You are on page 1of 8

See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.

net/publication/281224079

Review of Issues Related to Tourism Policies regarding Environmental


Management and Customary Practices of Tourism in Gilgit-Baltistan,
Pakistan

Article · January 2012

CITATIONS READS

8 6,188

3 authors, including:

Rehmat Karim Azhar Hussain


Karakoram International University Karakoram International University
61 PUBLICATIONS 256 CITATIONS 66 PUBLICATIONS 322 CITATIONS

SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE

Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:

BS (Hons) Zoology View project

Geostatistical Analysis of Anemia Among the RAW in selected districts of Gilgit-Baltistan View project

All content following this page was uploaded by Azhar Hussain on 25 August 2015.

The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file.


Journal of Environmental Science and Engineering B 1 (2012) 1087-1093
Formerly part of Journal of Environmental Science and Engineering, ISSN 1934-8932
D DAVID PUBLISHING

Review of Issues Related to Tourism Policies regarding


Environmental Management and Customary Practices of
Tourism in Gilgit-Baltistan, Pakistan

Rehmat Karim, Salma A. Durrani and Azhar Hussain


Integrated Mountain Area Research Centre (IMARC), Karakoram International University, Gilgit-Baltistan 15100, Pakistan

Received: August 30, 2012 / Accepted: September 15, 2012 / Published: September 20, 2012.

Abstract: The purpose of this study is to highlight the issues and problems of tourism planning, policy formulation and
implementation in Gilgit-Baltistan-mountainous region of Pakistan—a place which is abound with worth seeing natural scenes and
also hub of world’s highest mountain ranges. Tourism in many countries plays an important role in improving not only economic
conditions but it also has been used as a tool to preserve environment. Tourism policy is part of national development policy in many
countries, but in Pakistan this sector has been ignored in terms of proper policy formulation and also it was not considered as a
potential sector for economic betterment. Although Pakistan, particularly Gilgit-Baltistan is replete with tourism resources, haplessly
policy makers never focused on this sector in capitalizing these tourism resources. It also covers the traditional practices of 4 As
(Access, Attractions, Accommodation and Acceptance) in Gilgit-Baltistan. In Pakistan, there have been different laws and
regulations formulated with the passage of time but they have not been implemented properly. In Pakistan, tourism policy was first
prepared in 1983 but it was not enforced appropriately. According to ranking of WEF T&T (World Economic Forum Travel and
Tourism) competitiveness index, Pakistan is ranked below average in policy formulation and implementation.

Key words: Statuary policies, customary practices, 4 As, environment, Gilgit-Baltistan, Pakistan.

1. Introduction same as it is thought to be inconceivable in tourism


sector as well. In tourism sector, policies have to be
In the milieu of national development in Pakistan,
formulated according to the real information about
tourism sector in general and mountain tourism in
number of tourist arrivals, type of tourists, purpose of
Gilgit-Baltistan has particularly not received much
visit and their preferences etc.. TDGB (Tourism
attention as compared to other sector or industries.
Department of Gilgit-Baltistan) compiles the statistics
Tourism industry has been considered as the only tool
of tourist arrivals in Gilgit-Baltistan but unfortunately
to satiate the demand of foreign exchange and its
this data does not reflect the ground realities [15].
imbalances. Although Pakistan, particularly
TDGB could compile only statistics in number of
Gilgit-Baltistan, is enriched in tourism attractions,
tourists arrival from 2007 to 2010 but visiting
especially in mountain tourism resources,
different tourism destination, used accommodation,
unfortunately this tourism has not got a very long
transportation, tourism receipts etc. are not available.
history. The first marketing campaign was launched in
So without the above mentioned information, planning
1981 by Pakistan’s first International Trekking
and policy formulation has no meaning at all.
Convention.
Millions of rupees have been invested to construct
Without valid or real data, policy formulation and
hotels and souvenir shops in many areas of
management in any industry or sector is formidable
Gilgit-Baltistan, especially in Karim Abad Hunza.
Corresponding author: Rehmat Karim, Ph.D., lecturer, Hoteliers have borrowed money from banks and
main research field: sustainable mountain eco-tourism. E-mail:
rehmat@kiu.edu.pk. cooperative societies to construct hotels and shops but
1088 Review of Issues Related to Tourism Policies regarding Environmental Management and Customary
Practices of Tourism in Gilgit-Baltistan, Pakistan

due to tourism slump, these local people are suffering The place is so glamorous that it appeals all nature
from heavy losses for the last many years. lovers. It is indeed a real place to discover perfect
Government has never backed up these people who peace of mind [1].
have lost their money and are paying interests to
3. Literature Review
banks without getting return from their businesses and
there is no any system of subsidy, insurance or any Unplanned tourism activities consequently lead to
relief for losses in this respective sector. tourism slump. Tourism development took place in
most areas of the world as an unplanned activity [2].
2. Study Area
Moreover, many countries in the Third World did not
Northern Pakistan, particularly Gilgit-Baltistan, is know the importance of the tourism industry and the
covered with high, snow capped mountains of impacts that it can have [3] and many governments
Himalaya, Hindukash and Karakoram ranges (Fig. 1). have supposed the industry to be the business of the
The place is rough and rocky with terrific terrains and private sectors [2]. Lack of appropriate land use policy
hefty dissected slopes. The topography is overly and regulations governing the location and
uneven due to corrosion and land slips. The soil is a distribution of tourism facilities and infrastructure
mixture of stones and pebbles. In some areas, there are caused decline in tourism [4-7]. Consequently, most
boulders in the midst of cultivated land, lessening its private investors, in the tourism and hospitality
fertility. industry, tend to put their capital investments in
The tallest peaks in the world are located in regions perceived to have high potential for quick
Gilgit-Blatistan. They attract a number of soft and profit returns and suddenly lose their investment if
hard adventure tourists, mountain climbers, trekkers tourism fell down [7]. Challenge in terms of the
and eco-tourists. There is no comparison in its natural management and regulation of the industry is the need
beauty. The junction of three highest mountain ranges, to deal with a wide range of organizations from
Himalaya, Karakoram and Hindukash, adds to its large-scale, international companies to the large
beauty. Between these peaks, there are beautiful number of small-scale, privately owned
valleys, mesmerizing glaciers, effervescent springs, establishments [8]. For improving the multiplier and
alluring lakes, long rivers and beguiling waterfalls.

Gllglt-Baltlstan

Ladakh
Kashmir

Fig. 1 Map of Gilgit-Baltistan/Northern areas of Pakistan.


Review of Issues Related to Tourism Policies regarding Environmental Management and Customary 1089
Practices of Tourism in Gilgit-Baltistan, Pakistan

net benefit of tourism, industry policy and planning estimated that approximately 43 million domestic
must be recognized as vital importance [9]. It is based visitors traveled within the country in 2006. Nearly
on realization that tourism planning is getting renewed 90% domestic tourists traveled by road, 8.5% by rail
importance among academics and government. and only 1.8% traveled by air [13].
Successful and profitable destinations will be those According to TDGB, domestic tourists visit
which could build and expand the planning and Gilgit-Baltistan for different purposes, e.g. business,
policies with clear links to local level organizations VFRs (visiting friends and relatives), adventure,
[10]. Tourism management for the destination is mountaineering, hiking etc. Data in Table 2 shows the
therefore likely to be best implemented through the domestic tourists arrival from 2007 to 2010.
application of signage, development of guidelines and
6. Review of Contemporary Statuary
codes of conduct [11]. Currently, the common idea
Policies
articulated in scientific literature and put forward by
international agencies is that tourism development and Pakistan’s first tourism plan was prepared in 1967
management should be guided by philosophy of with the help of United Nations [1]. In this plan,
sustainability [12]. Through its strategic though environment was given contemplation in broad
process—analysis, formulation, implementation and terms, it was not given any specifically consideration
evaluation, tourism planning is, at both the local and to environmental protection and it conservation. There
the regional level, a suitable tool to carry out public was no any authority which could work in a structural
policies, guiding tourism destinations according to a way to play a role in managerial and physical planning
vision of the community in the long run [12]. for tourism and environment.
Presently, all public sector organizations and its
4. Foreign Tourism
development projects/programs are approved by
According to Ref. [13], foreign tourists visited Planning Commission and its respective ministry. All
Balochistan (1.5%), Sindh (33.5%), Punjab (56.3%), tourism related projects/programs are routed
KPK (5.6%), Gilgit-Baltistan (0.6%) and Azad Jammu through its details of PC-I form, which is
and Kashmir (2.5%) [1]. generally an accepted document for
According to data available in the office of Tourism projects/programs’ approval. Ministry of Tourism
Department of Gilgit-Baltistan, the foreign tourists with the composite of Planning Commission approves
arrivals in Gilgit-Baltistan from 2007 to 2010 are the tourism projects/programs.
shown in Table 1. Rapid increase in human population especially in
Pakistan has raised the demand for natural resources
5. Domestic Tourism
in the last two to three decades. In many cases, the
According to Domestic Tourism Survey, it is development activities and its plans have damaged
Table 1 Foreign tourists arrival in Gilgit-Baltistan from 2007 to 2010.
Year 2007 2008 2009 2010
Total 10,338 4,756 7,728 5,511
Source: Ref. [14].

Table 2 Domestic tourists arrival in Gilgit-Baltistan from 2007 to 2010.


Year 2007 2008 2009 2010
Total 22,780 50,316 55,725 38,386
Source: Ref. [14].
1090 Review of Issues Related to Tourism Policies regarding Environmental Management and Customary
Practices of Tourism in Gilgit-Baltistan, Pakistan

both natural and physical environment. There are imposed on mountaineering and trekking parties:
innumerable tourism destinations in Gilgit-Baltsitan (1) Expedition/mountaineering/trekking party will
where shops, hotels, houses and roads have been be responsible for cleaning all kind of filth, plastic
constructed without proper planning and land use bags, tins, mountaineering gears, garbage etc. at the
management. This unplanned constructions and camping site or trekking routes after their expedition
deterioration of natural and physical environment was over.
would soon curtail tourism in this area. (2) Expedition and porters will be responsible for
The bulk of garbage, litter, containers, plastic bags deforestation and wildlife removal from the trekking
and mountaineering gears are often found at trekking routes and campsites. Expedition will have to supply
routes and camping sites. There is no appropriate filth kerosene oil to their porters for cooking and heating
removal system in the area [15]. This is hazardous for purposes.
not only environment but it can also cause tourism (3) If any expedition will find violated the rules and
dwindle on these popular trekking routes. Most of the regulations, that expedition, sponsor, travel/tour
local guides, porters, tour operators and hoteliers are company would be considered disqualified for a
not aware of the environment friendly trekking and period of four years for mountaineering in Pakistan.
mountaineering techniques including proper waste Another rule was enforced in 1988 which
management, recycling, use of alternative fuels etc.. demanded international expedition to pay 200 USD
There are no guidelines and very few awareness for removing garbage from base camps. It was also
programmes to address this issue [16]. mentioned that this money would be used for building
For the last many years, the WEF (World Economic toilets and installing dustbins along the trekking routes
Forum) has been evaluating the Travel & Tourism and campsites.
competitiveness of countries around the world. Expedition will have to deposit US$ 1000/- or
Sweden, Switzerland, and Denmark, three countries equivalent in Pakistani currency. This whole amount
were ranked on the top due to their good legislation, or some of amount would be kept as penalty if any
proper implementation of rules & regulation and expedition or its member was found destroying the
practices of environmental protection and its natural or physical environment at the destination.
sustainability [17]. According to in-depth study of To ensure all the above mentioned rules and
WEF, these countries have focused on tourism sector regulation, liaison officer was given responsibility to
in a sustainable way [18]. issue the certificate of adherence to mountaineering
According to Ahmed [16], Pakistan remained on code of conduct.
the ranks: stringency of environmental regulation-91, In case of fake certificate issued by liaison officer
enforcement of environmental regulation-103, (from army), the matter would be conveyed to higher
sustainability of T&T industry development-117, authorities to take action against liaison officer. In
carbon dioxide emissions-30, particulate matter case of civilian liaison officer or tour guide, his/her
emission-122, threatened species-86, environmental license/registration would be terminated and will be
treaty ratification-52 (Table 3). considered disqualified for a period of four years.
In 1983, mountaineering code of conduct was
7. Customary Practices of Tourism in
prepared to monitor and control environmental
Gilgit-Baltistan
deterioration in mountainous region which tourists
visited for trekking, mountaineering and other The history of travel and tourism is as old as the
adventure tourism. In this frame, three rules were history of Gilgit-Baltistan. Travelers or tourists have
Review of Issues Related to Tourism Policies regarding Environmental Management and Customary 2
Practices of Tourism in Gilgit-Baltistan, Pakistan

Table 3 The ranking of environmental sustainability travel & tourism competitiveness index in Pakistan, 2009.
Indicator Rank/133 (2009)
Stringency of environmental regulation 91
Enforcement of environmental regulation 103
Sustainability of T&T industry development 117
Carbon dioxide emissions 30
Particulate matter concentration 122
Threatened species 86
Environmental treaty ratification 52
Source: Ref. [18].

been visiting the area for various purposes like those rest houses. Remaining tourists used to stay in
military, adventurous, research, pilgrimage, trade and mosques, Sawab-e-Haa (free house) and in local
using the area as transit destination for China and houses without paying money.
Central Asian countries. There were no any hard and 7.1.3 Access
fast customary rules, laws and practices regarding There was no any proper transport system in earlier
tourism in Gilgit-Baltistan however there were some times throughout Gilgit-Baltistan. Travelers covered
rules for the travelers in specific areas like Hunza. In distances on foot. If distance was too long then they
Hunza it was Rajgiri (Miri) system and travelers were used to opt horses, mules and donkeys as
not supposed to cross Chalt-Nager (olden entry point transportation means.
to Hunza) unless Mir of Hunza gave permission letter 7.1.4 Attraction
to FITs (free independent travelers) and GITs (group There were many attractions which compelled
independent travelers). tourists and travelers to visit Gilgit-Baltistan which
included local gastronomy, traditional dress (cap
7.1 Traditional Practices of 4 As of Tourism in ladies and gents, chogha etc.), traditionally built
Gilgit-Baltistan houses, language, landscape, simple living and fresh
fruits. These amenities were attracting more tourists to
7.1.1 Acceptance
the area but many of the above mentioned tourism
Gilgit-Baltistan has been dealing with travelers and
assets are getting ruined now.
tourists for a long period of time. Different practices
were adopted to handle these tourists in different areas 7.2 Portering
of Gilgit-Baltistan. There were (and still there are) Porters are the most economically marginal people,
some areas like Hunza District, Astore District and especially uneducated or less educated and jobless
Skardu where tourist had been welcomed with warm members of poor and deprived families depend on
hospitality while in some areas of Diamer District daily income. There are different practices of
foreign tourists had not been warmly welcomed due to portering in Gilgit-Baltistan. On some trekking routes
their strict adherence to tribal culture and norms. like in Raikor Valley, tourists have to hire local
7.1.2 Accommodation people as porter from Tatoo village to fairy meadows.
In olden times, there was no any hotel industry It is same in Hunza. There is tribal ownership of
working in Gilgit-Baltistan. There were rest houses different pastures and only people from the specific
which were built during British colonial regime for tribe can go as porter to the pastures. But on the
their accommodation. Only diplomats, government trekking routes in Skardu, there are no restrictions for
officials or luxurious travelers were allowed to stay in porters.
1092 Review of Issues Related to Tourism Policies regarding Environmental Management and Customary
Practices of Tourism in Gilgit-Baltistan, Pakistan

8. Discussion 9. Conclusion
Any future plans should find appropriate policies In tourism, careful planning is a prerequisite to
and programmes to solve problems of environmental ensure that development is sustainable and does not
degradation while avoiding adverse effects on the exceed the carrying capacity of resources, which
local economy. The result should be aimed at include both natural and man-made attractions.
maintaining ecological balance in the mountain areas. Planning for sustainable tourism development should
Tourism infrastructure development is taking place all take place at national, regional and local levels. The
over the Gilgit-Baltistan without any land use major tools of planning are land use plans,
planning and zoning, which can result in un-planned environmental impact assessments, legislative,
and unmanageable towns and cities and could, regulatory and enforcement measures, monitoring and
ultimately, destroy the natural beauty of the area, on local participation. It is clearly a major task to
which the whole tourism sector is based. The tourism promote and develop behavior that acknowledges the
flow is un-regulated without any regard to the carrying need to sustain and protect the mountain environment.
capacity of a particular destination. Carrying The requirements for this task include political will,
capacities have not been calculated for any of the far-sighted policies, more efficient institutional
major tourist destinations in Gilgit-Baltistan. There structures, better social partnerships and increased
are certain rules and regulations mentioned in the participation of local people. Even if the work is
paper but not in practice. Gilgit-Baltistan has to have started now, it will continue to be the job of several
legislation for tourism development and policy generations. It is utmost need indeed for Ministry of
implementation because this sector can be the Tourism to review its tourism policy and consider the
backbone of Gilgi-Blatistan’s economy. Ministry of ground realities. Gilgit-Baltistan Government also has
Tourism has made rules and regulations for tourists to prepare its tourism master plan for tourism
when they visit to mountainous regions but development and its management. So that this sector
unfortunately there is no implementation of rules, could be used as an agent for economic prosperity and
policies and regulations. There are government poverty reduction in the region.
tourism directorates in different districts of
References
Gilgit-Baltistan but with limited number of staff
[1] Tourism in 2006, Ministry of Tourism, Government of
working in these offices. There are no tourist
Pakistan Web site, http://www.pakistantourism.gov.pk
reception counters for guiding tourists and travelers. (accessed July 4, 2009).
According to Ministry of Tourism, 90% of domestic [2] C. Tosun, L.C. Jenkins, The evolution of tourism
planning in third-world countries: A critique, Progress in
tourists travel by road but the road is in critical
Tourism and Hospitality Research 4 (1998) 101-114.
condition even in some touristic areas there is no [3] A.K. Bhatia, Tourism Development Principle and
metal road available. So government needs to improve Practice, Sterling Publisher Private Ltd., New Dehli,
the road condition to give easy access for the travelers 1986.
[4] M.T. Sinclair, Tourism Development in Kenya, World
in Gilgit-Baltistan. There is no any policy for the
Bank, Nairobi, 1990.
transportation and price (fare) control system in [5] Kibara, Tourism development in Kenya: The government’s
Gilgit-Baltistan. Some transporters charge 10 times involvement and influence, Master’s Dissertation,
University of Surrey, Guildford, Surrey, 1994.
more than the usual fare from tourists, which
[6] C. Costa, An emerging tourism planning paradigm? A
de-motivate the tourists to revisit the area. comparative analysis between town and tourism planning,
Review of Issues Related to Tourism Policies regarding Environmental Management and Customary 1093
Practices of Tourism in Gilgit-Baltistan, Pakistan
International Journal of Tourism Research 3 (2001) 425-441. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/sd.495/abstract.
[7] S.J. Akama, Tourism development in Kenya: Problems [13] Government of Pakistan, facts and figures 2007, Ministry
and policy alternatives, Progress in Tourism and of Tourism Web site,
Hospitality Research 3 (1997) 95-105. http://www.pakistantourism.gov.pk/pdf/facts%20and%20
[8] Y.H. Lin, N. Hemmington, The impact of environmental figures%202007.pdf (accessed July 4, 2009).
policy on the tourism industry in Taiwan, Progress in [14] Unpublished Facts and Figures Tourism Flow in
Tourism and Hospitality Research 3 (1997) 35-45. Gilgit-Baltistan, Tourism Department of Gilgit-Baltistan,
[9] R. Welford, B. Ytterhus, J. Eligh, Tourism and Pakistan, 2010.
sustainable development: An analysis of policy and [15] F. Ata, Z. Siddiqui, Environmental Impact of Tourism in
guidelines for managing provision and consumption, the Mountainous Areas of Pakistan, United Nations
Sustainable Development 7 (1999) 165-177. Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the
[10] I. Sindiga, Domestic tourism in Kenya, Annals of Pacific, ST/ESCAP/1152, 1993, pp. 4-30.
Tourism Research 23 (1) (1996) 19-31. [16] B. Ahmed, Sustainable tourism and cultural heritage,
[11] A. Lewis, D. Newsome, Planning for stingray tourism at northern areas strategy for sustainable development, in:
Hamelin bay, western Australia: The importance of IUCN Pakistan Program, Pakistan, 2003, pp. 13-14.
stakeholder perspectives, International Journal of [17] Measuring Sectoral Drivers in a Downturn, The travel &
Tourism Research 5 (2003) 331-346. tourism competitiveness report, World Economic Forum,
[12] J.N. Simão, M.R. Partidário, How does tourism planning Geneva, 2009, p. 9.
contribute to sustainable development?, Sustainable [18] Managing in a Time of Turbulence, The travel & tourism,
Development [Online early access]. DOI: 10.1002/sd.495, competitiveness index report, World Economic Forum,
Published Online: Aug. 22, 2010, Geneva, 2009.

View publication stats

You might also like