THE UNIVERSITY OF PEOPLE

11TH OCTOBER,2023

HS 4510-01 BIOSTATISTICS AY2024-T1

Written Assignment Unit 5

1. studies Hypotheses:

Null hypothesis (H0): The soft drink's sugar ranges are within perfect limits.

opportunity hypothesis (H1): The gentle drink's sugar levels exceed ideal limits.

i)kind 1 mistakes: In this example, a kind 1 errors could suggest incorrectly rejecting the null speculation,
suggesting that the soft drink has excessive sugar ranges while it does now not. this may result in
unnecessary regulatory movements or product recollects.

ii)kind 2 blunders: A kind 2 mistakes would mean failing to reject the null speculation when it's false,
indicating that the gentle drink does have higher sugar ranges than appropriate. this could allow a
harmful product to remain in the marketplace, probably endangering consumer health.

converting importance level:

2.Type 1 error: reducing the significance degree from 0.05 to 0.01 reduces the chance of creating a type
1 mistakes. this means the research may be extra stringent in concluding that an effect exists.

Type 2 errors: reducing the importance stage increases the danger of creating a kind 2 mistakes as it
calls for stronger proof to reject the null hypothesis.
power: lowering the significance level will decrease the electricity of the have a look at as it becomes
harder to hit upon true results.

reducing confidence c program languageperiod:

3.reducing the confidence c programming language from 95% to ninety% will lower the chance of
creating a kind 1 errors due to the fact the confidence interval is narrower.

it will no longer notably affect the opportunity of making a type 2 error, as the sort 2 mistakes is
normally motivated by means of the sample length and impact length.

The power of the take a look at may additionally lower barely because of the narrower self belief c
programming language, making it more difficult to detect institutions.

research venture:

4.research question: Does an intervention result in a extensive reduction in blood pressure through the
years in hypertensive patients?

Null speculation (H0): The intervention has no enormous impact on blood pressure over the years
(μbaseline = μ2 months = μ4 months).

alternative speculation (H1): The intervention ends in a huge reduction in blood stress through the years
(μbaseline > μ2 months > μfour months).

impact length: The take a look at will inspect the importance of exchange in systolic and diastolic blood
pressure from baseline to two months and four months following the intervention.

kind 1 errors: on this look at, a type 1 mistakes might suggest incorrectly concluding that the
intervention has a tremendous impact on blood strain whilst it does not, probably main to pointless
interventions and healthcare fees.

kind 2 errors: A kind 2 blunders could suggest failing to locate a full-size effect of the intervention whilst
it surely exists, potentially missing an opportunity to improve sufferers' fitness.