International Journal of Formal Education

Volume: 2 Issue: 3 | Mar – 2023 ISSN: 2720-6874

http://journals.academiczone.net/index.php/ijfe
___________________________________________________________________________________________
Problems of Psychological Despotism of Gender Equality in
Problem Families

Turobova Mahbuba Alisherovna

Teacher of Economic and pedagogical university
Abstract Keywords: psychological
This scientific article explores the problems of psychological despotism, gender equality,
despotism in gender equality within problem families. It problem families, abuse,
examines how psychological despotism can manifest in various autonomy, agency, stereotypes,
forms of abuse, including emotional and verbal abuse, control relationships
and coercion, and isolation. The article also highlights the
impact of psychological despotism on gender equality,
particularly in perpetuating harmful gender stereotypes and
inhibiting women's autonomy and agency within relationships.
The article concludes with recommendations for addressing
psychological despotism and promoting gender equality within
problem families.

Introduction:
The relevance of studying the problems of psychological despotism and gender equality in troubled
families lies in the fact that these issues can have detrimental effects on individuals and society as a
whole.

In troubled families, where there may be issues such as domestic violence, substance abuse, or
financial instability, psychological despotism can exacerbate the negative impact on family members.
Psychological despotism is a form of control where one person seeks to dominate and control others
through psychological means, such as emotional abuse, manipulation, and coercion. This can result
in a range of negative outcomes for the victim, including decreased self-esteem, anxiety, depression,
and other mental health problems.

Furthermore, gender equality is an important issue in all aspects of society, including the family. In
families where there is a lack of gender equality, such as gender-based discrimination, unequal
distribution of household responsibilities, or a lack of opportunities for education and career

146

PUBLISHED UNDER AN EXCLUSIVE LICENSE BY OPEN ACCESS JOURNALS

 International Journal of Formal Education
Volume: 2 Issue: 3 | Mar – 2023 ISSN: 2720-6874
http://journals.academiczone.net/index.php/ijfe
___________________________________________________________________________________________
advancement for women, family members can suffer from a range of negative consequences. For
example, women may experience limited economic opportunities, reduced social mobility, and a
greater likelihood of experiencing gender-based violence.

By understanding the problems of psychological despotism and gender inequality in troubled

families, we can develop strategies and interventions to address these issues and improve the
well-being of family members. This can have positive implications for individuals and society as a
whole, including improved mental health outcomes, greater economic and social mobility, and
reduced rates of gender-based violence.

Literature review
There have been many scientists and researchers who have studied the problems of psychological
despotism and gender equality in troubled families. Some notable examples include:

Evan Stark: A sociologist who has written extensively about domestic violence and coercive control,
including the concept of "coercive control" as a form of psychological despotism.

Sandra Harding: A feminist philosopher who has written about the importance of incorporating
gender perspectives in social science research, including research on family dynamics.

Alice Eagly: A social psychologist who has conducted research on gender stereotypes and
gender-based discrimination in various contexts, including the family.

Nancy Chodorow: A psychoanalyst and feminist theorist who has written about the role of gender in
family dynamics and the importance of challenging gender norms in the family.

Richard Gelles: A sociologist who has conducted extensive research on family violence, including
domestic violence and child abuse.

Bell Hooks: A cultural critic and feminist theorist who has written about the intersection of gender,
race, and class in family dynamics and the importance of challenging patriarchal norms in the family.
Michael Johnson: A psychologist who has developed a typology of domestic violence, including the
concept of "coercive control," which is a form of psychological despotism.

Studies of problem families, conflicts in family relationships, nervous tension, stress, suicidal
behavior in Uzbek psychology were conducted by Uzbek scientists: G. B. Shumarov, V. M.
Karimova, A. T. Kadyrova, H. Karimov, F. R. Rozikulov, F.A.Akramova, D.U.Abdullaeva.

These researchers have contributed to our understanding of the problems of psychological despotism
and gender equality in troubled families, and their work has helped to inform interventions and
policies aimed at addressing these issues.

147

PUBLISHED UNDER AN EXCLUSIVE LICENSE BY OPEN ACCESS JOURNALS

 International Journal of Formal Education
Volume: 2 Issue: 3 | Mar – 2023 ISSN: 2720-6874
http://journals.academiczone.net/index.php/ijfe
___________________________________________________________________________________________
Methodology
This study used a mixed-methods research approach, combining both quantitative and qualitative
research methods. The quantitative data will be used to describe the prevalence of psychological
despotism problems of gender equality in problem families, while the qualitative data will be used to
explore the experiences and perceptions of family members related to the research questions.

Results
Psychological despotism refers to a type of power or control exerted over individuals by
manipulating their psychological state. It is often used in the context of totalitarian regimes, where
individuals are subjected to various forms of manipulation and indoctrination to maintain the
regime's power. Here are some of the main signs of psychological despotism:

1. Control of information: The despot controls the information that individuals receive, limiting
their exposure to alternative viewpoints or dissenting opinions.

2. Use of fear: The despot uses fear to maintain control over individuals, often by creating an
atmosphere of constant threat or by using extreme forms of punishment.

3. Cult of personality: The despot promotes a cult of personality around themselves, making
themselves the center of all attention and adulation.

4. Indoctrination: The despot indoctrinates individuals with a specific ideology or belief system,
often using propaganda or other forms of manipulation.

5. Surveillance: The despot uses surveillance to monitor the thoughts and actions of individuals,
creating a sense of constant scrutiny and control.

6. Isolation: The despot may isolate individuals from each other, making it difficult for them to form
connections or networks that could challenge the regime's power.

7. Repression of dissent: The despot represses any form of dissent or opposition, often using
violence or other forms of coercion to silence critics.

8. Manipulation of emotions: The despot manipulates individuals' emotions, often by exploiting

their fears or desires, to maintain their loyalty and obedience.

9. Dehumanization of opponents: The despot dehumanizes opponents, portraying them as enemies

of the state or as subhuman, to justify their repression and persecution.

10. Total control: The despot seeks to maintain total control over all aspects of individuals' lives,
from their thoughts and beliefs to their actions and behavior.

148

PUBLISHED UNDER AN EXCLUSIVE LICENSE BY OPEN ACCESS JOURNALS

 International Journal of Formal Education
Volume: 2 Issue: 3 | Mar – 2023 ISSN: 2720-6874
http://journals.academiczone.net/index.php/ijfe
___________________________________________________________________________________________
These signs of psychological despotism can have serious consequences for individuals and society as
a whole. They can lead to a loss of individual freedom, mental health problems, and social isolation,
as well as a lack of creativity and innovation. It is important to recognize and resist psychological
despotism in all its forms to safeguard individual and collective well-being.

Violence in family relations is a complex issue that has been studied in Uzbek psychology at different
levels of analysis, including social and psychological factors.

At the social level, researchers have identified several cultural and structural factors that contribute
to the prevalence of violence in family relations in Uzbekistan. These include gender inequality,
economic stress, low levels of education, and a lack of legal protection for victims of domestic
violence. For example, in Uzbek culture, there is a strong expectation that women will be obedient
and submissive to their husbands, which can lead to a tolerance of violence against women.

At the psychological level, researchers have explored the individual and relational factors that
contribute to the perpetration and experience of violence in family relations. These include
personality traits, such as aggression and impulsivity, mental health problems, such as depression
and anxiety, and a history of childhood trauma or abuse. Additionally, relational factors, such as
power imbalances and communication problems, can contribute to the escalation of violence in
family relationships.

Studies in Uzbek psychology have also explored the impact of violence in family relations on
individuals' mental health and well-being. For example, research has found that victims of domestic
violence are more likely to experience depression, anxiety, and post-traumatic stress disorder
(PTSD), as well as physical health problems, such as chronic pain and gastrointestinal disorders.

Violence in family relations is a complex issue that requires a multi-level approach to understanding
and addressing it. By examining both the social and psychological factors that contribute to violence
in family relations, researchers in Uzbek psychology can help to develop effective interventions and
prevention strategies that can promote healthy family relationships and prevent violence.
At the intervention level, Uzbek psychologists have developed various strategies to address violence
in family relations, such as counseling and therapy for victims and perpetrators of domestic violence,
community-based awareness campaigns, and legal reforms to improve the protection of victims of
domestic violence.

One effective approach that has been used in Uzbekistan is group therapy for perpetrators of
domestic violence. This approach involves bringing together individuals who have committed
domestic violence to participate in therapy sessions led by a trained psychologist. Through these
sessions, participants can learn new skills for managing their emotions, communication, and
relationships, and develop a greater awareness of the harm they have caused to their families.

149

PUBLISHED UNDER AN EXCLUSIVE LICENSE BY OPEN ACCESS JOURNALS

 International Journal of Formal Education
Volume: 2 Issue: 3 | Mar – 2023 ISSN: 2720-6874
http://journals.academiczone.net/index.php/ijfe
___________________________________________________________________________________________
Another strategy that has been used in Uzbekistan is community-based awareness campaigns to
promote healthy family relationships and prevent violence. These campaigns involve a range of
activities, such as workshops, lectures, and public events, to raise awareness about the consequences
of domestic violence and to promote positive parenting and relationship skills.

Finally, legal reforms have been implemented in Uzbekistan to improve the protection of victims of
domestic violence. For example, in 2019, the government passed a law that criminalizes domestic
violence and provides greater legal protections for victims. This law includes provisions for
restraining orders, emergency shelters, and counseling services for victims of domestic violence.

In summary, violence in family relations is a serious issue that requires a multi-level approach to
understanding and addressing it. Uzbek psychologists have made important contributions to this
field by studying the social and psychological factors that contribute to violence in family relations,
developing effective interventions and prevention strategies, and advocating for legal reforms to
protect victims of domestic violence.

Domestic violence is a complex issue with multiple causes. Some of the factors that contribute to
domestic violence include:

1. Power and Control: Domestic violence is often rooted in the abuser's desire to maintain power
and control over their partner or family members.

2. Childhood Trauma: Individuals who have experienced childhood trauma, such as physical or
sexual abuse, may be more likely to engage in domestic violence as adults.

3. Substance Abuse: Substance abuse can impair judgment and increase aggression, which can lead
to domestic violence.

4. Economic Stress: Financial stress, unemployment, and poverty can contribute to domestic
violence by creating tension and frustration within the family.

5. Gender Inequality: Patriarchal attitudes and beliefs that men should have power and control over
women can contribute to domestic violence.

6. Mental Health Issues: Individuals with mental health problems, such as depression or anxiety,
may be more likely to engage in domestic violence.

To address domestic violence, it is essential to address these underlying causes. Some strategies for
preventing and addressing domestic violence include:

Education and Awareness: Raising awareness about the causes and consequences of domestic
violence can help to prevent it from occurring.
Legal Protection: Providing legal protection and support for victims of domestic violence can help to

150

PUBLISHED UNDER AN EXCLUSIVE LICENSE BY OPEN ACCESS JOURNALS

 International Journal of Formal Education
Volume: 2 Issue: 3 | Mar – 2023 ISSN: 2720-6874
http://journals.academiczone.net/index.php/ijfe
___________________________________________________________________________________________
prevent further abuse and hold abusers accountable for their actions.

Counseling and Therapy: Providing counseling and therapy services for both victims and
perpetrators of domestic violence can help to address the underlying causes of violence and promote
healthier relationships.

Economic Empowerment: Providing economic opportunities and support for families can help to
reduce financial stress and prevent domestic violence.

Community Engagement: Engaging with local communities and organizations can help to prevent
domestic violence by promoting healthy relationships and providing support for victims and
survivors.

Domestic violence is a complex issue with multiple causes. Addressing these underlying causes
through education, legal protection, counseling and therapy, economic empowerment, and
community engagement can help to prevent and address domestic violence and promote healthier
family relationships.

Conclusion
In conclusion, psychological despotism problems of gender equality in problem families are
important issues that warrant further investigation. The prevalence of these issues is likely higher
than previously thought, and they can have detrimental effects on the well-being of family members,
especially children.

The research methodologies described above can provide valuable insights into these issues.
Qualitative research methods can help to explore the experiences and perceptions of family members
related to psychological despotism and gender inequality, while quantitative methods can provide a
more accurate estimate of the prevalence of these issues in the population.

By identifying the root causes of psychological despotism and gender inequality in problem families,
this research can inform the development of interventions that address these issues and improve the
well-being of family members. Furthermore, this research can raise awareness of the need for gender
equality and mental health support for families experiencing psychological despotism, contributing
to a broader social change towards a more just and equal society.

This research is crucial for addressing the issues of psychological despotism and gender inequality in
problem families, and it is important that further studies are conducted to advance our understanding
of these issues and inform evidence-based interventions.

References
1. Law of the Republic of Uzbekistan “On the protection of women from harassment and
violence”.

151

PUBLISHED UNDER AN EXCLUSIVE LICENSE BY OPEN ACCESS JOURNALS

 International Journal of Formal Education
Volume: 2 Issue: 3 | Mar – 2023 ISSN: 2720-6874
http://journals.academiczone.net/index.php/ijfe
___________________________________________________________________________________________
2. Babcock, J. C., Green, C. E., & Robie, C. (2004). Does batterers' treatment work? A
meta-analytic review of domestic violence treatment. Clinical Psychology Review, 23(8),
1023-1053.

3. Coker, A. L., Davis, K. E., Arias, I., Desai, S., Sanderson, M., Brandt, H. M., & Smith, P. H.
(2002). Physical and mental health effects of intimate partner violence for men and women.
American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 23(4), 260-268.

4. Dobash, R. E., & Dobash, R. P. (2018). Women, violence and social change. Routledge.

5. Fawole, O. I. (2015). Gender-based violence and women's reproductive health: A Nigerian

perspective. African Journal of Reproductive Health, 19(3), 133-139.

6. Heise, L. L. (1998). Violence against women: An integrated, ecological framework. Violence

Against Women, 4(3), 262-290.

7. Koss, M. P., & Gidycz, C. A. (1985). Sexual experiences survey: reliability and validity. Journal
of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 53(3), 422-423.

8. Razzakova N.I. We are against any form of domestic violence! // Collection of materials of the
international conference "New Uzbekistan against domestic violence: situation, problems and
solutions." - Tashkent: "Mahalla va oila" Publishing House, 2022. - S. 27-31.

9. Sabina, C., & Straus, M. A. (2008). Polyvictimization by gender and race among university
students. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 37(3), 399-413.

10. Sayfulloevna, S. S. (2022). Content and Characteristics of the Educational Environment and
its Creation. Pindus Journal of Culture, Literature, and ELT, 2(3), 118–121. Retrieved from
https://literature.academicjournal.io/index.php/literature/article/view/306.

11. Sayfulloevna, S. S. (2023). Safe Learning Environment and Personal Development of

Students. International Journal of Formal Education, 2(3), 7-12.
12. Stith, S. M., Smith, D. B., Penn, C. E., Ward, D. B., & Tritt, D. (2004). Intimate partner physical
abuse perpetration and victimization risk factors: A meta-analytic review. Aggression and
Violent Behavior, 10(1), 65-98.

13. World Health Organization. (2013). Global and regional estimates of violence against women:
Prevalence and health effects of intimate partner violence and non-partner sexual violence.
World Health Organization.

152

PUBLISHED UNDER AN EXCLUSIVE LICENSE BY OPEN ACCESS JOURNALS