You are on page 1of 9

Nurse Education in Practice 57 (2021) 103227

Contents lists available at ScienceDirect

Nurse Education in Practice


journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/issn/14715953

Perceived professional competence in spiritual care and predictive role of


spiritual intelligence in Iranian nursing students
Mehrnaz Ahmadi a, 1, Fateme Estebsari b, *, 2, Saeed Poormansouri c, 3, Simin Jahani a, 4,
Ladan Sedighie d, 5
a
Medical and Surgical Nursing Department, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Nursing Care Research Center in Chronic Disease, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of
Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran
b
Community Health Nursing Department, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
c
Treatment Deputy, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran
d
Medical and Surgical Nursing Department, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

A R T I C L E I N F O A B S T R A C T

Keywords: Aim/objective: The aim of this study was to identify the relationship between perceived competence in spiritual
Spiritual care care and spiritual intelligence among nursing students.
Spiritual care competency Background: One of the most important duties of nurses is to pay attention to the spiritual needs of patients and
Spiritual intelligence
provide them with proper spiritual care. Therefore, professional competence in this area is essential for nurses
Iran
Nursing students
and nursing students. Also, spiritual intelligence is a factor influencing the caring behaviors of nurses.
Design: A cross-sectional and correlational study
Settings/Participants: This study was included 510 undergraduate nursing students in two public faculties of
nursing in Iran in the 2018-2019 academic year.
Methods: The samples were selected using a census method. A demographic information questionnaire, the valid
and reliable Iranian questionnaire of nurses’ competencies in spiritual care and the spiritual intelligence self-
report inventory (SISRI) were used to collect data.
Results: A significant positive correlation was found between nursing students’ competence in spiritual care and
spiritual intelligence (p < 0.001, r = 0.26). No significant differences were found between the mean competence
scores of spiritual care in terms of demographic characteristics. There were significant differences between the
mean spiritual intelligence score in terms of age, marital status, history of clinical practice and academic year.
The regression model indicated that for increased rates of spiritual intelligence, professional competence in
spiritual care would rise as much as 0.39.
Conclusion: Spiritual intelligence can affect the competence of nursing students in providing spiritual care to
patients. Therefore, to promote students’ spiritual intelligence, appropriate plans with the aim of promoting the
level of critical thinking and spiritual self-awareness are recommended.

1. Introduction relationship between spirituality and physical health and psychological


well-being (Bożek et al., 2020; Elk et al., 2019; Jahromi and Akbar,
In recent years, attention to spiritual care as an important part of the 2020). Spiritual care can play a role in improving a patient’s coping
holistic approach to patient care has been expanding (Elk et al., 2019). skills in times of crisis and creating a positive outlook about life.
International research has shown that there is a strong positive Moreover, it has a positive effect on the physical and mental health of

* Corresponding author.
E-mail address: fa_estebsari@yahoo.com (F. Estebsari).
1
(0000-0002-6621-5704)
2
(0000-0001-7011-8731)
3
(0000-0002-4946-8195)
4
(0000-0002-4407-6993)
5
(0000-0002-7275-4464)

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2021.103227
Received 12 June 2021; Received in revised form 31 August 2021; Accepted 4 October 2021
Available online 5 October 2021
1471-5953/© 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Downloaded for Anonymous User (n/a) at National Library of the Republic of Indonesia from ClinicalKey.com/nursing by Elsevier on
March 03, 2022. For personal use only. No other uses without permission. Copyright ©2022. Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
M. Ahmadi et al. Nurse Education in Practice 57 (2021) 103227

patients, facilitates the recovery process and increases the satisfaction of evidence, the spiritual dimension of patients is less considered in
patients and lead to improving the level of spiritual health, spiritual healthcare systems and nurses do not have favorable competencies in
performance and quality of spiritual life of patients (Baldacchino, 2015; providing spiritual care (Adib-Hajbaghery et al., 2017; Baldacchino,
Hu et al., 2019; Veloza-Gómez et al., 2017). The International Council of 2015). One of the reasons for this could be the lack of adequate spiritual
Nurses Code of Ethics for Nurses recognizes spiritual care as one of the care training for nurses (Baldacchino, 2015). Studies have also shown
main duties of all nurses (International Council of Nurses, 2012). that nurses receive adequate training in spiritual care neither during nor
Therefore, nurses require adequate preparation to address the spiritual after their studies (Chandramohan and Bhagwan, 2015; Lewinson et al.,
needs of patients. In this regard, one of the important goals of teaching in 2015). Although many studies have been carried out on spiritual care
nursing students is to prepare them to provide spiritual care to their and integration of spirituality in medical education in Iran, there is no
patients and to acquire competence in the provision of this kind of care evidence showing that the results of these studies have been addressed
(Wu et al., 2016). There is little research known about factors influ­ in the health care system (Memaryan et al., 2017; Memaryan et al.,
encing professional competence in spiritual care in nursing students. 2015). Despite the importance of this issue, it is still ignored in medical
Spiritual intelligence as a framework for identifying and organizing the education in Iran and is not yet defined as a separate subject in the
skills and performance compatibilities could be one of the important Iranian Bachelor of the nursing curriculum (Memaryan et al., 2015).
factors affecting the improvement of nurses’ competence in providing Among other reasons for not providing spiritual care to patients,
spiritual care (Pinto and Pinto, 2020; Riahi et al., 2018). Therefore, in mention may be made of the overwork of nurses, lack of time, lack of
the present study, the correlation between spiritual intelligence and attention to personal spirituality and ethical issues and unwillingness to
competence in spiritual care was investigated in nursing students. provide spiritual care (Baldacchino, 2015). However, there are other
factors that can be considered as predictors of attention to spirituality in
2. Background nurses. More precisely, to understand the spiritual needs of others,
nurses need to have a clear understanding of their spirituality and ac­
As one of the four dimensions of human holistic care, spirituality curate knowledge of their beliefs. Developing their spirituality, nurses
includes a set of values, attitudes and hopes that connect people to a will be able to reflect the nature of their real life on their performance
superior being (Ahmadi et al., 2018; Ross et al., 2014). It is a quality that through trust and empathetic relationships (Moradnezhad et al., 2017).
goes beyond religious affiliation and strives to answer questions about Nurses’ spiritual experiences can enhance their positive attitude towards
the meaning and purpose of life (Adib-Hajbaghery et al., 2017). The spiritual care and be effective in helping patients to reduce their spiritual
effect of spirituality on healing human beings has received much distress (Zumstein-Shaha et al., 2020).
attention in the last two decades, as health professionals have found that Spiritual intelligence has been described as a set of abilities for using
spirituality can have a significant effect on various aspects of patient religious and spiritual resources through which issues related to mean­
care (Bennett and Thompson, 2015; Farahaninia et al., 2018). Spiritual ing and values are resolved (Shiasi et al., 2016). King defines spiritual
care is a multidimensional concept defined as care activities that intelligence as a set of psychic adaptation capabilities based on the
improve people’s spiritual well-being by establishing a balance between immaterial aspects of reality, which can be developed through effort,
the physical, psychosocial and spiritual aspects of life (Cavendish et al., search and practice (King and DeCicco, 2009). According to Noble,
2003). Spiritual care activities include respecting, empathizing, spiritual intelligence reflects a set of human experiences varying degrees
listening carefully to patients and helping them understand the disease of which are possessed by all human beings (Nobel, 2000). Spiritual
and its process (Baldacchino, 2015). intelligence is, thus, the foundation of a person’s beliefs that affect his or
The World Health Organization defines health in four aspects: her performance and can deepen one’s relationship with oneself and
physical, mental, social and spiritual health and emphasizes the others or the larger world in daily activities (Nouhi et al., 2014). One can
importance of spirituality in providing holistic care to patients (Chirico, use this intelligence to frame and reinterpret one’s experiences (Mor­
2016). Also, the nursing theorists such as Watson, Ray and Batty each adnezhad et al., 2017). Definitions of spiritual intelligence emphasize its
developed different theories that alluded to and used the concept of role in solving existential problems and finding meaning and purpose in
spirituality in nursing and emphasized spirituality as an essential life, as well as solving problems and issues related to the meaning of life
dimension of nursing care that can affect patients’ health (Mohammadi and values (Miri et al., 2015).
et al., 2015; Withers et al., 2017). Therefore, one of the most important Studies have shown that spiritual intelligence has a beneficial effect
duties of nurses is to pay attention to the spiritual needs of patients and on successful and efficient job management (Amram, 2009). Bagheri
provide them with proper spiritual care. As such, professional compe­ et al. (2010) identified spiritual intelligence as one of the influential
tence in this area is essential for nurses and nursing students (Baldac­ factors in nurses’ happiness, indicating that nurses with higher spiritual
chino, 2015; Veloza-Gómez et al., 2017). intelligence have a better adaptation to daily stresses (Bagheri et al.,
Fukada quotes Nakayama defined nursing competency as “the ability 2010). According to Ghaleei and Mohajeran (2015), spiritual intelli­
to take action by combining knowledge, skills, values, beliefs and gence had a role in improving mental health and reducing job stress in
experience acquired as a nurse” (Fukada, 2018). Professional compe­ nurses. Studies have also identified spiritual intelligence as a factor
tence in spiritual care is recognized as a continuously active process influencing the caring behaviors of nurses. Studies conducted by Miri
defined by three related elements of awareness of human values, et al. (2015) in Iran and Kaur et al. (2015) in Malaysia showed that the
empathy with the client and the ability to perform appropriate indi­ promotion of spiritual intelligence and strengthening the beliefs and
vidual interventions for each client. It also includes seven general personality of nurses could help improve the quality of patient care
competencies: integrating one’s individuality and nursing role as a (Kaur et al. 2015; Miri et al., 2015). Other studies have also shown a
profession; helping the patient to find the meaning of the disease and positive and significant relationship between nurses’ clinical compe­
accepting it; maintaining a positive relationship with patients and their tence and spiritual intelligence (Karimi-Moonaghi et al., 2015). As such,
family; relationship with patients, interdisciplinary teams and clin­ spiritual intelligence can be considered as one of the factors influencing
ical/educational organizations; providing spiritual care during the four the clinical competence of nurses in the area of spiritual care.
stages of the nursing process (review, planning, implementation and Paying attention to spiritual care and teaching it to nursing students
evaluation); observance of ethical issues in care such as confidentiality is one of the concerns of the educational system (Ali et al., 2015; Bennett
and protection of information; and providing holistic care (Baldacchino, and Thompson, 2015). Moreover, our knowledge of the factors related
2015). to spiritual care can facilitate the training and implementation of spir­
Despite the paramount relevance of addressing spirituality as an itual care in nursing students. However, limited studies have been
important part of the holistic approach to patient care, according to the conducted in this regard. Accordingly, this study was conducted to

Downloaded for Anonymous User (n/a) at National Library of the Republic of Indonesia from ClinicalKey.com/nursing by Elsevier on
March 03, 2022. For personal use only. No other uses without permission. Copyright ©2022. Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
M. Ahmadi et al. Nurse Education in Practice 57 (2021) 103227

determine the relationship between spiritual intelligence and spiritual domain was 0.76, for transcendental awareness domain was 0.78 and for
care in nursing students. conscious state expansion domain was 0.73. Moreover, face and content
validity were confirmed by psychologists. Also, for calculating the
3. Materials and methods construct validity, the exploratory factor analysis and first-order
confirmation factor analysis were calculated. The results of their study
3.1. Design and sample showed that this scale is a valid and reliable tool for measuring spiritual
intelligence in the Iranian society and can be used in educational and
This study was a cross-sectional and descriptive-correlational study research environments such as universities (Raghib et al., 2010). Based
conducted in the 2018–2019 academic year in two public faculties of on Cronbach’s alpha method, the reliability of the tool was 0.91 in the
nursing in Tehran and Ahvaz, Iran. The census method was used as the present study. This questionnaire has four subscales, including critical
sampling method, which included all undergraduate nursing students in existential thinking (5 questions), personal meaning production (7
the second year and above. In the census method, in-depth information questions), transcendental awareness (5 questions) and conscious state
related to an issue is covered, which helps in all-inclusive understand­ expansion (7 questions). The questions of the spiritual intelligence
ing. Since, in this type of sampling, every item of the universe is taken questionnaire are scored directly and only question 6 is scored reversely.
into account, the conclusions are more accurate and reliable (Kish, The total score obtained from this scale is in the range of 0–96 and the
1979). higher the score, the higher will be individual’s spiritual intelligence
Inclusion criteria consisted of passing at least two semesters of un­ (Raghib et al., 2010). On this scale, scores from 0 to 32 indicate low and
dergraduate nursing (because of passing the basic concepts of care and undesirable spiritual intelligence, scores of 33–65 indicate moderate
start of hospital internship) and consent to participate in the study. spiritual intelligence and scores of more than 66 indicate high and
desirable spiritual intelligence (Moradnezhad et al., 2017).
3.2. Data collection tools
3.3. Data analysis
Data collection tools in this study included a demographic informa­
tion questionnaire, the Iranian questionnaire of nurses’ competencies in Data analysis was performed using SPSS v.22 software. As the Kol­
spiritual care (Adib-Hajbaghery et al., 2016; Adib-Hajbaghery et al., mogorov–Smirnov test showed that the distribution of the data was
2017) and the spiritual intelligence self-report inventory (SISRI) (King normal, parametric tests were used. Independent sample t-test and one-
and DeCicco, 2009). The demographic information questionnaire way analysis of variance (ANOVA) were used to examine the statistical
included the students’ age, gender, marital status, academic year, his­ difference between mean competency scores and spiritual intelligence in
tory of clinical practice (yes and no) and history of training on spiritual nominal demographic variable subgroups (i.e., age, gender, marital
care (yes and no). status, history of clinical practice and history of training on spiritual
Nurses’ competencies in spiritual care scale (SANCSC) was a self- care). The relationship between outcome variables (competence in
report scale consists of 32 items in five areas: assessment and imple­ spiritual care and spiritual intelligence) were estimated in a correlation
mentation of spiritual care (17 items), which assesses nurses’ skills in matrix by Pearson correlation coefficients. Finally, stepwise-selection
providing spiritual care; human values (6 items) evaluates those values multiple linear regression analyses of the overall competence in spiri­
which are at the core of nurse-patient interaction such as, respect, tual care in nursing students and five domain scores were applied to
acceptance, consideration; knowledge (4 items), which examines the determine their predictors (P-value for entry <0.05).
nurses’ knowledge of spirituality and patients’ spiritual needs; attitudes
(3 items) that include nurses’ attitudes toward spiritual care; self- 3.4. Ethical considerations
recognition (2 items) include nurses’ self-awareness toward spiritual
care. All items are responded and scored on a 5-option Likert scale from This study was approved by the ethics committee of our university
‘always = 5′ to ‘never = 1′ , with the minimum and maximum score of 32 (ethics code: IR.SBMU.RETECH.REC.1395.1111). Ethical considerations
and 160, respectively. A total score of 118 and over were classified as including obtaining permission from the competent authorities,
optimal professional competence in spiritual care, while scores 74–117 explaining the objectives of the research to the participants and assuring
and 73 and lower were considered as moderate and poor competence, them about the confidentiality of the data and obtaining informed
respectively (Adib-Hajbaghery et al., 2016, 2017). The SANCSC was written and oral consent from the samples were observed.
previously developed and validated by Adib-Hajbaghery and Zehtabchi
in 2016 and its reliability estimated using Cronbach’s alpha coefficient, 4. Results
which for the whole method was equal to 0.93. For the assessment and
implementation of the spiritual care it was 0.93, the domain of human Among a total of 630 nursing students, 510 answered the question­
values was 0.83, the knowledge domain was 0.83, while the scope of the naire completely that were included in the analysis. The response rate
attitude was 0.82 and for the self-recognition domain was 0.75. They was 80.95%. The mean age of nursing students was 21.97 ± 2.98 years.
also confirmed the instrument’s content validity (content validity index Most of them (56.7%) were female and 86.7% were single and only
(CVI): 0.87–1 and content validity ratio (CVR): 0.6–1) (Adib-Hajbaghery 34.1% of students had received training about providing spiritual care.
and Zehtabchi, 2016). In the present study, the reliability of the SANCSC The mean of the nursing students’ overall competence in spiritual
using Cronbach’s alpha coefficient was 0.94. care was 116.81 ± 16. In total, 1.2%, 52.4% and 46.5% of students had
The Spiritual Intelligence Self Report Inventory (SISRI) was used to
assess students’ spiritual intelligence. This questionnaire was designed Table 1
and developed by King in 2008. This questionnaire is a self-report scale The mean score of the nursing students’ professional competence in providing
consisting of 24 questions. The questions of this questionnaire are scored spiritual care.
based on a Likert scale from 0 (strongly disagree) to 4 (strongly agree). Areas of competence M±SD
The reliability of this questionnaire was obtained 0.95 in King’s study
Assessment and implementation of spiritual care 60.5 ± 10.01
(King and DeCicco, 2009). The King’s Spiritual Intelligence Scale by Human values 22.76 ± 3.41
Raghib et al. (2010) in Iran among a group of students at the University Awareness 14.28 ± 2.51
of Isfahan is validated and its reliability estimated using Cronbach’s Attitude 11.37 ± 1.08
alpha coefficient was 0.88 for the total scale. For domain of critical Self-awareness 7.88 ± 1.31
Overall competence 116.81 ± 16
existential thinking, it was 0.75, for personal meaning production

Downloaded for Anonymous User (n/a) at National Library of the Republic of Indonesia from ClinicalKey.com/nursing by Elsevier on
March 03, 2022. For personal use only. No other uses without permission. Copyright ©2022. Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
M. Ahmadi et al. Nurse Education in Practice 57 (2021) 103227

poor, moderate and favorable competence in spiritual care, respectively moderate and relatively optimal, and almost half of the students had
(Table 1). The mean score of nursing students’ spiritual intelligence was high competencies in this regard. In line with the results of the present
67.86 ± 10.98. Moreover, 42.2% and 57.8% of nursing students had study, the professional competence of nursing students was estimated as
moderate and high spiritual intelligence, respectively (Table 2). optimal in the previous studies (Ahmadi et al., 2018; Aksoy and Coban,
No significant differences were found between the mean competence 2017; Attard jet al., 2014). However, in contrast to the results of the
scores of spiritual care in terms of age, sex, marital status, history of present study, Adib-Hajbaghery et al. (2017) showed that nurses did not
clinical practice, academic year and receiving training on spiritual care. have optimal professional competence in the area of spiritual care
However, a significant difference was found between some dimensions (Adib-Hajbaghery et al., 2017). The optimal results related to profes­
of competence in spiritual care and sex, history of clinical practice, ac­ sional competence in spiritual care in nursing students are a bit far from
ademic year and receiving training on spiritual care (Table 3). expected as nursing students spend only their internships in hospitals.
In the study, there were no significant differences between the mean This, on the one hand, is because of the introduction of spirituality and
spiritual intelligence score in terms of sex and receiving training on spiritual care to the education of nursing students, which has been
spiritual care. However, there were significant differences between the considered in recent years (Ali et al., 2015; Bennett and Thompson,
mean spiritual intelligence score in terms of age, marital status, history 2015) and, on the other hand, nursing students unlike nurses working
of clinical practice and academic year (Table 4). Also, using Pearson’s have not encountered issues such as work stress, lack of time and other
correlation coefficient, a significant and positive correlation was found routine programs in the nursing profession (Ahmadi et al., 2018). As
between the spiritual intelligence and all subscales of nursing students’ such, they feel that in their internships, they have been able to meet the
competency (Table 5). needs of their patients about spiritual care and consequently, obtain
Independent variables that were significantly associated with out­ high scores in this regard.
comes of the competence in spiritual care were included in the multiple In the present study, there was no significant difference in the total
regression. The results of stepwise-selection multiple linear regression competency score of nursing students in the area of spiritual care in
analysis revealed that overall spiritual intelligence was predictor for terms of age, sex, marital status, academic year, history of clinical
overall competence in spiritual care in nursing students. This model practice and history of training on spiritual care. This result is in line
explained 7% of the variance in competence in spiritual care (F=39.11, with some previous studies (Ahmadi et al., 2018; Aksoy and Coban,
p < 0.001). Also, this model indicated that the rise in spiritual intelli­ 2017; Mohammadi et al., 2015). However, some aspects of spiritual care
gence is associated with an increased level of competence in spiritual competence were significantly different in terms of the history of clinical
care by as much as 0.39. For the assessment and implementation of practice, history of training on spiritual care and academic year. The
spiritual care domain, overall spiritual intelligence (B: 0.14; 95% CI results of the present study showed that students with clinical experi­
0.06–0.22) and academic year (B: 1.52; 95% CI 0.47–2.57) were ence obtained significantly lower scores in the dimension of "attitude"
significantly associated with competence in spiritual care. The model compared with those without clinical experience. The weaker attitude of
explained 4% of the variance in assessment and implementation of this group of students in providing spiritual care to patients may be
spiritual care (F=11.76, p < 0.001). Overall spiritual intelligence (B: attributed to the pressure of work that leads to reduced efficiency and a
0.08; 95% CI 0.06–0.11) was the only variable included in the final lack of effective communication with patients. Another important point
model of the human values domain, explaining 7% of the variance in this regard is the prevailing clinical atmosphere where spiritual care
(F=42.27, p < 0.001). This was also the case for the self-awareness might be neglected. If there is no proper context for spiritual care in the
domain where overall spiritual intelligence (B: 0.04; 95% CI clinical environment, the nursing students will not understand the need
0.03–0.05) explained 14% of the variance in this domain (F=87.49, p < for spiritual care and as a result, a proper attitude will not be formed in
0.001). Personal meaning production (B: 0.13; 95%CI 0.03–0.23), fe­ their minds (Little, 2010).
males (B: − 0.58; 95%CI − 1.007 to − 0.15) compared with males, history In line with the present study, similar studies have been conducted
of training on spiritual care (B: 0.48; 95%CI 0.04–0.92), academic year by Ahmadi et al. (2018) in Iran and Aksoy et al. (2017) in Turkey to
(B: 0.32; 95%CI 0.05–0.58) and conscious state expansion (B: 0.09; 95% determine the professional competencies of nursing students in the area
CI 0.01–0.18) were significantly associated with awareness domain of of spiritual care. According to the results of these studies, the students
competence in spiritual care. The model explained 10% of the variance who participated in the workshops with ethical themes obtained
in this domain (F=11.27, p < 0.001). Conscious state expansion (B: 0.09; significantly higher scores in spiritual care competence (Ahmadi et al.,
95%CI 0.03–0.16) and critical existential thinking (B: 0.07; 95%CI 2018; Aksoy and Coban, 2017). The present study also showed that
0.01–0.13) were positively and history of clinical practice (B: − 0.69; students who participated in the workshops obtained higher scores in
95%CI − 1.09 to − 0.3) was negatively associated with attitude domain spiritual care. However, except in the dimension of "awareness," this
of competence in spiritual care. The model explained 10% of the vari­ difference was not significant in other dimensions and the total score. It
ance in this domain (F=19.02, p < 0.001) (Table 6). should be noted, however, that improving the level of awareness can be
a significant precondition for enhancing students’ professional compe­
5. Discussion tence in providing spiritual care. Determining the effectiveness of spir­
itual care training on improving the self-efficacy of nursing students in
This study aimed to determine the professional competence of providing spiritual care to patients, Frouzandeh et al. (2015) showed
nursing students in the area of spiritual care and its relationship with that these training courses could improve the level of self-efficacy and
spiritual intelligence. The study results showed that the average pro­ competence of students in providing spiritual care to patients (Frou­
fessional competence of students in the area of spiritual care was zandeh et al., 2015). The results of other studies have also shown that
providing training in spiritual care to health care professionals is one
way to integrate spirituality in comprehensive patient care that can play
Table 2 an influential role in improving nurses’ competence for providing spir­
The mean score of the nursing students’ spiritual intelligence. itual care to patients (Paal et al., 2015; Hu et al., 2019). These studies
Areas of spiritual intelligence M ± SD show the need to integrate spirituality and spiritual care in a structured
Critical Existential Thinking 20.08 ± 3.76
and comprehensive way in the curricula of nursing students.
Personal Meaning Production 14.12 ± 2.82 Moreover, the results of the present study indicated that last year’s
Transcendental Awareness 14.16 ± 3.02 students (semesters 7 and 8) were more competent than the second-year
Conscious State Expansion 19.49 ± 3.33 students (semesters 3 and 4) in providing spiritual care. This difference
Overall Spiritual intelligence 67.86 ± 10.98
was significant in the dimensions of assessments and implementation of

Downloaded for Anonymous User (n/a) at National Library of the Republic of Indonesia from ClinicalKey.com/nursing by Elsevier on
March 03, 2022. For personal use only. No other uses without permission. Copyright ©2022. Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
M. Ahmadi et al. Nurse Education in Practice 57 (2021) 103227

Table 3
Comparison competence in spiritual care in nursing students based on demographic variables.
Variables N Assessment and implementation of Human Awareness Attitude Self- Overall
spiritual care values awareness competence
M±SD M±SD M±SD M±SD M±SD M±SD

Age 19–21 254 60.21 ± 8.9 23.03 ± 3 14.09 ± 11.49 ± 7.78 ± 1.12 116.61 ± 13.39
2.26 1.83
≤ 22 256 60.79 ± 11.02 22.50 ± 14.47 ± 11.25 ± 7.98 ± 1.46 116.98 ± 18.26
3.75 2.73 1.93
P 0.5 0.08 0.08 0.1 0.09 0.7
value
Sex Male 221 61.04 ± 9.33 22.52 ± 14.6 ± 2.14 11.2 ± 7.95 ± 1.25 117.33 ± 14.09
2.87 1.68
Female 289 60.09 ± 10.5 22.95 ± 14.04 ± 11.49 ± 7.82 ± 1.35 116.41 ± 17.33
3.76 2.75 2.02
P 0.2 0.1 0.01 0.07 0.2 0.5
value
Marital status Singles 442 60.33 ± 10.27 22.78 ± 14.29 ± 11.32 ± 7.86 ± 1.29 116.61 ± 16.41
3.39 2.54 1.89
Married 68 61.6 ± 8.15 22.64 ± 14.19 ± 11.66 ± 8 ± 1.44 118.1 ± 13.1
3.52 2.38 1.82
P value 0.3 0.7 0.7 0.1 0.4 0.4
History of clinical practice Yes 101 60.34 ± 13.87 22.46 ± 14.78 ± 10.9 ± 7.95 ± 1.75 116.44 ± 23.94
4.86 3.33 2.44
No 409 60.54 ± 8.83 22.84 ± 14.16 ± 11.48 ± 7.86 ± 1.18 116.9 ± 13.38
2.95 2.26 1.7
P 0.8 0.4 0.07 0.02 0.6 0.8
value
Academic year Second 178 58.45 ± 10.54 22.89 ± 13.88 ± 11.46 ± 7.55 ± 1.14 114.65 ± 15.32
year 3.28 2.35 2.01
Third year 169 61.44 ± 6.52 22.31 ± 2.6 14.56 ± 11.23 ± 7.95 ± 1.04 117.11 ± 10.39
1.59 1.29
Fourth 163 61.76 ± 11.94 23.09 ± 14.42 ± 3.3 11.41 ± 8.14± 1.63 118.85± 20.66
year 4.17 2.23
P 0.003 0.09 0.03 0.5 < 0.001 0.05
value
History of training on Yes 174 61.61± 9.6 22.65± 14.68± 11.36 ± 7.93 ± 1.25 118.25 ± 14.78
spiritual care 3.18 2.07 1.77
No 336 59.93 ± 10.19 22.82 ± 14.07 ± 11.37 ± 7.85 ± 1.34 116.06 ± 16.57
3.52 2.69 1.94
P 0.07 0.5 0.005 0.9 0.5 0.1
value

spiritual care, awareness and self-awareness. This result is in line with beliefs and inclination to spiritual values in Iranian society; because
Yazdan Parast et al. (2017). In Pipkin’s et al. (2020), last year nursing believing in religious values and having religious beliefs are necessary
students, compared with first-year students, obtained higher scores in features for the formation of spiritual intelligence in individuals
the area of spirituality and spiritual care, though these differences were (Ahmadi et al., 2018).
not significant. Contrary to the results of the present study, no statisti­ No significant difference was observed in this study in the total score
cally significant difference was observed between second and of spiritual intelligence and its dimensions between men and women and
fourth-year students in the studies of Abbasi et al. (2014) in Iran and the history of training on spiritual care, which is consistent with some
Aksoy and Coban (2017) in Turkey. This difference in the results may be previous studies (Mohammadi et al., 2018; Moradnezhad et al., 2017).
attributed to the time of the above studies. The concepts of spirituality According to the results of the present study, the older students ob­
and spiritual care have recently been introduced into nursing courses tained higher scores in spiritual intelligence. This difference was sta­
and more attention has been paid to the teaching of spiritual care to tistically significant in the total score and all dimensions except the
students. However, the high sample size of the present study, which Conscious State Expansion. A significant relationship was observed be­
helped to find minor differences between the two groups, should not be tween age and spiritual intelligence in the studies of Yang et al. (2007)
overlooked. and Ahmadi et al. (2018), suggesting that the increase of age can
In the present study, the average spiritual intelligence of students improve spiritual intelligence. These studies are in line with the present
was assessed to be good and high and most of them had a high level of study. This may be due to the greater acceptance of spiritual experiences
spiritual intelligence. The results of previous studies on the spiritual with the increase of age.
intelligence of nursing students have also shown high levels of spiritual Moreover, in this study, the spiritual intelligence of married people
intelligence in these students (Ahmadi et al., 2018; Mohammadi et al., was higher than that of the singles and this difference was significant in
2018). Miri et al. (2015) and Karimi-Moonaghi et al. (2015) also showed the total score of spiritual intelligence as well as the dimensions of
a relatively good level of spiritual intelligence in nurses that is consistent Critical Existential Thinking and Transcendental Awareness. Although
with the present study (Ebrahimi Barmi et al., 2019; Karimi-Moonaghi spiritual intelligence has a mostly non-acquisitive nature, the impact of
et al., 2015; Miri et al., 2015). Contrary to the results of the present the environment and social conditions cannot be ignored. Marriage
study, Yang et al. (2007), conducting a study to determine the spiritual seems to be one of the factors which play a significant role in spiritual
intelligence of nurses in China, showed that 82.9% of nurses had low maturity and that is why married people in the present study had higher
spiritual intelligence. They also reported that only seven participants of spiritual intelligence compared with single people. However, most
their study had religious beliefs. The high level of spiritual intelligence studies showed no significant difference in marital status impact on
in Iranian nursing students and nurses can be attributed to religious spiritual intelligence scores (Ahmadi et al., 2018; Mohammadi et al.,

Downloaded for Anonymous User (n/a) at National Library of the Republic of Indonesia from ClinicalKey.com/nursing by Elsevier on
March 03, 2022. For personal use only. No other uses without permission. Copyright ©2022. Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
M. Ahmadi et al. Nurse Education in Practice 57 (2021) 103227

Table 4
Comparison Spiritual intelligence in nursing students based on demographic variables.
Variables N Critical Existential Personal Meaning Transcendental Conscious State Overall Spiritual
Thinking Production Awareness Expansion intelligence
M ± SD M ± SD M ± SD M ± SD M ± SD

Age 19–21 254 19.62 ± 3.47 13.52 ± 2.6 13.59 ± 2.73 19.49 ± 3.12 66.23 ± 9.62
≤ 22 256 20.54 ± 3.98 14.72 ± 2.91 14.72 ± 3.19 19.49 ± 3.54 69.48 ± 11.98
P 0.005 < 0.001 < 0.001 1 0.001
value
Sex Male 221 19.94 ± 3.5 14.2 ± 2.66 14 ± 2.82 19.48 ± 3.15 67.63 ± 10.1
Female 289 20.19 ± 3.95 14.06 ± 2.95 14.28 ± 3.17 19.5 ± 3.47 68.04 ± 11.62
P 0.4 0.5 0.2 0.9 0.6
value
Marital status Singles 442 19.92 ± 3.75 14.08 ± 2.79 14.01 ± 3.04 19.4 ± 3.34 67.42 ± 11.05
Married 68 21.1 ± 3.69 14.41 ± 3.05 15.08 ± 2.72 20.11 ± 2.19 70.72 ± 10.1
P 0.01 0.3 0.007 0.09 0.02
value
History of clinical Yes 101 21.05 ± 4.52 15.06 ± 3.47 15.08 ± 3.52 19.67 ± 4.02 70.89 ± 14.41
practice
No 409 19.84 ± 3.51 13.89 ± 2.59 13.93 ± 2.84 19.45 ± 3.14 67.12 ± 9.83
P 0.01 0.002 0.003 0.6 0.01
value
Academic year Second 178 20.06 ± 3.4 13.9 ± 2.49 14.01 ± 2.76 20.03 ± 3.19 68.01 ± 9.67
year
Third year 169 19.02 ± 3.43 13.91 ± 2.48 13.52 ± 2.77 18.99 ± 2.78 65.44 ± 9.05
Fourth 163 21.21 ± 4.14 14.58 ± 3.41 14.98 ± 3.36 19.42 ± 3.89 70.21 ± 13.42
year
P < 0.001 0.04 < 0.001 0.01 < 0.001
value
History of training on Yes 174 20.23 ± 3.78 14.41 ± 2.82 14.48 ± 3.15 19.82 ± 3.24 68.95 ± 11.33
spiritual care
No 336 20 ± 3.76 13.97 ± 2.82 13.99 ± 2.94 19.32 ± 3.37 67.3 ± 10.77
P 0.5 0.09 0.1 0.07 0.1
value

Table 5
Correlation between spiritual intelligence and competence in spiritual care in nursing students.
Areas Critical Existential Personal Meaning Transcendental Conscious State Overall Spiritual
Thinking Production Awareness Expansion intelligence
r (P value) r (P value) r (P value) r (P value) r (P value)

Assessment and implementation of 0.16 (<0.001) 0.14 (0.001) 0.1 (0.02) 0.14 (0.001) 0.16 (<0.001)
spiritual care
Human values 0.25 (<0.001) 0.21 (<0.001) 0.2 (<0.001) 0.25 (<0.001) 0.27 (<0.001)
Awareness 0.2 (<0.001) 0.25 (<0.001) 0.14 (<0.001) 0.22 (0.001) 0.24 (<0.001)
Attitude 0.18 (<0.001) 0.15 (<0.001) 0.13 (0.002) 0.21 (<0.001) 0.2 (<0.001)
Self-awareness 0.22 (<0.001) 0.19 (<0.001) 0.20 (<0.001) 0.23 (<0.001) 0.25 (<0.001)
Overall competence 0.23 (<0.001) 0.21 (<0.001) 0.16 (<0.001) 0.23 (<0.001) 0.26 (<0.001)

2018; Moradnezhad et al., 2017). Therefore, marriage cannot be Based on the results of the present study, a significantly positive
considered effective in improving the level of spiritual intelligence and relationship was observed between spiritual intelligence and its con­
more research should be conducted in this regard. stituent dimensions and the professional competence of nursing students
Additionally, clinical records and being last year nursing students in spiritual care and its dimensions (p < 0.001). According to the results
were identified as factors playing a role in promoting students’ spiritual of multiple linear regression, spiritual intelligence was able to predict
intelligence in the present study. It seems that students in their final year 7% of changes in the professional competence of nursing students in
of education and entering the clinical environment as a nurse, have a spiritual care. The regression model showed that for each increase in the
better acceptance of spiritual experiences and achieve spiritual matu­ students’ spiritual intelligence, their professional competence in spiri­
rity. No study was found to be consistent with the present study in this tual care increases 0.39 times. Spiritual intelligence and different di­
regard. However, investigating the relationship between spiritual in­ mensions of it were also found to be the main predicting factor for
telligence and student self-efficacy, the results of a study conducted by different domains of competence in spiritual care. Although the per­
Zamirinejad et al. showed a direct and significant relationship between centage of variances obtained by the models are low, it can still be
spiritual intelligence and student self-efficacy (Zamirinejad et al., 2016). predicted that improvements in the spiritual intelligence of nurses will
Since spiritual intelligence is the ability to focus on problem-solving to increase their competence in spiritual care. These results are consistent
adapt and achieve goals (Zamirinejad et al., 2016) and self-efficacy re­ with the results of Ahmadi et al. (2018). The effect of spiritual intelli­
fers to people’s belief in their own ability to produce certain levels of gence on nurses’ performance has also been shown in other studies.
performance (Viswam et al., 2017), the direct relationship between Measuring the relationship between nurses’ clinical competence and
spiritual intelligence and self-efficacy can be justified. Moreover, ac­ spiritual intelligence, Karimi-Moonaghi et al. (2015) showed a positive
cording to the results of studies that the self-efficacy of nursing students significant relationship between spiritual intelligence and nurses’ clin­
improves with the increase of academic years (Van Horn and Christman, ical competence. Miri et al. (2015) also showed a positive significant
2017; Viswam et al., 2017), it is evident that last year students get higher relationship between spiritual intelligence and the quality of nursing
scores in spiritual intelligence. care. In the study of Kaur et al. (2015), spiritual intelligence had a

Downloaded for Anonymous User (n/a) at National Library of the Republic of Indonesia from ClinicalKey.com/nursing by Elsevier on
March 03, 2022. For personal use only. No other uses without permission. Copyright ©2022. Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
M. Ahmadi et al. Nurse Education in Practice 57 (2021) 103227

Table 6
Stepwise-selection multiple linear regression models with the total and the five domain scores of competence in spiritual care as dependent variables.
R R2 AdjR2 Independent variables 95%CI Sig

Model B SE β t Lower Upper


bound bound

Overall competence 0.26 0.07 0.07 Constant 90.37 4.28 – 21.1 81.96 98.78 <
0.001
Overall spiritual intelligence 0.39 0.062 0.26 6.25 -0.26 0.51 <
0.001
Assessment and implementation of 0.21 0.04 0.04 Constant 49.08 2.74 – 17. 91 43.70 54.46 <
spiritual care 0.001
Overall spiritual intelligence 0.14 0.04 0.161 3.68 0.06 0.22 <
0.001
Academic year 1.52 0.53 0.124 2.85 0.47 2.57 0.004
Human values 0.27 0.07 0.07 Constant 16.92 0.91 – 18.59 15.13 18.71 <
0.001
Overall spiritual intelligence 0.08 0.01 0.277 6.50 0.06 0.11 <
0.001
Awareness 0.31 0.10 0.09 Constant 11.89 0.84 – 14.6 9.42 12.35 <
0.001
Personal meaning 0.13 0.05 0.151 2.68 0.03 0.23 0.007
production
Gender (ref: male) -0.58 0.21 -0.114 -2.66 -1.007 -0.15 0.008
History of training on 0.48 0.22 0.091 2.14 0.04 0.92 0.032
spiritual care
Academic year 0.32 0.13 0.105 2.40 0.05 0.58 0.016
Conscious state expansion 0.09 0.04 0.130 2.32 0.01 0.18 0.021
Attitude 0.31 0.10 0.09 Constant 8.1 0.49 – 16.33 7.12 9.07 <
0.001
Conscious state expansion 0.09 0.03 0.175 3.07 0.03 0.16 0.002
History of clinical practice -0.69 0.20 -0.148 -3.46 -1.09 -0.30 0.001
Critical existential thinking 0.07 0.02 0.147 2.57 0.01 0.13 0.01
Self-awareness 0.38 0.14 0.14 Constant 4.76 0.36 – 13.21 4.05 5.47 <
0.001
Overall spiritual intelligence 0.04 0.005 0.383 9.35 0.03 0.05 <
0.001

significant effect on nurses’ caring behaviors. Riahi et al. (2018) con­ patients. Therefore, to promote students’ spiritual intelligence, appro­
ducted a study to investigate the effect of spiritual intelligence training priate plans with the aim of promoting the level of critical thinking and
on the competence of spiritual care in nurses. The results showed that spiritual self-awareness are recommended. However, results of multiple
spiritual intelligence training and, consequently, the improved level of linear regression showed spiritual intelligence was able to predict only
spiritual intelligence had a positive effect on improving the competence 7% of changes in the professional competence of nursing students in
of nurses in spiritual care. The results of these studies are in line with the spiritual care. Therefore, it is also recommended to conduct studies that
present study. Based on these results, it can be said that the promotion of can show other predictors of students’ competence in providing spiritual
spiritual intelligence can improve the quality of nursing care and affect care.
the performance of nurses. Spirituality is a natural quality in humans
and is a source of thoughts, feelings and values. As an important concept, 7. Implication
spirituality is the basis of nursing activities (Kaur et al., 2015). People
with high spiritual intelligence have an overview of life and, by having One of the aspects that nurses must pay special attention to is to
moral virtues, are greatly able to solve problems and adapt to them. As consider spiritual care as an unquestionable part of patient-centered
nursing is a stressful profession, higher levels of spiritual intelligence holistic care. In this regard, preparing nursing students and improving
can improve the competence of nurses in providing nursing care (Kar­ their competence to provide spiritual care is essential. The result of this
imi-Moonaghi et al., 2015). study brings new insight into the importance of spiritual self-awareness
and training as a way for improving nurses’ competence in providing
6. Conclusion spiritual care. Therefore, the inclusion of spiritual intelligence and
spiritual care issues in nursing undergraduate curriculum training is
According to the results of this study, most nursing students enjoyed necessary. Considering the significant relationship between clinical
high levels of spiritual intelligence and had reasonable competence in practice and spiritual intelligence, necessary platforms should be pro­
the area of spiritual care. However, no significant difference was vided by educational managers and planners and faculty members to
observed in the total score of spiritual care competence and spiritual create appropriate learning spaces in clinical settings. The results of this
intelligence between students who participated in the workshops and study will also be helpful for all health care providers, including nurses,
those who did not. This was despite the fact that the students who physicians, psychologists and spiritual care providers, to promote their
participated in the workshops were expected to be significantly more spiritual intelligence as an influential factor in providing optimal spiri­
competent. This shows the need to pay attention to the quality of edu­ tual care to patients.
cation in spiritual care and eliminate the gap between theoretical and
practical education in providing this kind of care. Integrating spirituality 8. Limitations
into the nursing education curriculum as well as using role-modeling can
be effective in this regard (Timmins et al., 2015; Baldacchino, 2015). Using an indigenous instrument for assessing the nursing students’
Furthermore, this study showed that spiritual intelligence could competence in spiritual care may be viewed as a strength of this study.
affect the competence of nursing students in providing spiritual care to However, some limitations should be noted. First, self-report bias may

Downloaded for Anonymous User (n/a) at National Library of the Republic of Indonesia from ClinicalKey.com/nursing by Elsevier on
March 03, 2022. For personal use only. No other uses without permission. Copyright ©2022. Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
M. Ahmadi et al. Nurse Education in Practice 57 (2021) 103227

have been introduced by the nursing students in response to the items of Cavendish, R., Konecny, L., Mitzeliotis, C., Russo, D., Luise, B.K., BS, M.L., Bajo, M.A.M.,
2003. Spiritual care activities of nurses using nursing interventions classification
the questionnaires; therefore, results might not wholly reflect their
(NIC) labels. Int. J. Nurs. Terminol. Classif. 14 (4), 113–124.
competency level. It might be necessary to conduct observational studies Chandramohan, S., Bhagwan, R., 2015. Spirituality and spiritual care in the context of
to better assess nursing students’ competence in providing spiritual care. nursing education in South Africa. Curationis 38 (2).
Second, the cross-sectional design of the study did not allow for mea­ Chirico, F., 2016. Spiritual well-being in the 21st century: It’s time to review the current
WHO’s health definition. J. Health Soc. Sci. 1 (1), 11–16.
surement of the variables over time and cannot be used to infer Ebrahimi Barmi, B., Hosseini, M.A., Abdi, K., Bakhshi, E., Shirozhan, Sh, 2019. The
causality. relationship between spiritual intelligence and resiliency of rehabilitation staff.
J. Pastoral Care Couns. 73 (4), 205–210.
Elk, R., Hall, EJ, DeGregory, C., Graham, D., Hughes, BP., 2019. The Role of Nurses in
Funding Providing Spiritual Care to Patients: An overview. Journal of Nursing.
Farahaninia, M., Abasi, M., Seyedfatemi, N., JafarJalal, E., Haghani, H., 2018. Nurses’
attitudes towards spiritual care and spiritual care practices. J. Client-Cent. Nurs.
This study was supported by research deputy of the Shahid Beheshti Care 4 (2), 61–68.
University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. Frouzandeh, N., Aein, F., Noorian, C., 2015. Introducing a spiritual care training course
and determining its effectiveness on nursing students’ self-efficacy in providing
spiritual care for the patients. J. Educ. Health Promot. 4, 34.
Author contributions statement Fukada, M., 2018. Nursing competency: Definition, structure and development. Yonago
Acta Med. 61 (1), 001–007.
Ahmadi, Estebsari, Poormansouri, Jahani, and Sedighie involved in Ghaleei, A., Mohajeran, B., 2015. The relationship among spiritual intelligence, mental
health and job stress in nurses in imam khomeini hospital of mahabad. Avicenna J.
the study conception/design. Ahmadi, Estebsari, Poormansouri, and Nurs. Midwifery Care 23 (4), 14–21.
Sedighie contributed to the data collection/analysis. Ahmadi, Estebsari, Hu, Y., Jiao, M., Li, F., 2019. Effectiveness of spiritual care training to enhance spiritual
Poormansouri, Jahani, and Sedighie drafted the manuscript. Ahmadi, health and spiritual care competency among oncology nurses. BMC Palliat. Care 18
(1), 1–8.
Estebsari, and Jahani involved in critical revisions for important intel­ Jahromi, M.F., Akbar, R.E., 2020. spiritual needs of hospitalized patients from nurses’
lectual content and administrative/technical support and supervised the viewpoints: a qualitative study. Arch. Venez. De Farmacol. Y. Ter. 39 (8), 916–922.
work. Ahmadi, Estebsari, Poormansouri, Jahani, and Sedighie approved Karimi-Moonaghi, H., Gazerani, A., Vaghee, S., Gholami, H., Salehmoghaddam, A.R.,
Gharibnavaz, R., 2015. Relation between spiritual intelligence and clinical
the final version to be submitted. competency of nurses in Iran. Iran. J. Nurs. Midwifery Res. 20 (6), 665–669.
Kaur, D., Sambasivan, M., Kumar, N., 2015. Impact of emotional intelligence and
spiritual intelligence on the caring behavior of nurses: a dimension-level exploratory
Conflict of interest study among public hospitals in Malaysia. Appl. Nurs. Res. 28 (4), 293–298.
King, D.B., DeCicco, T.L., 2009. A viable model and self-report measure of spiritual
intelligence. Int. J. Transpers. Stud. 28 (1), 68–85.
The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect Kish, L., 1979. Samples and censuses. Int. Stat. Rev. /Rev. Int. De. Stat. 47 (2), 99–109.
to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. Lewinson, L.P., McSherry, W., Kevern, P., 2015. Spirituality in pre-registration nurse
education and practice: a review of the literature. Nurse Educ. Today 35 (6),
806–814.
Acknowledgements Little, N.K., 2010. Clinical pastoral education as professional training: some entrance,
curriculum and assessment implications. J. Pastor. Care Couns. 64 (3), 1–8.
Memaryan, N., Rasooli, M., Vahidshahi, K., 2017. Developing educational goals and
This study was extracted from a research proposal approved by the expected competencies for teaching spiritual health to the students of medical
Student Research Committee, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical sciences. Iran. J. Med. Educ. 17, 116–125.
Memaryan, N., Rassouli, M., Nahardani, S.Z., Amiri, P., 2015. Integration of spirituality
Sciences, Tehran, Iran (NO:1395/77496). The researchers appreciate all
in medical education in Iran: a qualitative exploration of requirements. Evid. -Based
staff in “Student Research Committee” and “Research & Technology Complement. Altern. Med. 2015, 1–7.
Chancellor” in Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences for their Miri, K., Keshavarz, A., Shirdelzadeh, S., Parsa, P., 2015. The relationship between
financial support. In addition, the researchers are thankful to the nurses’ spiritual intelligence and quality of nursing care based on nurses’& patients’
viewpoints. J. Urmia Nurs. Midwifery Fac. 13 (6), 518–524.
“Research & Technology Chancellor” of Ahvaz Jundishapur university Mohammadi, Gh, Mirshahi, F., Movahedi, A., Taghavi, M., Moghadam Pasha, A.,
of Medical Sciences, for their cooperation and all the nursing students Mardani, M., Kavosi, A., 2015. Nurses and midwives attitude of hospitals of
who participated in this study. Neyshabur city about spirituality and spiritual care. Med. Ethics J. 9 (33), 45–63.
Mohammadi, S., Soleymanpoor, L., Borhani, F., Roshanzadeh, M., 2018. Evaluation of
spiritual intelligence and spiritual health in nursing students of Boroujen. Iran. J.
References Nurs. 1, 11–31.
Moradnezhad, M., Seylani, Kh, Navab, El, Esmaeilie, M., 2017. Spiritual intelligence of
nurses working at the intensive care units of hospitals affiliated with Tehran
Abbasi, M., Farahani-Nia, M., Mehrdad, N., 2014. Nursing students’ spiritual well-being,
university of medical sciences. Nurs. Pract. Today 4 (4), 170–179.
spirituality and spiritual care. Iran. J. Nurs. Midwifery Res. 19 (3), 242–247.
Nobel, K.D., 2000. Spirit. Intell.: A N. Fram. mind 9 2000 1 28.
Adib-Hajbaghery, M., Zehtabchi, S., 2016. Developing and validating an instrument to
Nouhi, E., Nakhaee, N., Rahimi, N., 2014. Spiritual intelligence and attitude towards
assess the nurses’ professional competence in spiritual care. J. Nurs. Meas. 24 (1),
spirituality and spiritual care in nursing and midwifery students. Iran. J. Nurs. 27
15–27.
(90), 150–159.
Adib-Hajbaghery, M., Zehtabchi, S., Azizi Fini, I., 2017. Iranian nurses’ professional
Paal, P., Helo, Y., Frick, E., 2015. Spiritual care training provided to healthcare
competence in spiritual care in 2014. Nurs. Ethics 24 (4), 462–473.
professionals: a systematic review. J. Pastor. Care Couns. 69 (1), 19–30.
Ahmadi, M., Izadi, A., Poormansouri, S., Sedighie, L., Estebsari, F., Zarea, K., 2018.
Pinto, C.T., Pinto, S., 2020. From spiritual intelligence to spiritual care: a transformative
Relationship between nursing students’ professional competence in spiritual care
approach to holistic practice. Nurse Educ. Pract. 47, 102823.
and spiritual intelligence. Avicenna J. Nurs. Midwifery Care 25 (5), 189–199.
Pipkins, C.M., Rinker, M.A., Curl, E., 2020. Spiritual care perceptions of baccalaureate
Aksoy, M., Coban, G.I., 2017. Nursing students’ perceptions of spirituality and spiritual
nursing students. J. Holist. Nurs. 38 (1), 131–138.
care. Int. J. Caring Sci. 10 (3), 1136–1147.
Raghib, M., Siadat, A., Hakiminiya, B., Ahmadi, J., 2010. The validation of king’s
Ali, G., Wattis, J., Snowden, M., 2015. Why are spiritual aspects of care so hard to
spiritual intelligence scale (SISRI-24) among students at University of Isfahan.
address in nursing education?’a literature review (1993-2015). Int. J. Multidiscip.
J. Psychol. Achiev. 17 (1), 141–164.
Comp. Stud. 2 (1), 7–31.
Riahi, S., Goudarzi, F., Hasanvand, Sh, Abdollahzadeh, H., Ebrahimzadeh, F.,
Amram, J.Y., 2009. The Contribution of Emotional and Spiritual Intelligences to Effective
Dadvari, Z., 2018. Assessing the effect of spiritual intelligence training on spiritual
Business Leadership. Institute of Transpersonal Psychology.
care competency in critical care nurses. J. Med. Life 11 (4), 346–354.
Attard, J., Baldacchino, D.R., Camilleri, L., 2014. Nurses’ and midwives’ acquisition of
Ross, L., van Leeuwen, R., Baldacchino, D., Giske, T., McSherry, W., Narayanasamy, A.,
competency in spiritual care: a focus on education. Nurse Educ. Today 34 (12),
Schep-Akkerman, A., 2014. Student nurses perceptions of spirituality and
1460–1466.
competence in delivering spiritual care: a European pilot study. Nurse Educ. Today
Bagheri, F., Akbarizadeh, F., Hatami, H., 2010. The relationship between nurses’
34 (5), 697–702.
spiritual intelligence and happiness in Iran. Procedia-Soc. Behav. Sci. 5, 1556–1561.
Shiasi, M., Etebarian, A., Abadi, Z.Z., Ahmadi, M., 2016. The effect of spiritual
Baldacchino, D., 2015. Spiritual care education of health care professionals. Religions 6
intelligence on the productivity of employees at Isfahan University of Medical
(2), 594–613.
Sciences based on structural equation model. J. Health Adm. (JHA) 19, 63.
Bennett, V., Thompson, M.L., 2015. Teaching spirituality to student nurses. J. Nurs.
Timmins, F., Murphy, M., Neill, F., Begley, T., Sheaf, G., 2015. An exploration of the
Educ. Pract. 5 (2), 26–33.
extent of inclusion of spirituality and spiritual care concepts in core nursing
Bożek, A., Nowak, P.F., Blukacz, M., 2020. The relationship between spirituality, health-
textbooks. Nurse Educ. Today 35 (1), 277–282.
related behavior and psychological well-being. Front. Psychol. 11, 1–13.

Downloaded for Anonymous User (n/a) at National Library of the Republic of Indonesia from ClinicalKey.com/nursing by Elsevier on
March 03, 2022. For personal use only. No other uses without permission. Copyright ©2022. Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
M. Ahmadi et al. Nurse Education in Practice 57 (2021) 103227

Van Horn, E., Christman, J., 2017. Assessment of nursing student confidence using the Yang, Ke, P, Mao, Xiu, Y., 2007. A study of nurses’ spiritual intelligence: a cross-sectional
clinical skills self-efficacy scale. Nurs. Educ. Perspect. 38 (6), 344–346. questionnaire survey. Int. J. Nurs. Stud. 44 (6), 999–1010.
Veloza-Gómez, M., Muñoz de Rodríguez, L., Guevara-Armenta, C., Mesa-Rodríguez, S., Yazdan Parast, E., Afrazandeh, S.S., Ghorbani, H., Asadi, F., Rajabi, R., Naseri, L.,
2017. The importance of spiritual care in nursing practice. J. Holist. Nurs. 35 (2), Sekandari, F., 2017. Analysis of spiritual care competence in students of Ferdows
118–131. health and paramedical school: 2014-15. Iran. J. Nurs. 30 (105), 47–57.
Viswam, A., Kaviyabala, D., Sayujya, C.P., Thakur, V., Buvaneswari, R., 2017. Self- Zamirinejad, S., Azizi, S., Shakeri, A., Hassandoust, Z., Mohammad, P.M., Yousefi, H.,
efficacy among nursing students. Int. J. Curr. Res. 9 (8), 55748–55751. Akaberi, A., 2016. Predicting self-efficacy of students based on spiritual intelligence.
Withers, A., Zuniga, K., Van Sell, Sh.L., 2017. Spirituality: concept analysis. Int. J. Nurs. J. Sabzevar Univ. Med. Sci. 23 (2), 196–203.
Clin. Pract. 4 (1). Zumstein-Shaha, M., Ferrell, B., Economou, D., 2020. Nurses’ response to spiritual needs
Wu, L.F., Tseng, H.Ch, Liao, Y.Ch, 2016. Nurse education and willingness to provide of cancer patients. Eur. J. Oncol. Nurs. 48, 101792.
spiritual care. Nurse Educ. Today 38, 36–41.

Downloaded for Anonymous User (n/a) at National Library of the Republic of Indonesia from ClinicalKey.com/nursing by Elsevier on
March 03, 2022. For personal use only. No other uses without permission. Copyright ©2022. Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

You might also like