You are on page 1of 3

Title Findings Conclusion Statement

The influence of The problem of Furthermore, students


promotional secondary school may believe that One way that private
elements to the students performing institutions equipped universities get ahead
Gen. Z senior poorly academically with the newest in its market share is
high school in external exams, technology are better by having the
students' decision such as those prepared to deliver a appropriate marketing
in choosing an administered by the thorough and modern
and promotional
educational West African education.
institution Examinations strategies to create
Council and the loyalty by means of
National managing the
Examination promotional elements
Council, has been of the university.
more prevalent in
Nigeria recently. The
learning
environment has I think due to the
received relatively differences in the
little attention, with academic tracks that
the main concerns each student is
being the caliber of currently studying,
the professors and
there were differences
the students' lack of
dedication to their
in how each student
studies as a result of viewed the promotional
distractions that aspects.
impair learning.
However, a number
of factors, including
conveniences,
hygienic conditions,
maintenance
practices,
aesthetics, and
libraries as well as
play areas, technical
workshops, labs,
and classrooms,
influence how well
pupils learn and
succeed
academically.
Accordingly, in order
to improve students'
academic
performance, the
learning
environment
continues to be a
crucial topic that
needs to be
researched and
effectively
controlled.
According to how
the study was read,
the facilities and
equipment that are
available and of a
high quality have a
REFERENCES

- The influence of promotional elements to the Gen. Z senior high school students’
decision in choosing an educational institution. (n.d.). https://rdc.ubaguio.edu/the-
influence-of-promotional-elements-to-the-gen-z-senior-high-school-students-decision-in-
choosing-an-educational-institution/

-Baafi, R. K. A. (2020). School physical environment and student academic


performance. Advances in Physical Education, 10(02), 121–
137. https://doi.org/10.4236/ape.2020.102012

-The Impact of School Aesthetics on the Psychology of Students in District Peshawar


(22 C.E., July 30). Pakistan Journal of Clinical
Psychology. https://www.pjcpku.com/index.php/pjcp/article/view/149?
fbclid=IwAR3ExLQYgPD_ggoZwAyI6qHxbQTYv8sCDUkXydyV6GZZlDNSlTylUog6kfE_
aem_AQTHVG4_qJSP4T_NFs9aEO5V7YXtCdgssIDWvNwNNjDtFnVkehL7owc86W-
uF6KZleo

-Le, T. M. H., Nguyen, V. K. L., Nguyen, T. S., Le, T. H., & Duong, T. N. M. (2021).
Assessment of students’ satisfaction of facility service quality in private universities.
Universal Journal of Educational Research, 9(5), 974–
983. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2021.090510

- Hawkins, G. T., Chung, C. S., Hertz, M. F., & Antolin, N. (2023, September). The
School Environment and Physical and Social‐Emotional Well‐Being: Implications
for Students and School Employees. Journal of School Health, 93(9), 799–812.
https://doi.org/10.1111/josh.13375

You might also like