DE BOTON, ROSHEL ALEXANDRA M.

ARCH42S8

ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY

Kim, S., & Kwon, H. (2018, April 19). Urban Sustainability through public architecture. Retrieved February 1,
2023, from https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/4/1249
The experts have looked at how sustainability might be implemented in European towns' public
architecture. First and foremost, there is the construction process, which uses an architectural mechanism to
empty the urban space rather than filling it. Public architectural design has a close relationship with the
environment and is tied to skin with materials. Finally, through affecting regional and environmental factors,
public architectural design should guarantee flexible usage of the program. Sustainability should take into
account each region's priority for the common properties starting with the fundamentals.

Koohsari, M., Mavioa S., Villanueva K., Sugiyama T., Badland H., Kaczynski A., Owen N., & Giles-Corti B. (2015,
March 19). Public open space, physical activity, urban design and Public Health: Concepts, methods and
Research Agenda. Retrieved February 1, 2023, from
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1353829215000295
Public open spaces like parks and green spaces are important components of the built environment in
neighborhoods that support a range of physical activity behaviors. A growing number of active living research
studies have been looking at how public open space affects physical activity during the past ten years. The
evidence between various characteristics of public open space (such as proximity, size, and quality) and physical
activity, however, demonstrates conflicting relationships. The formulation of precise, evidence-based
recommendations for policymakers and urban planners for (re)designing public open space to promote physical
activity is hampered by these discrepancies. By highlighting important conceptual and methodological challenges
that may lead to discrepancies in studies looking at relationships between public open space and physical
activity, this study intends to further this research goal.

Bedimo-Rung A., Mowen, A., & Cohen, D. (2005, February 04). The significance of parks to physical activity and
Public Health: A Conceptual Model. Retrieved February 1, 2023, from
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0749379704003046
A possible way to meet the current physical activity standards is through park-based physical exercise.
However, little is known about the environmental and governmental factors that can increase physical activity
levels in parks. In this categorization system, the focus is on park environmental qualities, such as park features,
condition, access, aesthetics, safety, and policies that may be associated with physical activity. Specific
geographic locations in or around the park, such as activity areas, supporting areas, the overall park, and the
neighborhood, should be the focus of data collection for these categories. Future study should concentrate on
operationalizing certain metrics and procedures for data collection as well as assessing connections between
personal levels of physical activity and particular park attributes.

Anuar, M., & Saruwono, M. (2012, April 09). Barriers of user's involvement in the design process of public parks
as perceived by landscape architects. Retrieved February 1, 2023, from
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877042812003989
Despite these obstacles, recommendations from the study regarding potential strategies for promoting
public involvement in the design process have also been highlighted. Landscape architects, designers, and other
professionals will need to participate in the co-designing teams because they offer specialized knowledge that
the general public lacks. Professional designers are knowledgeable about current, new, and developing
technologies and have a general understanding of manufacturing procedures and the project's commercial
environment. Public park design will become a genuinely comprehensive process thanks to the collaboration
between users and landscape architects.

Jogdande, A., & Bandyopadhyay A., (2022, April 21). Retrieved January 31, 2023, from
https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Aniruddha-Jogdande-
2/publication/360466113_Identifying_and_Assessing_Uses_of_Public_Parks_A_Systematic_Literature_Review/li
nks/6283400bdcb5ce0499d6bc74/Identifying-and-Assessing-Uses-of-Public-Parks-A-Systematic-Literature-
Review.pdf?origin=publication_detail
The methods for evaluating park utilization must be modified in light of the context of the research area.
According to the literature assessment conducted by the researchers, physical observation and survey are the
two approaches that are most frequently employed to gauge park use. For studying other park uses including
social cohesiveness, comfort, and environmental awareness, new methods and instruments need to be looked
into. In order to completely understand and evaluate park usage, it has been noticed that researchers
incorporate a number of park evaluation factors, including both spatial and non-spatial, physical and nonphysical.
It is necessary to create a mixed-method model that is appropriately tailored to the location in order to assist
municipal planners and policy makers in maximizing park usage.