Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ABSTRACT
The gas turbine cycle has various uses in the present scenario. The ancient and mostly use of
gas turbine cycle for the generation of power. The gas turbine cycle is based on Braton cycle. In the
present work the parametric study of a gas turbine cycle model power plant with intercooler
compression process and regeneration turbine were proposed. The thermal efficiency, specific fuel
consumption and net power output are simulating with respect to the temperature limits and
compressor pressure ratio for a typical set of operating conditions. Simple gas turbine cycle
calculations with realistic parameters are made and confirm that increasing the turbine inlet
temperature no longer means an increase in cycle efficiency, but increases the work done.
Regenerative gas turbine engine cycle is presented that yields higher cycle efficiencies than simple
cycle operating under the same conditions. The analytical formulae about the relation to determine
the thermal efficiency are derived taking into account the effected operation conditions (ambient
temperature, compression ratio, intercooled effectiveness, regenerator effectiveness, compressor
efficiency, turbine efficiency, air to fuel ratio and turbine inlet temperature).The analytical study is
done to investigate the performance improvement by intercooling and regeneration. The analytical
formula for specific work and thermal efficiency are derived and analyzed. The simulation results
shows that increasing turbine inlet temperature and pressure ratio can still improve the performance
of the intercooled gas turbine cycle. The power output and thermal efficiency are found to be
increasing with the regenerative effectiveness, and the compressor and turbine efficiencies. The
efficiency increased with increase the compression ratio to 5, then efficiency decreased with
increased compression ratio, but in simple cycle the thermal efficiency always increase with
increased in compression ratio. The increased in ambient temperature caused decreased thermal
efficiency, but the increased in turbine inlet temperature increase thermal efficiency.
Keywords: Gas turbine, Intercooling, Regeneration, Thermal efficiency, Power plant, Brayton cycle.
43
International Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Technology (IJMET), ISSN 0976 –
6340(Print), ISSN 0976 – 6359(Online) Volume 4, Issue 6, November - December (2013) © IAEME
The world energy demand has increased steadily and will continue to increase in the future:
the International Energy Agency (IEA) predicts an increase of 1.7% per year from 2000 to 2030.
This increase corresponds to two thirds of the current primary energy demand, which was 9179 Mtoe
in 2000, and in 2030, fossil fuels will still account for the largest part of the energy demand. In
addition, the IEA predicts that the demand for electricity will grow by 2.4% per year and that most of
the new power generating capacity will be natural gas-fired combined cycles [1] Therefore, it is
important to find improved technologies for power generation with high electrical efficiencies and
specific power outputs (kJ/kg air), low emissions of pollutants and low investment, operating and
maintenance costs for a sustainable use of the available fuels. Advanced power cycles based on gas
turbines can meet these requirements, since gas turbines have relatively high efficiencies, low
specific investment costs (USD/kW), high power-to-weight ratios and low emissions. The power
markets have been deregulated in several countries and distributed generation and independent
power producers have become more competitive. These changes require flexible power plants with
high efficiencies for small-to-medium power outputs. As a result of this, it was estimated that more
than half of the orders for new fossil-fueled power plants in the last part of the 1990s were based on
gas turbines [2], since non-expensive and clean natural gas was available, and the demand for gas
turbines continues to increase [4].
(1)
(2)
In the above equations, T stands for gas or air temperature in deg K and
44
International Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Technology (IJMET), ISSN 0976 –
6340(Print), ISSN 0976 – 6359(Online) Volume 4, Issue 6, November - December (2013) © IAEME
process to the left on the T-s diagram and reduces the discharge temperature following compression
to . The work required to compress air from to in two stages is given by considering two
compressors namely low pressure compressor and high pressure compressor. Therefore, work
required by the low pressure and high pressure compressor depends upon their pressure ratios.
For low pressure compressor the work required in isentropic compression is given by,
(3)
For the high pressure compressor, the work required in isentropic compression is given by,
(4)
Therefore, the total work required by the compressor is given by
(5)
In the present work the intercooler effectiveness is given by [22].
(6)
(7)
(8)
Note that intercooling increases the net work of the reversible cycle. Thus intercooling may
be used to reduce the work of compression between two given pressures in any application.
However, the favorable effect on compressor work reduction due to intercooling in the gas turbine
application may be offset by the obvious increase in combustor heat addition, ), and
by increased cost of compression system.
45
International Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Technology (IJMET), ISSN 0976 –
6340(Print), ISSN 0976 – 6359(Online) Volume 4, Issue 6, November - December (2013) © IAEME
Figure 2 T-s representation of intercooling between two compressors in gas turbine cycle
(9)
(10)
(11)
(12)
The work developed by turbine is then rewritten as in (2):
(13)
(14)
or
46
International Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Technology (IJMET), ISSN 0976 –
6340(Print), ISSN 0976 – 6359(Online) Volume 4, Issue 6, November - December (2013) © IAEME
(15)
In the combustion chamber, the heat supplied by the fuel is equal to the heat absorbed by air, Hence,
(16)
Power output is given by:
(17)
Air to fuel ratio is given by
(18)
and Specific Fuel consumption
(19)
Fuel to air ratio is given by
FAR=1/AFR (20)
Thermal Efficiency is given by
(21)
47
International Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Technology (IJMET), ISSN 0976 –
6340(Print), ISSN 0976 – 6359(Online) Volume 4, Issue 6, November - December (2013) © IAEME
0.375
EFF=0.5
EFF=0.6
0.370
EFF=0.7
EFF=0.8
Thermal Efficiency
0.365 EFF=0.9
0.360
OPR=30
LPR=2
0.355
TIT=1500K
0.350
0.345
280 290 300 310 320 330 340
Ambient Temperature (K)
48
International Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Technology (IJMET), ISSN 0976 –
6340(Print), ISSN 0976 – 6359(Online) Volume 4, Issue 6, November - December (2013) © IAEME
0.58
0.56
OPR=24
LPR=2
0.54 TIT=1500K
Power(kWX10 )
5
0.52
0.50
EFF=0.5
EFF=0.6
0.48
EFF=0.7
EFF=0.8
0.46 EFF=0.9
0.44
280 290 300 310 320 330 340
Ambient Temperature (K)
Figure 7 shows the variation of compressor work with compressor pressure ratio for different
values of intercooler effectiveness. It is to be noted that the compressor work increases on increasing
the pressure ratio for a given value of atmospheric temperature and low pressure ratio. It also
observed that the compressor work decreases on increasing the intercooler effectiveness for a fixed
value of compressor ratio.
600
550 EFF=0.5
EFF=0.6
Total Compressor Work (kJ/kg)
500 EFF=0.7
EFF=0.8
450
EFF=0.9
400
350
LPR=2
300
Tamb=310K
250 TIT=1500K
200
150
5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45
Compressor Pressure Ratio
It is shown in the figure 8 that work ratio increases on increasing the turbine inlet temperature
for a given intercooler effectiveness, compressor pressure ratio and ambient temperature. It is also
noticed from that figure work ratio increases on increasing the intercooler effectiveness for a given
TIT, compressor ratio and ambient temperature.
49
International Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Technology (IJMET), ISSN 0976 –
6340(Print), ISSN 0976 – 6359(Online) Volume 4, Issue 6, November - December (2013) © IAEME
0.65
EFF=0.5
0.60
EFF=0.6
0.55 EFF=0.7
EFF=0.8
0.50 EFF=0.9
Work Ratio
0.45
0.40
OPR=30
LPR=2
0.35
Tamb=310K
0.30
0.25
0.20
1000 1200 1400 1600 1800
Turbine Inlet Temperature (K)
0.56
0.55 RGEFF=0.45
OPR=20 RGEFF=0.55
0.54
TIT=1700K RGEFF=0.65
0.53
RGEFF=0.75
0.52
RGEFF=0.85
0.51 RGEFF=0.95
Thermal Efficiency
0.50
0.49
0.48
0.47
0.46
0.45
0.44
0.43
0.42
50
International Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Technology (IJMET), ISSN 0976 –
6340(Print), ISSN 0976 – 6359(Online) Volume 4, Issue 6, November - December (2013) © IAEME
0.60
OPR=24
0.55
TIT=1700K
0.50
0.45
Thermal Efficiency
0.40
Tamb=280K
0.35 Tamb=290K
Tamb=300K
0.30
Tamb=310K
0.25 Tamb=320K
Tamb=330K
0.20 Tamb=340K
0.15
Figure 12 Effect of isentropic turbine efficiency and ambient temperature on thermal efficiency
0.55
0.50
Thermal Efficiency
0.45
Simple Gas Turbine
Regenerative Gas Turbine
0.40 Intercooled Gas Turbine OPR=20
TIT=1700K
RGEFF=0.95
0.35 EFF=0.95
0.30
Figure 4.30 Variation of thermal efficiency with ambient temperature for various cycles
51
International Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Technology (IJMET), ISSN 0976 –
6340(Print), ISSN 0976 – 6359(Online) Volume 4, Issue 6, November - December (2013) © IAEME
CONCLUSION
The present work determined the performance of a regenerative and intercooled gas turbine
power plant. A design methodology has been developed for parametric study and performance
evaluation of a regenerative and intercooled gas turbine. Parametric study showed that compression
ratio (rp), ambient temperature and turbine inlet temperature (TIT) played a very vital role on overall
performance of a regenerative and intercooled gas turbine. The simulation result from the analysis of
the influence of parameter can be summarized as follows:
1. The heat duty in the regenerator decreases with the pressure ratio but increases with the
decreases ambient temperature and increases TIT this mean increased thermal efficiency.
2. The thermal efficiency of the simple gas-turbine cycle experiences small improvements at
large pressure ratios as compared to regenerative gas turbine cycle.
3. In general, peak efficiency, power and specific fuel consumption occur at compression ratio
(rp = 5) in the regenerative gas turbine cycle.
4. The thermal efficiency increases and specific fuel consumption decreases with the
regenerator effectiveness.
5. The thermal efficiency increases and specific fuel consumption decreases with increase in the
intercooler effectiveness.
6. The thermal efficiency of the simple gas-turbine cycle experiences small improvements at
large compression ratios as compared to gas turbine cycle with intercooler.
7. The peak efficiency, power and specific fuel consumption occur when compression ratio
increases in the gas turbine cycle with intercooler.
8. Maximum power for the turbine inlet temperature is selecting an optimum value of
compression ratio and turbine inlet temperature, which will result in a higher thermal
efficiency.
NOMENCLATURE
52
International Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Technology (IJMET), ISSN 0976 –
6340(Print), ISSN 0976 – 6359(Online) Volume 4, Issue 6, November - December (2013) © IAEME
REFERENCES
[1] Ainley D. G. (1957), “Internal air cooling for turbine blades, A general design study”, Aero-
nautical Research Council Reports and Memorandum 3013.
[2] Allen R. P., Kovacik J. M. (1984), “Gas turbine cogeneration – principles and practice”, ASME
Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbine and Power 106, 725–731.
[3] Ashley D. S., Sarim Al Zubaidy(2011), “Gas turbine performance at varying ambient
temperature”, Applied Thermal Engineering (31) 2735-2739
[4] Bannister R. L. et al. (1995), “Development Requirement for an Advanced Gas Turbine System”,
ASME Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbine and Power, Vol. 117, pp 724.
[5] Bhargava R., et al. (2002), “Thermo economic analysis of an intercooled, Reheat and
Recuperated Gas Turbine for cogeneration Application Part II Part load Application”, ASME.
[6] Bhargava R. and Peretto A. (2001)., “A unique approach for thermo-economic optimization of
an intercooled, reheated and recuperated gas turbine for cogeneration application”, ASME
Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbine and Power 124, 881–891.
[7] Bhargava R. and Meher-Homji C.B. (2005), “Parametric analysis of existing gas turbines with
inlet evaporative and overspray fogging”, J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power, 127(1): 145-158.
[8] Bianchi M. et al. (2005), “Cogenerative below ambient gas turbine performance with variable
thermal power”, ASME Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbine and Power 127, 592–598.
53
International Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Technology (IJMET), ISSN 0976 –
6340(Print), ISSN 0976 – 6359(Online) Volume 4, Issue 6, November - December (2013) © IAEME
[9] Horlock J. H. (2003), “Advance Gas Turbine Cycles”, ELSEVIER SCIENCE Ltd. British. ISBN:
0-08-044273-0. Eng FR, FSR.
[10] Konstantinos G. Kyprianidis et al. (2013), “Multidisciplinary Analysis of a Geared Fan
Intercooled Core Aero-Engine”, J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power 136(1), 011203.
[11] Maher M Abou Al-Sood et al. (2013), “Optimum parametric performance characterization of an
irreversible gas turbine Brayton cycle”, International Journal of Energy and Environmental
Engineering pp 1-13.
[12] M. J. Moran, and H.N. Shapiro (2008), “Fundamentals of Engineering Thermodynamics,” New
York: John Wiley & Sons, INC.
[13] M. M. Rahman, et al. (2010), “Thermal Analysis of Open-Cycle Regenerator Gas-Turbine
Power-Plant”, World Academy of Science Engineering and Technology, 44.
[14] P. A. Dellenback (2002), “Improved gas turbine efficiency through alternative regenerator
configuration,” Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power, vol. 124, pp. 441-446.
[15] P. Iora and P. Silva (2013), “Innovative combined heat and power system based on a double shaft
intercooled externally fired gas cycle”, Applied Energy vol 105 pp108–115.
[16] Poullikkas(2005), “An overview of current and future sustainable gas turbine technologies”,
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 9, 409–443.
[17] R. Bhargava, et al. (2004), “A Feasibility Study of Existing Gas Turbines for Recuperated,
Intercooled and Reheat Cycle”, pp 531-544.
[18] Rahim Ebrahimi (2009), “Thermodynamic simulation of performance of an endoreversible Dual
cycle with variable specific heat ratio of working fluid”, Journal of American Science 5 (5):
175-180.
[19] Sanjay, Singh O. and Prasad B. N. (2007), “Energy and exergy analysis of steam cooled reheat
gas-steam combined cycle”, Applied Thermal Engineering 27, 2779–2790.
[20] Sonntag, R. E. et al. (2003), “Fundamentals of Thermodynamics” John Wiley & sons
publications.
[21] Thamir K. Ibrahim et al. (2011), “Improvement of gas turbine performance based on inlet air
cooling systems: A technical review”, International Journal of Physical Sciences Vol. 6(4),
pp. 620-627.
[22] Thamir K. Ibrahim, et al. (2010), “Study on the effective parameter of gas turbine model with
intercooled compression process”, Scientific Research and Essays Vol. 5(23), pp. 3760-3770.
[23] Wadhah Hussein A. R. (2011), “Parametric Performance of Gas Turbine Power Plant with Effect
Intercooler”, Modern Applied Science Vol. 5, No. 3; Published by Canadian Center of Science
and Education 173.
[24] Wenhua Wang et al. (2005), “Power optimization of an irreversible closed intercooled
regenerated Brayton cycle coupled to variable-temperature heat reservoirs”, Applied Thermal
Engineering 25 1097–1113.
[25] Yadav R and Jumhare S.K. (2004), “Thermodynamic analysis of intercooled gas-steam combined
and steam injected gas turbine power plants”, Proceedings of ASME TURBO EXPO: Power for
Land, Sea and Air. Vienna, Austria, pp. GT -54097.
[26] Xiaojun S, et al. (2003), “Performance enhancement of conventional combined cycle power plant
by inlet air cooling, inter-cooling and LNG cold energy utilization”, Appl. Ther. Eng., 30.
[27] P.S. Jeyalaxmi and Dr.G.Kalivarathan, “CFD Analysis of Turbulence in a Gas Turbine
Combustor with Reference to the Context of Exit Phenomenon”, International Journal of
Advanced Research in Engineering & Technology (IJARET), Volume 4, Issue 2, 2013, pp. 1 - 7,
ISSN Print: 0976-6480, ISSN Online: 0976-6499.
[28] P.S. Jeyalaxmi and Dr.G.Kalivarathan, “CFD Analysis of Flow Characteristics in a Gas Turbine-
A Viable Approach to Predict the Turbulence”, International Journal of Mechanical Engineering
& Technology (IJMET), Volume 4, Issue 2, 2013, pp. 39 - 46, ISSN Print: 0976 – 6340,
ISSN Online: 0976 – 6359.
54