Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Sobek of Shedet The Crocodile God in The-7
Sobek of Shedet The Crocodile God in The-7
24
Papyrus Brooklyn Museum 47.218.50, col. XIV, 12: GOYON 1972, 69. The date of this
papyrus, originating perhaps from Heliopolis and which migth be a copy of a text of
the Eighteenth Dynasty, is uncertain.
25
LEITZ 2002, III, 661.
– 143 –
Sobek of Shedet. The Crocodile God in the Fayyum in the Dynastic Period
26
DAVIES 1953, pl. III; CRUZ-URIBE 1988, 18-19.
27
On Anuket in the Fayyum, see ZECCHI 2001, 209-211.
28
DAVIES 1953, pl. III; BROVARSKI 1984, 1009, 1025 note 266.
29
CRUZ-URIBE 1988, 18.
30
ZECCHI 2006, 127-128.
– 144 –
The Third Intermediate Period and The Late Period
31
This man is known thanks to other documents: HERBIN 1979, 267-272; EL-SAYED
1982, 452; ZECCHI 1999, 71-72.
32
Based on a personal copy of the text. See also HERBIN 1979, 268-270. FABRETTI –
ROSSI – LANZONE 1888, 411, claim that the statue came from Thebes (PM I, 794), but a
provenance from the Fayyum region seems more plausible,
33
STEWART 1983, 32, no. 120 dates the statuette to the Ramesside Period. The Petrie
Museum has also a lower part of an amulet in form of counterpoise inscribed with
‘[Sobek/Horus ?] of Shedet’ (UC 45361) (doc. 195).
34
Wb. IV, 95, 1. For a similar alliteration, see pStrasbourg 2, col III, 3-4: ‘You have
riunited your limbs… in your name of Sobek of Shedet’ (sbq.n=i Haw… m rn=k pw n
sbk Sdt): BUCHER 1928, 148.
– 145 –
Sobek of Shedet. The Crocodile God in the Fayyum in the Dynastic Period
35
The statue has generally been attributed to the Ptolemaic Period after PM IV, 99 (see
for example EL-SAYED 1982, 453; EL-SAYED 1985, 286, and also myself: ZECCHI 1999,
4-6). But it seems that it should be dated to an earlier period, from XXVI (FISCHER
1973, 27; HERBIN 1979, 255; GUERMEUR 2005, 412) to the Late Period (BORCHARDT 1930,
133, and LEITZ 2002, VI, 265).
36
At least three men of the family bore this name. Its reading is uncertain: ppnH,
pnpH. It cannot be ruled out the possibility that the name should be read pA-n-p(t)H, as
suggested by HERBIN 1979, 256, 259, note 2.
37
On the reading of this epithet in this speciic case, see, however, LEITZ 2002, VI, 265.
38
This epithet will be ascribed again to Sobek in the temple of Kom Ombo (Kom
Ombo, 921) in an offering scene of cloth (mnxt). See also LEITZ 2002, VII, 467-468.
– 146 –
The Third Intermediate Period and The Late Period
and typical of the Twelfth Dynasty and used to describe his true
identity. However, starting from the Twenty-sixth Dynasty, with
the priest Harkhebis, who held the ofice of ‘hem-priest of Sobek
of the great seat (Hm-ntr sbk n st wrt), the association between
god and st wrt became quite recurrent in the titles of the clergy
of Sobek of Shedet.
Another monument which is worth noting, even though its
text does not expressly mention Sobek of Shedet, is a statue39
from the Fayyum, belonging to another priest of Neith and
Sobek, Wennefer, who held the ofices of ‘hem-priest of Neith and
Sobek’, ‘herald of Sobek and the cow’ (wHmw n sbk iHt), ‘master
of the secrets of Isis, the great’ (Hry-sStA n Ast wrt)40 and ‘puriier of
Sobek’ (sbk ab)41. The statue represents Wennefer holding a naos
with closed doors and wearing the leopard skin and a necklace
with a pendant in the shape of a ram-headed crocodile, with
atef-crown. The inscription of the monument contains a sort of
autobiography of the owner, with an impressive long sequence
of his supposed good qualities. He is, however, the one who does
what is praiseworthy ‘to his lord’, that is Sobek (n nb=f)42, ‘whose
name is great among the ancestors, the unique… the one who
irrigates the hearts… great of respect (wr Sfyt) in all the lands
(m-hn tAw nbw) like the one who created him (mi qmA sw), Sobek
foremost of the gods (sbk xnty ntrw)…’.
Ankhruty, son of a certain Djed-bastet-iuef-ankh, was certainly
one of the most inluential man of the Fayyum of the Late Period.
Very likely, he lived during the Thirtieth Dynasty and was buried
at Hawara, where his cofin was brought to light (doc. 190)43.
This high-ranking personage was ‘mayor of the land of the lake’
(HAty-a tA-S) and ‘great overseer of the great green’ (imy-r aA wAd-
wr), evidently an honoriic title. As well as the mayors of the
Eighteenth Dynasty, Ankhruty had the control of the clergy of
39
Statue CG 688: BORCHARDT 1930, 31, pl. CXXVI; PM IV, 104; EL-SAYED 1981, 313-323,
pls. XXXVII-XL.
40
A priesthood of Isis in the Fayyum is attested only starting from the Saitic period.
Spiegelberg described a fragment of a statuette dated by him at the Twenty-sixth
Dynasty and seen by him in 1927. The object belonged to a certain Horudja, who was
‘hem-priest of Sobek of the Island, of Isis Nefer-set, of Renenutet’ (Hm-ntr sbk n pA-iw
Ast nfr-st rnnwtt): SPIEGELBERG 1928, 55-56. Two brothers of the Late Period, both called
Djed-bastet-iuef-ankh, bore the title, among others, of ‘hem-priest of Isis of mr-wr’:
PETRIE 1889, pl. IV.
41
See also the title ‘great puriier of Sobek Shedety’, attested on a stela of the Middle
Kingdom: PETRIE 1879, pl. VIII.
42
The word ‘lord’, nb, is written with the sign of the crocodile.
43
PETRIE 1889, 9, 21-23, pls. I-III. As stated by Petrie, the cofin is in the Cairo Museum.
See also DOLZANI 1961, 216; FISCHER 1973, 127, note 57; HERBIN 1979, 302-315, doc. no.
A 2; ZECCHI 1999, 41-42, no. 189. According to Petrie, the tomb of Ankhruty had been
built on the surface, in the necropolis of Hawara.
– 147 –
Sobek of Shedet. The Crocodile God in the Fayyum in the Dynastic Period
44
He was ‘hem-priest of Neith’ and ‘overseer of the singers of Neith, who resides in the
land of the lake’ (imy-r Hsw n nt Hry-ib tA-S), an otherwise unattested title in the Fayyum.
45
‘Hem-priest of Hathor’, ‘hem-priest of Hathor lady of Atih in the land of the lake’
(Hm-ntr Ht-Hr nbt tpt-iHw m tA-S) and ‘divine ad-mr of Hathor’ (ad-mr ntr n Ht-Hr). See also
the title ‘hem-priest of Hathor of Atih’, borne by the two brothers Djed-bastet-iuef-
ankh, known thanks to their canopic jars discovered at Hawara: ZECCHI 1999, 49. On
the presence of Hathor in the Fayyum, see ZECCHI 2001, 26, 57, 80-81, 101, 108-110,
124, 139-142, 145-146, 171-172, 188-191, 203.
46
‘Hem-priest of Thot’. On the presence of this god in the Fayyum: ZECCHI 2001, 89,
115, 123, 141, 190, 200.
47
‘Hem-priest of Horus’. On the priests of Horus in the Fayyum, ZECCHI 1999, 99-100.
48
‘The one who is in the horizon of Horus, the son of Isis of Mer-ur’ (imy Axt n Hr-pA-sA-
Ast n mr-wr). For other attestations of the title imy Axt, see VERNUS 1978, 192. The place-
name mr-wr is here followed by the determinative of ‘city’ and, very likely, denotes
Gurob. The cult of Horus son of Isis was associated in this settlement with those of
his parents. The two above-mentioned brothers Djed-bastet-iuef-ankh were also ‘hem-
priest of Isis of mr-wr’, while a certain Pa-di-aset, known thanks to the offering-table
CG 23235 from Hawara (KAMAL 1909, 50 no. 227), had the title of ‘servant of Osiris
(of) mr-wr’.
– 148 –
The Third Intermediate Period and The Late Period
possessor (of the qualities) of Maat in the great place (and of) his
Ennead’ (Hm-ntr sbk nb mAat m st wrt psdt=f). Following a phraseology
inaugurated during Amenemhat III’s reign, these titles insisted on
stressing the greatness of the temple of Shedet and the connection
of its god with the wrrt-crown. The temple of Shedet was still the
‘great palace’, the place of the st wrt, where Sobek lived together with
his Ennead and where he could take possession of the wrrt-crown
and show his rightness through his association with Maat. Ankhruty
was also hem-priest of ‘Sobek sharp of teeth’ (sbk spd ibHw), an
epithet already used in the hymns to Sobek of Shedet of the Middle
Kingdom49, of ‘Sobek lord of the House of the Prince, beautiful
of manifestation’ (sbk nb Hwt-sr nfr mswt)50 and of ‘hem-priest of
Sobek lord of the land of the lake, the Mansion of Sobek’ (Hm-ntr
sbk nb tA-S Hwt sbk), which, besides conirming the supremacy of the
crocodile god over the whole Fayyum, suggests that the region itself
was the preferred residence of the deity. The association between the
crocodile god with the heb-sed, which had already been expressed
in the Middle Kingdom temple of Medinet Madi where he granted
the rejuvenation and eternal kingship of the ruling kings, and which
continued through the reigns of Ramesse II and Osorkon II, are here
conirmed through the title of hem-priest of ‘Sobek lord of the jubilee
festival’ (sbk nb Hb-sd)51. Furthermore, Ankhruty held the ofices of
‘overseer of the singers of Sobek’ (imy-r Hsw n sbk), a title that has
a parallel in that of ‘overseer of the singers of Neith’, and of ‘chief
of the cloth of Sobek’ (Hry mnxt n sbk). This title perhaps refers to
a control of Ankhruty over the production of the cloth and fabrics
used to dress the statue of the god, in order to protect and decorate
it, or, possibly, to wrap the mummies of the sacred crocodiles. In
this respect, a funerary function of the cloths of Sobek of Shedet is
suggested by the embalming ritual, where we read that they were
a product of the local temple (mnxt m pr-sbk) and could be used to
embalm the body of the deceased (ii n=k mnxt nt sbk Sdty)52. There are
two other interesting titles of Ankhruty that deserve to be mentioned.
The irst one is that of ‘protector and sacred of Sobek’ (xw dsr n sbk).
I do not know any other attestation of this title referred to Sobek,
nor do I know any other non-royal person to have been called xw
dsr53. But this title was used by kings in the Greco-Roman temples
when performing rituals involving amulets and pectorals, so that it
49
GARDINER 1957, 52.
50
The connections between Sobek of Shedet and the House of the Prince of Heliopolis
go back to the Middle Kingdom, when the god could be called ‘great in the House
of the Prince’ (wr m Hwt-sr) in an hymn in his honour: Gardiner 1957, pl. 4. For the
epithet nfr mswt, see LEITZ 2002, IV, 212.
51
LEITZ 2002, III, 696.
52
SAUNERON 1952, 6, 3, and 8, 3.
53
Wb. III, 245, 25.
– 149 –
Sobek of Shedet. The Crocodile God in the Fayyum in the Dynastic Period
54
See the examples collected by CAUVILLE 2008, 53, who translates the title as ‘l’orfèvre’.
55
Edfu II 72, 10.
56
In his cofin, Ankhruty bears also the title dsr, the ‘sacred’, of which I know only two
other examples of the Greco-Roman period. The irst one in the temple of Edfu (Edfu
I 344, 16) and the second one at Dendera (Dendera X 15, 5), respectively as priests
of Behdet and Lycopolis. To these, it should be added the above-mentioned priest of
Sobek Hor-sa-aset of the Saitic period, who was ‘sacred of his lord’.
57
Grifith, in PETRIE 1889, 23.
58
DOLZANI 1961, 216.
59
HERBIN 1979, 308, 315, note 39.
60
Wb. V, 504, 5; WILSON 1997, 1249.
61
Wb. III, 446, 3 – 447, 1. The verb ‘to be buried’ is usually smA tA: Wb. III 448, 15 – 449, 17.
62
Edfu II, 163, 15.
63
Based on the copy in PETRIE 1889, pl. III, but a new collation of the text woud be
necessary for a reliable transaltion.
– 150 –
The Third Intermediate Period and The Late Period
boasts to have carried out for the beneit of a temple, very likely
that of Shedet. If we give credit to this text, Ankhruty was active
for a span of time of thirty-four years, during which he erected
the cult images of the gods (saHa ahmw) in the seats in the temple
(swt m pr ntr) and took care of the health (snb) of all its pigeons
(mnwt)64; moreover, following the command of an anonymous
king (wd Hm=f), he was responsible of some works in the temple
(kAt n Hwt-ntr) and made the god Sobek ‘to rest in his mansion’
(rdi Htp sbk m pr=f), an expression that might refer to the fact that
he controlled the ceremonies of the burial of the sacred crocodile.
The special devotion of Ankhruty to Sobek is conirmed by the
fact the he chose to have a double image of the god just above
his head on his cofin. The underside of the lid is covered with
stars and two discs, one with a cynocephalus over the feet and
one, over the head, with two Sobek65. This double iconography
emphasises different aspects of the god’s nature. Both the deities
have a human body and a crocodile head and hold was-staff and
ankh-sing, but they are wearing two different headgears. The irst
one has the double crown, an emblem of royal power, the second
image has a solar disc with two high plumes on his head.
There is one last, but unpublished, document which must
be mentioned. As we have seen, in his autobiographical text,
Ankhruty declares to have followed the decree of a unnamed
king, who ordered some works in the temple of Shedet. Although
not necessarily connected with what stated by the mayor of the
Fayyum, there is a piece of evidence that at least one of the kings
of the Thirtieth Dynasty was active in the temple of the crocodile
god. In the Cairo Museum, there is a relief (doc. 187)66 said to
come from Kom Fares with an scene representing Nectanebo II,
called ‘the beautiful king, the lord of the two lands, Senedjem-
ib-ra setep-en-imen, son of Ra, lord of appearances, Nectanebo,
given life’, while offering a ield (sxt) to ‘Sobek of Shedet – Horus
who resides in Shedet, given life’ (sbk Sdt Hr Hry-ib Sdt di anx),
here represented crocodile-headed with was-staff and pshent.
Unfortunately, there is no other attestation of Nectanebo II in
Shedet or in the Fayyum which might corroborate the presence of
this sovereign in the region. If this relief actually comes from the
64
Wb. II, 68, 2-4. Pigeons are known to be included in offering lists from the Old
Kingdom. At Edfu they appear in a list of offering for a festival (Edfu V, 134, 9). A
papyrus of Roman date from Bakchias in the Fayyum (pBakchias 138) contains a
pigeon count, which, however, is not necessarely connected with a breeding of these
birds in the temple or in its proximity; it should be added that in front of the temple
numerous dead pigeons were found during the 1997 and 1998 excavations at the site:
NACHTERGAL 1999, 117-121.
65
PETRIE 1889, pl. I.
66
Unpublished, quoted by HERBIN 1979, 252, doc. no. 253.
– 151 –
Sobek of Shedet. The Crocodile God in the Fayyum in the Dynastic Period
– 152 –
CONCLUSIONS
S
obek of Shedet was the most successful crocodile god
in the dynastic period. He was able to transcend his
rapacious nature, to become involved in a wide range of
religious themes and issues. At the base of his success there were
religious, political and economical factors, such as the territorial
exploitation of the Fayyum, the presence in the region of royal
burials and of the so-called Labyrinth during the Twelfth Dynasty,
and the building of new temples. Moreover, Egyptian kings, in
particular Amenemhat III, strongly promoted the syncretistic
association of the crocodile Sobek of the Fayyum with the
falcon Horus. In terms of dynasty policy, this divine union was
signiicant because it allowed Amenemhat III to stress, on a
local level, the connection of his legitimate rule to the divine
world and permitted Sobek of Shedet to be involved in the royal
ideology and to become one of the gods from whom the royal
power derived.
In the Greco-Roman period Sobek of Shedet still retained
great part of his prestige and he would deserve to be studied in
depth. His main temple was very likely enlarged starting from the
reign of Ptolemy II1, and his igure was exalted in the so-called
‘Book of the Fayyum’2, a group of texts that provides a ‘map’
of the Fayyum region. In this period, his main characteristics
were still intact. As in the previous ages, Sobek’s name could
appear alone or united with that of the falcon god in the usual
form ‘Sobek Shedety (or ‘of Shedet’) – Horus who resides in
Shedet’. Nevertheless, the speciic Horus of Shedet was able to
act independently from his crocodile side3, in contexts, however,
where he imitated the functions of Sobek of Shedet4. Moreover,
Sobek of Shedet was still described as an aggressive deity5, but
who could show his more gentle aspect to the dead6, assisting
1
PETRIE 1889, 58-59.
2
BOTTI 1959; BEINLICH 1991; TAIT 2003.
3
See, for example, Fayyum Book 7 (BEINLICH 1991, 138-139) and a couple of scenes
from the temple of Edfu: Edfu IV, 84, 13, and VII, 119, 2 (on these scenes see also:
ZECCHI 2001, 64-65).
4
In the ‘Book of Breathing’ (II, 8) Horus of Shedet acts in favour of the dead, ‘carrying
his wish’: HERBIN 2008, 39, pls. 19-20.
5
pStrasbourg 2, III, 2: BUCHER 1928, 148. In the temple of Kom Ombo, Sobek is
occasionally called ‘lord of fear, ruler of the great green’ (nb snd HqA wAd wr) (Gutbub,
Kom Ombo I, no. 14) and the one ‘who eats enemies in his lake’ (wnm xftyw m S=f) (DE
MORGAN 1894, II, no. 94, 419-420, 470) very likely an allusion to the lake of the Fayyum.
6
SAUNERON 1952, 6,3, and 8, 2.
– 153 –
Sobek of Shedet. The Crocodile God in the Fayyum in the Dynastic Period
7
For example, Fayyum Book 747-754 (BEINLICH 1991, 212-213); pStrasbourg 2, III, 23
(BUCHER 1928, 152).
8
pStrasbourg 2, III, 3 (BUCHER 1928, 148).
9
Fayyum Book 67 (BEINLICH 1991, 144-145); DE MORGAN, Cat. des Mon., II, no. 61.
10
Fayyum Book, 1265 (BEINLICH 1991, 264-265).
11
Fayyum Book, 161-164 (BEINLICH 1991, 154-155). See also Esna III, 271-273, no. 334,
where Sobek-Ra is the one ‘who is bright in the primeval waters (sSp m nnw wr), as
Ra who is between the horns of Mehet-weret, the great god who is in the land of the
lake (ntr wr m tA-S)’.
12
For example: pStrasbourg 2, V. 3 (BUCHER 1928, 162).
13
On some observations on the god Sobek in the Fayyum of the Greco-Roman period,
see, for example: TOUTAIN 1915, 171-194; PERNIGOTTI 2000, 16-19, 23-27, 81-88; WIDMER
2003, 3-22; RONDOT 2004; WIDMER 2005, 171-184; WIDMER 2005a, 345-354; ZECCHI 2006a,
132-137; KOCKELMANN 2008, 153-164.
14
For the Greek documents on Sobek in the main town of the Fayyum, see: TOUTAIN
1915, 173-174, and RÜBSAM 1974, 26-29. Some Greek papyri offer evidence on
the presence at Shedet/Crocodilopolis of other forms of the crocodile god, such as
Soknebtynis, Soknopaios, Sokopichonsis and Petesuchos: RÜBSAM 1974, 34-36.
– 154 –
Conclusions
15
As ‘Sobek foremost of the lake, lord of Mer-ur’ (sbk xnty S nb mr-wr), see: Kom Ombo,
no. 891; as ‘Sobek lord of Mer-ur’ (sbk nb mr-wr): Kom Ombo, no. 100; as ‘Sobek lord of
Mer-ur, lord of the lake’ (sbk nb mr-wr nb S): Kom Ombo, no. 60; as ‘Sobek foremost of
the great green’ (sbk xnty wAd wr): Kom Ombo, no. 881; as ‘ruler of the great green’ (HqA
wAd wr): GUTBUB, Kom Ombo, I, no. 14; as ‘foremost of the lake, who resides in the great
green’ (sbk xnty S Hry-ib wAd wr): Kom Ombo, no. 255; GUTBUB, Kom Ombo, I, no. 263.
16
Esna II, 156, 25; 191, 27; Kom Ombo, no. 61, 8; 104; 132; 133, 3; 274; 895; 896; El-
Qalaa I, 14, 7; 41, 5; 47, 5: Temple of Shanhur (VANDIER D’ABBADIE 1963, 39, pl. 26, 2).
17
CAUVILLE 2007, 29-39.
18
CAUVILLE 2007, 36-39.
– 155 –
LIST OF THE DOCUMENTS
(with texts referring to Sobek of Shedet)
Old Kingdom
Amenemhat II
7. Circular object Brooklyn Museum 37.1746E (unknown provenance),
sbk Hr Sdty mry: JAMES 1974, 42, no. 96, pl. XXXIII.
Senusret II
8. Cylinder Brooklyn Museum 44.123.56 (unknown provenance), sbk
nb Sdt mry: JAMES 1974, 47-48, no. 108, pl. XXXV.
Amenemhat III
9. Blocks Berlin 15801-15803 (Fayyum), sbk Sdty Hr Hry-ib Sdt: BERLIN
1913, 138, 268; PM IV, 103; LEPROHON 1980, 297-301; HIRSCH 2004,
345, no. 288.
10. Block Berlin 11585 (Medinet el-Fayyum), sbk Sdty Hr [Hry-ib Sdt
mry]: Berlin 1913, 139; PM IV, 98; HIRSCH 2004, 346, no. 291.
11. Block Berlin 11586 (Medinet el-Fayyum), [sbk Sdty Hr] Hry-ib Sdt:
Berlin 1913, 139; PM IV, 98; HIRSCH 2004, 346-347, no. 292.
12. Block Berlin 16953 (unknown provenance, very likely Medinet el-
Fayyum), sbk Sdty mry; Hr Hry-ib Sdt nb tA-S mry: Berlin 1913, 212;
PM IV, 98; WORRINGER 1927, pl. XV; HABACHI 1937, 95, ig. 10; DOLZANI
1961, 185, ig. 11; SCHÄFER 1963, 361-365, pl. 21; SCHOSKE 1986, 151-
156; KRAUS, LOEBEN 1996, 159-172; UPHILL 2000, 39; HIRSCH 2004, 348,
no. 297; BLÖM-BOER 2006, 285.
– 157 –
Sobek of Shedet. The Crocodile God in the Fayyum in the Dynastic Period
– 158 –
List of the Documents
– 159 –
Sobek of Shedet. The Crocodile God in the Fayyum in the Dynastic Period
Amenemhat IV
54. Temple of Medinet Madi, sbk Sdt Hr Hry-ib Sdt: DONADONI 1947, scenes
I, R; sbk Sdt Hr Hry-ib Sdt mry: DONADONI 1947, scenes H, Q; sbk Sdt Hr
Hry-ib Sdt nb wrrt Hnwty Hry-ib aH nb nst wrt mry, sbk Sdt Hr Hry-ib Sdt
nb fAw aA Sfyt qmA m sSd Swty mry: DONADONI 1947, scenes M, N.
Sobekneferu
55. Architrave (red granite) (Herakleopolis), sbk-Sdt-nfrw: DARESSY 1917,
33-38; HABACHI 1954, 462-463; VALLOGGIA 1964, 45-46; MOKHTAR 1983,
90, pl. 8A; MATZKER 1986, 50; HIRSCH 2004, 147, 386, no. 349.
56. Block UC 14337 (limestone) (Hawara), sbk-Sdt-nfrw: PETRIE 1890, pl.
XI.1; BLOM-BÖER 2006, 188-190, no. 93.
57. Cylinder Cairo JdE 72663 (unknown provenance), sbk-Sdty-nfrw:
AUFRÈRE 1989, 13.
58. Block Berlin 1164 (limestone) (Hawara), sbk Sdt Hr Hry[-ib Sdt…]:
LD II, 140k; Berlin 1913, 153; PM IV, 100; UPHILL 2000, 32 H.46, 36
H.67; BLÖM-BOER 2006, 281, no. SG.1; ZECCHI 2006, 35, no. 43.
59. Bead (unknown provenance), mrt sbk Sdty Hr Hry-ib Sdt nb tA-S Hry-ib
aH: HABACHI 1954, 463-464, no. 8; VALLOGGIA 1964, 46.
60. Cylinder BM EA 16581 (unknown provenance), sbk-Sdty-nfrw, mrt
sbk Sdty: PETRIE 1917, pl. XIV; HABACHI 1954, 463, no. 5; VALLOGGIA
1964, 50.
61. Cylinder (unknown provenance), mry [sbk] Sdty: NEWBERRY 1943, 75;
YOYOYYE 1957, 86, no. 1n; VALLOGGIA 1964, 47.
62. Statue base Berlin 38/66 (limestone) (unknown provenance), sbk
Sdty HqA idbwy: KAISER 1967, 42, no. 428; BLÖM-BOER 2006, 286, no.
SG.27.
63. Statue (basalt) (Tell el-Dab’a), mryt sbk Sdt Hr Hry-ib Sdt xnt S n pr-aA:
HABACHI 1954, 459; pl. 7 B; VALLOGGIA 1964, 46, no. 1; STAEHELIN 1989,
146; HIRSCH 2004, 387, no. 385.
64. Statue (basalt) (Tell el-Dab’a), mryt sbk Sdty Hr Hry-ib Sdt m Htp sbk
m xnt S pr-aA: HABACHI 1954, 459-460, pl. 8; VALLOGGIA 1964, 46, no. 1;
STAEHELIN 1989, 146; HIRSCH 2004, 388, no. 356.
Unknown king
65. Statue British Museum EA 35361 (quartzite) (unknown provenance),
‘beloved of Sobek Shedety’: BUDGE 1922, 122, no. 29; PM VIII, 14.
66. Fragmentary relief in Cairo Museum (from Soknopaiou Nesos),
[sbk nb] grg-bA=f, sbk nb rA-sHwy, [sbk nb] Sdt, sbk nb ddw: YOYOTTE
1957, 92.
Smenkh-ka-ra Imyremeshaw
68. Bead British Museum EA 74185 (unknown provenance): smnx-kA-ra
[imy-r-mSa] sbk Sdty mry: VASSILIKA 1995, 201.
– 160 –
List of the Documents
Neferhotep I
69. Statue Bologna EG 1799 (unknown provenance): ntr nfr nb tAwy
nfr-Htp sbk Sdty Hr Hry-ib Sdt mry; ntr nfr nb tAwy xa-sxm-ra sbk Sdty Hr
Hry-ib Sdt mry: PM IV, 103; PERNIGOTTI 1980, 29-30, pls. 1, XXVII-
XXIX; DAVIES 1981, no. 20; PERNIGOTTI 1994, 58.
70. Seal (unknown provenance): king’s name + sbk Sdty mry: YOYOTTE
1957, 86 (1o).
Sobekhotep IV
71. Seal Metropolitan Museum 10.1301638 (unknown provenance):
dedication to sbk Sdt Hr Hry-ib Sdt: HAYES 1953, 353, ig. 226.
Mer-hotep-ra Sobekhotep V
72. Seal (unknown provenance): mr-Htp-ra sbk Sdty mry: YOYOTTE 1957,
86 (1q).
Mer-nefer-ra Aya
73. Ball (unknown provenance) anx ntr nfr mr-nfr-ra sbk Sdty mry: GODRON
1965, 198-200.
74. pUC 32114 (el-Lahun), [sbk] Sdty Hr Hry-ib Sd[t]: COLLIER, QUIRKE
2002, 29.
75. pUC 32120 (el-Lahun), sbk Sdty […]:COLLIER, QUIRKE 2002, 49.
76. pUC 32131 (el-Lahun), sbk Sdty Hr Hry-ib Sdt: COLLIER, QUIRKE 2002,
69.
77. pUC 32202 (el-Lahun), sbk Sdty [Hr Hry-i]b Sdt: GRIFFITH 1898, pl.
XXXII) (lot VI.6); COLLIER, QUIRKE 2002, 111.
78. pUC 32210 (el-Lahun), sbk [Sdty] Hr Hry-ib Sd[t]: GRIFFITH 1898, pl.
XXXV (lot VIII.1); COLLIER, QUIRKE 2002, 133.
79. pUC 32214 (el-Lahun), sbk Sdty Hr Hry-ib Sdt: GRIFFITH 1898, pl.
XXXVI.
80. pUC 32179 (el-Lahun), mdt nt [Htpw]-ntr sbk Sdty: GRIFFITH 1898, pls.
XVI-XVII; QUIRKE 1997, 25; COLLIER, QUIRKE 2006, 25.
81. pBerlin 10056A (Year 31, Amenemhat III) (el-Lahun), ‘divine
offerings’ (Htpw-ntr) from Hwt-ntr nt sbk Sdty: BORCHARDT 1902-1903,
14; KAPLONY-HECKEL 1971, 25-26; QUIRKE 1997, 29.
82. pBerlin 10112Bd (el-Lahun), sbk Sdty: COLLIER, QUIRKE 1971, 55-56;
QUIRKE 1997, 31.
83. pBerlin 10203 (el-Lahun), mdt nt Htpw-ntr sbk Sdty: QUIRKE 1997, 31;
LUFT 1998, 21.
84. pCairo JdE 71580 (previously pBerlin 10005), sbk Sdty: KAPLONY-
HECKEL 1971, 266.
85. pRamesseum VI (EA 10759): GARDINER 1957; BARUCQ, DAUMAS 1980,
419-430; ZECCHI 2004, 57-65.
86. pGolenischeff I: ERMAN 1911; ROEDER 1959-1961, 268-275; BARUCQ,
DAUMAS 1980, 55-71; ZECCHI 2004, 66-80.
– 161 –
Sobek of Shedet. The Crocodile God in the Fayyum in the Dynastic Period
– 162 –
List of the Documents
– 163 –
Sobek of Shedet. The Crocodile God in the Fayyum in the Dynastic Period
Thutmose III
135. Stone slab (Gurob), [mn-]xpr-[ra] sbk Sdt [mry]: PETRIE 1890, pl.
XXII.2; HERBIN 1979, 22 doc. 8.
Sety I
136. Boundary Stela (JdE 34502) (year 2, from the Fayyum), pr sbk Sdty:
DARESSY 1893, 38; KRI I, 45; RITA I, 38 §23; HERBIN 1979, 159-160
,doc. 176; RITANC 47-48 §23; BRAND 2000, 153.
137. List of deities in the temple of Abydos, sbk m Sdt: MARIETTE 1869,
no. 13-16, 45; KRI I, 181, HERBIN 1979, 207-208, doc. 200.
– 164 –
List of the Documents
Ramesse II
138. Block, part of a ‘marriage Stela’ (Medinet el-Fayyum), sbk Sdty mry:
DAVOLI, NAHLA MOHAMMED AHMED 2006, 83-85, pls. XXIII-XXVI.
139. List of dyads (Saqqara), where the king is sbk Sdt Hr Hry[-ib Sdt] mry:
HABACHI 1971, 70, pl. VII; HERBIN 1979, 208 doc. 201; KRI II, 428-
431; PM III, 669.
Sety II (?)
140. Altar of the Museum of Turin 22053 (unknown provenance), sbk m
Sdt: HABACHI 1977a, 67.
Ramesse III
141. Temple of Medinet Habu, scene of offering of wine to Sobek (sbk
Sdt) and Hathor of Shedet: Epigraphic Survey 1964, 582d; HERBIN
1979, 217, doc. 213.
142. ‘Book of the Dead’, Chapter 171 (Eighteenth Dynasty), sbk Sdty:
ALLEN 1974, 178; HERBIN 1979, 214-216, doc. 211.
143. pBM 10689 (Chester-Beatty IX) (Nineteenth Dynasty), sbk Sdty:
GARDINER 1935, 111, pl. 60; HERBIN 1979, 213-214, doc. 210.
144. pCairo 86637, recto, I, 12 (Nineteenth Dynasty), Hb sbk Sdty: BAKIR
1966, 11; HERBIN 1979, 213, doc. 209; LEITZ 1994, 435.
145. pHarris I (reign of Ramesse IV), pr sbk Sdty Hr Hry-ib tA-S: ERICHSEN
1933, 61b, 14; HERBIN 1979, 218, doc. 214; GRANDET 1994, 311.
146. pWilbour (reign of Ramesse V), pr sbk Sdty Hr […] (A 10, 18); pr sbk
nb Sdt nty m rA-Hnt (A 15, 25); pr sbk nb Sdt (A 15, 26; 16, 2; B 20,
23): GARDINER 1941-1948; HERBIN 1979, 218-219, doc. 215.
147. pBM 10068, recto, 4, 12, 15 (year 17 of the reign of Ramesse IX), pr
sbk Sdty, pr sbk: PEET 1930, 90, pl. XI; HERBIN 1979, 219, doc. 216.
148. Hieratic inscription on a column of Deir el-Bahari (Ramesside
Period), sbk Sdty Hr Hry-ib tA-S: MARCINIAK 1972, 79-81; MARCINIAK
1974, 71-72, pls. XII and XIIA; SADEK 1984, 82.
– 165 –
Sobek of Shedet. The Crocodile God in the Fayyum in the Dynastic Period
qA Swty Atf HAt nb iart aSA iarwt; Htp-di-nswt sbk Sdty wsir Hry-ib tA-S,
imy-r Hmw-ntr n sbk Sdty: BRUGSCH 1893, 20; MASPERO 1889, 6-7; PM
IV, 104; Urk. IV, 1587-1588; CHARLES 1960, 1-26, pls. 1-2; HERBIN
1979, 171-176, doc. 181; CUMMING 1984, 284-285, no. 521.
152. Statue Berlin 11635 of the imy-r Hmw-ntr n sbk Sdty Sobekhotep
son of Kapu (reign of Amenhotep II, from the Fayyum), Htp-di-nswt
sbk Sdty Hr Hry-ib Sdt qA Swty Atf HAt nb iart aSA iarwt; Htp-di-nswt imn-ra
ntr aA nb S: BRUGSCH 1893, 23; ERMAN 1899, 139; Berlin 1924, 45-
46; CHARLES 1960, 7-8, pl. 2; WENIG 1961, 58, pl. 28; Urk. IV, 1586;
HERBIN 1979, 176-179, doc. 182; CUMMING 1984, 283-284, no. 520.
153. Statue Brussels E 6856 of Sobekhotep son of Min (reign of
Thutmose IV, unknown provenance), Htp-di-nswt sbk Sdty Hr Hry-ib
tA-S; Htp-di-nswt wsir Hry-ib tA-S, imy-r Hmw-ntr n sbk Sdty: VANDIER
1958, 476, pl. CLVIII.6; DE WALLE 1963, 77-85, pl. 12; HERBIN 1979,
169-171, doc. 180; PM VIII, 555.
154. Theban tomb no. 63 of Sobekhotep son of Min (reign of Thutmose
IV), imy-r Hmw-ntr n sbk Sdty, wrt xnrt n sbk Sdty, Hm-ntr n sbk Sdty:
Urk. IV 1582-1583; HERBIN 1979, 203-207, doc. 199; DZIOBEK, ABDEL
RAZIQ 1990, 67-68, 72.
155. Stela Philadelphia, University Museum, of itwnm (Eighteenth
Dynasty, from Sedment), it ntr n sbk Sdt: PETRIE, BRUNTON 1924, 53;
PM IV, 117; RANKE 1950, ig. 27; HERBIN 1979, 180-181, doc. 184.
156. Stela CG 34044 of itwnwn (Eighteenth Dynasty, unknown
provenance, but possibly from Sedment), it ntr n sbk Sdt: LACAU
1909-1957, 76-78, pl. XXVI; HELCK 1958, 224; HERBIN 1979, 74-77,
doc. 84.
157. Statue of Irerwt (Eighteenth Dynasty, unknown provenance), Htp-
di-nswt sbk Sdty Hr Hry-ib Sdt: Christie’s Sale Catalogue 1994, 42-43,
no. 105; PM VIII, 623.
158. Stela BM 1332 of the ‘great artisan’ of numerous sacred barques
Iuna (Eighteenth Dynasty), ‘great artisan’ of the wiA-barque of sbk
Sdty Hr Hry-ib Sdt m niwt wrt: GLANVILLE 1932, 39-41, pl. 2; EDWARDS
1939, 38-40, pl. XXXIII; Urk. IV 1632, 4; HERBIN 1979, 202-203,
doc. 198.
159. Fragment from tomb 474 of Gurob (Eighteenth Dynasty?), […] sbk
Sd[…]: BRUNTON, ENGELBACH 1927, 19, pl. L.14; HERBIN 1979, 7-8.
160. Adoration scene at Sehel of a man with his family (reign of
Ramesse II), sbk Sdty Hr Hry-ib tA-S: DE MORGAN 1894, 95, no. 149bis;
HERBIN 1979, 209, doc. 202; PM V, 521; KRI III, 847, 8-13.
161. Tomb of Qurna no. 23 (reign of Merenptah), wrt xnrt n sbk Sdty:
Wb. III 298, 1; HERBIN 1979, 210, doc. 203; KRI IV, 116.
162. Statue of the ‘royal scribe’ Ramesse (Nineteenth Dynasty, unknown
provenance), Htp-di-nswt sbk Sdty Hr Hry-ib Sdt sA Ast bnr mrwt wsir ity
Hry-ib tA-S: unpublished; text given by HERBIN 1979, 187-191, doc. 189.
163. Lintel and jamb from the tomb of Hori (JdE 29334 and 29335)
(reign of Ramesse IX), wab sS mSa Hri n pr sbk Sdt, Hm-ntr tpy n sbk
Sdty: DARESSY 1893, 28; PM IV, 104; HELCK 1960-1969, 965; KRI VI,
554; HERBIN 1979, 163-167, doc. 178; ZECCHI 2002, 17-33.
164. Stela of wrn-iwny (Twentieth Dynasty, from the Fayyum), pr sbk
Sdty Hr Hry-ib Sdt: BRUGSCH 1893, 29; HERBIN 1979, 181, doc. 185.
– 166 –
List of the Documents
165. Stela of nb-ntrw (JdE 36841) (Ramesside Period, from Gurob), sbk
Sdt Hr <Hry-ib> Sdt: LOAT 1904, pl. XVI.5; PM IV, 113; DOLZANI 1961,
201, ig. 12; HERBIN 1979, 25-27, doc. 11.
166. Statue Manchester 5376 of Kha-em-tir (Ramesside Period, from
Hawara), Htp-di-nswt sbk Sdty Hr Hry-ib tA-S; Htp-di-nswt sbk nb Sdt
wsir Hry-ib tA-S; Htp-di-nswt Ast wrt mwt-ntr nbt pt Hnwt tAwy HtHr
[nbt] imntt: PETRIE 1911, 21, pl. XIX.1; PETRIE, WAINWRIGHT, MCKAY
1912, 36, pl. XXXVIII.3; PM IV, 101; HERBIN 1979, 182-184 doc.
187; ZECCHI 2006, 58-59, no. 92.
167. Statue CG 889 of Kha-em-tir (Ramesside Period, unknown
provenance), Htp-di-nswt sbk Sdty Hr Hry-ib tA-S ntr aA; [Htp-di-nswt]
sbk-ra nb dt ntr aA nb pt: BORCHARDT 1930, 140; VANDIER 1958, 658;
HERBIN 1979, 184-187, doc. 188; PM VIII, 532.
168. Statuette Manchester 1467 (Ramesside Period, from Gurob), sbk
Sdty Hr Hry-ib Sdt: LOAT 1904, pl. IV.41; HERBIN 1979, 72, doc. 82.
169. Wood fragment (panel from a box?) UC 7948 (Ramesside Period,
from Gurob), […] Sdty: PETRIE 1927, 68 no. 110; THOMAS 1981, 32,
no. 24, pl. 2.
170. Wood fragment (lid from a box?) UC 7949 (Ramesside Period,
from Gurob), sbk Sdty Hr Hry-ib [tA-]S: PETRIE 1891, 20, pl. XXII.31;
PETRIE 1927, 68, no. 112; THOMAS 1981, 35, no. 50, pl. 42.
171. Wooden stamp UC 7953 (Ramesside Period, from Gurob), sbk Sdt:
THOMAS 1981, 84, no. 719.
Osorkon II
172. Festival-hall at Bubastis, sbk Sdt Hr Hry-ib [tA-]S ntr aA nb pt: NAVILLE
1892, pl. XII.8; HERBIN 1979, 247, doc. 248.
Apries
175. Naos Brussels E 5818 (unknown provenance, but very likely Sais),
sbk Sdt Hr Hry-ib Axt-tA; sbk Sdt Hr Hry-ib Sdt; sbk Sdt Hr Hry-ib pr-xnt:
SPEELERS 1923, 87-88; CAPART 1924, 24-25, pl. III; PM IV, 48; HERBIN
1979, 293-294, doc. 276; EL-SAYED 1982, 413; KAPER 2003, 264.
– 167 –