◦ Fear is in response to objectively threatening events. ◦ Fear is of appropriate severity given the threat. ◦ Fear subsides when threat has passed. ◦ Fear leads to adaptive behavior. Fear is slightly maladaptive when: ◦ Fear is somewhat unrealistic ◦ Fear persists after the threat has passed. ◦ Fear may lead to behavior that may be somewhat inappropriate. Fear potentially meets criteria for an anxiety disorder: ◦ Fear is moderately unrealistic. ◦ Fear is definitely more than is warranted given the severity of the threat. ◦ Fear persists for quite awhile after the threat has passed. ◦ Fear leads to behaviors that are potentially dangerous or impairing. Fear likely meets diagnostic criteria for an anxiety disorder: ◦ Fears are completely unrealistic. ◦ Fears are excessive given the objective threat. ◦ Fears persist long after the threat has passed and chronic anticipatory anxiety exists. ◦ Fear leads to dangerous behavior or impairment. The hypothalamus activates the adrenal- cortical system by releasing corticotropin-release factor (CRF), which signals the pituitary gland to secrete ACTH, the body’s major stress hormone. ACTH stimulates the outer layer of the adrenal glands , releasing group of hormones such as cortisol. The amount of cortisol in the blood or urine is often used as a measure of stress. ACTH also signals the adrenal glands to release about 30 other hormones, each plays a major role in the body’s adjustment to emergency situations. Eventually, when the threatening stimulus had passed, the hippocampus, a part of the brain that helps regulate emotions turns off this physiological cascade. Freud’s theory: ◦ Accumulation of the undischarged libido is transformed into anxiety ◦ Libido could either result from external obstacles to its appropriate discharge or form internal inhibitions related to unconscious conflicts about sexual gratification ◦ Freud referred to this anxiety as actual neurosis. It is associated with pathological and overwhelming fear. It is usually associated with a number of physiological symptoms and an overwhelming sense of panic and terror. ◦ Anxiety has a biological or genetic basis. ◦ Traumatic situations are central to the development of anxiety ◦ As children developed, they learn to anticipate dangerous situation before it happens and react to it with anxiety. He called this signal anxiety. Anxiety is both symptomatic manifestation of neurotic conflict and an adaptive signal to avoid awareness of neurotic conflict. Signal anxiety is a way of attenuating a more profound and terrifying anxiety. • Repression is a defense mechanism that keeps undesirable id impulses from coming into consciousness. Reaction formation may also be another defense from an underlying wish related to drive pressures. Melanie Klein expanded on Freud's view by developing a theory of internal object relations linked to drives. She regarded fear of annihilation as the most fundamental anxiety and related it to Freud's death instinct. In her view, the ego engaged in a splitting process to deal with that fear of annihilation. All the derivatives of the death instinct, such as sadism, hatred, aggression, and any form of “badness,” were evacuated from the infant and projected into the mother. As the infant moved from the paranoid- schizoid position to the depressive position, splitting of the ego was overcome by an integrative effort that was designed to link good and bad aspects of the self and of objects. Instead of viewing the mother as “all bad,” the child is now able to see that mother has both good and bad qualities. When the child becomes aware that the loving and nurturing mother is basically the same person as the hateful, rejecting mother, an important developmental moment has been achieved. • Hence depressive anxiety can be summarized as a concern about the loss of the love object through one's own destructiveness. The child learns to deal with these guilt feelings through a process of reparation, in which the child attempts to repair the perceived damage through loving behavior toward the ambivalently regarded object. ( Kaplan & Saddock, 2000 p.3010) ◦ His emphasis is on infantile needs rather than repressed wishes or drives. ◦ He believes that the need to maintain self-esteem and well-being is as powerful as sexuality and aggression in molding a human person. ◦ The child has powerful to idealize a parent; to receive affirmation, validation and empathy from that parent and to maintain a sense of wholeness of the self. ◦ Disintegration anxiety is the most fundamental concern of the individual. This anxiety is generated by the child’s concern that the failure of adequate self object responses in the environment will lead to fragmentation of self. ◦ Biological mechanisms are linked to the generation of anxiety. ◦ Acute panic attacks appear to arise in the brainstem and represent spontaneous hyperactivity of noradrenergic nuclei in conjunction with lowered firing thresholds in medullary respiratory chemoreceptors. By contrast, anticipatory anxiety seems to represent the effect of a kindling in the limbic lobe. Phobic avoidance appears to be cortical in origin. Developmental Hierarchy of Anxiety: ◦ Superego anxiety ◦ Castration anxiety ◦ Fear of loss of love ◦ Separation anxiety – fear of loss of the object ( Kleneian depressive anxiety) ◦ Persecutory anxiety ◦ Disintegration anxiety Biochemical findings: ◦ High levels of cortisol indicate an elevated stress response. ◦ Resting levels of cortisol among people with PTSD ( when not exposed to trauma reminders) tend to be lower than among people without PTSD. ◦ Cortisol acts to reduce sympathetic nervous system activity after stress, so lower levels may result in prolonged activity of the sympathetic nervous system. Neuroimaging findings: ◦ Differences between brain activity of those with PTSD from those without PTSD can be seen in areas that regulate flight-or-fight response and memory including amygdala, hippocampus and prefrontal cortex. ◦ Amygdala responds more actively to emotional stimuli to those with PTSD. ◦ Prefrontal is less active ◦ Damage to the hippocampus my interfere with returning to normal level after the threat has passed. Psychodynamics: ◦ Difficulty tolerating anger ◦ Physical or emotional separation from significant persons both in childhood and adult life ◦ May be triggered by situation of increased work responsibilities. ◦ Perception of parents as controlling, frightening, critical and demanding. ◦ Internal representations of relationships involving sexual or physical abuse. A chronic sense of feeling trapped Psychodynamics: ◦ Difficulty tolerating anger ◦ Physical or emotional separation from significant persons both in childhood and adult life ◦ May be triggered by situation of increased work responsibilities. ◦ Perception of parents as controlling, frightening, critical and demanding. Internal representations of relationships involving sexual or physical abuse. ◦ A chronic sense of feeling trapped. ◦ A vicious cycle of anger at parental-rejecting behavior followed by anxiety that the fantasy will destroy the tie with the parent. ◦ Failure of signal anxiety function in ego-related disorder to self-fragmentation and sle-other boundary confusion. ◦ Typical defense mechanisms: reaction formation; undoing; somatization and externalization. Panic disorder runs in families. Poor regulation of several neurotransmitters including norepinephrine, serotonin, GABA and cholecystokinin Brain mechanisms: ◦ Amygdala ◦ Hypothalamus ◦ Hippocampus ◦ Periaqueductal gray ◦ Locus ceruleus – dysregulation of norepinephrine systems Poor regulation in the locus ceruleus may cause panic attacks which then stimulates the limbic system, lowering the threshold for the activation of diffuse and chronic anxiety. The hormone progesterone can affect the activity of both serotonin and GABA neurotransmitter system. Cognitive factors: ◦ People prone to panic attacks tend to: Pay very close attention to their bodily sensations. Misinterpret these sensations in a negative way. Engage in snowballing catastrophic thinking, exaggerating symptoms and their consequences ◦ Defense mechanisms include: displacement, projection and avoidance ◦ Environmental stressors including humiliation and criticisms from an older sibling, parental fights, or loss and separation from parents interact with genetic –constitutional diathesis. A characteristic pattern of internal object relations is externalized in social situations in the case of social phobia ◦ Defense mechanisms include: displacement, projection and avoidance Environmental stressors including humiliation and criticisms from an older sibling, parental fights, or loss and separation from parents interact with genetic –constitutional diathesis ◦ Defense mechanisms include: displacement, projection and avoidance.
Environmental stressors including humiliation
and criticisms from an older sibling, parental fights, or loss and separation from parents interact with genetic –constitutional diathesis Psychodynamics: ◦ Worrying serves as a defensive function to avoid thinking about more disturbing issues. ◦ Increased prevalence of past traumas is highly characteristic. ◦ Link with an insecure/conflicted attachment in childhood. ◦ The underlying conflict that creates the anxiety can be related to any number of developmental themes. ◦ The unconscious conflict continues to be alive in self- defeating patterns in relationships. ◦ Resistance is common in moving below the level of symptoms to underlying symptoms of conflict. A 35-year-old woman who had witnessed her son's death in an auto accident felt she could never get over what happened. Much of her psychotherapy focused on her repeated reexperiencing of the event, including vivid nightmares that caused her to wake up crying. The therapist repeatedly tried to get the patient to mourn the loss of her child, but the patient steadfastly refused, saying she did not know how to grieve and she did not think she could ever get over it. The therapist interpreted her wish to hang on the images of the son as a way of avoiding the mourning. The interpretations fell on deaf ears, and the patient continued to talk about the accident and her feelings of guilt in connection with it. After months of this repetitive interaction in the therapy, the therapist began to feel angry and irritated at the patient for thwarting all his attempts. He became more and more forceful in his efforts to provide her with insight about how she was holding on to the past. Finally, the patient experienced him as intrusive and unsympathetic, and she shouted at him: “Would you stop trying tomake me do what you want me to do and just leave me alone?!” As the therapist reflected on this outburst, he recognized that he had felt so helpless and inadequate that he had had re-created an abusive situation in the therapeutic relationship. The patient was again feeling victimized, not only by the cruel hand of fate in the death of her son and by the drunken driver who killed him but also by the therapist himself. As this fragment of a psychotherapy process reveals, many patients with posttraumatic stress disorder present formidable challenges to the psychotherapist: A 26-year-old single man was admitted to a psychiatric hospital with obsessive-compulsive disorder because he had refused to cooperate with pharmacotherapy and behavior therapy approaches. He was obsessed with the concern that his father and mother might bring the “AIDS virus” into the home, so he asked that everything be sprayed with disinfectants. He also insisted that his parents wear gloves around the house and specifically when handling his personal items or touching the doorknob of his room. His parents had reluctantly complied with these instructions because they feared his wrath when they did not go along with him. When he arrived in the hospital, the young man became concerned that the previous occupant of his room might have masturbated and left semen stains in his room that could transmit HIV infection to him. Even though the hospital staff tried to engage him in discussions of other issues, he repeatedly wanted to get everyone to discuss the possibility of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) contamination in the room. One nurse who was assigned to him was told each day not to touch anything in his room unless he was wearing gloves. Eventually, the nurse capitulated and began wearing gloves when entering the patient's room. The nurse felt embarrassed about this capitulation and tried to keep it secret from the other hospital staff, but he was eventually discovered wearing gloves when he emerged from the patient's room. The behavior led to a useful discussion of counter transference in treating such patients. It also led to a productive exploration of the patient's entitlement. He was indignant when people did not comply with his expectations. In this regard his hospital psychiatrist confronted him with the observation that he tended to deny the autonomy and subjectivity of anyone else in his life. All family members and all treated were supposed to respond primarily to his needs rather than their own needs. These confrontations eventually helped the patient to recognize his omnipotent control of others, and he began to withdraw his demandingness. Discussion : This case example reflects how patterns of relationships become internalized because of the specific needs of the patient with obsessive-compulsive disorder. His needs to avoid contamination became paramount over every other concern in his environment. This pattern of omnipotent control was internalized as his characteristic mode of object relatedness. His admission into the hospital and the recapitulation of that pattern of relatedness is an example of the time-honored principle of psychodynamic hospital treatment—namely, that the patient attempts to re-create his family situation in the milieu of the hospital with various staff members. This case also illustrates the extent to which significant characterological issues may operate in concert with the symptoms of obsessive-compulsive disorder. To some degree the patient had everyone in his family waiting on him hand and foot and doing exactly what he wanted them to do. He was thus reluctant to enter into any treatment program that might change his behaviors and loosen the hold he had on his family. Studies have suggested that patients with comorbid personality disorders in association with obsessive- compulsive disorder are much more likely to terminate behavior therapy and be classified as treatment resistant.