdated less that 8 references related to the topic with at
least 5 references from the past 10 years /
Undeveloped discussion that filly addresses the Well developed discussion that filly addresses the Well developed discussion that filly addresses the
selected topic. selected topic. selected topic.
Reflective contribution that advances discussion Lack of reflective contribution that advances Reflective contribution that advances discussion
on the previous research of background. 500 - 800 discussion on the previous research of on the previous research of background. 500 - 800
words (not exceeding 800) background. 500 - 800 words (not exceeding 800) words (not exceeding 800) /
Clearly presented selected design project which Clearly presented selected design project which Clearly presented selected design project which
will be upgraded during this course with the will be upgraded during this course with the will be upgraded during this course with the
interactive system components. Unclear overview interactive system components. Clear overview of interactive system components. Clear overview of
of how the project can be upgraded. No or how the project can be upgraded. No or unclear how the project can be upgraded. Explanatory
unclear graphics (sketch, diagram) on the project graphics (sketch, diagram) on the project graphics (sketch, diagram) on the project
upgrade. upgrade. upgrade. /
Clearly presented design (layouts, sections, Clearly presented design (layouts, sections, Clearly presented design (layouts, sections,
elevations) with interactive architecture elements. elevations) with interactive architecture elements. elevations) with interactive architecture elements.
Concept clearly supported by literature, but Concept clearly poorlu supported by literature, but Concept clearly supported by literature and
solution is not using contemporary technology. solution based on contemporary technology. solution based on contemporary technology. 30.00% 2 0.15
Algorithm shown through at least 3 scenarios with Well developed, accurate algorithm shown through Well developed, accurate algorithm shown through
2 parameters included, but without adequate logic at least 3 scenarios. at least 3 scenarios.
applied 2 parameters included in the algorithm. At least 3 parameters included in the algorithm. 30.00% 3 0.225
Original graphical presentation that comunicates Original presentation that comunicates the
Original graphical presentation that lacks
the interactivity of the architecture in clear an interactivity of the architecture in clear an logical
explanation on the interactivity of the architecture
logical way. 1 or 2 graphics that represent layouts way. At least 3 graphics that represent layouts and
in clear an logical way.
and sections of the proposed solution sections of the proposed solution 30.00% 4 0.3
Well developed reflection on the topic addressed
during the semester with subjective opionon on the
/ /
usefulnes of the interactive architecture and
methods presented 10.00% 4 0.1
Total 100.00% Total: 77.50%
 1 2 3 4 5 Report 1 40.00%
88 - 100% 75 - 87% 63 - 74% 51 - 62% <51% Report 2 60.00%

Example
Report 1 76.25% 31%
Report 2 77.50% 47%
Total: 77%
Grade: 2