You are on page 1of 1

Annexure I

Km 0+000 to Km 0+945 (Connector)


DESIGN CHAINAGE
(km)
Sr No AE Comments on plan and profile R0 Compliance AE Comments on plan and profile R1
FROM TO

Proposed ROW in this section is 13m .Also As per clause 1.2 of


Schedule- B of EPC agreement geometry has to be corrected to the
Speed provided in P&P is not as per standard
extent land is available. Hence geometry has been developed to OK
specification and also not provided in Schedule D
maximum possible extent within Proposed Right of Way
(ROW).Hence it is requested to accept the compliance.

Limiting gradient of 6.9% as per IRC-SP-48 has been adopted


Provide limiting gradient as per standard
whenever it is not possible to provide rulling gradients of 6%. OK
specifications.
Hence it is requested to accept the compliance.
1 0/000 Raise the FRL at Pipe Culvert ch 0+090, Ch 0+476 GAD for HPC at CH-0+090 & 0+476 has found in order by AE for
0/945 OK
and ch 0+685 for coushionong Encasing vide mail dated 14/10/2022.
As per IRC SP 73 Clause 4.2, it is necessary to raise
Provision of CC drain has been considered on hill side on LHS as
the FRL to maintain the embankment at location OK
per applicable TCS. Hence it is requested to accept the compliance.
from km 0+800 to km 0+945 (on RHS).

Provide Superelevation schematically in Profile.


No Value has been mentioned in schematic.
Embankment slope interface shall be shown in
plan.

You might also like