Professional Documents
Culture Documents
AND ZOOMERS
Pew Research Center 2009 described Millennials as The research is driven by the fact that values affects
individual who were born between 1981 and 1996 and many aspects of life including one’s visions,
came during the age of internet explosion. On the philosophies and decision making. By looking into this
Madrona et al. 328/333
Psych Educ , 2023, 14: 328-333, Document ID:2023 PEMJ1258, doi:10.5281/zenodo.8409777, ISSN 2822-4353
Research Article
problem, we can possibly identify the loopholes in the The Theory of Basic Values by Shalom Shwartz
process of cultural change as well as generational gaps explains the basic personal values of people. It
which are obstacles in our unity and progress. The considers values as consistent principles which serve
clear picture of the latest generations’ values may lead as basis of how we value all else, including the
to plausible recommendations in using culture as the approp riaten ess of the norms, b eh avio rs,
fo undation in the p rocess of f o rm u lating characteristics or virtues that may be suggested to us.
developmental programs especially is transforming the The ten basic values that realize the three universal
curriculum into one that will meet the needs of the biological needs of humans include tradition,
evolving society. conformity, security, universalism, benevolence,
stimulation, self-direction, hedonism, achievement and
Research Questions power. They are are organized into a circular structure
of motivations (circumplex) along the following two
The main thrust of the study is to describe the values bipolar dimensions: openness to change (including
held by Filipino Millennials and Zoomers. self-directed and stimulation basic values) vs.
Specifically, it seeks to answer the following conservation (including security, tradition, and
questions: confirmation basic values) and self-enhancement
(including achievement and power basic values) vs.
1. What is the profile of the respondents: self-transcendence (including benevolence and
1.1 Gender; and universalism basic values) (Swhartz, 1994, 2012).
1.2 Generation?
2. What are the values of Filipino Millennials and According to the U.S. Census Bureau Statistics,
Zoomers in the following dimensions: Millennials is the largest cohort size in history since
2.1 Personal Values; and they constitute of more than 80 million people. They
2.2 Cultural Values? are potentially the most researched generation to date.
3. Is there a significant difference between the values The data we can find about them are varied and
of Filipino Millennials and Zoomers in the following sometimes contradictory. In reality, the Millennials are
categories: full of contradictions, which, of course, could explain
3.1 Personal Values; and the youth of every generation. Almost having a digital
3.2 Cultural Values? sixth sense, they are technically savvy. Millennials are
likely to be early adopters of technology 2.5 times
more than are older generations. Millennials live in a
Literature Review wired, connected world. They are growing to be the
most educated generation in history (Barkley, 2011).
Values are fundamental concepts presumed to underlie This generation experienced a number of tragic events
and affect diversity of constructs across disciplines. It like the 9/11, terrorist attacks, the 2004 Southeast
can also show major social change in different Asian tsunami, school shootings like Columbine, yet,
societies (Schwartz, 2003). Many social scientists they are still optimistic (Pew Research Center,
consider values as deeply entrenched, abstract motives 2009).Jean Twenge, a psychologist and Gen. Y
that direct, justify or clarify behaviors, norms, opinions scholar, and her colleagues have observed that young
and attitude (Halman & de Moor, 1994; Rokeach, adults today are more interested in extrinsic life
1973; Schwartz, 1992; Williams, 1968). Guth et.al aspirations and less concerned about others and
(1965) stresses that: “Values are not only closely community engagement (Twenge ,et.al., 2010). “They
related to personality, they are part of it, and serve as a are described as overly self-confident and self-
guiding system by personality when facing choices absorbed (Myers & Sadaghiani , 2010)”. Millennials
and alternatives, values form a very consistent have an inclination towards personal branding, which
personality trait of an individual, especially if some appears to be self-promoting on its surface. Going a
values are clearly dominated by the others”. little further indicates a way for young people to
identify their desires and take the most expedient path
Personal values are sets of beliefs, conceptual goals, ahead, rather than for others to set a path for them. In
etc. which can affect an individual’s view of the world addition, this generation masters self-expression, with
(Rokeach, 1973; Schwartz, 1992). Črešnar & 75 per cent building a profile on a social networking
Jevšenak in 2019 also describes personal values as “a site, 20 per cent sharing a video of their own online, 38
cognitive filter, through which a person is judging per cent with one to six tattoos, and 23 per cent with a
specific real-world circumstances.” piercing in a position other than an earlobe (Pew
Table 4. Personal Values of Filipino Zoomers religiosity. Despite of the challenges that they are
facing, they prefer to visualize the affirmative side
(Generation Z)
rather than on the negative and they consistently attend
masses and following the teachings of God. Further, it
also implies that Filipino Zoomers also love to
entertain and accommodate visitors in their homes
whatever their economic status. On the other hand,
Filipino Zoomers less likely valued close family ties
which suggest that they spend less time and
communication to their family members. This may be
associated with the advent of technology where it
became an extension of their lives, some of them were
raised by millennial parents who might be very busy in
working to provide them a better life or it might be the
uniqueness of their family set-up. GfK Consumer
Life’s research revealed that Generation Z are unlikely
to want to be “reachable at all times.” This was seen to
be a result of technology engagement since Zoomers
Filipino Zoomers (also known as Generation Z) values are raised with computers and internet (Molla, 2019).
security the most as reflected in Table 4. It is Among the negative the negative Filipino Cultural
immediately followed by Universalism. This conveys Values, mañana habit obtained the highest score
that Filipino Zoomers want to achieve peace through a which implied that Filipino Zoomers were inclined to
safe and harmonious environment and compassion for work on a certain undertaking on the last minute.
the common good. Then, personal values under the Nevertheless, negative Filipino values are at the
“Openness to Change” dimension, Stimulation and bottom of Filipino Zoomers’ values.
Self-Direction, also belong to the top spots, an
indication that they are excited to try novel Table 6. Difference Between Filipino Millennials and
experiences and challenges and that they value Zoomers’ Values
independence in choosing their own goals in life.
According to Pew Research Center (2009), this
generation likes to define their self-interests and
decide their own path. Lastly, Filipino Zoomers place
the least importance on the values under “Self-
enhancement” dimension, power and achievement.
Just like the Filipino Millennials, they are not aiming
for great power in the society.
Table 6 presents the difference between Filipino
Table 5. Cultural Values of Filipino Zoomers Millennials and Zommers’ Personal and Cultural
(Generation Z) Values. The computed t values at 0.05 level of
significance for both categories indicated the
acceptance of Null hypothesis. Therefore, there is no
significant difference in the values of Filipino
Millenials and Zoomers.
Conclusion
value “self-enhancement” dimension the least which The Philippine experience (Reprint ed.). Quezon City, Philippines:
University of the Philippines Press.
means that they are not inclined on gaining power and
achievement. In terms of cultural values, fun-loving Guth, W. D. and R. Tagiuri. 1965. ‘Personal Values and Corporate
trait and hospitality are most valued by Filipino Strategy.’ Harvard
Millennials and Zoomers. It appeared that the value of Merriman, M. & D. Valerio (2016). One Tough Customer: How Gen
Z is Challenging the
close family ties is declining in Filipino Zoomers. For
both generations, the negative Filipino values are least Molla, R. (October 2019). Generation Z doesn’t always want to hear
valued. Among all negative Filipino Values, Mañana from you. Vox.
habit is valued most. Generally, Filipino Millennials Monster Worldwide, Inc. (2016). Move over Millennials: Gen Z is
and Zoomers hold the same values. The most essential about to Hit the
value dimension that shapes the sense of self is the
Myers, K. M., Sadaghiani, K. (March 2010) Millennials in the
external scene of control to emphasize the free will,
Workplace: A one-tough-customer/$FILE/EY-onetough-
individual motivation and personal effort and customer.pdf
responsibility. Educators can tap the values of the
learners in order to make instruction more sensible for Pew Research Center (2009) MILLENNIALS Confident.
Connected. Open to
them.
Puyat, J. H. (2005). The Filipino youth today: Their strengths and
(1) The findings of the study may be included in the challenges they face. Youth in Transition.
module making in Senior High School and Higher
Ramirez, D. (2023). Marketing to gen Z in the Philippines.
Education on a particular lesson covering values and Spiralytics.
contemporary issues for localization most especially
the value of close family ties. (2) The findings of the Schwartz, Shalom. (2003). A proposal for measuring value
orientations across nations. Questionnaire Package of ESS. 259-290.
study may be used as reference for further research,
especially for the rural areas. Schwieger, D., & Ladwig, C. (2018). Reaching and Retaining the
Next Generation: Adapting to the Expectations of Gen Z in the
Classroom. Information Systems Education Journal (ISEDJ), 45-54.
References
Serafica, R. M. (2023). Unraveling the enigmatic, confounding gen
Z. RAPPLER. Shifts Toward Money, Work and Communication
Abdi, F. (2017). The Agreeableness Type of Personality and the Preferences.
Basic Personal Values. European Journal of Multidisciplinary
Studies, 2(7), 53-59. and Intrinsic Values Decreasing, Journal of Twenge, J. M., Campbell, S. M., Hoffman, B. J. (September
Management 2010) Generational
Barkley, SMG, Boston Consulting Group (September U.S. Chamber of Commerce Foundation. (2017, March 15). The
2011) American Millennials: Millennial Generation Research Review. Workforce. PR Newswire.
Bernardo, A. B., Clemente, J. A., & Liem, G. A. (2014). Describing Dexter G. Madrona
the values of Filipino adolescents: A comparison with pan-cultural Sandingan National High School Department of
norms. Journal of Tropical Psychology, 4.Business Review Education - Calayugan Norte, Philippines
43(5):123-32 Change. Communication Perspective on Millennials’
Organizational Relationships and Performance, , Journal of Business Euljem Fe C. Empuerto
and Psychology.Competitive Landscape and Redefining Cebu Normal University
Omnichannel. Ernst & Young Report.
Main Campus, Philippines
Cukur, C. S., De Guzman, M. R. T., & Carlo, G. (2004). Religiosity, Mark Mauris E. Cabahug
values, and horizontal and vertical individualism—Collectivism: A Bohol Island State University
study of Turkey, the United States, and the Philippines. The Journal
of social psychology, 144(6), 613-634.Deciphering the Enigma
Main Campus, Philippines
Generation.