Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Below are brief descriptions of each problem and case. These descriptions are accompanied by the
estimated time (in minutes) required for completion and by a difficulty rating. The time estimates
assume use of the partially filled-in working papers.
Problems (Sets A and B)
12.1 A,B Atlantic Airlines/Pacific Airlines 30 Easy
Preparation of a condensed income statement and earnings per
share figures for a company with a discontinued segment and an
extraordinary loss. Emphasizes format of the income statement
rather than computation of amounts. Students also are asked to
forecast future operating results.
1. The purpose of presenting subtotals such as Income from Continuing Operations and Income
before Extraordinary Items is to assist users of the income statement in making forecasts of
future earnings. By excluding the operating results of discontinued operations and the effects of
unusual and nonrecurring transactions, these subtotals indicate the amount of income derived
from the company’s ongoing, normal operations.
2. The discontinued operations classification is used in the income statement only when a business
discontinues an entire segment of its activities. Frank’s has two business segments—pizza
parlors and the baseball team. Only if one of these segments is discontinued in its entirety will
the company report discontinued operations. The sale or closure of a few parlors does not
represent the disposal of the pizza parlor segment of the company’s business activities.
3. Extraordinary items are gains and losses that are unusual in nature and not expected to recur in
the foreseeable future.
Separate line-item presentation should be made for items that are unusual in nature or infrequent
in occurrence, but not both. While these items are disclosed separately via their separate
presentation, a subtotal for income before and after them is not presented as is done for
extraordinary items.
4. The restructuring charges should be combined and presented as a line item in the company’s
income statement in determining operating income.
In predicting future earnings for the company, the charges generally should not be considered to
be costs that will be incurred in the future. In fact, if the program of downsizing is successful,
operating results in the future could be expected to improve as a result of having incurred the
restructuring charges.
5. A prior period adjustment represents a correction of an error in the amount of income reported
in a prior period. Prior period adjustments are shown in the statement of retained earnings (or
statement of stockholders’ equity) as an adjustment to the balance of retained earnings at the
beginning of the period in which the error is identified.
6. Irregular income items, such as extraordinary items, discontinued operations, and prior period
adjustments, are legitimate parts of the earnings history of a company. On the other hand, they
are non-recurring and should not carry the same weight in evaluating future profitability as
normal, recurring operating revenues and expenses.
7. a. The current-year preferred dividend is deducted from net income to determine the earnings
allocable to the common stockholders. (If the preferred stock is noncumulative, the
preferred dividend is deducted only if declared; the preferred dividend on cumulative
preferred stock is always deducted.)
8. No, the number of common shares used in computing earnings per share may be different from
that used to determine book value per share. In computing earnings per share, earnings
allocable to the common shareholders is divided by the weighted-average number of common
shares outstanding throughout the period. In computing book value per share at a specified date,
stockholders' equity allocable to the common stockholders is divided by the number of common
shares actually outstanding on that date. If the number of common shares outstanding has not
changed during the period, the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during
the period will be equal to the number of common shares outstanding on a particular date.
9. a. The price-earnings ratio is computed by dividing the market price of a share of common
stock by the annual earnings per share.
b. The amount of basic earnings per share is computed by dividing the net income available
for common stock by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during
the year.
c. The amount of diluted earnings per share is computed by dividing net income by the
maximum potential number of shares outstanding after convertible securities are assumed
to have been converted.
12. Date of declaration is the day the obligation to pay a dividend comes into existence by action
of the board of directors. Date of record is the day on which the particular stockholders who
are entitled to receive a dividend is determined. Persons listed in the corporate records as
owning stock on this day will receive the dividend. Date of payment is the day the dividend is
distributed by the corporation. Ex-dividend date (usually three business days prior to the date
of record) is the day on which the right to receive a recently declared dividend no longer
attaches to shares of stock. As a result, the market price of the shares usually falls by the
amount of the dividend.
A stock dividend occurs when there is a relatively small increase in the number of shares issued,
with no change in the net assets of the company but a transfer from retained earnings to the
paid-in capital section of the balance sheet. The par value of stock remains the same.
The distinction in the accounting treatment of a stock dividend and a stock split stems directly
from the difference in the effect on stated (legal) capital and retained earnings. There is no
difference in the probable effect on per-share market price of a stock dividend and a stock split
of equal size, although stock splits are usually much larger than stock dividends.
15. Restructuring charges result when the company incurs costs in the process of reorganization,
often downsizing. The purpose of reorganization is to benefit future operations in terms of more
efficient operations, but the cost is ordinarily charged to current operations. Restructuring
charges are not extraordinary items, and unless they directly related to a discontinued part of the
business, are not presented as discontinued operations. They are often presented as a single line
item in the income statement, before income taxes.
16. Three items that may be shown in a statement of retained earnings as causing changes in the
balance of retained earnings are:
The investor has benefited by $900. He/she could sell about 95 shares [$900/($10 ´ 95%)] at
$9.50 and still have a stock investment equal to the value before the stock dividend, although the
investor would own a smaller percentage of the company after the sale.
18. A liquidating dividend is a return of the investment made in the company to the investor, in
contrast to a non-liquidating dividend which is a return on the investment in the company. A
liquidating dividend occurs when dividends are distributed in excess of a company’s retained
earnings.
20. The statement of retained earnings shows for the Retained Earnings account the beginning
balance, changes in the account balance during the period, and the ending balance. A statement
of stockholders’ equity provides the same information, but includes every category of
stockholders’ equity account (including retained earnings). Therefore, a statement of
stockholders’ equity may appropriately be described as an expanded statement of retained
earnings.
Revenues $1,500,000
Expenses 1,200,000
Income before extraordinary item $300,000
Extraordinary gain from passage of new legislation, net of $80,500
income taxes 149,500
Net income $449,500
b. Since Smiley is a small and growing corporation, the board of directors probably
decided that cash from operations was needed to finance the company’s expanding
operations.
c. You are probably better off because of the board’s decision not to declare cash
dividends. Smiley was obviously able to invest the funds to earn a high rate of
return, as evidenced by the value of your investment, which has grown from
$1,000 to $17,280.
Ex. 12.5 a. 1. Net income (all applicable to common stock) ……………… $1,920,000
Shares of common stock outstanding throughout the year .. 400,000
Earnings per share ($1,920,000 ¸ 400,000 shares) ……….. $4.80
2. Net income ………………………………………………………… $1,920,000
Less: Preferred stock dividend (100,000 ´ 8% ´ $100) ………………….800,000
Earnings available for common stock …………………… $1,120,000
Shares of common stock outstanding throughout the year 300,000
Earnings per share ($1,120,000 ¸ 300,000 shares) …………………… $3.73
b. The earnings per share figure computed in part a (2) is a basic EPS figure.
Although the company has outstanding both common and preferred stock, the
preferred stock must be convertible into common stock in order to result in a
diluted computation of earnings per share. The potential conversion of preferred
stock into common stock is what necessitates disclosure of diluted EPS. Because
the preferred stock in this exercise is not convertible, the EPS computation is
basic.
Ex. 12.7 a. Apr. 30 Memorandum: Issued an additional 1,000,000 shares of capital stock in
a 2-for-1 stock split. Par value reduced from $1 per share to $0.50 per
share.
b. 2,100,000 shares
1,000,000 + 1,000,000 + 100,000
c. $0.50 par value per share ($1 par reduced to $0.50 par due to 2-for-1 stock split on
April 30.)
d. Stock split—No effect
Ex. 12.10 a. After a stock split, earnings per share are expressed in terms of the new shares.
Therefore, a 3-for-1 stock split will cause earnings per share figures to be
restated at one-third of their former amounts.
c. Dividends declared or paid do not enter into the determination of net income.
Therefore, the declaration and/or payment of a cash dividend on common stock
has no effect upon earnings per share.
d. Earnings per share are restated to reflect the increased number of shares
resulting from a stock dividend. Therefore, a stock dividend causes a
proportionate reduction in the earnings per share reported in past periods, as
well as in the current period. (This effect parallels that of a stock split, only
smaller.)
h. This information may be included in the annual report, but it is not a required
disclosure in financial statements. It is reported by investors’ services and in the
financial pages of most newspapers.
*$290,000 ´ 35%
Ex. 12.13 a. 10% stock dividend: 500,000 shares x 1.10 = 550,000 shares
2:1 stock split: 550,000 x 2 = 1,100,000 shares
Note: The cash dividends do not affect the number of outstanding shares.
Your portfolio after the four transactions is $8,800 compared to $6,500 before
the four transactions. In addition, you would have received cash dividends, as
follows:
(100 shares x 1.10 x $1) + (110 shares x 2 x $.60) = $110 + $132 = $242
Ex. 12.14 a. Home Depot is a very aggressive company. It is constantly opening new
stores, requiring large amounts of capital. The company retains the majority
of its earnings in order to have the capital available to take advantage of its
growth opportunities and to constantly open new markets for its growing
business.
b. Home Depot, Inc. has one class of common stock in its capital structure.
10,000 million shares are authorized, and at January 29, 2006, 2,401 million
shares had been issued. Treasury stock on that date consisted of 227 million
shares. This means that 2,174 million shares were outstanding (2,401 - 227).
c. During the three years presented, treasury stock was purchased in all three
years. In the year ending January 29, 2006, the company purchased 77 million
shares for over $3 billion.
The balance sheet indicates that issued shares increased between January 30,
2005 and January 29, 2006 by 16 million shares (2,401 million - 2,385 million).
The statement of stockholders' equity and comprehensive income describes these
as "Shares Issued Under Employee Stock Plans."
c.
Total cash dividends declared during 2007 (data given) $ 950,000
Less: Preferred stock dividend (80,000 shares x $6.25 per share) 500,000
Cash dividends to common stockholders $ 450,000
Number of common shares outstanding through 2007 200,000
Cash dividend per common share ($450,000 ÷ 200,000 shares) $ 2.25
d. The single 2008 $8.00 figure for EPS is unfavorable in comparison with 2007 performance.
Since 2008 has only one EPS figure, it should be compared to the earnings per share from
continuing operations in 2007, which amounted to $12.25 per share. Slick Software, Inc.’s
earnings per share from continuing operations fell $4.25 per share (approximately 35%)
from 2007 to 2008.
c. The “gain on sale of treasury stock” represents the excess of reissue price received over the
cost Phoenix paid to acquire some of its own shares of stock. Although a corporation may
reissue treasury stock at prices above or below its cost of acquiring its own stock, the
difference between amounts received and the cost of treasury shares does not result in gains
or losses recognized in the income statement. Rather, the amount described as “gain on sale
of treasury stock” is included as part of additional paid-in capital in the stockholders’ equity
section of the balance sheet.
Note to instructor: Net income actually increases book value throughout the year, not merely on
the date upon which net income is closed into retained earnings.
The two types of dividends do not have the same impact upon stockholders’ equity. A cash
dividend is a distribution of a corporation’s assets (cash) to stockholders and, as such,
causes a decrease in stockholders’ equity. A stock dividend is simply issuing more stock
certificates to the existing group of shareholders with no accompanying increase or
outflow of assets; a corporation’s own stock is not an asset of the corporation. With both
small and large stock dividends, stockholders’ equity is adjusted to reflect the increased
number of shares outstanding, but there is no additional equity created and no decrease in
equity.
2007
Jan 3 Dividends 382,000
Dividends Payable 382,000
To record declaration of $1 per share cash
dividend payable on Feb. 15 to stockholders of
record on Jan. 31
b. 1. Declaration of a cash dividend has no immediate effect upon net income or cash
flows. It increases current liabilities (dividends payable), but has no effect on
current assets. Also, retained earnings is decreased, resulting in a decrease in
stockholders’ equity.
2. Payment of a cash dividend has no effect on revenue or expenses, but it reduces cash.
Since it reduces cash, it also reduces current assets. The transaction has no effect on
stockholders’ equity, which has already been decreased when the dividend was
declared.
3. The purchase of treasury stock has no effect on either revenue or expenses and,
therefore, does not affect net income. But cash is used to purchase the treasury
stock, and this decreases cash and current assets. Because treasury stock is
deducted from stockholders’ equity in the balance sheet, its purchase decreases
stockholders’ equity.
4. Reissuance of treasury stock at a price less than its original cost results in a loss, but
these losses are not recorded in the income statement. Instead additional paid-in
capital is decreased for the amount of the loss. Therefore, this transaction does not
affect net income. Since the treasury stock account is deducted from stockholders’
equity, reissuance of the stock increases the total amount of stockholders’ equity.
Also, both cash and current assets are increased as a result of the cash received from
sale of the stock.
b.
MANDELLA CORPORATION
Partial Balance Sheet
December 31, 2007
Stockholders’ equity:
Capital stock:
Common stock, $5 par, 1,000,000 shares authorized,
328,000 shares issued and outstanding (1) $ 1,640,000
Additional paid-in capital:
From issuance of common stock $ 3,000,000
From stock dividend 350,000
From treasury stock (2) 50,000 3,400,000
Total paid-in capital $ 5,040,000
Retained earnings (3) 874,000
Total stockholders’ equity $ 5,914,000
b.
Net loss $ (18,301)
Less: Preferred dividend requirements (2,778)
Net loss applicable to common stockholders (21,079)
Weighted-average number of shares of common stock 39,739
Loss per share ($21,079 ÷ 39,739) $ (0.53)
c.
Total cash dividends declared during 2007 (data given) $ 2,000,000
Less: Preferred stock dividend (100,000 shares x $6 per share) 600,000
Cash dividends to common stockholders $ 1,400,000
Number of common shares outstanding through 2007 200,000
Cash dividend per common share ($1,400,000 ÷ 200,000 shares) $ 7.00
d. The single 2008 $75.00 figure for EPS is unfavorable in comparison with 2007 performance.
Since 2008 has only one EPS figure, it should be compared to the earnings per share from
continuing operations in 2007, which amounted to $76.50 per share. Beach, Inc.’s earnings
per share from continuing operations fell $1.50 per share (2%) from 2007 to 2008.
c. The “gain on sale of treasury stock” represents the excess of reissue price received over the
cost Walton paid to acquire some of its own shares of stock. Although a corporation may
reissue treasury stock at prices above or below its cost of acquiring its own stock, the
difference between amounts received and the cost of treasury shares does not result in gains
or losses recognized in the income statement. Rather, the amount described as “gain on sale
of treasury stock” is included as part of additional paid-in capital in the stockholders’ equity
section of the balance sheet.
Note to instructor: Net income actually increases book value throughout the year, not merely on
the date upon which net income is closed into retained earnings.
The two types of dividends do not have the same impact upon stockholders’ equity. A cash
dividend is a distribution of a corporation’s assets (cash) to stockholders and, as such,
causes a decrease in stockholders’ equity. A stock dividend is simply issuing more stock
certificates to the existing group of shareholders with no accompanying increase or
outflow of assets; a corporation’s own stock is not an asset of the corporation. With both
small and large stock dividends, stockholders’ equity is adjusted to reflect the increased
number of shares outstanding, but there is no additional equity created and no decrease in
equity as occurs when a cash dividend is declared.
2007
Jan 5 Dividends 560,000
Dividends Payable 560,000
To record declaration of $1 per share cash
dividend payable on Feb. 18 to stockholders of
record on Jan. 31.
b. 1. Declaration of a cash dividend has no immediate effect upon net income or cash
flows. It increases current liabilities (dividends payable), but has no effect on
current assets. Also, retained earnings is decreased, resulting in a decrease in
stockholders’ equity.
2. Payment of a cash dividend has no effect on revenue or expenses, but it reduces cash.
Since it reduces cash, it also reduces current assets. The transaction has no effect on
stockholders’ equity, which has already been decreased when the dividend was
declared.
3. The purchase of treasury stock has no effect on either revenue or expenses and,
therefore, does not affect net income. But cash is used to purchase the treasury
stock, and this decreases cash and current assets. Because treasury stock is
deducted from stockholders’ equity in the balance sheet, its purchase decreases
stockholders’ equity.
4. Reissuance of treasury stock at a price less than its original cost results in a loss, but
these losses are not recorded in the income statement. Instead additional paid-in
capital is decreased for the amount of the loss. Therefore, this transaction does not
affect net income. Since the treasury stock account is deducted from stockholders’
equity, reissuance of the stock increases the total amount of stockholders’ equity.
Also, both cash and current assets are increased as a result of the cash received from
sale of the stock.
b.
ADAMS CORPORATION
Partial Balance Sheet
December 31, 2007
Stockholders’ equity:
Capital stock:
Common stock, $.50 par, 200,000 shares authorized,
43,200 shares issued and outstanding (1) $ 21,600
Additional paid-in capital:
From issuance of common stock $ 480,000
From stock dividend 48,000
From treasury stock (2) 20,000 548,000
Total paid-in capital $ 569,600
Retained earnings (3) 1,567,200
Total stockholders’ equity $ 2,136,800
b.
Net loss $ (16,220)
Less: Preferred dividend requirements (3,100)
Net loss applicable to common stockholders $ (19,320)
Weighted-average number of shares of common stock 10,000
Loss per share ($19,320 ÷ 10,000) $ 1.932
a. Both the operating loss from the noncoal minerals activities and the loss on disposal should be
classified in ARCO’s income statement as discontinued operations and should be shown
separately from the results of ARCO’s ongoing business operations. These losses qualify for
this separate treatment because the discontinued activities represented an entire identifiable
segment of ARCO’s business operations.
b. A change in the estimated useful life of depreciable assets is a change in accounting estimate.
Changes in estimate affect only the current year and future years, and are included in
revenues and expenses from normal operations.
c. The explosion of a chemical plant of a company like Union Carbide appears to meet the
criteria for classification as an extraordinary loss. These criteria are (1) material in amount,
(2) unusual in nature, and (3) not expected to recur in the foreseeable future.
d. The criteria for classification as an extraordinary item are (1) material in amount, (2) unusual
in nature and (3) not expected to recur in the foreseeable future. Condemnations of assets by
governmental authorities generally are viewed as meeting these criteria. Therefore, the $10
million gain would be classified as an extraordinary item in Georgia Pacific’s income
statement.
a. If JPI had not sold the baseball team at the end of 2007, it still would have incurred the
team’s $1,300,000 operating loss for the year. However, the company would not have realized
the $4,700,000 gain on the sale. Other items in the income statement would not have been
affected. Thus, JPI’s income for 2007 would have been $4,700,000 less than was actually
reported, or $2,600,000 ($7,300,000 - $4,700,000 = $2,600,000).
b. In 2007, JPI’s newspaper business earned $4,500,000, as shown by the subtotal, Income from
Continuing Operations. If the profitability of these operations increased by 7% in 2008, they
would earn approximately $4,815,000 ($4,500,000 ´ 1.07 = $4,815,000). If the baseball team
were still owned and lost $2,000,000 in 2008, JPI could be expected to earn a net income of
about $2,815,000 in that year.
c. Given that the baseball team was sold in 2007, JPI should earn a net income of
approximately $4,815,000 in 2008, assuming that the profitability of the continuing
newspaper operations increases by 7% ($4,500,000 ´ 1.07 = $4,815,000).
d. The operating loss incurred by the baseball team in 2007 indicates that the team’s expenses
(net of tax effects) exceeded its net revenue by $1,300,000. If the expenses were $32,200,000,
the net revenue must have amounted to $1,300,000 less, or $30,900,000.
a. The company reports earnings per share computed on both a basic and a diluted basis
because it has outstanding convertible preferred stock. The conversion of these
securities into common stock would increase the number of common shares outstanding and
thereby dilute (reduce) earnings per share of common stock. The primary purpose of a
company’s disclosing diluted earnings per share is to warn investors of the dilution in
earnings that could occur if the convertible securities actually were converted.
b. The total dollar amount of the company’s extraordinary loss can be computed from the
earnings per share information as follows:
This answer appears reasonable, since the number of common shares outstanding
ranged from 77,987,500 at the beginning of the year to 77,353,100 at year-end. The
77,804,878 approximate figure for the $1.23 annual dividend appears compatible with the
beginning and ending actual figures because it falls between these numbers.
c. The stock issued during the year for the stock option plans consisted of treasury shares, not
newly issued shares. The Treasury Stock account is used to account for repurchases of a
corporation’s stock, as well as the reissuance of treasury shares. When stock is repurchased
and subsequently reissued, the Common Stock account is not affected; these transactions do,
however, affect the Treasury Stock account, a contra- stockholders’ equity account.
d. $29.79 average cost per share of treasury stock at the beginning of the year
($135,900,000 total cost ¸ 4,562,500 treasury shares)
e. The aggregate reissue price for the treasury shares must have been lower than the cost to
acquire those treasury shares, because the Additional Paid-in Capital account was reduced
by the reissuance of the treasury stock. The cost of the treasury shares reissued was
$16,700,000; the reissue price for the treasury shares must have been $15,300,000 to cause a
$1,400,000 reduction in Additional Paid-in Capital.
f. $63.61 average cost per share for treasury stock acquired during the current year
($78,600,000 aggregate cost ¸ 1,235,700 shares repurchased)
g. Earnings per share: Divide by the weighted-average number of shares outstanding
throughout the year
Book value per share: Divide by the actual number of shares outstanding as of the specific
date (usually a balance sheet date)
b. Although materiality in terms of size is important, size alone does not qualify a loss as an
extraordinary item. Nor does the fact that the item is not routine.
To qualify as extraordinary, an event should be unusual in nature, and not be expected to
recur in the foreseeable future. Given that Elliot-Cole has operations in more than 90
countries, losses of this nature could recur. The fact that in a single year, such losses were
incurred in several different countries suggests that this may be more than a one-time event.
Thus, in light of Elliot-Cole’s business environment, it appears that we would not classify
these losses as extraordinary.
Note to instructor: We do not consider this answer cut and dried. If these assets had been
expropriated, the losses would be classified as extraordinary. These assets have not been
expropriated—nor is there any indication that they will be. Nonetheless, there are some
parallels between this situation and an expropriation of assets by a foreign government.
These similarities may be set forth as an argument for classifying the losses as
extraordinary.
c. 1. Net income will be reduced by the same amount regardless of whether these losses are
classified as ordinary or extraordinary. In either case, they are deducted in the
computation of net income.
2. Income before extraordinary items will be reduced only if the losses are classified as
ordinary. If they are classified as extraordinary, they will be deducted after the
computation of the subtotal, Income before Extraordinary Items.
3. Extraordinary items are deducted after the determination of Income from Continuing
Operations. Therefore, this subtotal will be reduced only if the losses are classified as
ordinary.
4. Given that these losses do not affect income taxes, they have no cash effects. Therefore,
net cash flow from operating activities will be unaffected.
d. The p/e ratio is based upon income before extraordinary items (stated on a per-share basis).
As stated in c (2), above, income before extraordinary items will be unaffected if the losses
are classified as extraordinary. Therefore, the p/e ratio will be unaffected. But if the losses are
classified as ordinary, income before extraordinary items will be reduced, and the p/e ratio,
therefore, will be higher.
e. Yes. Members of management have a self-interest in seeing stock prices increase, which
would favorably affect the value of their stock options as well as stock they already own. In
addition, a rising stock price makes it easier for the company to raise capital, benefits
stockholders, and makes management look good.
© The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2008
Case 12.5
CASE 12.5
CLASSIFICATION (continued)
The classification of these losses may well affect Elliot-Cole’s stock price. Investors
consider income from continuing operations a predictive subtotal. If the losses are
classified as ordinary, this key subtotal will decline, probably below last year’s level.
(The losses amount to 18% of pre-loss earnings, which exceeds the company’s normal
earnings growth of 15%. Thus, these losses may be sufficient to cause a decline in
earnings relative to the preceding year.) This could have an adverse effect on stock
price.
On the other hand, if the losses are considered extraordinary, this subtotal will be unaffected
and, presumably, continue to reflect the company’s 15% annual growth rate.
Similarly, classifying the losses as ordinary will reduce income before extraordinary
items, which is the income figure used in computing p/e ratios. Thus, the p/e ratio
reported in the financial press will rise significantly above its normal level. This, too,
may have a depressing effect upon stock price. But if the losses are classified as
extraordinary, the per-share earnings used in the computation of the company’s p/e ratio
will not be affected.
In summary, the adverse effects of these losses on the company’s stock price are likely
to be greater if the losses are classified as ordinary, rather than extraordinary.
Therefore, management has a self-interest in seeing these losses classified as an
extraordinary item.
f. These write-offs are likely to increase the earnings reported in future periods, especially if
the company continues to do business in any of the related countries. With the assets having
no book value, future earnings from these operations will not be reduced by charges for
depreciation (or, in some cases, for a cost of goods sold).
g. The ethical dilemma is the classification of these losses. Because of the probable effects
upon stock price, classifying them as extraordinary may be to management’s advantage.
The case is arguable—though we think it’s a bit of a reach. Bear in mind that a higher
stock price also benefits the company’s current stockholders. So who, if anybody, stands
to lose?
In management’s shoes, how would you classify these losses? (We find this question easier to
ask than to answer.)
Who were the losers? Anyone who bought the stock between the release of the original earnings
figures and the announcement that substantial losses would be reclassified.
We do not attempt in this solution to write the report that is required in the instructions in
the case, but rather to provide some ideas of how students might respond to each of the
bulleted items.
The case statement indicates that it is particularly important for Flexcom, Inc. to control its
inventory because of the highly competitive market in which they operate and the sensitivity of
inventory to changes in consumer demand and technology changes. This sounds as if competition
and technological obsolescence are particularly important risks that Flexcom must control in
order in order to be successful. Rapidly rising inventory levels could be explained several
different ways. There may be perfectly logical and appropriate reasons for management to be
increasing inventory at an above-normal rate, particularly if sales are sluggish. On the other
hand, in light of sluggish sales, a logical question is whether the company has an inventory
obsolescence problem and simply can't sell its inventory which is building up. If inventory
obsolescence is an issue, the fact that the allowance for inventory obsolescence has significantly
declined raises an interesting question that is worthy of further exploration.
A possible explanation that is at least worth exploring is whether management has taken
conscious steps to overstate inventory. The motivation would be to increase reported net income
to enhance the position of management. The relationship of inventory to net income is as follows:
an overstatement of inventory is offset by an understatement of cost of goods sold which, in turn,
overstates net income. By overstating inventory, either intentionally or in error, net income is
improved and the company appears to be more profitable that it actually is.
Understating the allowance overstates the net inventory amount, which results in an
understatement of cost of goods sold, which inflates net income.
Several reasons may be cited for why there is an increase in “special items” in U.S. corporations’
income statements. Perhaps the most persuasive is that companies are constantly looking for
ways to make their performance look better to investors and creditors. If a special item is a loss,
separating that item out from normal, recurring operations, and presenting an income subtotal
before and after that loss may encourage investors and creditors to discount that item in terms of
it recurring in the future.
For all companies to report by the same rules is critical to being able to compare the performance
of one company against others. For that reason, the FASB has spent a great deal of time, effort,
and money to try to develop financial reporting standards to increasingly move companies
toward more comparable financial reporting. Special items, however, have been a particularly
difficult area, and achieving a balance between prescriptive standards that border on absolute
rules and allowing judgment in the application of standards is a difficult task.
Note: We cannot supply quantitative answers to this assignment as they will vary depending upon
which companies the student selects. In general, it would be expected that the NASDAQ company
will have a higher price-earnings ratio than the Fortune 500 company.