2ND Defense Final Preparation

ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN 9 (AR501)
TECHNOLOGICAL INSTITUTE OF THE PHILIPPINES

ARCHITECTURE DEPARTMENT
P. Casal Campus, Manila City
ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN 9
(AR501)
RECAP
Section 10 GUIDELINES AND REQUIREMENTS FOR ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN 9 (AR501)
SITE AND ARCHITECTURAL PROGRAMMING
A. Chapter 1 t0 4
B. Endorsement for second defense
C. Timetable and schedules
D. Requirements to proceed on defense 02
GRADING SYSTEM
EQUIVALENT GRADES
RESULT OF GRADE FROM ADVISER AND DEFENSE 01

TOPICS
SITE AND ARCHITECTURAL
PROGRAMMING
Chapter 1 PROJECT BACKGROUND

A. Chapter 1 t0 4
B. Endorsement for Chapter 2 SITE JUSTIFICATION
second defense a. SITE SELECTION CRITERIA
C. Timetable and
b. MACRO-MESO SITE ANALYSIS: REGION/ PROVINCE/ TOWN/ CITY
schedules
c. MICRO SITE ANALYSIS: THE SITE AND ITS IMMEDIATE ENVIRONS
D. Requirements to
proceed on defense 02 Chapter 3 DESIGN INPUTS
Chapter 4 ARCHITECTURAL PROGRAMMING
a. ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN DEVELOPMENT
GRADING SYSTEM 1. SITE PLANNING AND SPACE PROGRAMMING
2. BUILDING PROGRAM
EQUIVALENT GRADES 3. DESIGN CONSTRAINTS
RESULT OF GRADE FROM 4. INITIAL SITE AND SCHEMATIC DIAGRAM
ADVISER AND DEFENSE 01
TOPICS
PROGRAMMING
• 10.8.2 Endorsement for Site and Architectural Programming Defense

A. Chapter 1 t0 4
B. Endorsement for
second defense CAPSTONE PROPONENT MAYBE ENDORSED PROVIDED THAT:
C. Timetable and
schedules
D. Requirements to • able to arrive at a passing or at least a near-passing overall mark based on the
proceed on defense 02 rubrics used during the consultation period
• able to present the necessary documents and/or perform the actions needed to
substantiate claims or address concerns raised during the consultation period
GRADING SYSTEM
EQUIVALENT GRADES
RESULT OF GRADE FROM
TOPICS
PROGRAMMING
Endorsement for Site and Architectural Programming Defense

A. Chapter 1 t0 4
B. Endorsement for 1. Overall Cohesiveness of Chapter
second defense 2A1. Comprehensiveness of General Site Criteria
C. Timetable and
schedules 2A2. Comprehensiveness of Specific Site Criteria
D. Requirements to 2A3. SWOT Analysis
proceed on defense 02
2B. Macro-Meso Analysis: Comprehensiveness of Discussion & Supporting Documents
2C. Micro Analysis: Comprehensiveness of Discussion & Quality of Supporting Documents
3A1. RRCS Foreign: Quality of Analysis
GRADING SYSTEM
3A2. RRCS Local Foreign: Quality of Analysis
EQUIVALENT GRADES 3A3. Pertinent Laws and Guidelines
TOPICS
PROGRAMMING

A. Chapter 1 t0 4
B. Endorsement for 4A1. User Flow Analysis
second defense 4A2. Space Adjacency Matrix
C. Timetable and
schedules 4A3a. Design Constraints
D. Requirements to 4A4a. Accuracy of Computation for Demand Analysis
4A4b. Accuracy of Computation for Building Space Program
4A4d. Accuracy of Computation for Bldg. Spatial Requirements based from Pertinent Laws
2D. Initial Schematic Site Development Plan
GRADING SYSTEM
Overall Quality of Oral Presentation and Defense
EQUIVALENT GRADES
TOPICS
PROGRAMMING

A. Chapter 1 t0 4
B. Endorsement for CAPSTONE PROPONENT WHO WERE UNABLE TO RECEIVE ENDORSEMENT ON OR
second defense BEFORE THE DEADLINE WILL STILL BE ELIGIBLE TO PROCEED TO THE
C. Timetable and DELIBERATION BUT SHALL BE SUBJECTED TO THE FF CONDITIONS:
schedules
D. Requirements to
proceed on defense 02 • The schedule of defense of Capstone Proponents who were not endorsed for defense
will be after the schedule of all endorsed proponents
• Final computed grades to be received may either be Passed or Failed, depending on the
GRADING SYSTEM results of the defense proceedings and the computation of grades. Further elaborations on this
provision will be covered in the latter section of this manual under the topic of Grading System
EQUIVALENT GRADES
TOPICS
PROGRAMMING

A. Chapter 1 t0 4
B. Endorsement for
BEFORE
second defense
C. Timetable and
schedules
D. Requirements to
GRADING SYSTEM
EQUIVALENT GRADES
TOPICS
PROGRAMMING
New schedule
A. Chapter 1 t0 4
B. Endorsement for
second defense
C. Timetable and
schedules
D. Requirements to
NOVEMBER 15,
proceed on defense 02 Until 6:00pm ONLY!!
DEADLINE for DEFENSE 02 MATERIALS!!
FAILED TO SUBMIT ON TIME WILL
GRADING SYSTEM NOT BE ACCEPTED, HENCE WILL
NOT PROCEED TO 2ND DEFENSE!!!
EQUIVALENT GRADES
Posting of Endorsed Students
Will be on November 12
TOPICS
PROGRAMMING
New schedule
A. Chapter 1 t0 4
B. Endorsement for
second defense
C. Timetable and
schedules
D. Requirements to AREX Architectural Exhibit!
WEEK 18
GRADING SYSTEM
DECEMBER 11 and 12
EQUIVALENT GRADES MONDAY and
RESULT OF GRADE FROM TUESDAY Signing of
ADVISER AND DEFENSE 01 Book
TOPICS
PROGRAMMING
A. Chapter 1 t0 4 10.8.4 Timetable for Defense Proceedings

B. Endorsement for
second defense
C. Timetable and
schedules The defense proceedings shall be within a 30-minute period
D. Requirements to for every proponent.
Mobilization 5 minutes
Presentation Proper 5 minutes
GRADING SYSTEM Discussion/ Defense Proper 10 minutes
Panel Deliberation 5 minutes
EQUIVALENT GRADES
Announcement of Results 5 minutes
TOPICS
PROGRAMMING
10.8.5 Defense Requirements: VERY IMPORTANT!!!

A. Chapter 1 t0 4
B. Endorsement for Absence of any of the following items is considered as failure to comply with the Defense
second defense Requirements and shall merit a grade of zero (0) and hence will not proceed to 2nd defense
C. Timetable and
schedules • DESIGN PROJECT STUDY One (1) set of draft printed is required. Discussions in the
D. Requirements to Design Project Study should be more substantial than the key points covered in the slide
proceed on defense 02 presentation
• SLIDE PRESENTATION: The slide presentation shall be composed of bulleted key words
or phrases together with ample illustrations / images. A script/spiel may be prepared in
advance to be used hand-in-hand with the slide presentation
GRADING SYSTEM • ARCHITECTURAL DEVT BOARDS: A3 sized portfolio format

1. maps and images to support the site analysis,
EQUIVALENT GRADES 2. plans and images showing a more comprehensive discussion of the related case studies,
3. more visual presentation of the initial design translation in the design project study.
TOPICS
PROGRAMMING
10.8.5 Defense Requirements: VERY IMPORTANT!!!

A. Chapter 1 t0 4
B. Endorsement for Absence of any of the following items is considered as failure to comply with the Defense
second defense Requirements and shall merit a grade of zero (0) and hence will not proceed to 2nd defense
C. Timetable and
• ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS:
schedules
D. Requirements to
• The Design student should have all pertinent data relating to his/her capstone, well-
proceed on defense 02 labeled, organized, and at hand both in electronic file and in hardcopy, to help him/her
answer whatever clarifications and inquiries that the Defense Panel may raise during the
Defense Proper.
GRADING SYSTEM • The students shall follow a prescribed design format. Failure to follow the prescribed
format would mean unacceptability of the capstone and failure to comply with the
EQUIVALENT GRADES Capstone Requirements
TOPICS
PROGRAMMING
10.10.1 COMPUTATION OF GRADES

A. Chapter 1 t0 4
B. Endorsement for
• Prelim Class Standing (Coordinator Grade): 50% based on Attendance to orientations
second defense
and/or lecture sessions + 50% based on Punctuality in submissions
C. Timetable and • Prelim Exam (Coordinator Grade): Grade based on participation on AREX and submission
schedules of post-defense requirements
D. Requirements to
• Midterm Class Standing (Adviser Grade): Defense #1

• Midterm Exam (Adviser Grade): Defense #2
GRADING SYSTEM
EQUIVALENT GRADES • Final Class Standing (Defense Panel Grade): Project Proposal Defense
• Final Exam (Defense Panel Grade): Site and Architectural Programming Defense
GRADING SYSTEM
10.10.2 EQUIVALENT OF GRADES

10.10.2.1 PASSED (1.0-3.0)
Students may receive a Passing Grade if the computed final grade is 50 or higher.
10.10.2.2 INCOMPLETE
• The student passed the Site and Architectural Programming Defense and THE computed final
grade is close to Passing but he/she was not able to accomplish the post-defense requirements
• Was endorsed by the Adviser but received a failing grade from the Defense Panel, said defense
score will not be included in the computation and a grade of INC will instead be given
• Was NOT endorsed by the Adviser and the student decided to follow the Adviser’s
recommendation and deferred his/her presentation to the following semester.
• Was endorsed for defense by the Adviser and received a passing grade from the Defense Panel
but the computed final grade is less than 50
GRADING SYSTEM
10.10.2 EQUIVALENT OF GRADES

10.10.2.3 FAILED (5.0)
The student was NOT endorsed for Site and Architectural Programming Defense by his/her
Adviser but the student decided to proceed to said defense and, unfortunately, failed to
get a passing verdict for said defense.
10.10.2.4 ADDITIONAL PROVISIONS
No student with a grade of Incomplete (INC) in Design 9 shall be allowed to enroll in

Design 10 (AR502) prior to the completion of his/her pending requirements. This provision
shall be strictly implemented to ensure continuity and correctness of the Capstone Project
since the undertaking is composed of a sequence of steps and procedure starting from
the Design 9 up to its culmination in Design 10.
RESULT OF GRADE
Grade Rating
A 50% - above Satisfactory
B 45%-49% Nearly satisfactory
C 40%-44% Conditional
D 35%-39% Double double time to work on your Project
E 30%-34% Recommend NOT to proceed on final defense but if

you are very much confident, then take the risk
F 30% BELOW Recommend NOT to proceed on final defense

RESULT OF GRADE
From adviser and from Defense 01

Thank you!!!
BEST of LUCK

2ND Defense Final Preparation

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

2ND Defense Final Preparation

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN 9 (AR501)

TECHNOLOGICAL INSTITUTE OF THE PHILIPPINES

Section 10 GUIDELINES AND REQUIREMENTS FOR ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN 9 (AR501)

SITE AND ARCHITECTURAL PROGRAMMING

RESULT OF GRADE FROM ADVISER AND DEFENSE 01

Chapter 1 PROJECT BACKGROUND

• 10.8.2 Endorsement for Site and Architectural Programming Defense

Endorsement for Site and Architectural Programming Defense

Endorsement for Site and Architectural Programming Defense

Endorsement for Site and Architectural Programming Defense

Endorsement for Site and Architectural Programming Defense

A. Chapter 1 t0 4 10.8.4 Timetable for Defense Proceedings

10.8.5 Defense Requirements: VERY IMPORTANT!!!

GRADING SYSTEM • ARCHITECTURAL DEVT BOARDS: A3 sized portfolio format

10.8.5 Defense Requirements: VERY IMPORTANT!!!

10.10.1 COMPUTATION OF GRADES

• Midterm Class Standing (Adviser Grade): Defense #1

10.10.2 EQUIVALENT OF GRADES

10.10.2 EQUIVALENT OF GRADES

10.10.2.4 ADDITIONAL PROVISIONS

No student with a grade of Incomplete (INC) in Design 9 shall be allowed to enroll in

A 50% - above Satisfactory

B 45%-49% Nearly satisfactory

D 35%-39% Double double time to work on your Project

E 30%-34% Recommend NOT to proceed on final defense but if

F 30% BELOW Recommend NOT to proceed on final defense

From adviser and from Defense 01

You might also like