You are on page 1of 12

THE EFFECT OF THE ENGLISH CLUB PROGRAM TOWARD THE SECOND

GRADE STUDENTS’ SPEAKING ABILITY AT SMPN 18 PADANG

Silvia Amita1, Lisa Tavriyanti1, Ernati1


1
English Department, The Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Bung Hatta University
Email: silvia.amita@yahoo.com

Abstract

This research was aimed to describe the effect of English club toward students’
speaking ability at SMPN 18 Padang. In this study the writer applied the
descriptive research design. The population of this study was 185 students of the
second grade at SMP N 18 Padang. The writer chose purposive sampling
technique. This study focused on English club members and the members are 9
students. The result of this study showed that English club program does not
affect second grade students’ speaking ability at SMPN 18 Padang. From the
result of speaking test, there were 7 students who had moderate speaking
ability, 1 student had high speaking ability and 1 student had low speaking
ability. From the result of questionnaire, it showed that 1 student had high
participation in English club, 6 students had moderate participation in English
club and 1 student had low participation in English club. The writer concluded
that English club program does not influence second grade students’ speaking
ability at SMPN 18 Padang. The purpose of the students join to English club
program is to improve speaking ability, to improve their knowledge of English
and to increase their English grade. Students said that English club program
helped them to be more confident. It was suggested to English teachers to
improve students’ speaking ability, by giving more practice and drill the
speaking skill whether inside or outside the classroms. There should be a study
about factors students’ speaking ability beside other factors.

Keyword: speaking, ability, effect, English club

Introduction

Language is system of arbitrary In era globalization, people need to


symbols that help the people of a particular communicate each other. They can be in
community to communicate and to interact different country and different language.
(Bashir et al, 2011:36). This means that They can use English as international
language has important role to understand language to communicate. English has four
and to speak to others. People need skills, they are listening, speaking, reading
language in their daily life. We learn it to and writing.
imitate the language when we were baby.
Speaking is one of language skills
When we are young, we learn to speak it.
that must be mastered by students. When
1
speaking, we must know what we will talk performance is related not only to their
about. The speakers have to know the linguistic and personality factors, but also
knowledge. Speaking without knowledge the types of classroom tasks provided by
just makes you look like joking and the teachers (Widiati & Cahyono,
speakers cannot say anything. The kind of 2006:279). In fact, learners do not have
knowledge that speaker brings to the skill good oral level in English. They made a
of speaking comprise extra linguistic great error when speaking.
knowledge, such as background
Based on the writer’s experience
knowledge of topic and culture, and
when teaching practice at SMP N 18
linguistic knowledge, including discourse
Padang, students have less self-confidence
knowledge, speech act knowledge, and
to speak in front of their friends. Some of
knowledge of grammar, vocabulary and
them think that speaking is difficult. The
phonology (Thornbury, 2007:26).
writer thinks that students need an
According to Canale and Swain (1980:27),
attractive activity to encourage the student
communicative competence includes four
to speak. Students have english extra
components of competence: grammatical
activity that is english club program. In
competence, discourse competence,
english club program, they do many
sociolinguistic competence, and strategic
activities they are story-telling, discussions
competence. As a result, students must
and games.
learn the knowledge before they speak.
The knowledge can be learnt in other In curriculum 2013, speaking is
English skills, such as reading and one of the skills that have to be mastered
listening. by students for each level. Allocation of
time to study English is very limited. They
Wardhaugh (2006:3) states
only have about 90 minutes to study
knowing a language also means having
English every week. It is not enough time
know how to use that language since
to improve their English skills especially
speakers know not only how to form
in speaking skills. To solve the problem
sentences but also how to use them
above, there is an additional program to
appropriately. So, speaking is important
improve students’ language skill. One of
skill that students have to learn in school.
the programs is English club program. It is
The problems that Indonesian EFL
necessary to study scientifically about the
learners face in developing their speaking

2
effect of English club program toward specific cases through in-depth descriptive
their speaking ability. studies or with a natural setting with a
phenomenological approach and reported
At the second grade students of
in thick description or the ex-post facto
SMPN 18 Padang, they studied three kinds
research with a more complex relationship
of text in regular class; they are descriptive
between the variables.
text, narrative text and recount text
including speaking materials. In other Descriptive research can answer
word, they did not study about story- the comparative research questions. Gay
telling, discussions and games while (1978:247) states that causal-comparative
English club activity covers story-telling, research is sometimes treated as a type of
discussions and games. The writer wants descriptive research since it describes
to see students’ speaking ability in English conditions that already exist. So, the writer
materials at regular class while they used descriptive research to describe the
participate in English club program to effect of English club toward second
practice and drill their English ability. students speaking ability.

This research aimed at describing the Population is the group in which


effect of English club toward students’ the researcher would like the result of the
speaking ability at SMPN 18 Padang. study to be generalized (Gay, 1987:102).
The population of this study was the
Research Method
second grade students at SMP N 18
Research is a process of steps used Padang. The writer chose the second grade
to collect and analyze information to students because they had learnt about
increase our understanding of a topic or descriptive text
issue (Creswell, 2012:3). In this study the
According to Gay, et al (2006:99),
writer applied the descriptive qualitative
a sample is made up of the individuals,
research design. Descriptive research
items, or event selected from a larger
involves collecting data in order to answer
group refer to as a population. In this
question concerning the current status of
study, the writer chose purposive sampling
subject of the study (Gay, 1987:189).
technique. In purposive sampling,
Darmadi (2011:146) also says that
researcher chose the cases to be included
descriptive research can also be developed
in the sample on the basis of their
towards the naturalistic research that uses
3
judgement of their typicality or possession Valid and reliable are the
of the particular characteristics being criteria of good instrument. The
sought (Cohen, 2007:114). This study instruments were valid if it
focused on English club members and the measures what it is supposed to be
member is only 9 students. measured. The writer used content
validity in this study. Content
In this study, the writer used three
validity is to demonstrate this form
kinds of instruments. They are speaking
of validity the instrument must
test, questionnaire and interview. The
show that it fairly and
instruments that will be used by writer are:
comprehensively covers the
1. Speaking test domain or item that it purpose to
cover (Cohen, 2007:137). The test
Test is a method of
that would be given to students was
measuring a person’s ability,
constructed based on curriculum,
knowledge, or performance in a
syllabus and teaching materials.
given domain (Brown, 2004:3).
Reliability means that
The writer measured the students’
scores from an instrument are
speaking skill. Picture description
stable and consistent (Creswell,
is the activity of speaking test.
2012:159). Reliability was
Picture can stimulate students’
interpreted by number as a
ideas. Brown states pictures may be
coefficient. High value of
very simple, designed to elicit a
coefficient means that the
word or a phrase (2004:151). The
instrument shows high reliability.
writer gave some pictures of people
The writer used inter-rater
to the students. They chose one of
technique. The writer used two
the pictures that are familiar with
scorers. The first scorer was the
them. Then they would describe the
writer and the second scorer was
picture in twenty minutes with
Fitria Harisandi, S. Pd. The writer
different picture.
chose her because her ability to
There were four pictures of speak English is well. To figure out
people that the writer gave to the reliability of the instruments,
students. They would describe one the writer used Pearson Product
of the pictures. Moment Formula, as follow:
4
rating scale, they are always, often,
sometimes, seldom, never.

Where: The writer analyzed content

= correlation coefficient between validity to make this questionnaire


valid. Content validity measures
two variables of the test
the content on the questionnaire.
N= number of students
This questionnaire is valid if it
x = the score of the first scorer
measures what is going to measure.
y = the score of the second scorer
So, the writer used this indicator in
The coefficient of correlation is
every statement in the
categorized as follows:
questionnaire that was used to
0.81 – 1.00 = very high correlation
gather the data as follows:
0.61 – 0.80 = high correlation
a. Students’ attendance in english
0.41 – 0.60 = moderate correlation
club
0.21 – 0.40 = low correlation
b. Participation in games activity
0.00 – 0.20 = very low correlation
c. Participation in story-telling
(Arikunto, 2006:276)
activity
The result showed that the
d. Participation in discussions
test had coefficient of correlation
activity
was 0.93. It means that the test had
very high correlation. In the other 3. Interview
word, the test was reliable. The writer used interview to
get information about the
2. Questionnaire contribution of English club on
Questionnaire was used to students’ speaking ability. A
measure students’ participation in qualitative interview occurs when
English club. The students gave a researchers ask one or more
check at the appropriate answer in participants general, open-ended
the questionnaire that has available questions and record their answers
with criteria of the answer. This (Creswell, 2012:217). The writer
instrument used rating scales. used indicators in every question
Students would choose one of the when interview are:

5
a. The students’ purpose to join 3. The writer gave score for the
English club answer according to the table
b. The benefit of English club below.
C. Interview
In this research, the data were collected
The data from interview were
by using speaking test, questionnaire and
gathered through several steps:
interview. The procedures in collecting
1. The writer chose face-to-face
the data are:
interviews. So, the writer asked the
A. Speaking test students one by one in Indonesian,
The data from speaking test would be it aimed to get clear information
gathered through several steps: from the students.
1. The writer gave some pictures of 2. During interview, the questions and
people to the students and asked responses were recorded by using
them to choose one of pictures of hand phone.
people, let the students wrote the 3. The writer did transcription of the
description of the people and then recording.
they described the picture orally.
After the writer got the data from test,
2. The writer listened and recorded
questionnaire and interview, the writer
the students’ speaking by using
analyzed the data used the following
hand phone.
procedures:
3. The recordings replayed to evaluate
students’ speaking skill based on 1. Analyzing speaking test by using
the following criteria. the following steps:
a. The writer presented raw scores
B. Questionnaire from first scorer and second
The data from questionnaire were scorer
gathered through several steps: b. The writer counted the average
1. The writer gave questionnaire to speaking test score of two
students to evaluate the students’ scorers by using the formula:
participation in English club. Student’s score =
2. The writer read the respond of the
students one by one.

6
c. The writer calculated the mean a. The writer made transcription
and standard deviation of data of the result of interview
d. The writer classified the b. The writer concluded the result
students’ speaking ability into of interview
high, moderate and low using 4. Summarized the data
the following categories: Validating findings means that the
> M + 1 SD = High researcher determines the accuracy or
M + 1 SD – M – 1 SD = Moderate credibility of findings through strategies
< M – 1 SD = low such as member checking or triangulation
2. Analyzing questionnaire by using (Creswel, 2012:259). To make this data
the following steps: valid, the writer applied member checking
a. The writer gave score based on in this study. Member checking is a
the scale in table. process in which the researcher asks one or
b. The data would analyzed in more participants in the study to check the
descriptive percentage table with accuracy of the account (Creswel,
formula below: 2012:259). The strategy was applied in this
study by asking the students who have
been interviewed to check the transcription
P = percentage of the item of the interview if the results were
F = frequency of the item acceptable.
N = the total number of the item
c. The writer calculated the mean Findings
and standard deviation
d. The writer classified the After analyzing the data from

students’ participation in english speaking test, questionnaire and

club into high, moderate and interview, the writer explains the result

low using the following of the research. The writer can conclude

categories: that English club program does not

> M + 1 SD = High affect second grade students’ speaking

M + 1 SD – M – 1 SD = Moderate ability at SMPN 18 Padang. Student

< M – 1 SD = low who had high ability in speaking skill

3. Analyzing interview by using the had low participation in English club

following steps: program. There are three students who

7
had moderate speaking ability had high who answer that the purpose of joining
and low participation in English club. English club is to improve speaking
Student who had low ability in speaking ability, 33.3% students answer who
skill had moderate participation in state that the purpose is to improve their
English club program. The others knowledge of English and 11.1%
students had moderate speaking ability students who has purpose to increase
and participation in English club. their English grade.
After the writer calculated the Dealing with the result of the
mean and standard deviation from the interview about the contribution of
result of speaking test, the writer got English club program, 87.5% students
mean 79.2 and standard deviation 5.0. (7 students) said that they got benefit to
So, there are 7 students had moderate join English club program to improve
speaking ability, 1 student had high the component of speaking such as
speaking ability and 1 student had low grammar, vocabulary, pronounce and
speaking ability. After the writer fluency. 50% students (4 students) said
calculated the mean and standard that English club program help them to
deviation from the result of be more confident.
questionnaire, the writer got mean From the result of questionnaire
97.67 and standard deviation 14.6. about students’ participation in English
From the result, it showed that 1 student club the writer got the information as
had high participation in English club, 6 follow, only 35.6% students who
students had moderate participation in always participate in English club in
English club and 1 student had low every activity. It means they
participation in English club. participated in every activity actively.
From the result of interview there There are 34.2% students who often
were 8 students from 9 students as the participated in English club. That
sample in this study. Based on the result showed that students were active in
of interview, there were two points, English club but not in for each activity.
they are the purpose of students to join There are still 2.2% students who were
English club and the benefits that have not active at activities in English club.
been got by students after join English Participation in English club is
club. Based on the purpose joining divided into four indicators, they are
English club, there are 55.6% students students’ attendance in English club,
8
participation in games activity, extracurricular aims to develop the
participation in story-telling activity personality, talents, interests and abilities
and participation in discussion activity. of learners, English club program does not
For students’ attendance in English affect the second grade students’ speaking
club, 66.7% students who always attend ability yet at SMPN 18 Padang. It means
in English club program. that English club does not affect the talents
For participation in games and abilities of the students. On the other
activity, there are 39.7% students who hand, English club only influenced the
often participated in games activity students’ personality, it is proved by 50%
actively, and 25.4% students were students stated that English club program
always active in games activity. It help them to be more confident.
means almost of students like to play According to Oemar (2007: 212)
English games. In term of participation acquisition based on experience, give
in story-telling activity, 39.7% students students sets of situation learning like real
said that they were always active in experience that was planned by teachers
story-telling activity and 34.9% are aim to improve their confident and
students who answer that they often students’ skill through participation
participated. For participation in actively. However, there is no effect of
discussion activity, 33.3% students said English club program toward students’
that they always participated and 32.1% speaking ability in this study. It might be
students who answer that they often caused by teachers do not manage well the
participated in discussion activity. It activities in English club. Wilson
showed that students participated (2009:19) states that negative effect of
actively when discussion in English participatin extracurricular is having poor
club. quality coach as a role model or mentor.
The teachers should prepare the activities
Discussions in English club, such as they must choose
the interest media.
Based on the findings above, it was
To foster positive attitudes and to
stated that English club program does not
motivate learning, in particular, the
affect second grade students’ speaking
learning of English as a Second/Foreign
ability at SMPN 18 Padang. According to
Language, an environment conducive to
PERMENDIKBUD RI No. 81 A 2013,
learning must be created (Hussin et al,
9
2001). The students who joined English students) said that they got the benefits to
club were based on their wants to improve join English club program to improve the
and drill their skill in English. It means components of speaking such as grammar,
they interest to do all activities in English vocabulary, pronounce and fluency. There
club. It was suitable with extracurricular are 50% students (4 students) said that
principles in PERMENDIKBUD RI No. English club program help them to be
81 A 2013. more confident.
Extracurricular is the educational
activities undertaken by learners outside
Conclusions
the standard hours of study curriculum as
This study had scrutinized the an extension of the curriculum and the
English club program in affecting activities carried out under the guidance of
students’ speaking skill after students the school with the aim to develop the
participate in English club program. Based personality, talents, interests, and abilities
on the findings on chapter 4, English club of learners wider or outside interests
program does not influenced second grade developed by curriculum
students’ speaking ability at SMPN 18 (PERMENDIKBUD RI No.81 A 2013).
Padang. So, the English club program at The teachers have to take benefit from
SMPN 18 Padang can not encourage existing of extracurricular to develop
students’ needs to improve their English students’ skill especially in English.
skill especially speaking skill. Students who join English club interested
The students who join English club in English. They want to develop their
program have purpose as follow, there are skill. Because of that they chose English
55.6% students who answer that the club. Students who have interest to study
purpose of joining English club is to can motivate them to learn.
improve speaking ability, there are 33.3%
students answer who state that the purpose Suggestions
is to improve their knowledge of English Based on the conclusion of the research,
and 11.1% students who have purpose to the writer proposes some suggestions as
increase their English grade. follow:
In term of the result of the interview 1. For the English teachers
about the benefits of English club After the writer conducted this study,
program, there are 87.5% students (7 the writer suggest to the teachers to
10
manage well their activities to 2(1), 34-50. Available from:
facilitate the students in studying http://www.bjournal.co.uk/BJASS.as
English in English club such as use px. [accessed March 10th 2014]
others speaking activities or prepare
Brown, H. D. 2004. Language Assessment:
the media to encourage students’ Principles and Classroom Practices.
speaking ability. English club can be New York: Pearson Education, Inc.

fun environment to learn English for Canale, M. & Swain, M. 1980. Theoretical
Bases of Communicative
students. If students are interested in
Approaches to Second Language
learn English it can enhance Teaching and Testing. Applied
Language, 1(1), 1-47. Available
students’ skill especially in English.
from: http://google.com/ [accessed
2. For students January 09th 2015]
Students have to take benefits of Creswell, J., W., 2012. Educational
English club program to improve Research: Planning, Conducting,
and Evaluating Quantitative and
students’ academic outcomes. Qualitative Research. Boston:
Students should more active to Pearson. Available from:
http://libgen.org/ [accessed June 10th
practice and drill the speaking skill 2014]
in English club activity. Cohen, L., Manion, L. & Morrison, K.
3. For the further researchers 2007. Research Methods in
Education. 6thed. New York:
It is suggested to the further Routledge. Available from:
researchers to study about factors http://libgen.org/ [accessed January
15th 2015]
that make the English club program
affect students’ speaking ability, Darmadi, H., 2011. Metode Penelitian
Pendidikan. Bandung: Alfabeta
because activities in English club
Gay, L. R. 1987. Educational Research:
program can affect the students’ competencies for analysis and
speaking ability. application. 3rd ed. Columbus: Meril
Publishing Company
Gay, L., R., Mills, G., E., & Airasian, P.,
Bibliography
2006. Educational Research:
Competencies for analysis and
Arikunto, S. 2006. Prosedur Penelitian. applications. 8thed. New York:
Jakarta: Bumi Aksara. Pearson
Bashir, M., Azeem, M., & Dogar, A.H., Hussin, S., Maarof, N. & D’Cruz, J.V.
2011.Factor Effecting Students’ 2001. Sustaining an Interest in
Learning English and Increasing the
English Speaking Skill. British Motivation to Learn English: An
Journal of Arts and Social Sciences, Enrichment Program, The Internet
11
ESL Journal, 7(5). Available from:
http://iteslj.org// [accessed March 8th
2015]
MENDIKBUD. 2013. PERMENDIKBUD
No. 18A tentang Implentasi
Kurikulum: Pedoman Kegiatan
Ektrakurikuler. Jakarta:
MENDIKBUD. Available from:
http://wordpress.com/ [accessed
th
October 17 2014]
Oemar, H. 2007. Proses Belajar
Mengajar. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara
Thonrbury, S., & Harmer, J., 2007. How to
Teach Speaking. London: Longman.
Available from: http://bookza.org
[accessed March 07th 2014]
Wardhaugh, R., 2006. An Introduction to
Sociolinguistics. 5th ed. Oxford:
Blackwell Publishing. Available
from: http://google.com/ [accessed
November 03rd 2014]
Widiati, U. & Cahyono, B.Y., 2006. The
Teaching of EFL Speaking in The
Indonesian Context: the State of the
Art. Bahasa dan Seni, 34(2), 269-
292. Available from:
http://google.com// [accessed March
05th 2014]
Wilson, Nikki, 2009. Impact of
Extracurricular Activities on
Students. Published Thesis.
America: University of Wisconsin
Stout. Available from:
http://uwstout.edu/ [accessed
February 18th 2014]

12

You might also like