You are on page 1of 9

A let-7 microRNA binding site

polymorphism in the KRAS 3′UTR is


associated with increased risk and reduced
survival for gallbladder cancer in North
Indian population
Hasan Raza Kazmi, Abhijit Chandra,
Saket Kumar, Leena Khare Satyam,
Annapurna Gupta, Jaya Nigam, Meenu
Srivastava & Balraj Mittal
Journal of Cancer Research and
Clinical Oncology

ISSN 0171-5216

J Cancer Res Clin Oncol


DOI 10.1007/s00432-016-2254-9

1 23
Your article is protected by copyright and
all rights are held exclusively by Springer-
Verlag Berlin Heidelberg. This e-offprint is
for personal use only and shall not be self-
archived in electronic repositories. If you wish
to self-archive your article, please use the
accepted manuscript version for posting on
your own website. You may further deposit
the accepted manuscript version in any
repository, provided it is only made publicly
available 12 months after official publication
or later and provided acknowledgement is
given to the original source of publication
and a link is inserted to the published article
on Springer's website. The link must be
accompanied by the following text: "The final
publication is available at link.springer.com”.

1 23
Author's personal copy
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol
DOI 10.1007/s00432-016-2254-9

ORIGINAL ARTICLE – CLINICAL ONCOLOGY

A let‑7 microRNA binding site polymorphism in the KRAS


3′UTR is associated with increased risk and reduced survival
for gallbladder cancer in North Indian population
Hasan Raza Kazmi1,2 · Abhijit Chandra1 · Saket Kumar1 · Leena Khare Satyam3 ·
Annapurna Gupta4 · Jaya Nigam1 · Meenu Srivastava1 · Balraj Mittal4

Received: 20 August 2016 / Accepted: 1 September 2016


© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016

Abstract At allelic level, allele G has significant higher risk for GBC
Purpose Gallbladder cancer is a lethal malignancy of as compared with T allele (p = 0.008, odds ratio = 2.5,
hepato-biliary system with high incidence in North India, 95 % CI 1.25–5.01). Survival analysis reveals decrease in
especially along gangetic plain. The let-7 microRNAs play overall survival for heterozygous genotype (p < 0.0001,
a key role in regulating KRAS expression and a polymor- hazard ratio = 3.42, 95 % CI 1.21–4.20). Also, significant
phism in 3′ untranslated region (rs61764370, T/G) of KRAS decrease in overall survival was observed for patient carry-
leads to its higher expression. This polymorphism is known ing allele G (p < 0.0001, HR = 2.89, 95 % CI 1.21–4.20)
to be associated with increased risk and prognosis of various as compared with allele C.
cancers but its association with gallbladder cancer has not Conclusions We conclude that KRAS rs61764370 poly-
been evaluated. To address this research question, we evalu- morphism is significantly associated with risk and progno-
ated whether rs61764370 variant is associated with gall- sis of gallbladder malignancy in this endemic belt.
bladder cancer susceptibility and clinical outcomes.
Methods In present case–control study, we enrolled 541 Keywords Gallbladder cancer · KRAS · let-7 · rs61764370
patients with gallbladder malignancy and 307 controls.
Genomic DNA was obtained from peripheral blood and
genotyping was performed using Taqman allelic discrimi- Introduction
nation assay.
Results Heterozygous (TG) individuals are at a signifi- Gallbladder cancer (GBC) is the most common malignancy
cant higher risk for GBC as compared with wild genotype of the biliary tract with high incidence in Northern India
(TT) (p = 0.007, odds ratio = 2.56, 95 % CI 1.27–5.18). especially along the gangetic belt (Dhir and Mohandas

* Abhijit Chandra Balraj Mittal


abhijitchandra@hotmail.com bml_pgi@yahoo.com
Hasan Raza Kazmi
1
hasanrazakazmi@yahoo.co.in Department of Surgical Gastroenterology, King George’s
Medical University, Lucknow 226003, India
Saket Kumar
2
krsaketsingh@gmail.com Present Address: Department of Molecular and Human
Genetics, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi 221005, India
Leena Khare Satyam
3
leena.satyam@gmail.com Cell and Molecular Biology Department, Aurigene Discovery
Technologies Limited, Bangalore 560095, India
Annapurna Gupta
4
annapurnagupta12@gmail.com Department of Medical Genetics, Sanjay Gandhi Post
Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow 226003,
Jaya Nigam
India
jayanigam27@gmail.com
Meenu Srivastava
meenu.srivastava12@gmail.com

13
Author's personal copy
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol

1999; Manoharan et al. 2010; Kazmi et al. 2014; Yadav radiological evaluation. Patients were followed after one
et al. 2015; Gupta et al. 2016). Complete surgical resec- month of recruitment to their death or completion of the
tion remains only potential curative treatment for this study whichever occurred earlier. Telephonic interview was
malignancy but with high recurrence rate. However, at the done to obtain prognostic data (number of chemotherapy
time of diagnosis most patients have advanced disease due cycles and overall survival).
to lack of specific sign and symptoms (Shaffer 2008; Zhu Genomic DNA was obtained from 3 ml peripheral blood
et al. 2010; Dutta 2012). The prognosis of GBC remains (collected in EDTA) which was obtained from each subject
extremely poor, because of late presentation and aggres- by intravenous puncture. Integrity of DNA was checked in
siveness. Hence, novel diagnostic and prognostic biomark- 0.8 % agarose gel and quantification of DNA was assessed
ers are needed for better clinical outcome. using nanodrop spectrophotometer. Genotyping was done
MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are short non-coding RNAs of using Taqman allelic discrimination assay (Applied Biosys-
20–24 nucleotides long that play an important role in gene tems, USA) with a custom-designed primer probe (Forward
regulation of their target mRNAs by binding to comple- primer: 5′-GCCAGGCTGGTCTCGAA-3′, reverse primer:
mentary sites in the 3′ untranslated region (UTR) (John- 5′-CTGAATAAATGAGTTCTGCAAAACAGGTT-3′, VIC
son et al. 2005; Hollestelle et al. 2011). A large number reporter probe: 5′-CTCAAGTGATTCACCCAC-3′, and
of studies have confirmed miRNA binding site polymor- FAM reporter probe: 5′-CAAGTGATTCACCCAC-3′) set
phism to be novel class of polymorphic variations of clini- using ABI PRISM 7500 software.
cal importance and could be useful biomarkers for disease Statistical analysis was performed by Statistical Pack-
progression, treatment response, and prognosis (Cipollini age for the Social Sciences (SPSS Version 16.0, Chicago,
et al. 2014). Let-7 miRNAs are genetic regulators that are IL) for windows or using Graph pad prism (Version 5.0).
important in controlling KRAS expression and a polymor- Two-tailed p value <0.05 was considered to be statistically
phism in 3′UTR (rs61764370 T/G) of the gene disrupts significant. Kaplan–Meier survival method was used for
let-7 miRNA binding site which ultimately leads to higher patient survival’s estimation and the difference was ana-
expression of ras protein (Chin et al. 2008; Hollestelle et al. lyzed by the log-rank test. Hazard of failure was estimated
2011). The association of rs61764370 polymorphism with using Cox proportional hazard model.
several types of cancer has been extensively studied (Chin
et al. 2008; Nelson et al. 2010; Sebio et al. 2013; Hol-
lestelle et al. 2011; Ratner et al. 2010; Christensen et al. Results
2009). However, its association with risk and prognosis for
gallbladder malignancy has not been evaluated. Therefore, In the present case–control study, a total of 848 subjects
in present study we investigated KRAS rs61764370 poly- were recruited including 541 cases of gallbladder can-
morphism and its association with susceptibility, clinical cer while 307 subjects were healthy controls. Control
outcomes, and survival of GBC patients in Northern Indian group was matched with cases by age and gender. Clini-
high risk population. cal characteristics of the study population are illustrated in
Table 1. For both cases and controls, the observed geno-
type frequency was in Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium. We
Material and methods observed significant difference in genotype frequency for rs
61764370 polymorphism between GBC cases and healthy
This present hospital based case control study was ethi- population (Table 2). However, we were unable to find any
cally approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee and mutant genotype (GG) in our recruited subjects. Individu-
all subjects provide written inform consent before enrol- als having heterozygous genotype (TG) have significant
ment. In our study, a total of 541 histologically confirmed higher risk for GBC as compared with wild genotype (TT)
or fine needle aspiration cytology-proven cases of gallblad- (p = 0.007, odds ratio = 2.56, 95 % CI 1.27–5.18). Simi-
der cancer were included. There are 307 controls (healthy larly, at allelic estimation, allele G has significant higher
subjects, without any malignancy or gallstones or polyp) risk for GBC as compared with T allele (p = 0.008, odds
in this cohort from the same geographical area and ethnic- ratio = 2.5, 95 % CI 1.25–5.01).
ity. Cases and controls were mainly recruited from January Till the last follow-up, only 68 (12.6 %) patients were
2010 to October 2015 from outpatient department (OPD) found to be surviving, 316 patients were dead while 157
of King George’s Medical University, Lucknow. All the (29.0 %) were lost to follow-up. Kaplan–Meier survival
procedures were according to the Declaration of Helsinki. curve indicates significant decrease (p < 0.0001) in over-
Staging for gallbladder malignancy was done according all survival for patients carrying heterozygous genotype
to 7th edition of American Joint Committee on Cancer— (hazard ratio = 3.42, 95 % CI 1.21–4.20) (Fig. 1). Also,
Tumor node metastasis classification (TNM), 2010 or by significant decrease in overall survival was observed

13
Author's personal copy
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol

Table 1  Table showing clinical Parameters Case (n = 541) Controls (n = 307) p value
characteristics of recruited
subjects Age ± SD 50.33 ± 15.7 48.99 ± 11.28 0.19
Sex –
Male/female 153 (28.3 %)/388 (71.7 %) 100 (32.57 %)/207 (67.43 %) 0.22
Stage at diagnosis N/A –
1a/1b 1 (0.2 %)/7 (1.3 %) –
2 25 (4.6 %) –
3a/3b 57 (10.5 %)/61 (11.3 %) –
4a/4b 111 (20.5 %)/244 (45.1 %) –
Missing 35 (6.5 %) –
T N/A –
1 7 (1.3 %) –
2 84 (15.5 %) –
3 165 (30.5 %) –
4 217 (40.1 %) –
Missing 68 (12.6 %) –
N N/A –
0 114 (21.1 %) –
1 138 (25.5 %) –
2 137 (25.3 %) –
Missing 152 (28.1 %) –
M N/A –
0 285 (52.7 %) –
1 189 (34.9 %) –
Missing 67 (12.4 %) –
Gallstones N/A –
Present/absent 424 (78.4 %)/96 (17.7 %) –
Missing 21 (3.9 %) –
Jaundice N/A –
Present/absent 337 (62.3 %)/158 (29.2 %) –
Missing 46 (8.5 %) –
Palpable lump N/A –
Present/absent 363 (67.1 %)/151 (27.9 %) –
Missing 27 (5.0 %) –
Weight loss N/A –
Present/absent 390 (72.1 %)/112 (20.7 %) –
Missing 39 (7.2 %) –
Chemotherapy N/A –
Complete course 59 (10.9 %) –
Incomplete course 142 (26.3 %) –
No chemotherapy 183 (33.8 %) –
Missing 157 (29.0 %) –
Survival status N/A –
Dead/living 316 (58.4 %)/68 (12.6 %) –
Lost to follow-up 157 (29.0 %) –

for patient carrying allele G as compared with allele T node involvement, and distant metastasis) in respect
(p < 0.0001, HR = 2.89, 95 % CI 1.21–4.20). We do not with KRAS genotype (Table 3). Also, no difference in
observe change in mean overall survival for any of the mean survival was observed for presence or absence of
pathological parameters (stage of tumor, tumor invasion, gallstones, jaundice, gallbladder mass, weight loss, and

13
Author's personal copy
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol

Table 2  Genotype and allele frequency distribution of KRAS (rs61764370) gene polymorphism in gallbladder cancer patients and healthy con-
trols
Polymorphism Cases (n = 541) Control (n = 307) Odds ratio (95 % confidence interval) p value

rs61764370
Wild (TT) 498 297 1 Ref 1 Ref
Variant (heterozygous + mutant) (TG + GG) 43 10 2.56 (1.27–5.18) 0.007
Allele carriage
T allele 1039 604 1 Ref 1 Ref
G allele 604 10 2.5 (1.25–5.01) 0.008

Differences in KRAS-variant allele frequencies between cases and controls were tested for significance by a χ2-test. Case–control odds ratios
and their confidence intervals were calculated using Woolf approximations
p < 0.05 was considered as statistically significant

and these findings require further validation. In our cohort


of 838 subjects, we didn’t find mutant genotype (GG) and
hence all comparison is done with reference to heterozy-
gous genotype (TG). Our results are consistent with Cerne
et al. (2012) who have made a similar observation in a large
sample pool. Absence of detection of mutant genotype
(GG) in this study may be due to its very low frequency in
North Indian population. However, this hypothesis needs to
be validated in further studies.
The association of KRAS rs61764370 polymorphism
with susceptibility to head and neck, ovarian, oral, breast,
colorectal and non-small cell lung cancer has been widely
studied (Cipollini et al. 2014). Paranjape et al. (2011) iden-
tified variant genotype as a genetic marker for triple-neg-
Fig. 1  Kaplan–Meier overall survival curve of Gallbladder cancer
patients (n = 541) for KRAS (rs61764370) gene polymorphism. Sta-
ative breast cancer in premenopausal women. In addition,
tistical analysis using the log-rank test indicates significant difference altered gene expression and lower level of let-7 miRNA has
between the survival curves been observed for KRAS-variant tumors. Dai et al. (2015)
observed a functional role of rs61764370 polymorphism in
colorectal cancer development and oxaliplatin-based chem-
status of adjuvant chemotherapy clinical parameters otherapy response. Significant association is also observed
(Table 4). in females who develop both breast and ovarian cancer with
uninformative BRCA sequencing results (Pilarski et al.
2012). In line with these results, we have also observed sig-
Discussion nificant association of rs61764370 polymorphism with sus-
ceptibility of GBC. These findings indicate possible asso-
To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study evalu- ciation of the variant genotype with the risk of malignancy.
ating the association of rs61764370 polymorphism with An account of this association may be lowered cellular lev-
susceptibility and prognosis of gallbladder malignancy in els of let-7 which may increase cell growth or altered let-
this endemic belt. The study results show that heterozy- 7 binding in the 3′UTR which may lead to KRAS overex-
gous genotype (TG) and mutant allele (G) is associated pression. However, Caiola et al. (2012) have not observed
with increased risk of GBC with worse outcomes in North significant association of rs61764370 polymorphism with
Indian population. Heterozygous carrier carries signifi- ovarian cancer. Also, in a large case control study, no sig-
cant higher risk (odds ratio = 2.56, 95 % CI 1.27–5.18, nificant association with ovarian or breast cancer has been
p = 0.007) of GBC with respect to homozygous wild geno- observed (Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium, Breast
type (TT). Similarly, at allelic level, patients with allele G Cancer Association Consortium, and Consortium of Modi-
have higher risk of malignancy (odds ratio = 2.5, 95 % CI fiers of BRCA1 and BRCA2). These contradictory results
1.25–5.01, p = 0.008) in comparison with allele T. Sub- may be due to population and patient selection bias and
sequent limitation of the current study is of sample size, need further evaluation.

13
Author's personal copy
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol

Table 3  Table showing association between various pathological characteristics with overall survival of GBC patients

Tumor stage (n = 367) Mean survival in months ± SD p value


Wild genotype (TT) (n = 297) Heterozygous + mutant (TG + GG) (29)

1a (n = 1) 24.0 (n = 1) – –
1b (n = 5) 18.75 ± 7.89 (n = 4) 24.0 (n = 1) 0.349
2 (n = 19) 14.53 ± 4.56 (n = 19) – –
3a (n = 42) 11.04 ± 8.0 (n = 40) 4.39 ± 5.66 (n = 2) 0.349
3b (n = 48) 8.09 ± 3.1 (n = 46) 6.05 ± 8.41 (n = 2) 0.399
4a (n = 89) 3.23 ± 2.24 (n = 76) 2.44 ± 1.44 (n = 13) 0.224
4b (n = 163) 1.97 ± 1.18 (n = 141) 1.48 ± 0.94 (n = 22) 0.063
T status (n = 349) Mean survival in months ± SD p value
Wild genotype (TT) (n = 310) Heterozygous + mutant (TG + GG) (n = 39)

T1 (n = 4) 15.75 ± 9.53 (n = 4) – –
T2 (n = 67) 7.84 ± 4.91 (n = 65) 7.95 ± 5.73 (n = 2) 0.976
T3 (n = 115) 5.85 ± 5.73 (n = 104) 2.37 ± 3.42 (n = 11) 0.051
T4 (n = 163) 3.54 ± 3.62 (n = 137) 2.78 ± 4.49 (n = 26) 0.345
N status (n = 296) Mean survival in months ± SD p value
Wild genotype (TT) (n = 266) Heterozygous + mutant (TG + GG) (n = 30)

N0 (n = 85) 9.91 ± 6.18 (n = 77) 4.06 ± 3.43 (n = 8) 0.01


N1 (n = 102) 4.86 ± 3.66 (n = 93) 3.09 ± 3.52 (n = 9) 0.166
N2 (n = 109) 2.62 ± 2.54 (n = 96) 1.4 ± 1.04 (n = 13) 0.092
M status (n = 344) Mean survival in months ± SD p value
Wild genotype (TT) (n = 306) Heterozygous + mutant (TG + GG) (n = 38)

M0 (n = 217) 6.95 ± 5.64 (n = 196) 4.22 ± 5.55 (n = 21) 0.04


M1 (n = 127) 2.51 ± 1.38 (n = 110) 2.36 ± 0.81 (n = 17) 0.05

Statistical analysis done using independent Student t test


p < 0.05 was considered as statistically significant

Most of the studies have revealed significant associa- These results indicate that KRAS genotype (rs61764370) is
tion of rs61764370 polymorphism with patient survival. an independent prognostic biomarker for gallbladder can-
Christensen et al. (2009) observed worse clinical outcome cer for North Indian population.
for oral cancer in relation to variant genotype. Similarly, In a study by Ganzinelli et al. (2015), no evidence of
patients with colorectal cancer with G allele (mutant) have association was observed for overall survival and pro-
a shorter survival and a higher risk of relapse or metasta- gression-free survival in non-small cell lung cancer in
sis when compared to those carrying the wild allele (Dai regards to this polymorphism. Also, better prognosis was
et al. 2015). We also observed significant association of observed for patients treated with docetaxel instead of
heterozygous genotype (TG) and mutant allele (G) with erlotinib for both overall survival and progression-free
decreased overall survival of patients with gallbladder survival. A study by Caiola et al. (2012) also has not dem-
malignancy. In addition, survival of GBC patients in rela- onstrated an association of rs61764370 polymorphism
tion to rs61764370 polymorphism was found to be inde- with outcome or physiopathological characteristic in
pendent of any prognostic factor (stage of tumor, presence ovarian cancer. These differences may be due to hetero-
or absence of jaundice, gallbladder mass, chemotherapy, geneity of the disease and impact of several confounding
and weight loss). It is possible that a decrease in let-7 factors on the results.
miRNA binding leads to a corresponding increase in KRAS We are now beginning to understand the importance of
protein expression which results in activated GTPase activ- 3′ untranslated region miRNA binding site polymorphism
ity which in turn leads to poor prognosis in these patients. in cancer biology (Pelletier and Weidhaas 2010). Better

13
Author's personal copy
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol

Table 4  Table showing association of various clinicopathological parameters with overall survival of GBC patients

Gallstone (n = 365) Mean survival in months ± SD p value


Wild genotype (TT) Heterozygous + mutant (TG + GG)

Present (n = 302) 5.28 ± 5.19 (n = 269) 2.69 ± 4.41 (n = 33) 0.09


Absent (n = 63) 4.83 ± 4.83 (n = 54) 3.27 ± 3.43 (n = 9) 0.36
Jaundice (n = 371) Mean survival in months ± SD p value
Wild genotype (TT) (n = 331) Heterozygous + mutant (TG + GG) (n = 40)

Present (n = 261) 3.09 ± 2.96 (n = 228) 1.78 ± 1.29 (n = 33) 0.01


Absent (n = 110) 9.76 ± 5.79 (n = 103) 9.76 ± 5.79 (n = 103) 0.39
Palpable gallbladder Mean survival in months ± SD p value
mass (n = 374)
Wild genotype (TT) (n = 334) Heterozygous + mutant (TG + GG) (n = 40)

Present (n = 270) 3.17 ± 2.8 (n = 234) 2.04 ± 2.12 (n = 36) 0.02


Absent (n = 104) 9.77 ± 6.15 (n = 100) 9.87 ± 10.58 (n = 4) 0.98
Weight loss (n = 373) Mean survival in months ± SD p value
Wild genotype (TT) (n = 332) Heterozygous + mutant (TG + GG) (n = 41)

Present (n = 288) 3.69 ± 3.53 (n = 250) 1.83 ± 1.26 (n = 38) 0.001


Absent (n = 85) 9.63 ± 6.39 (n = 82) 16.00 ± 6.93 (n = 3) 0.09
Chemotherapy (n = 382) Mean survival in months ± SD p value
Wild genotype (TT) (n = 340) Heterozygous + mutant (TG + GG) (n = 42)

Complete (n = 59) 14.35 ± 4.29 (n = 56) 16.0 ± 6.93 (n = 3) 0.53


Incomplete (n = 142) 5.42 ± 2.48 (n = 132) 3.41 ± 0.81 (n = 10) 0.01
No chemotherapy (n = 181) 1.49 ± 0.76 (n = 152) 1.24 ± 0.84 (n = 29) 0.11

Statistical analysis done using independent Student t test


p < 0.05 was considered as statistically significant

understanding of miRNA, miRNA binding site polymor- SERPD/D-3429) and Indian Council of Medical Research, Govern-
phism along with its functional role will be very useful ment of India, India (Grant No. 3/2/2/60/2011/NCDIII).
towards clinical utilization of these new genetic variations. Compliance with ethical standards
Also, validation of these variants as a diagnostic, prognos-
tic, and predictive biomarker for gallbladder cancer would Conflict of interest The authors declare that they have no conflict of
provide a valuable clinical tool (Kim and Slack 2014). interest.
To conclude, in our pilot study, we have demonstrated
that KRAS rs61764370 polymorphism is significantly asso- Human and animals rights All procedures performed in studies
ciated with risk and prognosis of gallbladder malignancy involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical
in this endemic belt. We hope that our results will help in standards of the institutional research committee and with the 1964
Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical
characterizing these variants as potential biomarker of can- standards.
cer outcome, treatment response, and disease management,
heading towards personalized medicine. Informed consent Informed consent was obtained from all individual
participants included in the study.
Acknowledgments The authors are thankful to the Council of Sci-
ence and Technology, Government of Uttar Pradesh, Lucknow, India
for financially supporting the study (Grant No. CST/SERPD/D-3429).
Hasan Raza Kazmi is thankful to Indian Council of Medical Research,
Government of India, New Delhi, India for providing fellowship References
(Grant No. 3/2/2/60/2011/NCDIII).
Caiola E, Rulli E, Fruscio R, Buda A, Broggini M, Marabese M
Funding The study was funded by Council of Science and Tech- (2012) KRas-LCS6 polymorphism does not impact on outcomes
nology, Government of Uttar Pradesh, India (Grant No. CST/ in ovarian cancer. Am J Cancer Res 2(3):298–308

13
Author's personal copy
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol

Cerne JZ, Stegel V, Gersak K, Novakovic S (2012) KRAS rs61764370 and elderly suggests two subsets of the same disease? Biomed
is associated with HER2-overexpressed and poorly-differentiated Res Int 2014:625695
breast cancer in hormone replacement therapy users: a case con- Kim M, Slack FJ (2014) MicroRNA-mediated regulation of KRAS in
trol study. BMC Cancer 12:105. doi:10.1186/1471-2407-12-105 cancer. J Hematol Oncol 7:84. doi:10.1186/s13045-014-0084-2
Chin LJ, Ratner E, Leng S, Zhai R, Nallur S, Babar I, Muller RU, Manoharan N, Tyagi BB, Raina V (2010) Cancer incidences in rural
Straka E, Su L, Burki EA, Crowell RE, Patel R, Kulkarni Delhi—2004-05. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 11(1):73–77
T, Homer R, Zelterman D, Kidd KK, Zhu Y, Christiani DC, Nelson HH, Christensen BC, Plaza SL, Wiencke JK, Marsit CJ, Kel-
Belinsky SA, Slack FJ, Weidhaas JB (2008) A SNP in a let-7 sey KT (2010) KRAS mutation, KRAS-LCS6 polymorphism,
microRNA complementary site in the KRAS 3′ untranslated and non-small cell lung cancer. Lung Cancer 69(1):51–53
region increases non-small cell lung cancer risk. Cancer Res Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium, Breast Cancer Association
68(20):8535–8540 Consortium, Consortium of Modifiers of BRCA1 and BRCA2,
Christensen BC, Moyer BJ, Avissar M, Ouellet LG, Plaza SL, Hollestelle A, van der Baan FH, Berchuck A, Johnatty SE, Aben
McClean MD, Marsit CJ, Kelsey KT (2009) A let-7 micro- KK, Agnarsson BA et al (2016) No clinical utility of KRAS
RNA-binding site polymorphism in the KRAS 3′ UTR is asso- variant rs61764370 for ovarian or breast cancer. Gynecol Oncol
ciated with reduced survival in oral cancers. Carcinogenesis 141(2):386–401
30(6):1003–1007 Paranjape T, Heneghan H, Lindner R, Keane FK, Hoffman A, Hol-
Cipollini M, Landi S, Gemignani F (2014) MicroRNA binding site lestelle A, Dorairaj J, Geyda K, Pelletier C, Nallur S, Martens
polymorphisms as biomarkers in cancer management and JW, Hooning MJ, Kerin M, Zelterman D, Zhu Y, Tuck D, Harris
research. Pharmgenomics Personal Med 7:173–191 L, Miller N, Slack F, Weidhaas J (2011) A 3′-untranslated region
Dai Q, Wei HL, Huang J, Zhou TJ, Chai L, Yang ZH (2015) KRAS KRAS variant and triple-negative breast cancer: a case-control
polymorphisms are associated with survival of CRC in Chinese and genetic analysis. Lancet Oncol 12(4):377–386
population. Tumour Biol 37(4):4727–4734 Pelletier C, Weidhaas JB (2010) MicroRNA binding site polymor-
Dhir V, Mohandas KM (1999) Epidemiology of digestive tract can- phisms as biomarkers of cancer risk. Expert Rev Mol Diagn
cers in India IV. Gall bladder and pancreas. Indian J Gastroen- 10(6):817–829
terol 18(1):24–28 Pilarski R, Patel DA, Weitzel J, McVeigh T, Dorairaj JJ, Heneghan
Dutta U (2012) Gallbladder cancer: can newer insights improve the HM, Miller N, Weidhaas JB, Kerin MJ, McKenna M, Wu X,
outcome? J Gastroenterol Hepatol 27(4):642–653 Hildebrandt M, Zelterman D, Sand S, Shulman LP (2012) The
Ganzinelli M, Rulli E, Caiola E, Chiara Garassino M, Broggini M, KRAS-variant is associated with risk of developing double pri-
Copreni E, Piva S, Longo F, Labianca R, Bareggi C, Agnese mary breast and ovarian cancer. PLoS ONE 7(5):e37891
Fabbri M, Martelli O, Fagnani D, Cristina Locatelli M, Berto- Ratner E, Lu L, Boeke M, Barnett R, Nallur S, Chin LJ, Pelletier C,
lini A, Valmadre G, Pavese Calcagno A, Giuseppa Sarobba M, Blitzblau R, Tassi R, Paranjape T, Hui P, Godwin AK, Yu H,
Marabese M (2015) Role of KRAS-LCS6 polymorphism in Risch H, Rutherford T, Schwartz P, Santin A, Matloff E, Zelter-
advanced NSCLC patients treated with erlotinib or docetaxel in man D, Slack FJ, Weidhaas JB (2010) A KRAS-variant in ovar-
second line treatment (TAILOR). Sci Rep 5:16331. doi:10.1038/ ian cancer acts as a genetic marker of cancer risk. Cancer Res
srep16331 70(16):6509–6515
Gupta S, Kori C, Kumar V, Misra S, Akhtar N (2016) Epidemiological Sebio A, Paré L, Páez D, Salazar J, González A, Sala N, del Río E,
study of gallbladder cancer patients from North Indian Gangetic Martín-Richard M, Tobeña M, Barnadas A, Baiget M (2013) The
Planes—a high-volume centre’s experience. J Gastrointest Can- LCS6 polymorphism in the binding site of let-7 microRNA to
cer 47(1):27–35 the KRAS 3′-untranslated region: its role in the efficacy of anti-
Hollestelle A, Pelletier C, Hooning M, Crepin E, Schutte M, Look M, EGFR-based therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer patients.
Collee JM, Nieuwlaat A, Dorssers LC, Seynaeve C, Aulchenko Pharmacogenet Genom 23(3):142–147
YS, Martens JW, van den Ouweland AM, Weidhaas JB (2011) Shaffer EA (2008) Gallbladder cancer: the basics. Gastroenterol
Prevalence of the variant allele rs61764370 T>G in the 3′UTR of Hepatol (NY) 4(10):737–741
KRAS among Dutch BRCA1, BRCA2 and non-BRCA1/BRCA2 Yadav A, Gupta A, Yadav S, Rastogi N, Agrawal S, Kumar A, Kumar
breast cancer families. Breast Cancer Res Treat 128(1):79–84 V, Misra S, Mittal B (2015) Association of Wnt signaling path-
Johnson SM, Grosshans H, Shingara J, Byrom M, Jarvis R, Cheng way genetic variants in gallbladder cancer susceptibility and sur-
A, Labourier E, Reinert KL, Brown D, Slack FJ (2005) RAS is vival. Tumour Biol 37(6):8083–8095
regulated by the let-7 microRNA family. Cell 120(5):635–647 Zhu AX, Hong TS, Hezel AF, Kooby DA (2010) Current management
Kazmi HR, Chandra A, Baghel K, Singh A, Nigam J, Parmar D, of gallbladder carcinoma. Oncologist 15(2):168–181
Mahdi AA, Goel SK, Kumar S (2014) Differential expression
of cholecystokinin A receptor in gallbladder cancer in the young

13

You might also like