Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Abstract. Incremental sheet forming (ISF), based on the ‘layered manufacturing’ principle of rapid
prototype manufacturing technology, is an innovative and highly flexible technology for forming
complex shaped parts without the need for costly dies. This paper presents a numerical investigation
on the influence of forming process parameters by modeling the forming process. ANSYS/LS-DYNA
has been used for the simulation. The results of study show that small vertical step size can improve
the accuracy of the forming. Moreover, large forming angle can increase plastic strain and the four
screwdown point optimization paths is an effective method to increase the accuracy of the formed
sheet.
Introduction
The incremental sheet forming process (ISF) involves the use of a smooth forming tool, which is
rotated and moved in 3D space against the work piece. This work piece is clamped around its
periphery in a holder on the machine bed and the movement of the tool is controlled by a CNC milling
machine. The force between the tool and the sheet metal work piece causes local plastic deformation,
enabling a 3-D profile to be made by progressively moving the tool against the work piece in a
controlled pattern. The ISF process avoids the need for expensive dies used in sheet forming process
because the only equipment necessary is a standard CNC milling machine with CAD/CAM software,
and a smooth forming tool. Therefore, it is possible in theory to move directly from a 3D CAD design
to make a finished product without any intermediate stages [1-3].
A number of academic groups around the world have made various studies of the process. Most
researchers have focused on the force measurement, applications and FEM process modelling the
deformation mechanism [3]. Work by the authors of this paper, focuses on the generation a tool path
correction algorithm for optimum process accuracy, but also aims to understand the influence of
forming process parameters using FEM modelling and experimental measurement. A FEM model
should then enable reliable theoretical predictions of process limitations and product profile.
All rights reserved. No part of contents of this paper may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means without the written permission of Trans
Tech Publications, www.ttp.net. (ID: 130.113.151.253, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada-07/04/15,19:07:54)
Advanced Materials Research Vols. 97-101 159
short it because the ISF process involves large deformations and long working times [6]. The whole
model consists of 5564 elements and 5732 nodes(Fig.1).
1
ELEMENTS
JUL 14 2004
14:54:25
An identical pyramid part to that being simulated was made by experiment by generating an ISF
tool path and forming the part on a CNC machine. The comparison between the simulated and
corresponding measured profile is shown in figure2. As can be seen, in Fig.2, the simulated profile is
significantly closer to the experimental, with this reduction in step size that is 2mm per cycle.
Therefore, this FEM model was used to discuss the forming effect of the process parameters such as
vertical step size, forming angle and different tool path.
1.00
0.95
0.90
0.85
0.80
0.75
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
vertical step(mm)
As can be seen in Fig.3 and Fig.4, the thinning areas of the formed part occurs on the side wall of
the pyramid part and the minimum thickness takes place on the corner of this part. The minimum
thickness of the formed part increases when the vertical step decreases. The minimum thickness of the
part is 0.94mm when the vertical step is 4mm per cycle. The minimum thickness of the part adds up to
0.97mm when the vertical step decreases to 1mm.
Fig.5 The shell thickness of different Fig.6 Longitudinal section and symmetry
forming angles with the different paths
Table1 the von Mises stress and von Mises plastic strain of different forming angles
Forming angle [ ° ] 30 45 60 75
Maximum equivalent stress [ MPa ] 95.4 104 108 123
Maximum equivalent strain 0.322 0.602 0.938 1.279
As can be seen in Fig.5 and Table 1, the maximum equivalent stress and the maximum equivalent
strain of the formed sheet obviously enhance when the forming angle is increased. The ratios of these
maximum equivalent stresses are 1.28: 1.13: 1.09: 1 and the ratios of these maximum equivalent
strains are about 4: 3: 2: 1 when the forming angles are75°, 60°, 45° and 30°. The simulation results
also indicate that the minimum thickness of the sheet is 0.47 mm when the forming angle is 75° and
the minimum thickness of the sheet adds up to 1.21mm when the forming angle is 30°. The reason is
that the main deformation area is in the side wall for the pyramid part. Therefore, the area of the side
wall for the pyramid part decreases when the forming angle increases. Due to the same depth of the
part, the biggish deformation of the unit area causes the thickness of the shell to be reduced.
In this paper, path 1 is designed to adopt one single point to screw at the same corner of the pyramid
part when the tool begins to move per cycle. Path 2 is designed to adopt two points to screw at the
diagonal corner of this part when the tool begins to move per cycle. Path 3 is designed to adopt four
points to screw at the all corner of this part when the tool begins to move per cycle. The simulation
results also indicate that the geometric accuracies of the formed part using path3 is better than that of
the formed part using other tool paths. And the symmetry of the part along z axis using path3 is
improved.
At the same time, the maximum equivalent strain of the formed part using path1 is 0.78 and the
maximum equivalent strain of the formed part using path2 is 0.736 and the maximum equivalent
strain of the formed part using path1 decrease to 0.635. The maximum equivalent strain of the part
using path 3 is compare with that of formed part using path1, this strain declines 18.6%.It means that
the forming limit of the sheet may be improved when the multi-point are used to screw down when the
tool begins to move per cycle.
Conclusions
The ISF process has been investigated when simulating a pyramid with a 45°wall slope using the
Finite Element Method. By using ANSYS/LS-DYNA, it is possible to model the ISF process such
that a better understanding of the deformation mechanism is achieved.
(1) Simulated results show good agreement with experimental data for the geometry of the
pyramid when the vertical step size is 2mm or 1mm per cycle. An appropriate vertical step
size must be chosen under the conditions prescribed by forming accuracies for reducing the
solution time.
(2) The maximum equivalent stress and the maximum equivalent strain of the formed sheet
obviously enhance when the forming angle is increased. Therefore, the small forming angle
can improve the limit of the sheet and increase the thickness of the formed part.
(3) The geometric accuracies of the formed part are improved when the four corner of the pyramid
part are adopted to screw down, then the maximum equivalent strains of the formed part are
decreased and the forming limit of the sheet may be improved.
Acknowledgements
The authors wish to thank the EPSRC’s Engineering IMRC at the University of Bath for supplying the
experimental results.
References
[1] Kim, T.J. and Yang, D.Y.: Int. J. Mech. Sci. Vol. 42(2001), p.1271
[2] J.Kopac and Z.Kampus: J. Mater. Process. Tech 162-163(2005), p.622
[3] J. Jeswiet et. Al: Annals of the CIRP(Italy 2005)
[4] Fratini, L. Ambrogio,G., Di Lorenzo, R., Filice,L. and Micari, F: Annals of CIRP, Vol.53 (2004),
p.207
[5] Filice, L., Fantini, L., Micari, F: Annals of the CIRP, Vol. 51 (2002), p.199
[6] Qin Qin, E.S. Masuku, A.N. Bramley and A.R. Mileham, G.W. Owen: P. 8th ICTP (Italy 2005)
Manufacturing Science and Engineering I
10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.97-101
Numerical Simulation on the Effect of Process Parameters for Incremental Sheet Forming
10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.97-101.158
DOI References
[4] Fratini, L. Ambrogio,G., Di Lorenzo, R., Filice,L. and Micari, F: Annals of CIRP, Vol.53 (2004), p.207
doi:10.1016/S0007-8506(07)60680-5
[3] J. Jeswiet et. Al: Annals of the CIRPItaly 2005)
doi:10.1016/S0007-8506(07)60021-3
[4] Fratini, L. Ambrogio,G., Di Lorenzo, R., Filice,L. and Micari, F: Annals of CIRP, Vol.53 (2004), .207
doi:10.1016/S0007-8506(07)60680-5
[5] Filice, L., Fantini, L., Micari, F: Annals of the CIRP, Vol. 51 (2002), p.199
doi:10.1016/S0007-8506(07)61499-1