Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Keratin-associated proteins are involved in the forma- protein 1.7 with other human keratin-associated protein
tion of the cross-linked network of the keratin-inter- 1 members revealed that keratin-associated protein 1
mediate ¢lament proteins that support hair ¢bers. In proteins are fundamentally composed of ¢ve distinct
recent years, several keratin-associated protein genes have domains, and that they can be classi¢ed primarily by
been identi¢ed and become an attractive topic in hair a striking variation in double cysteine-containing
research. More recently, we isolated two cDNA encod- pentapeptide repeats in the repetitive I domain. The
ing novel members of the human keratin-associated sum of the data analyzed suggests that human keratin-
protein 1 family (human keratin-associated protein associated protein 1 family genes may have arisen
1.6 and human keratin-associated protein 1.7), and mainly through gene duplication of the cysteine-repeat
described their expression in the hair follicle by RNA motifs during evolution. Key words: human gene/
in situ hybridization. A comparison of human keratin- in situ hybridization/keratin/keratin-associated protein. JID
associated protein 1.6 and human keratin-associated Symposium Proceedings 8:96 ^99, 2003
H
uman hair ¢bers share a common structural orga- proposed by Rogers and Powell (1993). Of these KAP families,
nization, in which a multicellular cortex is encased the KAP1 family has been de¢ned as a group of high-sulfur pro-
in a cuticular layer of £attened cells, often with a teins expressed in the cortical layer of the hair follicle (Rogers
medulla layer centrally placed in the cortex. Hair and Powell, 1993), and so far, eight KAP1 members have been re-
¢bers are composed primarily of keratin proteins ported from sheep, rabbits, and humans (Elleman and Dopheide,
that are derived from several multigene families. These hair-spe- 1972; Powell et al, 1983; Zhumbaeva et al, 1992; Mitsui et al, 1998).
ci¢c keratins have been classi¢ed into the keratin intermediate- In humans, two KAP1 genes, hB2A and hB2B, were initially iso-
¢lament proteins (KIF) and their associated proteins (KAP) (Powell lated from a single genomic clone (Zhumbaeva et al, 1992), and
et al, 1991). KAP are a major component of the hair ¢ber matrix and later renamed hKAP1.1A and hKAP1.2, respectively (Rogers et al,
participate in the formation of a rigid hair shaft by cross-linking 2001). In a recent study, we isolated two cDNA encoding new
the KIF to form a meshwork (Powell and Rogers, 1997). Based on hKAP1 members during the analysis of the hKAP1.1A gene in
their amino acid composition, KAP have been originally classi¢ed patients with a congenital fragile hair disorder, which we have
into three groups: (i) high-sulfur KAP (16^30 mol% cysteine; named hKAP1.6 and hKAP1.7 (Shimomura et al, 2002). hKAP1.6
KAP1-3, 10^16 and 23 families) (Swart and Haylett, 1973; Swart and hKAP1.7 show high nucleotide sequence homology with
et al, 1976; Powell et al, 1983; Frenkel et al, 1989; Zhumbaeva et al, hKAP1.1A. In particular, the three genes share a completely iden-
1992; Huh et al, 1994; Powell and Rogers, 1997; Aoki et al, 1998; Cole tical sequence in their 30 -noncoding regions. At the amino acid
and Reeves, 1998; Mitsui et al, 1998; Takaishi et al, 1998; Kuhn et al, sequence level, the degree of identity between hKAP1.1A,
1999; Rogers et al, 2001; Rogers et al, 2002, Shimomura et al, 2002a); hKAP1.6, and hKAP1.7 is striking (Fig 1). A comparison of hKA-
(ii) ultra-high-sulfur KAP (430 mol% cysteine; KAP4, 5, 9, and 17 P1.1A and hKAP1.6 revealed a single amino acid change between
families) (McNab et al, 1989; MacKinnon et al, 1990; Fratini et al, the proteins as well as a 46 -residue deletion in the amino term-
1994; Jenkins and Powell, 1994; Powell et al, 1995; Perez et al, 1999; inal region of hKAP1.6. Similarly, comparison of hKAP1.1A with
Rogers et al, 2001); and (iii) high-glycine/tyrosine KAP (KAP6^8 hKAP1.7 revealed complete identity, except for a 92-residue ami-
families) (Kuczek and Rogers, 1987; Fratini et al, 1993; Aoki et al, 1997; no acid deletion in hKAP1.7. In addition, the multialignment of
Rogers et al, 2002). To date, KAP have been subdivided into a total hKAP1.6 and hKAP1.7 with sheep and rat KAP1 members de-
of 23 families (KAP1.n^KAP23.n), based on their cysteine/tyrosine- monstrated the structural features of the KAP1 family at the ami-
glycine content as well as the degree of amino acid homology no acid sequence level (Shimomura et al, 2002a).
within each family and the nature of repeat structures often Unexpectedly, as we identi¢ed hKAP1.6 and hKAP1.7, a large
found in these molecules, according to an uni¢ed nomenclature cluster of human high/ultra-high-sulfur KAP genes was found
on chromosome 17q12^21, resulting in the identi¢cation of
four additional novel hKAP1 genes, termed hKAP1.1B, hKAP1.3,
Manuscript accepted for publication February 1, 2003
Reprint requests to: Yutaka Shimomura, Department of Dermatology, hKAP1.4, and hKAP1.5 (Rogers et al, 2001). In particular,
Niigata University School of Medicine, Asahimachi-dori, Niigata 951-8510, hKAP1.1B is nearly identical to hKAP1.1A in DNA sequence.
Japan. Email: yshimo@med.niigata-u.ac.jp The multialignment of eight human KAP1 members showed
Abbreviations: KAP, keratin-associated protein; KIF, keratin intermediate that these proteins are composed of ¢ve individual domains: an
¢lament protein. N-terminal domain, a repetitive I domain, a central nonrepetitive
96
VOL. 8, NO. 1 JUNE 2003 CHARACTERIZATION OF HKAP1 MEMBERS 97
Figure 1. Multi-alignment of hKAP1 family members. Residues that are identical are colored light blue. Dashes denote gaps in the sequence to max-
imize alignment. The pentapeptide repeats are boxed with black lines. Brackets show the ¢ve KAP subdomains. The unique nonrepetitive sequences in the
repetitive I domain are boxed with red lines. The accession numbers for the respective protein sequences are: hKAP1.1A (hB2A), X63337; hKAP1.1B
(AC007455, nt 8801^9334); hKAP1.2 (hB2B), X63338; hKAP1.3 (AC007455, nt 15377^15880); hKAP1.4 (AC007455, nt 20120^20485); hKAP1.5 (AC007455,
nt 23043^23568); hKAP1.6 (AB052868); hKAP1.7 (AB055057).
domain, a repetitive II domain, and a C-terminal domain (Fig 1). to be composed essentially of amino acid variations on a double
The N-terminal, central nonrepetitive, and repetitive II domains cysteine-containing pentapeptide, CCQ(P/T)S and CCETS. In
appear to be signi¢cantly conserved among the hKAP1 members. addition, hKAP1 members have a curious nonrepetitive sequence
Likewise, these domains are well conserved in the KAP1 mem- ‘‘FCGF(P/R)SFST(G/S)GTC(D/S)SS’’or ‘‘FCDFLASQLVDLQLS’’
bers of other species (Shimomura et al, 2002a), indicating that between these pentapeptide repeats in the repetitive I domain
they may play an essential part in KAP1 family function. The C- (Fig 1). These sequences could not be detected in the repetitive I
terminal domain, which is the smallest region, is composed of domains of the KAP1 members of other species already reported
four to seven amino acid residues and generally contains a unique (Shimomura et al, 2002). The comparisons of the hKAP1 mem-
element, ‘‘EPTC’’, although this is not found in hKAP1.2, and bers showed high homologies at the N-terminal, central nonre-
shows high similarity across the family (Fig 1). An additional re- petitive, repetitive II, and C-terminal domains, but not in the
gion of interest in the KAP1 family members is the repetitive I repetitive I domain. Therefore, the distinction between hKAP1
domain, which is striking in its high degree of repetitiveness members obviously appears to be dependent on the number of
and size variability. The repeat structures in this domain appear pentapeptide repeats and the arrangement of the repeat segments
98 SHIMOMURA ET AL JID SYMPOSIUM PROCEEDINGS
Figure 2. Transcripts of hKAP1 genes are expressed in the cortex of the hair follicle. (A) hKAP1.1A/B, hKAP1.6, and hKAP1.7. (B) hKAP1.3. (C)
hKAP1.5. Note that due to the high DNA sequence homology of the hKAP1.1A/B, hKAP1.6, and hKAP1.7 genes, the in situ probe used for (A) recognizes
four transcripts. The red arrows demarcate the area of major KAP expression. No transcripts were detected in the medulla (data not shown) or in the ORS,
IRS, and CU. ORS, outer root sheath; IRS, inner root sheath; CU, cuticle of the hair shaft; CO, cortex; DP, dermal papilla. Scale bar: 150 mm.
and nonrepetitive sequences in the repetitive I domain, indicating and provide additional impetus to discover the complete set of
that this domain is likely to de¢ne the individual functional char- hKAP genes.
acteristics of each hKAP1 member. hKAP gene clusters are located on chromosomes 17q12^21
At present, eight hKAP1 genes have been isolated from hu- (Rogers et al, 2001) and 21q22.1 (Hattori et al, 2000; Rogers et al,
mans. It is intriguing to consider how these hKAP1 genes have 2002); however, the hKAP1.6 and hKAP1.7 genes are not detect-
arisen in the human genome. The presence of various patterns able at these gene loci, indicating that there may be a further clus-
of pentapeptide repeat structures in the repetitive I domain raises ter of hKAP genes elsewhere. Alternatively, the presence of high
the possibility that the hKAP1 genes arose by gene duplication, sequence identities among hKAP1.1A/B, hKAP1.6, and hKAP1.7
especially the duplication or deletion of cysteine-repeat segments, in the 50 - and 30 -noncoding regions as well as in the open read-
during the course of evolution (Rogers and Powell, 1993; Rogers ing frame suggests the possibility that hKAP1.6 and hKAP1.7 are
et al, 2001). Furthermore, additional mutations and/or small dele- the polymorphic alleles of either hKAP1.1A or hKAP1.1B created
tion events occasionally seem to have occurred in other domains, by intragenic deletions during evolution. So far, we have per-
such as the N-terminal domain in hKAP1.4 and the C-terminal formed further analysis of hKAP1 family members concerning
domain in hKAP1.2. these problems and have got some interesting results (Shimomura
In situ hybridization studies of human scalp hair using a et al, 2002).
probe against the 30 -noncoding region of hKAP1.6 revealed Mutations in the hair keratin genes, hHb1 or hHb6, have pre-
strong signals, predominantly in the cortical layer, throughout viously been shown to cause the congenital hair disease monile-
the keratogenous zone (Fig 2A). This ¢nding indicated that thrix, which is characterized by beaded and fragile hairs (Winter
hKAP1.1A/B and hKAP1.7 mRNA are also expressed in the same et al, 1997a, b; Korge et al, 1999). Along with the keratins, hKAP
region, because hKAP1.1A/B, hKAP1.6, and hKAP1.7 have a are the major component of human hair, in which mutations are
completely identical nucleotide sequence in the 30 -noncoding likely to cause hereditary hair genodermatoses. Therefore, the
region. Similarly, hKAP1.3 (Fig 2B) and hKAP1.5 (Fig 2C) analysis of hKAP genes in patients with hair abnormalities will
mRNA were detected in the cortical layer as well, using provide meaningful information. In addition, the production of
speci¢c probes, and their region of expression was consistent transgenic mice expressing mutated KAP is likely to provide in-
with that of the hKAP1.1A/B, hKAP1.6, and hKAP1.7 mRNA. sight into the function of the KAP in hair follicles, and may pro-
The relative quantities of these mRNA expressed in this region vide a model for human hair disorders, as well.
remain to be analyzed. Expression studies of all the hKAP1 mem- In this study, we gave only one example out of many hKAP
bers, as well as of other hKAP family members, at both the families. The hKAP1 family, however, shares similar characteris-
mRNA and protein levels, may give us some insight into the tics with the other hKAP families. Thus, a detailed study of hKAP1
characteristics that distinguish the hair of di¡erent individuals, members will be a good guide for understanding all the hKAP.
VOL. 8, NO. 1 JUNE 2003 CHARACTERIZATION OF HKAP1 MEMBERS 99