1

CRITICAL METHODOLOGY ANALYSIS OF AN ARTICLE

A Methodological Critique of "Civilian Support for Unstructured Resistance in

Conflict Zones: Insights from the West Bank’’.

1
 2

ABSTRACT

The primary focus is on the West Bank, the study "Support for Unstructured

Violence in Conflict Zones" by E. K. GADE (2020) explores the intricate reasons

why civilians support unstructured, individual violence as a form of resistance in

conflict zones. The investigation looks at the ways in which different West Bank

regions support this type of resistance to different degrees and how the "built

environment of conflict" affects these preferences. The research method used in this

study is qualitative research method using data from 71 interviews done during 2015,

this paper develops a theory inductively regarding the connection between various

forms of resistance and social isolation. The research questions, contributions,

placement within the academic literature, and methodology used in the study are all

assessed in this critique.

INTRODUCTION

This study examine the association between the social networks and

environment which is controlled by state and also resistance in civil preference in

zone where conflict is going on. However, the study Civilian support for unstructured

resistance in conflict zone by E. K. GADE (2020) insight the west bank.

Moreover, in the context of Israeli and Palestinian conflict ít investigate the

dynamic of unstructured civilian support, also resistance as a form of individualised

violence. Indivdualized voilence is not common in West Bank regions and Firing

Zone 918, and is common in H2 region. This Critique asses the weakness and strength

of the study, and taking into consideration the research question, method, future

examination also this research provide understanding of the information.

Furthermore, there are questions which drive this study such as 1. Why do

people in Firing Zone 918 withstand organized, individual civilian violence while

2
 3

those in H2 embrace it? 2. What effects does the constructed environment of conflict

—which includes state violence and checkpoint structures—have on people's

resistance preferences and behaviors? 3. How do social ties and isolation affect the

way that the general public supports various forms of resistance?

According to the study there are some substantive contribution. this study

makes an effort to explain the question of how the state controlled measures are

affected by unstructured voilence for civilian support, especially by contrcucted

environment of conflict. Howvere, the study examine the variables influence the

willingness and individual voilence in palestinian civilian in some of the location of

west bank in the form of resistance to the israeli state oppression. the main motive of

the study is to give a clear picture for why individuals live in H2 in Hebron are the

supporters of this kind of voilence, while the individuals living in the region of Firing

zone 918 restraint from the non-voilent resistance.

It directly aims to address the issue of why people in various West Bank

neighborhoods react to state violence in different ways, with some endorsing

collective, nonviolent resistance (as demonstrated in Firing Zone 918) and others

supporting violent, individualized resistance (as demonstrated in H2). Understanding

the nuances of civilian responses to state oppression in conflict zones is made possible

by this contribution.

The study makes a direct effort to comprehend how social connections and

isolation are impacted by the "built environment of conflict," which includes the

existence and effects of checkpoints. These factors then influence people's preferences

for various forms of resistance.

3
 4

It investigates how this setting affects people's hope, sense of agency, and

propensities for different forms of resistance, ultimately illuminating the elements that

encourage violent, unorganized resistance to state violence.

The study highlights how people's support for various forms of resistance is

influenced by the "built environment of conflict," which includes physical features

like checkpoints and the type of state violence. By doing this, it casts doubt on the

notion that repressive state actions will reduce opposition and highlights the ways in

which they may, on the contrary, increase support for violent crime.

The main goal of the essay is to comprehend how the physical and social

environment of a conflict zone influences people's decisions about resistance, whether

it be nonviolent or violent. This study adds to our growing understanding of modern

conflicts and how they affect human behavior, state authority, and the dynamics of

resistance and violence.

However, the Broader implications of the study are what make it scientifically

significant. It draws attention to the ways in which civilian preferences and the

character of resistance are influenced by environments under state control. The author

makes the insightful suggestion that this phenomenon might be applicable to different

conflict contexts, which is helpful for scholars studying conflict-related topics. It

provides a fresh viewpoint on the mechanics of state repression and challenges

academics to think about how territorial control affects resistance preferences in

various geographic areas.

The study's "scientific" or "generalizable" value stems from its wider

implications for comprehending political phenomena in conflict areas and the possible

influence of conflict-ridden environments and state control on civilian behavior. The

4
 5

author seeks to make a number of deductions that may be useful to other scholars and

advance more general scholarly discussions:

1. Broader Implications

According to the study, oppressive state actions may, paradoxically,

increase support for violence rather than reduce resistance. This goes against

conventional wisdom about state control and resistance. Other scholars

researching state control dynamics and conflicts around the world may find this

insight useful.

In order to better understand the relationship between physical structures, state

violence, and civilian responses in various conflict settings, it can be useful to

consider the role that the built environment of conflict plays as well as how it affects

social connections.

The study poses concerns regarding the possible effects of modern governance

practices such as checkpoints, surveillance, and nonviolent state control measures as

well as their influence on civilian behavior.

Literature

The author places the work in the context of earlier studies on resistance,

conflict dynamics, and state control. This covers writings on support for both

violent and peaceful resistance by the general public.

 How social behavior in conflict zones is affected by checkpoints, state violence,

and the built environment.

 The elements that influence inclinations toward certain types of resistance.

 Analyses that compare state control dynamics and conflict areas.

5
 6

By providing a comprehensive analysis of the relationship between social

networks, state-imposed structures, and civilian preferences for different forms of

resistance, the study expands on the body of existing literature in this area. The author

sheds light on how oppressive state actions can affect resistance dynamics by

highlighting the importance of social connections as a factor influencing these

preferences.

Essentially, the study contribute to the larger body of knowledge regarding the

intricate interactions that occur in conflict situations between civilian behavior, state

power, and resistance. It emphasizes the significance of social connections in

influencing civilian responses and challenges academics to think about the unexpected

effects of state control measures. The knowledge gathered from this research could

contribute to and improve our comprehension of political processes in conflict areas

worldwide.

The author provides a comprehensive analysis of the body of research on

conflict, government regulation, and nonviolent resistance. The literature serves as a

foundation for the study, highlighting earlier studies on the effects of state violence,

the importance of social networks, and civilian support for resistance in conflict

zones. The author makes use of this body of literature to formulate the research

questions and pinpoint knowledge gaps.

The study fits nicely into the body of scholarly work that has already been

written. It interacts with a variety of literary works, such as security studies, political

science, and conflict studies. The author demonstrates a solid grasp of the scholarly

discourse surrounding state control and resistance in conflict settings by citing

Foucault, Kalyvas, and other pertinent scholars.

6
 7

The literature is organized and comprehensible. The research framework is

expertly integrated by the author with pre-existing theories and concepts, giving the

study's methodology a strong foundation. The literature is an essential component of

the story that directs the research, not just background information.

Moreover, the author challenges certain presumptions about state control and

how it affects resistance in order to expand and deepen our understanding of the

subject, rather than making overt arguments against particular earlier works. By

demonstrating how repressive state actions can inadvertently encourage support for

violent resistance, the study subtly casts doubt on the efficacy of state tactics meant to

discourage resistance.

The author's main argument is that civilian preferences for various forms of

resistance can be influenced by the built environment of conflict, particularly the

checkpoint structures and state control measures imposed on communities in the West

Bank. Social ties are a major influence on these preferences. People may become

more supportive of unorganized, individualized violent resistance when state actions

cause them to feel alone and helpless. On the other hand, collective nonviolent

resistance emerges as the preferred tactic when social ties are preserved. According to

the study, repressive government actions may unintentionally encourage support for

resistance.

Concise "Bumper Sticker" Summary the Particular reason for the

circumstance is built environments affect social connections, oppressive state

control in conflict zones may paradoxically encourage violent resistance. The study

highlights the importance of social connection and isolation in these preferences

and shows how state-controlled environments influence civilian support for

resistance.

7
 8

However, the author's approach to invalidate the argument is in order to

obtain firsthand information and insights, the author uses a qualitative research

approach, conducting semi-structured interviews and life-story interviews with

communities in the West Bank. These interviews offer firsthand accounts that

strengthen the thesis. Through a critical analysis of the data, the author makes

connections between social isolation, the built environment, and the preferences of

civilians for resistance. Based on the empirical data, an inductive process is used to

develop the argument.

The author employs a qualitative approach, which includes semi-structured

interviews and life stories, to persuasively refute the claim. This strategy is

consistent with the study's use of inductive reasoning since it permits a thorough

examination of each person's experiences and viewpoints.

A crucial research question that the study successfully tackles is: How do

civilian preferences for various forms of resistance in conflict zones get influenced by

environments under state control? Understanding the unintended consequences of

state actions in these areas requires an understanding of the research questions, which

are crucial and pertinent.

Independent variables

The degree of social isolation and the constructed environment of conflict,

particularly checkpoint structures and state control measures.

Dependent variables

Civilians' inclinations toward various types of resistance (individual,

violent resistance or group, nonviolent resistance).

8
 9

The primary focus of the study is on the independent variables that are

associated with state control, particularly the constructed environment of conflict.

The civilian support for different forms of resistance is the dependent variable. The

information was obtained by means of 71 primary interviews carried out in Hebron

olive-farming communities between 2015 and 2016.

The author uses first-hand information from semi-structured interviews

and life stories with Hebron olive farming communities in the West Bank that were

conducted between 2015 and 2016. Rich qualitative data capturing the experiences,

opinions, and preferences of people residing in conflict-affected areas is provided

by these interviews.

The author compares two different West Bank regions—H2 (Hebron city)

and Firing Zone 918 (South Hebron Hills)—where oppressive state control is

prevalent but has varying effects on social ties in order to address alternative

explanations. The research invalidates other theories based on regional

characteristics and emphasizes the influence of the built environment on resistance

preferences by examining the variations in civilian preferences for resistance in

these two areas.

The study does not specifically rule out competing theories or points of

contention. Nonetheless, it makes a strong case for the impact of state-controlled

environments on civilian resistance preferences using empirical data and qualitative

analysis.

LIMITATION

There are a number of limitations to the study, such as a narrow focus, a small

sample size, time constraints, and potential bias. The limitations of the research have

9
 10

an impact on the findings' generalizability and their potential applicability to diverse

conflict contexts.

Advantages

The qualitative methodology offers benefits for thoroughly investigating the

research questions. It makes it possible to comprehend unique experiences and

preferences in a nuanced way. Nevertheless, the study's limited sample size and

temporal constraints limit its generalizability outside of the study's particular context.

1. One of the study's strengths is the utilization of qualitative research methods,

specifically life-story and semi-structured interviews. Using these techniques,

people's experiences, opinions, and preferences can be thoroughly explored in

their own words. It offers a sophisticated comprehension of the intricate

dynamics involved.

2. The study's empirically based inductive methodology is ideal for formulating a

theory regarding how civilian preferences for resistance are impacted by

environments under state control. Rather than forcing preconceptions, it lets the

theory come from the data.

3. The study provides a foundation for insightful comparisons by comparing two

different regions, H2 and Firing Zone 918. By separating out the influence of the

built environment on resistance preferences, this comparative method strengthens

the validity of the results.

Disadvantages

1. The main limitation of the study is its narrow focus. It focuses on two distinct

West Bank regions, which, although providing insightful information, might not

be entirely representative of all conflict zones. It would be beneficial to validate

the findings in a wider range of conflict situations. The study is based on 71 in-

10
 11

depth interviews, which might not fully represent the range of experiences and

viewpoints even though they offer rich qualitative data. The generalizability of

the study would be improved with a larger sample size.

2. The study was carried out in 2015–16, during a particular conflict period,

which restricts the findings' temporal applicability.

3. Conflict dynamics are subject to change over time, and the study does not take

these developments into account.

4. The study acknowledges the bias it may have introduced by only interviewing

participants who agreed to be interviewed, thus leaving out opinions that differ

from its main focus. The research would be strengthened if this bias was

addressed and a wider range of viewpoints were investigated.

Although there isn't any concrete proof of later research challenging this

study, it might encourage more investigation into the unforeseen effects of state

control in conflict areas. To validate and improve the results, researchers could

broaden the study's scope, boost the sample size, and investigate various conflict

contexts. In order to account for changing conflict dynamics, future research may also

take into account the long-term effects of state-controlled environments on civilian

preferences for resistance.

CONCLUSION

To sum up, everything that is stated in the study significantly advances our

methodological knowledge of how civilians react in conflict zones to environments

under state control. although the study's methodology is a useful means of examining

the research questions, there are some drawbacks, including those related to sample

size, scope, temporal applicability, and potential bias. Regardless these drawbacks, it

provides an insightful viewpoint on the inadvertent effects of state action and

11
 12

encourages more research into this intricate phenomenon. It is consistent with

previous research in the field and lays the groundwork for further studies in conflict-

related areas.

Benefits of Life Interviews and Qualitative Research:

1. In-depth and rich data are provided by qualitative research methods like life

interviews. Researchers are able to find details that quantitative approaches might

overlook. For instance, the author of the study notes that life-story interviews provide

insightful accounts of people's experiences and beliefs within the West Bank setting.

2. Qualitative research makes it possible to comprehend the social and cultural

contexts in which the study is conducted on a deeper level. The study sheds light on

the intricate interactions between state violence and popular attitudes and emphasizes

the significance of analyzing violent events in their local contexts.

Drawbacks of Life Interviews and Qualitative Research:

1. As the study points out, one drawback of qualitative research is its poor

generalizability. The conclusions drawn from in-depth interviews might not be readily

transferable to larger populations or other situations. For example, although the

study's qualitative methodology offers valuable insights into the West Bank, it might

not be applicable to other regions.

2. Subjectivity of the researcher and potential bias in data interpretation can affect

qualitative research. Although this problem isn't specifically addressed in the study,

it's a common one in qualitative research that researchers should be aware of and try

to address.

12
 13

13
 14

REFERENCES

Amir, M. (2013). The Making of a Void Sovereignty: Political Implications of the

Military Checkpoints in the West Bank. Environment and Planning D: Society

and Space, 31(2), 227–244. https://doi.org/10.1068/d19810

Austin, Z., & Sutton, J. (2014). Qualitative research: Getting started. The Canadian

Journal of Hospital Pharmacy, 67(6), 436–440. NCBI.

https://doi.org/10.4212/cjhp.v67i6.1406

B’tselem. (2017). Highlights. B’Tselem; Settlement Statistics.”.

https://www.btselem.org/

Bhavnan. (2011). Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International)

| IDEAS/RePEc. Ideas.repec.org. https://ideas.repec.org/s/sae/jocore5.html

Delaney, D. (2002). The Space That Race Makes. The Professional Geographer, 54(1),

6–14. https://doi.org/10.1111/0033-0124.00309

Dorff, C. (2017). Violence, kinship networks, and political resilience. Journal of Peace

Research, 54(4), 558–573. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022343317691329

Dorff, C. (2019). Violent and Nonviolent Resistance in Contexts of Prolonged Crisis:

The Civilian Perspective. Journal of Global Security Studies, 4(2), 286–291.

https://doi.org/10.1093/jogss/ogz007

GADE, E. K. (2020). Social Isolation and Repertoires of Resistance. American Political

Science Review, 114(2), 309–325.

https://doi.org/10.1017/s0003055420000015

14
 15

Nowell, L. S., Norris, J. M., White, D. E., & Moules, N. J. (2017). Thematic analysis:

Striving to Meet the Trustworthiness Criteria. International Journal of

Qualitative Methods, 16(1), 1–13. SagePub.

https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917733847

Pedrazzi, C. (2023, September 13). In Hebron, a case study in Israeli apartheid.

Https://Www.newarab.com/. https://www.newarab.com/analysis/hebron-

case-study-israeli-apartheid

Rahman, S. (2016). The Advantages and Disadvantages of Using Qualitative and

Quantitative Approaches and Methods in Language “Testing and

Assessment” Research: a Literature Review. Journal of Education and

Learning, 6(1), 102–112. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1120221.pdf

Treisman, R. (2023, October 27). Biden wants a two-state solution for Israeli-

Palestinian peace. Is it still possible? NPR.

https://www.npr.org/2023/10/27/1208694837/two-state-solution-israeli-

palestinian-conflict#:~:text=The%20two%2Dstate%20solution%20calls

University of Southern California. (2023). Research Guides: Organizing Your Social

Sciences Research Paper: Limitations of the Study. Usc.edu.

https://libguides.usc.edu/writingguide/limitations

15