Moral relativism and ethical relativism are closely related concepts but there is a subtle difference:
- Moral relativism is the view that morality is relative to the norms of one's culture or society. What is considered right or wrong varies between different cultures and individuals.
- Ethical relativism extends this further by suggesting that systems of ethical judgment are culturally or socially relative as well. It maintains that what is considered ethical cannot be determined across cultural boundaries in an objective way, but only from within the framework of a particular system of cultural norms.
So in summary:
- Moral relativism focuses on moral judgments of right and wrong.
- Ethical relativism focuses more broadly on entire systems of
Moral relativism and ethical relativism are closely related concepts but there is a subtle difference:
- Moral relativism is the view that morality is relative to the norms of one's culture or society. What is considered right or wrong varies between different cultures and individuals.
- Ethical relativism extends this further by suggesting that systems of ethical judgment are culturally or socially relative as well. It maintains that what is considered ethical cannot be determined across cultural boundaries in an objective way, but only from within the framework of a particular system of cultural norms.
So in summary:
- Moral relativism focuses on moral judgments of right and wrong.
- Ethical relativism focuses more broadly on entire systems of
Moral relativism and ethical relativism are closely related concepts but there is a subtle difference:
- Moral relativism is the view that morality is relative to the norms of one's culture or society. What is considered right or wrong varies between different cultures and individuals.
- Ethical relativism extends this further by suggesting that systems of ethical judgment are culturally or socially relative as well. It maintains that what is considered ethical cannot be determined across cultural boundaries in an objective way, but only from within the framework of a particular system of cultural norms.
So in summary:
- Moral relativism focuses on moral judgments of right and wrong.
- Ethical relativism focuses more broadly on entire systems of
ETHICS • DERIVED FROM THE GREEK WORD "ETHOS" MEANING "MORAL PHILOSOPHY"
• CONCERNED ABOUT HUMAN CONDUCT AND
DEALS WITH NORMS OR STANDARDS OF RIGHT OR WRONG APPLICABLE TO HUMAN BEHAVIOR ETHICS Another problem in philosophy is about ethical truths. If in the previous discussion, the question of empirical truth is viewed to be uncertain, ethical truths are all the more analyzed. Can there be an objectivity in the rightness or wrongness of actions which are considered under the lens of morality? Can a moral law that is true for all people regardless of qualifications be found?. ETHICS Practicality may dissuade a person from asking these basic questions and remain limited in the perspectives of what is only useful and expedient. However, a true lover of wisdom will not hide behind what is already accepted as true. A philosopher will instead continue to ask and analyze, reflect, and form more verifiable claims and reduce errors in thinking. What is Ethical Truths? ETHICAL TRUTHS - it pertain to principles or beliefs about what is morally right or wrong.
- They can vary among individuals and cultures,
leading to ethical relativism.
- Some common ethical theories include
utilitarianism, deontology, and virtue ethics, each offering different perspectives on how to determine ethical truths. Why is Ethical Truth a Philosophical Problem? SUBJECTIVITY • Ethics often involves questions about what is right or wrong, and these judgments can vary from person to person, culture to culture, or context to context. MORAL RELATIVISM - is the belief that moral principles are not universally objective but instead depend on cultural, societal, or individual perspectives. - It suggests that what is considered morally right or wrong can vary from one culture, society, or person to another. NORMATIVE ETHICS • is a branch of ethics that deals with determining what is morally right and wrong. • It provides frameworks and theories to guide individuals in making ethical decisions and evaluating the morality of actions. META-ETHICS • demonstrate the complexity of understanding the foundations and nature of morality and why it continues to be a central topic of philosophical inquiry. - Philosophers explore the nature of ethical language and concepts, asking questions like "What does it mean for something to be morally right?" or "Do moral facts exist independently of human beliefs?" MORAL DILEMMAS • Ethical truth becomes particularly challenging when dealing with conflicting moral principles or situations where there is no clear- cut answer. • Philosophers often wrestle with how to resolve such dilemmas. CULTURAL VARIATION - diversity of moral beliefs across cultures and historical periods raises questions about whether ethical truths are culturally contingent or whether there are any universal moral principles. MORAL SKEPTICISM - Some philosophers, known as moral skeptics, question whether ethical truths exist at all, leading to debates about the foundations of morality. Ethical truth is a philosophical problem because;
1) it involves profound inquiries
into the nature of morality, the basis of moral judgments, and
2) the possibility of arriving at
objective or universal ethical truths amid the complexities and diversity of human values and beliefs. THANK YOU! Now open for Questions and Clarifications In your understanding, how did Ethical Truth became a Philosophical Problem? What is the effect of individual perspectives in Ethical Truths? What is the difference between Moral Relativism and Ethical Relativism?