Professional Documents
Culture Documents
7
2016 7 Systems Engineering — Theory & Practice July, 2016
”
“
, ,
Æ
& !"# $%
( , 510640)
'( )*Æ+,-./012*3 4 4
“ ” “ ” ,
Abstract This paper proposes a bondage-based structural model that is derived from the trilemma
constraint among the monetary, foreign exchange and securities markets. It introduces a foreign exchange
intervention index to explore a new market landscape and regulatory strategies. Based on the differential
evolution algorithm and its application to the data from January 1998 to April 2014, it presents the
estimated nonlinear systems among the three policy goals of monetary independence, foreign exchange
intervention and capital account openness. The analysis results show the existence of equilibrium and
the local structural stability of systems by the system dynamics approach. Capital account openness
and monetary independence are in proximity to moderate levels after a short-term evolution (about 1
year). It could lock-in into different proportions in the long-term evolution (about 5 years) for its sensitive
dependence on initial conditions. In addition, China has the policy preference in the predominance of
exchange rate stability while the capital openness could be the leading indicator to affect their proportions.
Keywords trilemma; monetary policy; foreign exchange reserves; nonlinear dynamics; macro prudence
1
, Æ .
, . , “
”, “”. , ,
Æ
: 2015-04-07
: (1989–), , , , , : ; (1963–), , , , ,
, : , E-mail: wgzhang@scut.edu.cn; (1991–), , , , ,
%!"#$
1633–1642.
: Zhang Q, Zhang W G, Li J M. Analysis of nonlinear structure of financial policy goals based on trilemma[J].
Systems Engineering — Theory & Practice, 2016, 36(7): 1633–1642.
1634 36
-:; 8.
7::;8 " %< , Aizenman @1# “#” >; 170 =
[5−6]
䍗ᐱ
Ⲵ㖞
Ⲵ䈳
≷⦷
㢲ᙗ
䍗ᐱᐲ൪
˄䍗ᐱ᭯ㆆ ཆ≷ᐲ൪
0 102345123 64 75
Ⲵ⤜・ᙗ˅ 䍴ᵜⲴ⍱ࣘᙗ ˄≷⦷Ⲵっᇊᙗ˅
1 “ ”
*-/#, K D1L; 1:
C = f (x1 , x2 , x3 , t) (1)
3 ()8798,:8.9;<=>?
3.1 @:;<
.. # >; -A41 >XK “EE” *-4 x1 , x2 , x3 >.
A=B>C DA=?E@F
[5]
“ ” , (2)
3.1.1 (ERS) (F EI)
!=1G W!!)O, 6Æ 1G!!@"HI.
6Æ.X " 6Æ "6ÆT[ %V'3L0-.
1636 36
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
2013ᑈ1᳜
2013ᑈ7᳜
2014ᑈ1᳜
2014ᑈ7᳜
2010ᑈ7᳜
2011ᑈ1᳜
2011ᑈ7᳜
2012ᑈ1᳜
2012ᑈ7᳜
2008ᑈ1᳜
2008ᑈ7᳜
2009ᑈ1᳜
2009ᑈ7᳜
2010ᑈ1᳜
2002ᑈ7᳜
2006ᑈ1᳜
2006ᑈ7᳜
2007ᑈ1᳜
2007ᑈ7᳜
1998ᑈ7᳜
1999ᑈ1᳜
1999ᑈ7月
2001ᑈ7᳜
2002ᑈ1᳜
2003ᑈ1᳜
1998ᑈ1᳜
2000ᑈ1᳜
2000ᑈ7᳜
2001ᑈ1᳜
2003ᑈ7᳜
2004ᑈ1᳜
2004ᑈ7᳜
2005ᑈ1᳜
2005ᑈ7᳜
0 ^ _` ^ _ a bÆ
FEI ERS
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0
2004年1月
2003年1月
2003年7月
2010年7月
2001年7月
2002年1月
2002年7月
2009年1月
2009年7月
2010年1月
1998年1月
2000年7月
2001年1月
2008年1月
2008年7月
1999年7月
2000年1月
2004年7月
2007年7月
2011年1月
2013年7月
2014年1月
2014年7月
2012年7月
2013年1月
1998年7月
1999年1月
2005年1月
2005年7月
2006年1月
2006年7月
2007年1月
2011年7月
2012年1月
cC[YZ[SdeD0 \] ^ _` ^ _10QL3VWbÆ
FEI MI KO
3 1998 1 2014 3
4.2 X
=V0/ > @7U &Æ , S 4 K V$^ F EI
M I . KO PS, 8_3: >&m/ =4 . MI
1.0
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
FEI
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
d 1
K 3 bcd3ef h
d 2 g d 3 d 4
g h
cg hh\ nih\ hh\ nih\ hh\ nih\ hh\ nih\
g ei_ ei_ ei_ ei_ ei_ ei_ ei_ ei_
k=1 0.0700 0.1029 0.0657 0.1001 0.0657 0.1024 0.0655 0.1009
k=2 0.2026 0.2356 0.1978 0.2378 0.2013 0.2455 0.1974 0.2385
k=3 0.1599 0.1096 0.1599 0.1093 0.1596 0.1118 0.1596 0.1118
4.3 cC ijCk l
X j k
0 81a, x1, x2 , x3 Æ.o%d U: ."4, Q%-E
&46<7. 7: 8 ;p "AL , . x1 x3 , 47 Æ.
747A. S 5 *-S8 X 1 *- x1 , x2, x3 -3fEE . W" K,
F EI I_, o!dG M I 5, @!:4&6<7G. e, .C
F EI "Q@ lKU M I KO ". I_, F EI M I KO .c- W
!4 Æ .
FEI
FEI .增加额1
+ -
0.0966
-1.5909 *MI
- 1.9505 *FEI
MI -1.1579 *FEI .
MI .增加额2
- +
KO
1.0312
KO增加额3
.
+
0 mn 375o0
0.1008
5 1
+8BB -84%>D 4 -8(. fk, 8 4 81?
ÆIj=A% ?!6Æ. 4 8 % ?W"", K ÆIj%
?. ". , )B Wolf P% >XTP8 ;k gf>;X *-6Æ
[19]
iqd Zrj
K 4 0l 1 pqmnr mn3bÆ
Ylmmn ohhk[R
1 hp l qr [0, 1] i
P11 (0.7448, −0.1174, 0.1817)
−0.3116; −0.8762; −1.0965
3
hplqr [0, 1] i
P33 (0.3877, −0.5200, 0.3763) 3
0.8 0.8
0.6 0.6
0.4 0.4
0.2 0.2
t t
0 500 1000 1500 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700
0 mn u ^ _yw3gb0
6
1.0
1 1998 1 0 mn u ^ _yw3gb0
7
1.0
1 2005 6
0.8 0.8
0.6 0.6
0.4 0.4
0.2 0.2
t t
0 200 400 600 800 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200
0 mn u ^ _yw3gb0
8 1 2008 9
1.0
0 mn u ^ _yw3gb0
9 1 2010 5
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
t
0 100 200 300 400 500 600
0 mn u ^ _yw3gb0
10 1 2014 4
09*Aa, FT594 / 8 &l# l = 4
“EE” , X Æ 8>Æ. . -8 3: 8>"AL 1
(b4 12 )) EC$6Æ, L 5 (b4 60 )) C$j( 6Æ. H!..6Æ"(
XH!f, : .W!i"kp3f*A QÆ 3 $! f
. L , 8>"X Æ0U]. E6Æ% ? P P >" 3 12 22
:9 "N..*%, #>:$ &T6Æ"
3 V>U". “6Æ” G/8T[. (4, 5 .f F EI Æ. 7 lN$
?+c/s$6Æ", _3 %! %m #./. L , 7: 5 8b4); :
0:c/89 + qn?<, 30 J: .m.M. R28
, gk*G- != >&!7>t>.
5 “ .-” /.zs{,tu7|
..09 Æ/1>d, 9J. #>.+ tH, “EE” FG
*-4$; r=lu(+6Æ., Jm 4+.
1) 565GKU, YT*- 2-nn.
>D*A* 38 E&!H! (L 1 )$! (L 5 ) *-4 ,
--5 ?G !Yl# l KU. I ?GoB
7 , R: “” 1641
0" %<i$!7.
, 6Æ..% H!6Æ $!6Æ , @s)*gU0
"I 41t6,0. W" K, H!B8%21 6e $!B, v&tY
BBB-I -I 3va(+, -A w!XtH. 8 @%6uw !c
v? K , +& *1-@8!V 4M"V 4., @wx
>t/1GI 48#Q '. S E , 5 W vw
/1uw $?, uvx-I W>!, >dY 4M.
3) ;<wGÆM -, /x%.
7 , 1 ./. 35 5 .f F EI
Æ. , %!%m #./. 1,, "$!#syZ ;P#, @
;<)x $Q6Æ$!%. $s, $ @+o< 7
sI+& FoÆ . 35- “EE” , =Q H :;;5A"
:9, F5+=@J JH )* x,./. Rey ; “5 [21]
wZ x| b[a[lzy yz{}
Review, 2013, 18(2): 123–146.
[7] , . [J]. , 2002(5): 30–35.
Xie P, Zhang X P. Three times of conflict between monetary policy and exchange rate policy[J]. International
z { }\{l\a`a{| z{
Economic Review, 2002(5): 30–35.
[8] , . [J]. , 2009(8): 27–36.
Li W, Zhang Z C. An analytical framework of China foreign exchange reserves: Based on financial stability and
appropriate scale[J]. Economic Research Journal, 2009(8): 27–36.
[9] Dominguez K M E, Hashimoto Y, Ito T. International reserves and the global financial crisis[J]. Journal of
International Economics, 2012, 88(2): 388–406.
[10] Wu T. De facto index of monetary policy domestic activism and inefficient trilemma configurations in Oecd
countries[J]. International Journal of Finance & Economics, 2015, 20(2): 97–113.
[11] Rose A K. Surprising similarities: Recent monetary regimes of small economies[J]. Journal of International Money
and Finance, 2014, 49: 5–27.
[12] Chang C, Liu Z, Spiegel M M. Capital controls and optimal Chinese monetary policy[J]. Journal of Monetary
Economics, 2015, 74: 1–15.
[13] Fernald J G, Spiegel M M, Swanson E T. Monetary policy effectiveness in China: Evidence from a FAVAR
model[J]. Journal of International Money and Finance, 2014, 49: 83–103.