Professional Documents
Culture Documents
has
fallen below the standard appropriate to the duty that he owes?
a) foreseeability of harm
b) the magnitude of the risk
c) whether the claimant has contributed to his own harm
d) the practicability of precautions
1. Which statement(s) is(are) true with regard to defenses against liability claims?
I. Under contributory negligence, if you contribute to your injury, you cannot recover damages.
II. Under comparative negligence, if you contribute to your injury, you cannot recover damages.
A. I only
B. II only
C. Both I and II D.
Neither I nor II
2. Amanda needed surgery on her right knee. When the anesthesia wore off after the operation, she
noticed surgical wrapping around both knees. When she asked the nurse why both knees were
wrapped, the nurse replied that the surgeon made an incision on her left knee, discovered the mistake,
and proceeded with the operation on the right knee. What modification of the law of negligence will
Amanda probably be able to invoke to recover damages from the surgeon?
A. Contributory negligence
B. Negligence per se
C. Res ipsa loquitur
D. Comparative negligence
5. Linda, a driver for Swift Transportation, causes a five-car accident on an interstate highway.
Linda and Swift are liable to:
A. All those who are injured.
B. Only those whose injuries could reasonably have been foreseen.
C. Only those whose cars were immediately ahead and behind Linda’s vehicle.
D. Only those who do not have insurance.
6. The proximate cause requirement for a negligence tort is most likely NOT met where:
A. A customer becomes ill from food that is carelessly packed at a processing plant.
B. A patient becomes sick from a doctor carelessly prescribing the wrong medicine.
C. A customer in a building supply store carelessly drops a small can of paint that breaks open and is
ignited from a spark caused when the metal can hits the concrete floor.
D. A driver injures a pedestrian when rounding a curve at twice the legal speed limit.
E. The victim of an accident was aware, prior to the actual accident, that the accident was likely to occur.
7. Driving his sport utility vehicle negligently, Winnie crashes into a streetlight. The streetlight falls,
smashing through the roof of a house, killing Piglet instantly. But for Winnie’s negligence, Piglet
would not have died. Regarding the death, the crash is the:
A. Cause in fact
B. Intervening cause
C. Proximate cause
D. Superseding cause
8. Milo invites Morton into her apartment. Morton commits trespass to land if he:
A. Enters the apartment with fraudulent intent.
B. Harms the apartment in any way.
C. Makes disparaging remarks about Milo to others.
D. Refuses to leave when Milo asks him to go.
9. Christy, a nurse, hires Adam, an accountant, to handle her accounts. Dissatisfied with Adam's
work, Christy sues him, alleging negligence. Adam may successfully defend against the suit by
proving that he:
A. Did not injure Christy in any way.
B. Does not know every principle of accounting.
C. Performed as well as an ordinary person could have.
D. Performed as well as Christy could have.
10. Paula locks Tony in a ground floor room. Tony sues Paula for false imprisonment. Which of the
following is true?
A. Paula would escape liability if she let Tony out of the room after one hour.
B. According to some courts, Paula would escape liability if Tony slept through the entire period that the
door was locked and thus was unaware that he was being detained.
C. Even if Tony could easily have escaped through an open window, Paula still is liable.
D. Paula would not be liable if Tony could have escaped by traveling two miles through a narrow, filthy,
rat- infested sewer line that periodically floods with water.
11. Smitha goes diving during her Carnival Cruise. Carnival has Smitha sign a waiver form
indicating that, if she is injured by a shark, she cannot sue Carnival. Smitha was bitten by a shark
during her dive. Smitha sues Carnival. Carnival’s best defense is
A. Comparative negligence
B. Contributory negligence
C. Implied assumption of risk
D. Express assumption of risk
15. The law of contract is different from the law of tort in which way?
a) It is actionable in both the civil and criminal courts
b) It generally concerns a relationship between two parties only
c) Contracts are always written
d) Tort is made up predominantly of statute law
A) True
B) False
C) May be
D) I don’t know
18. According to the test of directness, a person is liable for all the direct consequences of his wrongful
act, whether he could foresee them or not; because consequences which directly follow a wrongful act are
not too remote.
19. The defendant’s servants negligently left a house van unattended in a crowded street. The throwing of
stones at the horses by a child, made them bolt and a policeman was injured in an attempt to stop them
with a view to rescuing the woman and children on the road.
20. Quasi-judicial is also known as a non-judicial body which has the ability to interpret law. It is an
entity or an agency, which has powers and procedures that resemble a court of law or judge, and
which is obliged to determine facts and draw conclusions from them so as to provide the basis of an
official action.
A) True
B) False
C) May be
D) I don’t know
21. Private Nuisance is that kind of nuisance in which a person’s use or enjoyment of his property is
ruined by another. It may also injuriously affect the owner of the property by physically injuring his
property or by affecting the enjoyment of the property.
A) True
B) False
C) May be
D) I don’t know
23. An injunction is a judicial order restraining a person from doing or continuing an act which might
be threatening or invading the legal rights of another.
A) It is a remedy available under torts
B) it is not a remedy available under torts
C) Neither a nor b
D) None of the above
24. The damages may be offered in terms of compensation to the aggrieved party.
A) Under law of torts
B) not under law of torts
C) neither a nor b
D) all of the above
25. Trespass, on one hand, is the direct physical interference with the plaintiff’s possession of the property
through some material or tangible object whereas, in the case of a nuisance, it is an injury to some right of
the possession of the property but not the possession itself. Is this statement true?
26. The concept of nuisance arises commonly in everyone’s daily life, in fact, the Indian courts have
borrowed quite a lot from the English principles as well as from the decisions of the common law along
with creating their own precedents.
A) this leads to the development of torts jurisprudence in India
B) This is not true
C) this does not lead to development
D) none of the above
27. The law of torts consists of rules recognized and acted on by courts of justice.
A) which is also known as Judge made law
B) which is known as international law
C) which is known as criminal wrong
D) none of the above
28. “Torts” are “civil wrongs” that the injured party can seek legal redressal for. Usually, the injured
party in a tort action is entitled to claim un-liquidated damages-
A) True
B) False
C) Both
D) None
29. The law of Torts in India came through England. After the Norman Conquest, French became the spoken
language in England’s judiciary and thus many of the English law’s technical terms owe their origin to
French and tort is one of them. The term ‘tort’ is based on the concept that there are certain rights for
everyone in society. The purpose of this tort law was to enforce rights and duties.
A) Correct
B) Incorrect
C) I don’t know
D) May be
30. ‘Necessity knows no law’. In order to avoid or prevent a great loss or harm, a defendant can cause lesser
harm that is justified. The act of the defendant may be not legal but if it is to avoid major damage then he
can plead this defense.
A) it is a valid defense in law of torts
B) invalid defense
C) both a and b
D) nether a nor b
31. A very unusual act or an event which is the result of the natural forces such as earthquakes, volcanic
eruptions, floods, droughts, etc. is coined as Act of God or ‘Vis major’. It is beyond human imagination
and could not be prevented by human intervention.
A) incorrect proposition
B) not sure
C) correct proposition
D) balanced proposition
34. In Volenti non fit injuria, if a plaintiff has consented to a wrongful act with free content, either express
or implied, under no pressure of fraud or coercion, with voluntary acceptance of risk, then he has no right
to sue the defendant. Also, there should be a duty on behalf of others.
36. The term tort is the French equivalent of the English word ‘wrong’ -
A) True
B) False
C) unsure
D) none
37. A tort is inflicted against or without consent; a contract is founded upon consent.
38. Motive is often taken into consideration in tort, but it is immaterial in a breach of contract.
A) False
B) Motive may become important in determining liability in a specific tort
C) motive and intention are the same things
D) None
39. In certain cases the same incident may give rise to liability both in contract and in tort. For example,
when a passenger whilst traveling with a ticket is injured owing to the negligence of the railway company,
the company is liable for a wrong which is both a tort and a breach of a contract.
40. Quasi contract cover those situations where a person is held liable to another without any agreement,
for money or benefit received by him to which the other person is better entitled.
A) true
B) false
C) quasi contract is same as contract
D) none
41. Being a civil injury, tort differs from crime in all respects in which a civil remedy differs from a criminal
one.
A) may be
B) absolutely yes
C) no
D) I don’t know
42. In general, a tort consists of some act done by a person who causes injury to another, for which damages
are claimed by the latter against the former.
43. There are many acts which though harmful are not wrongful and give no right of action to him who
suffers from their effects.
A) it is called Damnum Sine Injuria
B) it is called injuria sine damnum
C) it is called res ipsa loquitor
D) it is called respondent superior
44. The law of torts is said to be a development of the maxim ‘ubi jus ibi remedium’ or ‘there is no wrong
without a remedy’.
A) correct
B) incorrect
C) may be correct
D) I don’t know
45. To constitute a tort there must be a wrongful act, whether of omission or commission-
A) no, it has to be commission of act only
B) it could be both commission and omission of doing an act
C) it has no logic
D) none
47. Tort is a civil wrong for which the remedy is a common law action for unliquidated damages, and which
is NOT exclusively the breach of a contract, or, the breach of a trust, or other merely equitable obligation-
A) definition by Salmond
B) By Winfield
C) by Plato
D) by Grodski
48. In the case of contract, the duty is owed to a definite person(s) while in tort, the duty is owed to the
community at large i.e., duty in- rem.
A) yes
B) no
C) may be
D) none
49. The aim of litigation in torts is to compensate the injured party while in crime; the offender is punished
by the state in the interest of the society.
A) logical statement
B) illogical statement
C) wrong
D) none
53. “Tortious liability arises from breach of duty, primarily fixed by law; this duty is towards
persons generally and its breach is redressable by an action for unliquidated damages” This
definition is given by
(A) Winfield
(B) Salmond
(C) Flemmings
(D) Goodheart
54. In an action for the tort of negligence, what is not required to be proved by the plaintiff is that
(A) there is damage
(B) duty-situation arises
(C) breach of duty owed to some one
(D) breach of duty owed to the plaintiff
58. A loud bass beat that can be heard through an apartment wall (from another apartment) at
midnight can be classified as
a. Nuisance
b. Trespass
c. Interference with contractual relations
d. Conversion
60. Why is a reasonable person test used to determine breach of duty in a negligence case?
a. Because each tort case is quite similar.
b. Because negligence involves being reasonable.
c. Because a breach of duty occurs when a person does not exercise the degree of care that a
reasonable person would in the same situation
d. Because only reasonable persons are involved in breaches of duty.
61. Which of the following interests is not protected by the law of tort?
63. The law of contract is different from the law of tort in which way?
a) It is actionable in both the civil and criminal courts
b) It generally concerns a relationship between two parties only
c) Contracts are always written
d) Tort is made up predominantly of statute law
65. Which of the following is not a required element in establishing a negligence action?
a) Breach of duty
b) Malicious intent on the part of the defendant
c) Duty of care
d) Causation of damage of a legally recognized type
66. Which of the following best describes the main function of ‘duty of care’ in negligence?
a) It ensures that the correct defendant is sued
b) It ensures that the claimant is always within the time limit for bringing an action
c) It ensures that the tort of negligence is not committed too often
d) It ensures that the wrongdoer has actually been careless
82. A person cannot complain of harm which he has exposed himself with knowledge and free
will refers to
a. Volenti non fit injuria
b. act of God
c. inevitable accident
d. ex turpi causa non oritur actio
84. Tort is a:
(a) Civil wrong
(b) Criminal wrong
(c) Civil as well as criminal wrong
(d) None of the above
85. Who said, “Tortious liability arises from the breach of a duty primarily fixed by the
law, this duty is towards persons generally and its breach is redressable by an action for
unliquidated damages”?
(a) Lord Atkin
(b) Winfield
(c) John Salmond
(d) Fraser
90. The maxim injuria sine damno has been explained in:
(a) Danoghue v. Stevenson
(b) Winterbottom v. Wright
(c) Ashby v. White
(d) Lumley v. Gye.
92. Where the plaintiff in action sues for a pre-determined and inelastic sum of money, he
is said to have claimed:
(a) Unliquidated damages
(b) Confined damages
(c) Liquidated damages
d) Unlimited damages
96. Under this act, the minimum age of forum member of a district forum should be
A) 30
B) 40
C) 35
D) 65
97. Which of the following forum can reappoint the same person as its member?
A) National commission
B) State commission
C) District commission
D) None of the above
99. Within how many days does the opposite party have to answer after they are informed
about the complaint?
A) 30
B) 5
C) 20
D) 15