Professional Documents
Culture Documents
C
atalytic reforming units (CRUs) are one of the high- Scale formation
est margin but most energy-demanding processes Refineries seek ways to find energy optimisation solutions
in oil refining. This flexible technology can produce in their processes and prioritises projects that are geared
high-octane gasoline components and individual aromatic towards reducing fuel gas consumption and cutting GHG
hydrocarbons (xylene, benzene, toluene), which are raw emissions. These initiatives align with strong commit-
materials for the petrochemical industry. The reforming ments to a zero-carbon strategy, sustainability, and opti-
process involves converting low-octane naphtha into a mised energy usage, especially for units like the catalytic
reformate at high temperatures and relatively low pressure. platformer.
Catalytic reforming is typically carried out in a series of While platforming reactions occur in the stacked set
four reactors. Before entering each reactor, the feedstock of reactors, scale formation is observed on the external
is reheated to a temperature of 520-540°C. This reheating tube heater’s surfaces due to oxidation, fuel gas impuri-
is achieved using high heat flux fired heaters consuming ties, and high heat flux. Oxidation scale formation results
sizeable amounts of energy and emitting greenhouse gases in the non-uniform heat distribution along the tubes and
(GHGs). hotspots formation. Moreover, the radiant efficiency of the
Radiant coils within the catalytic reforming fired heater heater decreases with the corresponding fuel consumption
are made of 9%Cr chromium/molybdenum alloy (ASTM increase. To prevent oxidation scale formation, the refinery
A335P9) and are subject to oxidation scale formation under decided to apply ceramic coatings to the furnace tube and
firebox conditions. This oxidation scale may reach up to 1-2 refractory surfaces on-site during a turnaround.
mm thicknesses, reducing radiant coil thermal conductiv-
ity, hindering radiant section efficiency, and significantly
impacting the entire plant’s economic performance. A detailed analysis of furnace
operational data revealed the
Enhancing radiant efficiency
A CRU with continuous catalyst regeneration (CCR)
feasibility of high-emissivity
experiences a high rate of scale formation, approxi- ceramic coatings application to
mately reaching metal loss levels of 0.15-0.25 mm/year. the radiant tube and refractory
The plant team thoroughly tracked the performance and
detected an energy efficiency decrease due to scale for-
surfaces
mation. Every four years, during a major turnaround, the
plant carried out activities to clean the external tube sur- This case study pertains to the application of Cetek High
faces. Nevertheless, a significant decrease in furnace effi- Emissivity Coatings on both radiant tubes and refractory
ciency was observed by the end of the second year after surfaces within the refinery catalytic reforming heaters.
the turnaround. The primary objective was to enhance radiant efficiency
A detailed analysis of furnace operational data revealed and facilitate the sustainable operation of the heater for
the feasibility of high-emissivity ceramic coatings applica- the next 8-10 years.
tion to the radiant tube and refractory surfaces. The project Ceramic coatings nowadays are approved materials to
was executed during a major turnaround, and the furnace increase the energy efficiency of fired heaters or debot-
performance analysis was carried out two months later. tleneck the heaters with various limitations, such as
Post-project analysis showed a radiant efficiency gain of bridgewall temperature (BWT), firing duty or uneven heat
13%, expected to last over the coating’s service life (8-10 flux distribution. Initially developed in the 1970s, coatings
years). Achieved radiant efficiency enhancement may have found successful use in all heavy industrial appli-
be utilised for reducing fuel consumption along with CO2 cations, including metals processing, aerospace, glass
emissions or throughput/severity increase under the same industry, and fertilisers but became especially beneficial in
firing rate. the oil and gas and petrochemical industries.
Application
High emissivity coatings were applied
to all radiant surfaces in all three inter-
heaters during a major turnaround. A
special ceramic coating system has
been selected for each type of surface.
As a first step, tube surfaces have been
prepared to meet ISO SA 3 standards
(SSPC-SP5, NACE No. 1) via blasting to
white metal conditions (see Figure 1).
During tube blasting, the refractory
Figure 2 Tubes (on the left) and refractory (on the right) after coating was protected with tarps to prevent
damage. After the blowdown of the unit and removal of the all interheaters. This reduction was expected to enhance
tarps, a high emissivity tube coating (TC) was applied. radiant efficiency, enabling the potential for fuel savings or
After refractory preparation, additional cleaning, and an increase in capacity under the same firing rate.
blowdown, the tubes adjacent to the walls were protected Figure 3 demonstrates a substantial reduction in tube
from overspray. The result after both tube and refractory surface temperatures (averaging more than 100°C) fol-
application can be found in Figure 2. The application took lowing the turnaround, particularly in the context of fuel
only nine days, including all steps and phases. savings. Furthermore, the temperature distribution along
the length of the tubes became more uniform. The deter-
IR inspection results mination of tube metal temperature via IR thermography is
To accurately predict the anticipated outcomes following the notably more reliable after coating application, as the oxi-
application of high emissivity coatings, an infrared inspec- dation scale is eliminated, and the coating’s emissivity and
tion was conducted on all process tubes. This assessment temperature gradient are well-defined.
was coupled with collecting process data related to heater
performance. Post-application, a significant reduction in Visual inspection results
tube surface temperatures and BWTs was anticipated for Following the completion of the project, a visual inspection
41
35
33
31 830
21˚C lower weighted
29 average BWT
Fuel firing, Gcal/hr
27
Weighted average BWT, ˚C
25 800
Time (hours)
Figure 5 Weighted average BWT and fuel firing before and after the Cetek application
was carried out. Figure 4 vividly illustrates the noticeable After the application, BWTs were lower than before. These
distinction between the uncoated cell (charge heater) and lower BWTs led to a fuel consumption decrease under the
the coated ones (interheaters). As an additional advantage, same throughput. A weighted average BWT reduction of
the heat distribution along the length of the tubes became 21°C and fuel savings reduction of circa 5.0 Gcal/hr were
more even. Moreover, determining tube metal temperature observed.
through IR thermography became possible, owing to the
well-established ΔT (temperature difference) and a con- Full evaluation results
stant emissivity value attributed to the coating. The initial full data set was collected before the turnaround
and compared with data after application.
Data trends on energy efficiency Process data (see Table 1) shows that the application
Data trends on BWT, excess air, combustion air tempera- has improved radiant efficiencies and debottlenecked the
ture, and fuel consumption were analysed for periods before fired heater limitations. The Cetek coating application has
application and two months after application (see Figure 5). accomplished the objectives of increasing fired heater effi-
ciency and protecting process tubes
from corrosion and oxidation, thereby
Cetek Evaluation Results
prolonging tube service life. Data from
Parameter Oct-Nov 2022 Mar-Apr 2023 a year before the application was
Throughput (hydrotreated naphtha), % of design 100 100 selected as a base case condition due
H2:HC ratio, mole/mole 1.8 1.7 to the established throughput and
Interheaters combined ΔT, °C 211.2 213.8 similar weather conditions with the
Total absorbed duty (interheaters only), Gcal/hr Base case Base case – 0.2
post-application case after the pro-
Fuel consumption (interheaters only), Gcal/hr Base case Base case – 4.7
Apparent radiant efficiency (interheaters only), Δ% Base case Base case + 6.4 ject’s execution..
Achieved fuel savings (interheaters only), % – 13.2 This project has provided an imme-
diate economic benefit and long-term
Table 1 reliability for Tüpraş. It has achieved
13.2% of fuel savings under the same
production or a corresponding pro-
Cetek Ceramic Coating and Independent Modifications Results Comparison
Table 1 duction increase under the same fuel
Parameter Before Turnaround After Turnaround
firing potential. Based on the fuel con-
Throughput (hydrotreated naphtha), % of design 100 100 sumption reduction, the estimated CO2
H2:HC ratio, mole/mole 1.8 1.7 savings are circa 9,600 MTPA accom-
Fresh BFW consumption, vol. flow Base case Base case – 35% panied by thermal NOx emissions
Charge heater inlet temperature, °C 414 444 reduction due to lower radiant box
Charge heater bridgewall temperature, °C 842 647
temperatures.
Fuel consumption (charge heater), Gcal/hr Base case Base case – 5.0
Fuel savings (by ceramic T&R coatings), % – 48.4 The benefit (in Gcal/hr fuel savings)
Fuel savings % – 51.6 is very similar to the benefit after
other independent modifications (see
Table 2 Table 2).