Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Strategic Alliances
Introduction
• Complexity in business environments increasing
• Resources required to manage are becoming increasingly
scarce
• Enable business to gain competitive advantage through
access to a partner's resources such as markets,
technologies, capital and people.
• Always not effective to perform all key business functions
in-house
• Many times other firms have special resources and technical
knowledge and better suited to perform few functions
• Ex:
✔ Labour intensive activities outsourced to India and China due to
lower wages.
✔ Electronic hardware outsourced to Taiwan
✔ Software intensive work to India
Four Basic Ways to Ensure Tasks Are Completed
● Internal activities
● Perform the activities using internal resources and expertise if that are
core strengths. Best way to perform an activity.
● Acquisitions A B
● Gives the acquiring firm(B) full control over the way the particular
business function is performed. Ex; Corus by Tata steel
● Disadv: Can be difficult and expensive. (Culture/Competitors),
Effectiveness of acquired company (A) may be lost.
● Arm’s-length transactions
● Most business transactions are of this type.
● Short-term arrangement that fulfills a particular business need, but
doesn’t lead to long-term strategic advantages.
Ex: Delivery of a load of items, maintenance of a vehicle, design and
installation of software etc.
● Strategic alliances
● Multifaceted, goal-oriented, long-term agreement for cooperation between
two or more companies to create increased value for their customers
● Both risks & rewards are shared while remaining independent organizations
● Typically lead to long-term strategic benefits for both partners.
Framework for Strategic Alliances: When to
Go for a Strategic Alliance?
Advantages:
● Adding Value to the Products: Partnerships
between companies can add value to products.
Ex: improve time to market, distribution times, or
repair times etc.
● Improving market access: Partnerships can lead
to better advertising or access to new
market channels. Ex: Complementary consumer
product manufacturers can increase sales for
everyone.
Framework for Strategic Alliances: When to
Go for a Strategic Alliance?
Advantages:
● Strengthening operations: Alliance can help to
improve operations by lowering system costs and
cycle times. Ex: companies with complementary
seasonal products can effectively use
warehouses and trucks year-round.
● Adding technological strength: Alliance can help
to add to the skills base of both partners. Ex: a
supplier in need of a particular enhanced
information system can partner with a firm that
already has expertise in this system.
Framework for Strategic Alliances: When to
Go for a Strategic Alliance?
Advantages:
● Enhancing strategic growth: Partnerships can
enable firms to pool expertise and resources to
overcome entry barriers and explore new
opportunities.
● Enhancing organizational skills: Alliances provide
a opportunity for organizational learning from one
another, & to learn more about themselves.
● Building financial strength: Alliances can help to
build financial strength. Income can be increased
and administrative costs can be shared.
Downsides
● Core competencies should not be compromised
• Dependency on capacity
– Firm has the knowledge and the skills required to
produce the component
– For various reasons decides to outsource
• Dependency on knowledge
– Firm does not have the people, skills, and
knowledge required to produce the component
– Outsources in order to have access to these
capabilities.
Outsourcing Decisions at Toyota
• About 30% of components in-sourced
• Engines:
– Company has knowledge and capacity
– 100% of engines are produced internally
• Transmissions
– Company has the knowledge
– Designs all the components
– Depends on its suppliers’ capacities
– 70 % of the components outsourced
• Vehicle electronic systems
– Designed and produced by Toyota’s suppliers.
– Company has dependency on both capacity and
knowledge
Product Architectures
• Modular product
– Made by combining different components
– Components are independent of each other
– Components are interchangeable
– Customer preference determines the product
configuration.
• Integral product
– Made up from components whose functionalities
are tightly related.
– Evaluated on system performance, not on
component performance
– Components perform multiple functions.
A Framework for Make/Buy Decisions
Hierarchical Model to Decide Whether
to Outsource or Not
• Customer Importance
– How important is the component to the customer?
– What is the impact of the component on customer experience?
– Does the component affect customer choice?
• Component Clockspeed
– How fast does the component’s technology change relative to other
components in the system?
• Competitive Position
– Does the firm have a competitive advantage producing this
component?
• Capable Suppliers
– How many capable suppliers exist?
• Architecture
– How modular or integral is this element to the overall architecture of
the system?
Examples of Decisions