Frequency Table

Gender
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid Female 136 47.7 48.1 48.1
Male 147 51.6 51.9 100.0
Total 283 99.3 100.0
Missing 2 .7
Total 285 100.0

Age

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Valid 18-29 96 33.7 33.7 33.7
30-39 63 22.1 22.1 55.8
40-49 74 26.0 26.0 81.8
50-59 42 14.7 14.7 96.5
60 or older 10 3.5 3.5 100.0
Total 285 100.0 100.0

Highest level of education

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Valid Middle school 10 3.5 3.5 3.5
High school 18 6.3 6.3 9.8
Bachelor's Degree 174 61.1 61.1 70.9
Master's Degree 60 21.1 21.1 91.9
Doctoral Degree 12 4.2 4.2 96.1
Vocational school 11 3.9 3.9 100.0
Total 285 100.0 100.0

Profession

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Valid Civil servant 15 5.3 5.3 5.3
Others 6 2.1 2.1 7.4
Student 49 17.2 17.2 24.6
Unemployed 11 3.9 3.9 28.4
Company executive 27 9.5 9.5 37.9
Company worker 85 29.8 29.8 67.7
Doctor 4 1.4 1.4 69.1
Housewife 21 7.4 7.4 76.5
Lawyer 3 1.1 1.1 77.5
Part-time worker 8 2.8 2.8 80.4
Pensioner 4 1.4 1.4 81.8
Self-employed 52 18.2 18.2 100.0
Total 285 100.0 100.0
 Average Monthly Income (MNT)

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Valid 100,000 or below MNT 10 3.5 3.5 3.5
100,001-300,000 MNT 4 1.4 1.4 37.2
300,001-600,000 MNT 8 2.8 2.8 40.0
600,001-900,000 MNT 16 5.6 5.6 45.6
900,001-1,200,000 MNT 22 7.7 7.7 53.3
1,200,001-1,500,000 MNT 33 11.6 11.6 64.9
1,500,001-2,000,000 MNT 35 12.3 12.3 77.2
2,000,001-2,500,000 MNT 34 11.9 11.9 89.1
2,500,001-3,000,000 MNT 31 10.9 10.9 100.0
3,000,001 or above MNT 92 32.3 32.3 35.8
Total 285 100.0 100.0

District

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Valid Bagakhangai 1 .4 .4 .4
Baganuur 1 .4 .4 .7
Bayangol 62 21.8 21.8 22.5
Bayanzurkh 83 29.1 29.1 51.6
Chingeltei 26 9.1 9.1 60.7
Khan-Uul 58 20.4 20.4 81.1
Nalaikh 1 .4 .4 81.4
Songinokhairkhan 16 5.6 5.6 87.0
Sukhbaatar 37 13.0 13.0 100.0
Total 285 100.0 100.0

Partner/Family Importance

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Valid Slightly Important 7 2.5 2.5 2.5

Important 45 15.8 15.8 18.2

Very Important 233 81.8 81.8 100.0
Total 285 100.0 100.0

Wealth Importance

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Valid Not Important 1 .4 .4 .4
Not so Important 10 3.5 3.5 3.9
Neutral 3 1.1 1.1 4.9
Slightly Important 71 24.9 24.9 29.8
Important 151 53.0 53.0 82.8
Very Important 49 17.2 17.2 100.0
Total 285 100.0 100.0
 Health Importance

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Valid Important 28 9.8 9.8 9.8
Very Important 257 90.2 90.2 100.0
Total 285 100.0 100.0

Protecting the Environment Importance

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Valid Not at all Important 1 .4 .4 .4

Not so Important 2 .7 .7 1.1

Neutral 2 .7 .7 1.8
Slightly Important 12 4.2 4.2 6.0
Important 94 33.0 33.0 38.9
Very Important 174 61.1 61.1 100.0
Total 285 100.0 100.0

If air pollution worsens, the lives of residents will be threatened

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Valid Neither Agree Nor Disagree 1 .4 .4 .4

Agree 30 10.5 10.5 10.9

Strongly Agree 254 89.1 89.1 100.0
Total 285 100.0 100.0

Even if air pollution worsens and becomes a hindrance to our lives, it will be quite some
time away

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Valid Strongly Agree 41 14.4 14.4 14.4
Agree 84 29.5 29.5 43.9
Neither Agree Nor Disagree 32 11.2 11.2 55.1
Disagree 46 16.1 16.1 71.2
Strongly Disagree 82 28.8 28.8 100.0
Total 285 100.0 100.0

Indoor air pollution is a threat to our health

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid Disagree 2 .7 .7 .7
Neither Agree Nor Disagree 9 3.2 3.2 3.9
Agree 85 29.8 29.8 33.7
Strongly Agree 189 66.3 66.3 100.0
Total 285 100.0 100.0
 Part of the responsibility for worsening air pollution lies in my daily life

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Valid Strongly Disagree 6 2.1 2.1 2.1
Disagree 28 9.8 9.8 11.9
Neither Agree Nor Disagree 51 17.9 17.9 29.8
Agree 117 41.1 41.1 70.9
Strongly Agree 83 29.1 29.1 100.0
Total 285 100.0 100.0

I am responsible for solving the air pollution problem

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Valid Strongly Disagree 2 .7 .7 .7
Disagree 16 5.6 5.6 6.3
Neither Agree Nor Disagree 32 11.2 11.2 17.5
Agree 134 47.0 47.0 64.6
Strongly Agree 101 35.4 35.4 100.0
Total 285 100.0 100.0

Cooperating in air pollution reduction actions will improve the environment around us

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Valid Disagree 2 .7 .7 .7
Neither Agree Nor Disagree 6 2.1 2.1 2.8
Agree 109 38.2 38.2 41.1
Strongly Agree 168 58.9 58.9 100.0
Total 285 100.0 100.0

If we make ourselves less dependent on coal, we can reduce air pollution

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Valid Strongly Disagree 1 .4 .4 .4
Disagree 8 2.8 2.8 3.2
Neither Agree Nor Disagree 20 7.0 7.0 10.2
Agree 106 37.2 37.2 47.4
Strongly Agree 150 52.6 52.6 100.0
Total 285 100.0 100.0
 I know the details of the activities that individuals can do to reduce air pollution

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Valid Strongly Disagree 2 .7 .7 .7
Disagree 6 2.1 2.1 2.8
Neither Agree Nor Disagree 49 17.2 17.2 20.0
Agree 152 53.3 53.3 73.3
Strongly Agree 76 26.7 26.7 100.0
Total 285 100.0 100.0

It takes a lot of time and effort to live an eco-friendly life on a daily basis to take action
to reduce air pollution
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid Strongly Agree 6 2.1 2.1 2.1
Agree 33 11.6 11.6 13.7
Neither Agree Nor Disagree 24 8.4 8.4 22.1
Disagree 127 44.6 44.6 66.7
Strongly Disagree 95 33.3 33.3 100.0
Total 285 100.0 100.0

It takes a lot of time and effort to mobilize companies and governments about the local
air pollution environment

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Valid Agree 10 3.5 3.5 3.5
Neither Agree Nor Disagree 43 15.1 15.1 18.6
Disagree 143 50.2 50.2 68.8
Strongly Disagree 89 31.2 31.2 100.0
Total 285 100.0 100.0

If someone I know is participates in local air pollution reduction actions, I think I should
too

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Valid Strongly Disagree 1 .4 .4 .4
Disagree 8 2.8 2.8 3.2
Neither Agree Nor Disagree 18 6.3 6.3 9.5
Agree 142 49.8 49.8 59.3
Strongly Agree 116 40.7 40.7 100.0
Total 285 100.0 100.0
 I wish to use public transportation more often
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid Strongly Disagree 15 5.3 5.3 5.3
Disagree 31 10.9 10.9 16.1
Neither Agree Nor Disagree 62 21.8 21.8 37.9
Agree 114 40.0 40.0 77.9
Strongly Agree 63 22.1 22.1 100.0
Total 285 100.0 100.0

Type of housing

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Valid Apartment 232 81.4 81.4 81.4
Detached House 10 3.5 3.5 84.9
Baishin in Ger Areas 28 9.8 9.8 94.7
Ger 15 5.3 5.3 100.0
Total 285 100.0 100.0

Lower level of pro-environmental behavior (Frequency of using processed coal/saving

electricity)

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Valid Never 126 44.2 44.2 44.2
Once a month or less 26 9.1 9.1 53.3
Less than once a week 12 4.2 4.2 57.5
1-2 times a week 31 10.9 10.9 68.4
3-5 times a week 23 8.1 8.1 76.5
Everyday 67 23.5 23.5 100.0
Total 285 100.0 100.0

Lower level of pro-environmental behavior (Wish to use processed coal and good-
quality stove more often/to save electricity)

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid Strongly Disagree 14 4.9 4.9 4.9
Disagree 60 21.1 21.1 26.0
Neither Agree Nor Disagree 86 30.2 30.2 56.1
Agree 93 32.6 32.6 88.8
Strongly Agree 32 11.2 11.2 100.0
Total 285 100.0 100.0
Medium level of pro-environmental behavior (Frequency of using public transportation)

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Valid Never 56 19.6 19.6 19.6
Once a month or less 47 16.5 16.5 36.1
Less than once a week 18 6.3 6.3 42.5
1-2 times a week 41 14.4 14.4 56.8
3-5 times a week 57 20.0 20.0 76.8
Everyday 66 23.2 23.2 100.0
Total 285 100.0 100.0

Higher level of pro-environmental behavior (Housing upgrade Ger→Apartment→Eco

House)

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Valid Strongly Disagree 4 1.4 1.4 1.4
Disagree 10 3.5 3.5 4.9
Neither Agree Nor Disagree 22 7.7 7.7 12.6
Agree 87 30.5 30.5 43.2
Strongly Agree 162 56.8 56.8 100.0
Total 285 100.0 100.0

Higher level of pro-environmental behavior (Housing upgrade Ger→Eco House)

(OnlyGerQuestion)

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Valid 242 84.9 84.9 84.9
Disagree 1 .4 .4 85.3
Neither Agree Nor Disagree 1 .4 .4 85.6
Agree 10 3.5 3.5 89.1
Strongly Agree 31 10.9 10.9 100.0
Total 285 100.0 100.0

It is more affordable to live in

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Valid No 193 67.7 67.7 67.7
Yes 92 32.3 32.3 100.0
Total 285 100.0 100.0

I am used to living in this area

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Valid No 207 72.6 72.6 72.6
Yes 78 27.4 27.4 100.0
Total 285 100.0 100.0
 It is more comfortable to live in

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Valid No 195 68.4 68.4 68.4
Yes 90 31.6 31.6 100.0
Total 285 100.0 100.0

It has been passed down from generation to generation

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Valid No 262 91.9 91.9 91.9
Yes 23 8.1 8.1 100.0
Total 285 100.0 100.0

It is difficult and troublesome to move to another house

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Valid No 240 84.2 84.2 84.2
Yes 45 15.8 15.8 100.0
Total 285 100.0 100.0

I am not interested in environmental issues

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Valid No 278 97.5 97.5 97.5
Yes 7 2.5 2.5 100.0
Total 285 100.0 100.0

If I live here, I can move to an apartment or receive money through

equivalent exchange (GerOnlyQuestion)

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Valid No 41 14.4 95.3 95.3
Yes 2 .7 4.7 100.0
Total 43 15.1 100.0
Missing System 242 84.9

Total 285 100.0

I am not aware of the effectiveness of eco-house (NonGerOnlyQuestion)

 Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid No 200 70.2 82.6 82.6
Yes 42 14.7 17.4 100.0
Total 242 84.9 100.0
Missing System 43 15.1

Total 285 100.0