Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Source www.sciencedirect.com
Abstract English The main focus of the study was to know English as a subject
and as a language, the quality of the textbooks, opportunities of
listening to good English with proper/correct pronunciation and
to high light that various exercises/activities, i.e. seminars, group
discussions and debates competitions, etc. were regularly being
arranged or not. The study was descriptive in nature. The
researchers selected 20 male students and 20 female students
from 4 Govt. colleges in district Charsadda (N.W.F.P, Pakistan)
studying at the first year and second year level through stratified
random sampling procedure. The data was collected through a
questionnaire having alternate items. The questionnaire was
designed by consulting experts in the concerned field. It was
tabulated in the form of counting frequencies and then analyzed
through percentages. The main findings of the study were: by
teaching English as a subject to the students and not as a
language give vent to rote memory only to pass the examination
out of burden. Enough time is not given to various exercises and
opportunities for the improvement of speaking ability. Students
also complained of scolding, and discouraging by their teachers
for not speaking correctly. Although the teachers and students are
equally responsible for the poor speaking ability, yet the teachers
are more responsible by having the professional knowledge and
skills. To improve the speaking ability, more stress on the quality
of books at the basic level, enough time given to speaking and
phonetic drills of students, no scolding but provision of friendly
environment, making practical and applicable strategies by
teachers for students while speaking most of the time in
English, develop boldness and confidence in students for
asking questions from their teachers, no overcrowded classes,
awards and motivation for students, the role of media such as
listening to CNN and BBC, inclusion of viva-voce in the
examination system at various levels for checking the
competence of the candidates, up to-date and constant training
of teachers, arranging various activities and balance in the
courses with respect to literature and language should be there to
provide opportunities to improve the language competency of
students.
Indonesia Fokus utama dari penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui bahasa
Inggris sebagai mata pelajaran dan sebagai bahasa, kualitas buku
teks, peluang mendengarkan bahasa Inggris yang baik dengan
pengucapan yang tepat / benar dan untuk menyoroti berbagai latihan
/ kegiatan, yaitu seminar, diskusi kelompok. dan kompetisi debat,
dll. secara teratur diatur atau tidak. Penelitian ini bersifat deskriptif.
Para peneliti memilih 20 siswa laki-laki dan 20 siswa perempuan
dari 4 Pemerintah. perguruan tinggi di distrik Charsadda (N.W.F.P,
Pakistan) belajar di tahun pertama dan tingkat tahun kedua melalui
prosedur pengambilan sampel acak bertingkat. Pengumpulan data
dilakukan melalui kuesioner dengan item alternatif. Kuesioner
dirancang oleh konsultan ahli di bidang terkait. Itu ditabulasikan
dalam bentuk frekuensi penghitungan dan kemudian dianalisis
melalui persentase. Temuan utama dari penelitian ini adalah:
dengan mengajarkan bahasa Inggris sebagai mata pelajaran kepada
siswa dan bukan sebagai bahasa melampiaskan hafalan hanya untuk
lulus ujian karena beban. Tidak cukup waktu yang diberikan untuk
berbagai latihan dan kesempatan untuk peningkatan kemampuan
berbicara. Siswa juga mengeluhkan omelan, dan mengecilkan hati
oleh gurunya karena tidak berbicara dengan benar. Meskipun guru
dan siswa sama-sama bertanggung jawab atas buruknya
kemampuan berbicara, namun guru lebih bertanggung jawab dengan
memiliki pengetahuan dan keterampilan profesional. Untuk
meningkatkan kemampuan berbicara, lebih menekankan pada
kualitas buku di tingkat dasar, waktu yang cukup diberikan untuk
berbicara dan latihan fonetik siswa, tidak ada omelan tetapi
penyediaan lingkungan yang ramah, membuat strategi praktis dan
aplikatif oleh guru untuk siswa sambil berbicara sebagian besar
waktu dalam bahasa Inggris, mengembangkan keberanian dan
kepercayaan diri siswa untuk mengajukan pertanyaan dari guru
mereka, tidak ada kelas yang penuh sesak, penghargaan dan
motivasi untuk siswa, peran media seperti mendengarkan CNN dan
BBC, dimasukkannya viva-voce dalam sistem ujian di Berbagai
tingkatan untuk memeriksa kompetensi calon, pelatihan guru yang
mutakhir dan terus-menerus, mengatur berbagai kegiatan dan
keseimbangan dalam kursus berkenaan dengan sastra dan bahasa
harus ada untuk memberikan kesempatan untuk meningkatkan
kompetensi bahasa siswa.
Methodology
Source
Abstract English The aim of this research is to increase the students’
speaking ability through storytelling model in
Universitas Timor, Timor Tengah Utara Regency
(TTU), East Nusa Tenggara, Indonesia. The main
purpose of this research is to know the
improvement of many aspects in speaking ability
such as grammatical aspect, vocabulary aspect and
pronunciation aspect. This research used class
action research. The subject of the research is the
second semester of English education in A class in
the academic year of 2016/2017. There were 30
students for the research subject. Based on the data
analysis, there is a significance improvement in
each cycle. The average of students’ speaking
ability in Cycle I is 67%. That average is taken
from vocabulary aspects 68%, pronunciation aspect
67% and grammatical aspect 66%. Then, in cycle II
the average of student’s mark is increasing into 81%
that consist of vocabulary aspect 83%,
pronunciation aspect 795 and grammatical aspect
81%. Therefore, this research indicates that
storytelling model can improve the speaking ability
of second semester students in Uiversitas Timor.
Indonesia Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk meningkatkan
kemampuan berbicara siswa melalui model storytelling
di Universitas Timor, Kabupaten Timor Tengah Utara
(TTU), Nusa Tenggara Timur, Indonesia. Tujuan
utama dari penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui
peningkatan dari berbagai aspek kemampuan berbicara
seperti aspek tata bahasa, aspek kosakata dan aspek
pengucapan. Penelitian ini menggunakan penelitian
tindakan kelas. Subjek penelitian adalah semester dua
pendidikan bahasa Inggris di kelas A tahun ajaran
2016/2017. Subjek penelitian berjumlah 30 siswa.
Berdasarkan analisis data terdapat peningkatan yang
signifikan pada setiap siklusnya. Rata-rata kemampuan
berbicara siswa pada Siklus I adalah 67%. Rata-rata
tersebut diambil dari aspek kosakata 68%, aspek
pengucapan 67% dan aspek tata bahasa 66%.
Kemudian pada siklus II rata-rata nilai siswa
meningkat menjadi 81% yang terdiri dari aspek
kosakata 83%, aspek pengucapan 795 dan aspek tata
bahasa 81%. Oleh karena itu, penelitian ini
menunjukkan bahwa model storytelling dapat
meningkatkan kemampuan berbicara mahasiswa
semester dua di Universitas Timor.
Methodology Type of qualitative and quantitative
Research
Sample second semester students of English study program of
Timor University in academic year 2016/2017.
Therefore, total members of second semester students
were 90 who were divided into three (3) classes.
Data
Collection
Your Analysis In this research we can know data very well, the
(Strength and weaknesses explanation about the data also easy to understand. The
of content, theory, method, researcher also give an instruction for the technique.
language feature, etc)
Your Recommendation The journal will be more effective if her make the
conclusion shorter.
Data From the table above we can see that the students who
Analysis practiced using impromptu speaking method (experimental
group) were more successful than those who practiced with
conventional method (control group) as can be seen from
the experimental class mean score which was 96 points
while that of the control group was only 71.7 points.
Finding
Conclusion The first group of students who applied impromptu
speaking method was better in speaking more fluently and
naturally because they have learnt to use their own
sentences and their creativity to develop their speaking.
Your Analysis There is part that the writer include the name of
(Strength and weaknesses participant twice in a row, in my opinion the writer just
of content, theory, method, need include the table of each group because in that
language feature, etc) table the name of participant in it.
Your Recommendation