Paper Title* (use style: paper title)

line 1: 1st Given Name Surname
line 2: dept. name of
organization (of Affiliation)
line 3: name of organization (of
Affiliation)
line 4: City, Country
line 5: email address or ORCID
line 1: 2nd Given Name Surname
line 2: dept. name of
organization (of Affiliation)
line 3: name of organization (of
Affiliation)
line 4: City, Country
line 5: email address or ORCID
line 1: 3rd Given Name Surname
line 2: dept. name of
organization (of Affiliation)
line 3: name of organization (of
Affiliation)
line 4: City, Country
line 5: email address or ORCID
line 1: 4th Given Name Surname
line 2: dept. name of
organization (of Affiliation)
line 3: name of organization (of
Affiliation)
line 4: City, Country
line 5: email address or ORCI

Abstract—The threat posed by financial transaction fraud to
organizations and individuals has prompted the development of
cutting-edge methods for detection and prevention. The use of
real-time monitoring systems and machine learning algorithms to
improve fraud detection and prevention in financial transactions
is explored in this research study. The paper addresses the
drawbacks of conventional rule-based systems, explains why real-
time monitoring and machine learning should be used, and
describes the goals of the research. To comprehend the current
methodologies and pinpoint research gaps, a thorough literature
study is done. The suggested approach includes dimensionality
reduction, feature engineering, data preparation, and the
application of machine learning models built into a real-time
monitoring system. Results are assessed using performance
measures and contrasted with the performance of current
systems. Adaptive thresholds and dynamic risk scoring are two
proactive fraud prevention strategies that being investigated.
Considerations for scalability and deployment, including data
security and legal compliance, are also covered. The study
suggests areas for additional research in this field and helps to
design reliable fraud detection systems.
Keywords—component, formatting, style, styling, insert (key
words)
I. INTRODUCTION (HEADING 1)
For organizations, financial institutions, and people
everywhere, detecting and preventing fraud in financial
transactions is a top priority. The need to investigate more
sophisticated techniques has arisen as sophisticated fraud has
made clear the limitations of conventional rule-based systems.
This study explores how real-time monitoring systems and
machine learning algorithms can be used to improve financial
transaction fraud detection and prevention capabilities. In the
literature, the importance of fraud prevention and detection in
financial transactions has been extensively discussed. In
addition to causing significant financial losses, financial fraud
also erodes public faith in the financial system (association of
certified fraud examiners, 2020). Traditional rule-based
systems look for suspected fraudulent actions using
predetermined rules and patterns. But these systems struggle
to adjust to new and developing fraud strategies, which results
in many false negatives and potential financial losses (kumar
et al., 2020). The use of machine learning algorithms has
drawn a lot of interest as a solution to these restrictions.
Large volumes of transactional data can be automatically
mined for patterns and abnormalities using machine learning
algorithms, leading to more precise and adaptable fraud
detection. Financial institutions can examine past
transactional data to find trends linked to fraudulent actions
by utilizing machine learning techniques like supervised
learning, unsupervised learning, and deep learning (dal
pozzolo et al., 2015). Additionally, by continuously monitoring
transactions in real-time and sending out notifications for
suspected fraud, the integration of real-time monitoring
systems improves fraud detection (bolton et al., 2011). With
timely action made possible by this proactive strategy,
potential losses and damages are reduced. The necessity for a
more effective and efficient strategy to counteract changing
fraud strategies is what motivates the use of machine learning
algorithms and real-time monitoring systems. Financial fraud
is dynamic, necessitating the use of adaptable systems that
can recognize emerging trends and abnormalities. Detecting
complex and changing fraud patterns is made possible by
machine learning algorithms, allowing for early identification
and prevention (phua et al., 2010). In addition to machine
learning, real-time monitoring systems offer fast response
capabilities, enabling prompt intervention to stop fraudulent
transactions (kou et al., 2020).
1.1 Research Objectives
1. Investigate the use of machine learning algorithms for fraud
detection in financial transactions.
2. Design and develop a real-time monitoring system for
continuous fraud detection and prevention.
3. Assessing the performance of the suggested approach in
comparison to conventional rule-based systems.

XXX-X-XXXX-XXXX-X/XX/$XX.00 ©20XX IEEE

4. Exploring proactive measures for fraud prevention, such as
dynamic risk scoring and adaptive thresholds.
5. Analyse scalability and deployment considerations for
implementing the proposed system in real – world financial
institutions.
1.2 Research Questions
1. How can machine learning algorithms be used in financial
transactions to spot and stop fraud?
2. What effect do real-time monitoring systems have on the
capacity for fraud detection and prevention?
3. How effective and accurate at detecting fraud is the
suggested method compared to conventional rule - based
systems?
4. What preventative measures can be built into the system to
stop fraud before it happens?
5. What factors need to be considered while deploying the
suggested system in actual financial institutions?
II. LITERATURE REVIEW
In recent years, there has been a lot of study on applying
machine learning algorithms to detect fraud in financial
transactions. Various strategies and algorithms have been
examined in several research to increase the precision and
effectiveness of fraud detection systems. This section reviews
earlier studies and research articles in the field, addressing the
benefits and drawbacks of various strategies while identifying
the gaps in the body of knowledge that the current study seeks
to fill.
2.1 Supervised Learning Approaches
A fraud detection system based on logistic regression was
proposed by Buczak & Guven 2016. The study proved that
logistic regression is useful for spotting fraudulent transactions.
A popular classification approach called logistic regression
predicts the association between input features and the
likelihood that a transaction is fraudulent. It is a desirable
option for fraud detection systems because of its readability
and simplicity. Another well-liked supervised learning strategy
for fraud detection is decision trees. To categorize occurrences
as fraudulent or authentic, decision tree algorithms, such the
C4.5 algorithm, build a tree-like model that divides the dataset
depending on feature values. Because they can manage non-
linear correlations between features and the target variable,
decision trees have the advantage of being ideal for identifying
intricate fraud patterns. The ability of Support Vector Machines
(SVMs) to handle high-dimensional data and nonlinear
relationships has led to their use in fraud detection as well.
SVMs look for an ideal hyperplane that can distinguish
between fraudulent and legal transactions with the greatest
margin. at dealing with unbalanced datasets, SVMs have
shown to perform well at classifying fraudulent transactions.
Although these supervised learning algorithms are easy to use
and interpret, they could have trouble spotting fraud. The
complexity of fraud patterns is one of the biggest problems.
The techniques used by fraudsters are constantly changing,
creating complex and dynamic fraud patterns that these
algorithms would find challenging to successfully detect. The
unbalanced character of fraud datasets—where the proportion
of legal transactions is noticeably higher than that of fraudulent
transactions—presents another difficulty. The model may be
biased toward the majority class (legal transactions) because of
unbalanced datasets, which will lead to decreased performance
in identifying the minority class (fraudulent transactions)
Techniques such using the Synthetic Minority Over-
sampling Technique (SMOTE), which oversamples the
minority class, or under-sampling the majority class have been
suggested as solutions to the problem of unbalanced data.
These methods seek to improve the identification of fraudulent
transactions while balancing the distribution of classes.
2.2 Unsupervised Learning Approaches
For spotting fraud in numerous domains, unsupervised
learning techniques like clustering and anomaly detection have
been investigated. The goal of these strategies, which do not
require labelled data, is to find patterns and anomalies in the
data that may point to fraudulent activity. Clustering algorithms
were used in a study by Ranshous et al. (2015) to identify
fraud. To find clusters of connected fraudulent transactions, the
authors used clustering techniques, which made it possible to
spot trends and similarities in fraudulent behaviour. This
method is especially beneficial for identifying innovative or
previously unidentified fraud patterns that may not be picked
up by predetermined rules or labelled data. Unsupervised
learning techniques have the advantage of being able to adapt
to new fraud methods without relying on labels that have been
predetermined. They can find irregularities and patterns in the
data that may be signs of fraud. Unsupervised learning
techniques face considerable difficulties due to their increased
false positive rate when compared to supervised methods.
Unsupervised models have a high rate of false positives
because they can classify genuine transactions as anomalies or
find clusters that include both valid and fraudulent transactions.
Another drawback is the challenge of identifying specific fraud
incidents. While unsupervised learning techniques offer a more
comprehensive perspective of fraud tendencies, they could fall
short in terms of the level of detail needed to pinpoint
fraudulent transactions or the participants. To recognize and
authenticate specific fraud cases, more research and analysis
are frequently required. Hybrid methods that blend supervised
and unsupervised techniques have been developed to solve the
issues of false positives and the difficulty in identifying
specific fraud instances.
2.3 Hybrid Approaches
In fraud detection research, hybrid systems that blend
supervised and unsupervised techniques have gained
popularity. These solutions try to take use of the advantages of
both tactics while addressing the weaknesses of each, such as
high false positive rates or the inability to manage intricate
fraud patterns.
A hybrid fraud detection system with integrated clustering
and classification algorithms was proposed by Bhattacharyya et
al. (2018). The classification technique was used to separate
between fraudulent and valid transactions inside each cluster
once the clustering algorithm had identified groups of similar
transactions. When compared to employing either strategy
alone, our hybrid model showed enhanced fraud detection
performance. The benefit of hybrid techniques is their capacity
for both supervised learning to capture well-known fraud
patterns and unsupervised learning to detect new fraud patterns.
Hybrid models seek to increase fraud detection accuracy while
lowering false positives by incorporating the best features of
both approaches. However, using hybrid models in practical
settings is not without its difficulties. When compared to
individual approaches, these models are typically more intricate
and computationally intensive. Large-scale implementation
may be more difficult because to the need for additional
resources and knowledge for the integration and coordination
of multiple algorithms.
2.4 Deep Learning Approaches
Due to their effectiveness in extracting complicated patterns
from vast amounts of data, deep learning models, particularly
neural networks, have drawn a lot of interest in the field of
fraud detection. In a thorough review of data mining-based
fraud detection research, Phua et al. (2010) emphasized the
efficiency of neural networks in identifying credit card fraud.
Deep learning methods neural networks have demonstrated
exceptional performance in detecting credit card fraud. Even
complex fraud patterns that are difficult for people or
conventional machine learning algorithms to recognize can be
detected by these models, which can automatically learn key
attributes and capture them. Deep neural networks may
successfully extract high-level representations of the input data
by using numerous layers of interconnected nodes (neurons),
enabling precise fraud detection. However, there are a few
things to consider when using deep learning models for fraud
detection. First off, for deep learning models to operate at their
best, a lot of labelled training data is frequently necessary. In
the area of fraud detection, gathering an extensive and precisely
annotated dataset might be difficult because fraudulent
instances are frequently more rare than valid ones. To lessen
the problem of imbalanced datasets, sophisticated sampling
techniques and data augmentation approaches might be used. 8
Second, training and optimizing deep learning models can be
computationally taxing and may call for a lot of processing
power. Large datasets and complex neural architectures may
require the utilization of specialized hardware or distributed
computing resources in order to train models effectively.
Despite these difficulties, convolutional neural networks and
recurrent neural networks are examples of deep learning
approaches that have advanced and continue to help fraud
detection systems become more effective. The goal of ongoing
research is to improve the effectiveness of deep learning
models for fraud detection.
This includes developing lightweight architectures, model
compression methods, transfer learning, and transfer learning
methods. The current study tries to fill various gaps in the
literature despite the advancements made in machine learning-
based fraud detection. These gaps include the following:
1. Limited attention paid to real-time fraud detection: While
real-time fraud detection calls for prompt identification and
prevention during live transactions, many existing research
concentrate on offline analysis of past data.
2. Insufficient attention to temporal aspects: Although they
frequently go unnoticed, time-dependent characteristics and
temporal dependencies in financial transactions are vital for
spotting fraud.
3. Lack of consideration for interpretability and
explainability: To win the trust of stakeholders and meet
regulatory obligations, it is crucial to offer explanations and
interpretability as machine learning models get increasingly
complicated.
4. inadequate analysis of unbalanced datasets: In fraud
detection, where there are far fewer cases of fraud than there
are of valid transactions, unbalanced datasets are typical.
Further research is required to determine how well current
approaches perform on data that is unbalanced.
2.4 Feature extraction
The process of building new features out of already existing
ones to collect more data. The following are some methods
frequently employed for feature extraction in financial
transaction data:
• Aggregation: The summarization of transaction data over
predetermined time periods (e.g., daily, weekly) in order to
extract characteristics like the total number of transactions, the
average frequency of transactions, or the maximum amount of
transactions. 9
• Time-Based Features: Extraction of temporal data, such as
the day of the week, the hour of the day, or the amount of time
since the last transaction, using transaction timestamps.
• Statistical Features: Calculating statistical measures of
transaction amounts or other pertinent variables, such as mean,
standard deviation, and skewness.
• Text mining: The process of extracting terms or patterns
from text-based fields, such as transaction descriptions, that
may be indicators of fraud.
2.5 Dimensionality Reduction
Methods for reducing the number of characteristics in a
dataset while keeping the most crucial data are known as
dimensionality reduction techniques. This aids in combating
computational complexity and the "curse of dimensionality."
Techniques for dimensionality reduction that are frequently
employed include:
• Using principal component analysis (PCA), the original
characteristics are converted into a fresh collection of
uncorrelated variables (principal components), which account
for most of the variance in the data.
• The supervised dimensionality reduction technique linear
discriminant analysis (LDA) maximizes the separation between
several classes while minimizing within-class variation.
• t-Distributed Stochastic Neighbour Embedding, or t-SNE
a non-linear technique, frequently used for visualization, that
maintains the data's local structure while lowering its
dimensionality.
 III. METHODOLOGY
3.1 Dataset Description:
The dataset used for the research is a synthetic dataset
generated for the purpose of this study, appendix 1. It contains
information about financial transactions, including transaction
IDs, customer IDs, transaction amounts, transaction
timestamps, regions, states, customer categories, and account
balances. The dataset consists of 10000 records and includes
characteristics such as geographical information, customer
profiles, and transaction details.
3.2 Preprocessing Steps:
Before applying machine learning algorithms for fraud
detection, several preprocessing steps were employed to clean
and transform the data.
These steps are as follow:
• Handling missing values: Identify and handle any missing
values in the dataset, either by imputing them or removing the
corresponding records.
• Data normalization: Scale numerical features such as
transaction amounts and account balances to a common range
to ensure they have a similar impact during model training.
• Encoding categorical variables: Convert categorical
variables like regions, states, and customer categories into
numerical representations using techniques like onehot
encoding or label encoding.
• Feature selection: Identify and select the most relevant
features that contribute significantly to fraud detection,
considering their impact and reducing computational
complexity.
3.3 Exploratory Data Analysis:
Data visualization can be a valuable step to gain insights
into the dataset and understand its characteristics. Visualization
techniques applied were:
• Histograms: Plotting histograms can provide an overview
of the distribution of numerical features such as transaction
amounts and account balances.
• Bar plots: Visualizing categorical variables like regions,
states, and customer categories using bar plots can help
understand their frequency distribution.
• Scatter plots: Plotting transaction amounts against account
balances can reveal potential patterns or outliers.
• Heatmaps: Using a heatmap, correlations between
different features can be explored, which can help identify
relationships and potential predictors of fraud.
By visualizing the data, it becomes easier to identify any
anomalies, outliers, or patterns that may require further
investigation or preprocessing before training the machine
learning models.
3.4 Feature Engineering and Dimensionality Reduction:
The specific properties of the financial transaction data and
the goals of fraud detection should be aligned with the chosen
feature engineering approaches and dimensionality reduction
techniques.
The following methods were adopted:
• Feature Selection: By focusing on the most crucial
elements that helped with fraud detection, we scanned through
the data to identify noise. This lessened the possibility of
overfitting while also enhancing the model's accuracy and
interpretability.
• Feature Extraction: Transaction data frequently contains
important information that may not be readily captured by the
raw features. This is known as feature extraction. Meaningful
representations and identify significant fraud-related patterns or
trends were created.
• Dimensionality reduction: Datasets related to financial
transactions may be highly dimensional, which increases
computing complexity and raises the possibility of overfitting.
Methods for dimensionality reduction reduced the number of
features while retaining the most important data, which helped
to solve these problems.
The trade-off between model performance and
interpretability were considered while choosing certain
strategies. Higher predicted accuracy may be obtained using
more sophisticated approaches like deep learning or ensemble
methods, but they may also be more difficult to comprehend.
To balance model complexity, interpretability, and computing
efficiency, one must consider both the resources at hand as well
as the needs of the fraud detection system.
3.5 Machine Learning Algorithms:
The selection and implementation of machine learning
algorithms for fraud detection depend on the specific
requirements of the problem and the characteristics of the
dataset. In this research, the following algorithms were applied:
• Logistic Regression: This algorithm is suitable for binary
classification tasks and can provide interpretable results.
• Decision Trees: Decision trees can capture non-linear
relationships and are effective in handling categorical features.
• Random Forest: This ensemble method combines multiple
decision trees to improve accuracy and handle complex fraud
patterns.
• Support Vector Machines (SVM): SVMs can handle high-
dimensional data and are effective in separating classes with a
clear margin.
The four algorithms were used to be able to establish the
best possible result, and the associated algorithm as well as the
applicable hyperparameters.
3.6 Solution Deployment:
Deploying the machine learning models for fraud detection
in a production setting comes next after they have been trained
and assessed. The following are the main factors for algorithm
deployment were applied:
 • Model serialization A format was created to that makes it
simple to load and use the trained machine learning models
during deployment by serializing them . Pickle files, joblib
files, or serialized representations particular to the machine
learning framework of choice are examples of common
formats.
The final machine learning model were deployed to a local
device on which simulates the on-premise scenario
3.7 Model Deployment:
Options Machine learning models can be deployed in a
variety of ways, depending on the infrastructure and needs:
• On-Premises Deployment: Setting up the models on the
organization's own local servers or infrastructure.
• Cloud Deployment: Hosting the models on cloud
infrastructure like AWS, Azure, or Google Cloud.
• Containerization: Packing the models into containers for
scalability and simple deployment (like Docker).
• Serverless Deployment: This method involves deploying
the models as functions using serverless platforms (such as
AWS Lambda and Google Cloud Functions).
API Development:
To expose the deployed models, a microservice or an API
endpoint was created. This made it possible for other programs
or systems to communicate with fraud detection models and
make predictions. Transaction data are accepted as input by the
API, which should then output estimated fraud probability or
binary labels.
Scalability and effectiveness:
The solution was developed to allow increasing transaction
volumes in real-time. To increase performance and scalability,
strategies like load balancing, caching, and parallel processing
are suggested.
Monitoring and logging systems:
Implementing monitoring and logging systems to keep tabs
on the operation and behaviour of the deployed models. This
entailed logging all input information, forecasts, and runtime
faults or exceptions. Continuous improvement is made possible
via monitoring, which helps find any drift in model
performance over time.
Security Consideration:
Applying the proper security precautions to safeguard the
deployed models and the data they analyse. Access controls,
encryption of sensitive data, and frequent security audits may
all be necessary for this.
Versioning and Updates:
Versioning mechanism for the deployed models was
created to keep track of changes and simplify future updates.
To adapt to changing fraud tendencies, automated pipelines are
suggested for model updates and retraining.
A/B Testing and Evaluation:
A/B testing were performed to compare the performance of
the deployed models against a baseline or alternative
approaches. Continuous evaluation of the effectiveness of the
deployed models using relevant metrics including precision,
recall, and F1-score.
Continuous Improvement:
Feedback loops were incorporated to collect labelled data
on detected fraud cases and use it to improve the models. This
iterative process helps enhanced the accuracy and effectiveness
of the fraud detection system over time
Keep your text and graphic files separate until after the text
has been formatted and styled. Do not use hard tabs, and limit
use of hard returns to only one return at the end of a paragraph.
Do not add any kind of pagination anywhere in the paper. Do
not number text heads-the template will do that for you.
IV. RESULTS AND FINDINGS
The bar plot reveals the distribution of customer categories
in the dataset. The x-axis represents the different customer
categories, and the y-axis represents the count of customers in
each category. The following observations can be made from
the plot:
Low-Profile: This category has the highest count,
indicating that a significant portion of the customers falls into
this category.
Medium-Profile: The count of customers in this category
is moderately high, suggesting a considerable presence.
High-Profile: This category has a relatively low count
compared to the others, indicating a smaller proportion of
customers.
Implications: The distribution of customer categories
provides valuable insights into the customer base. The
dominance of the Low-Profile category suggests that most
customers in the dataset have low transaction activity or
account balances. On the other hand, the presence of Medium-
Profile and High-Profile categories indicates the existence of
customers with relatively higher transaction activity or account
balances.
Understanding the distribution of customer categories can
be useful for various purposes, such as targeted marketing
campaigns, customer segmentation, and fraud detection.
Further analysis can be performed to explore the relationships
between customer categories and other variables in the dataset.
It is important to note that this analysis is based on the given
dataset and may not represent the entire population accurately.
Additional data and more comprehensive analysis can
provide deeper insights into customer categories and their
significance in the context of the domain. In conclusion, the
categorical analysis of the 'customer_category' variable
provides a high level understanding of the distribution of
customer categories within the dataset. The bar plot visually
represents the counts of each category, highlighting the
dominance of the Low Profile category and the presence of
Medium-Profile and High-Profile categories.
 ACKNOWLEDGMENT
I would like to express my sincere gratitude to the
following individuals and institutions for their invaluable
contributions to the completion of my project, IntelliAI.
Gurpreet Singh Panesar, Asst. Professor, AIT-CSE Your
unwavering guidance, expert feedback, and unwavering
encouragement were instrumental in shaping the direction and
quality of our project. Your willingness to share your
knowledge and insights was truly inspiring.
Committee Members:
Afridi Haque, UID - 20BCS3879, AIT-CSE (20BDA2-A)
Amninder Sran, UID - 20BCS3959, AIT-CSE (20BDA2-B)
Laksh Walia, UID - 20BCS3889, AIT-CSE (20BDA2-A)
Akshat Shrivasta, UID - 20BCS3888, AIT-CSE (20BDA2-A)
I am deeply appreciative of your insightful comments,
constructive suggestions, and thorough review of my project.
Your expertise and valuable perspectives helped to refine my
work and enhance its overall impact. I am fortunate to have
collaborated with these talented individuals. Their expertise,
dedication, and collaborative spirit were essential to the
successful completion of this project. I would like to extend my
heartfelt gratitude to all the individuals who participated in my
research study. Their willingness to share their time and
experiences was invaluable to my research.
CONCLUSION
This study examined numerous methods to deal with this
pressing issue as it pertained to financial transaction fraud
detection and prevention. In order to identify fraudulent
activity, the study looked at the usage of supervised learning
algorithms, unsupervised learning algorithms, and hybrid
approaches. In addition, the capacity to recognize intricate
fraud patterns was tested for deep learning models, notably
neural networks. The study also stressed the significance of
incorporating machine learning models into real-time
monitoring to create a reliable fraud detection system.
Research Contributions and Findings:
The research's conclusions showed that each strategy
had advantages and disadvantages. While demonstrating
interpretability and ease of use, supervised learning methods
such as logistic regression and decision trees struggled with
complicated fraud patterns and unbalanced datasets.
Clustering and anomaly detection are two unsupervised
learning approaches that excel at spotting novel or
undiscovered fraud trends but have a high rate of false
positives and are unable to identify specific fraud instances.
Although hybrid approaches sought to integrate the best
features of both supervised and unsupervised techniques, their
complexity and processing requirements made large-scale
deployment difficult. By extracting complex patterns from
enormous volumes of data, deep learning models, in particular
neural networks, showed promise in the detection of fraud. For
efficient training, they needed a lot of labeled data and
processing power.
Future Study and Developments
a) Despite the advancements gained in this research,
there are still a number of opportunities for system
improvements and exploration in the future.
b) Examine the usage of ensemble models, like
Random Forest or Gradient Boosting Machines, to combine
the advantages of many methods and raise the accuracy of
fraud detection.
c) Focus on creating more explainable AI models to
offer insights into how fraud detection judgments are made,
improving system transparency and trust.
d) Investigate the use of online learning strategies to
modify the fraud detection system in real-time as new data
becomes available, enhancing its response to changing fraud
patterns.
e) Investigate how deep reinforcement learning can
be used to detect fraud. Through interactions with its
environment, the system can learn the best practices for
preventing fraud.
f) Enhanced Data Preprocessing: Improve the training
dataset's quality by further refining data preprocessing
procedures to manage missing or noisy data.
g) Integration with External Data Sources: To
improve the fraud detection process, think about integrating
external data sources, such as social media data or transaction
history from partner institutions.
h) Develop a thorough system for continual
monitoring, evaluation, and modifications to accommodate
new fraud schemes and guarantee the system's continued
applicability
REFERENCES
The template will number citations consecutively within
brackets [1]. The sentence punctuation follows the bracket [2].
Refer simply to the reference number, as in [3]—do not use
“Ref. [3]” or “reference [3]” except at the beginning of a
sentence: “Reference [3] was the first ...”
For papers published in translation journals, please give the
English citation first, followed by the original foreign-language
citation [6].
[1] Buczak, A. L., & Guven, E. (2016). A Survey of Data Mining and
Machine Learning Methods for Cyber Security Intrusion Detection.
IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 18(2), 1153-1176. DOI:
10.1109/COMST.2015.2494502.
[2] Ranshous, S., Bay, C., Cramer, N., Henricksen, M., & Hannigan, B.
(2015). Combining Clustering and Classification for Anomalous
Activity Detection in Cybersecurity. In Proceedings of the 2015
Workshop on Artificial Intelligence and Security (pp. 49-58).
[3] Bhattacharyya, D., Kalaimannan, E., & Verma, A. (2018). Anomalous
Pattern Detection in Enterprise Data Using Hybrid Classification and
Clustering Techniques. Procedia Computer Science, 132, 1066-1075.
DOI: 10.1016/j.procs.2018.05.110.
[4] Phua, C., Lee, V., Smith, K., & Gayler, R. (2010). A Comprehensive
Survey of Data Miningbased Fraud Detection Research. Artificial
Intelligence Review, 33(4), 229-246. DOI: 10.1007/s10462-009-9128-7.
[5] Friedman, J., Hastie, T., & Tibshirani, R. (2001). The Elements of
Statistical Learning: Data Mining, Inference, and Prediction. New York,
NY: Springer-Verlag.
[6] Brownlee, J. (2020). Master Machine Learning Algorithms. Machine
Learning Mastery.
[7] Chollet, F. (2018). Deep Learning with Python. Manning Publications.
[8] Varshney, A., Mishra, S., & Jha, R. P. (2019). A Review on Machine
Learning Algorithms for Fraud Detection. Procedia Computer Science,
132, 1575-1584. DOI: 10.1016/j.procs.2019.04.169.
[9] Cawley, G. C., & Talbot, N. L. (2010). On Over-fitting in Model
Selection and Subsequent Selection Bias in Performance Evaluation.
Journal of Machine Learning Research, 11, 2079- 2107.
[10] Kuhn, M., & Johnson, K. (2013). Applied Predictive Modeling. New
York, NY: Springer-Verlag.
[11] Kotsiantis, S. B. (2013). Decision Trees: A Recent Overview. Artificial
Intelligence Review, 39(4), 261-283. DOI: 10.1007/s10462-011-9272-4.
[12] Kingma, D. P., & Ba, J. (2015). Adam: A Method for Stochastic
Optimization. International Conference on Learning Representations
(ICLR).
IEEE conference templates contain guidance text for
composing and formatting conference papers. Please
ensure that all template text is removed from your
conference paper prior to submission to the conference.
Failure to remove template text from your paper may
result in your paper not being published.