Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Purpose
The purpose of this document is to serve as a guide for planning language acquisition goals for English Learner (EL) students for the 2020-2021 academic year. Many
of our EL students were not assessed or did not complete the English Learner Proficiency Test (ELPT) in the 2019-2020 academic year due to school closings related
to the COVID-19 pandemic. As a result, many schools/districts are seeking a way to determine language goals for the upcoming year. This document serves as a tool
to assist in determining language levels for individual students and may be used for multiple purposes including setting goals for student Language Service Plans.
Based on LAS Links Proficiency Level Descriptors and WIDA Can Do Descriptors
EL Progress Checklist Speaking (Kindergarten)
Please provide feedback for domain specific skills for this EL student. Student Name _________________________________________________
Teacher(s) completing this form_________________________________ Subject(s) you teach/taught this student _____________________________
Above Proficient/ Bridging Proficient/Expanding Intermediate/Developing Early Intermediate/ Beginning/Entering
Reaching Emerging
(Check all that apply) (Check all that apply) (Check all that apply) (Check all that apply) (Check all that apply) (Check all that apply)
1. The student can produce simple 1. The student can recount by: 1. The student can produce simple 1. In social and academic settings, the 1. In social and academic situations, 1. The student is starting to develop:
sentences and use correct grammar ❑ Relating school-based content and sentences and use correct student can use appropriate students typically use basic ❑ receptive skills in English
when: personal experiences with peers and grammar when: words and phrases when: vocabulary and simple phrases ❑ productive skills in English
❑ making requests adults ❑ making requests ❑ conducting transactions to:
❑ asking for clarification ❑ Rephrasing events from stories or ❑ asking for clarification ❑ making requests ❑ name or describe common objects 2. The student can narrate a story
❑ describing situations information with a partner (e.g., ❑ asking for clarification ❑ express opinions or preferences. with extensive and accurate:
class rules or routines) 2. The student can use appropriate ❑ vocabulary
2. The student can recount by: words and phrases to: 2. The student can narrate a story 2. The student can narrate a story ❑ grammar appropriate for their age
❑ Retelling familiar stories, ❑ label and describe the purpose of related to a sequence of pictures related to a sequence of pictures
including key details with 2. The student can explain by: less common objects about school-related activities about school-related activities 3. The student can recount by:
prompting and support ❑ Providing details related to using vocabulary that is: using: ❑ Repeating words, simple phrases or
❑ Describing details about classroom activities and tasks in 3. The student can use accurate ❑ mostly accurate ❑ restricted vocabulary expressions from familiar stories as
characters, settings, and major small groups (e.g., how we work vocabulary to ❑ limited ❑ developing grammar which limits a whole class
events in illustrated stories with together) ❑ narrate a story related to a sequence expression ❑ Participating in group songs,
prompting and support ❑ Describing steps in familiar cycles of pictures about school related 3. The student can recount by: chants, or poems using gestures or
and processes (e.g., getting in a activities ❑ Retelling main events in short 3. The student can recount by: physical movement
3. The student can explain by: circle to play a game) narrative stories to peers using ❑ Restating some language associated
❑ Comparing two objects using 4. The student can recount by: pictures with illustrated short stories or
measurable attributes (e.g., “The ❑ Retelling familiar stories through a ❑ Describing attributes of familiar informational text (e.g., “I see.” “I 4. The student can explain by:
3. The student can argue by: ❑ Identifying familiar objects used in
table is higher than the chair.”) ❑ Offering personal opinions about series of pictures objects, people, and places hear.”)
everyday routines and activities
❑ Describing the causes or effects of content-related ideas in small ❑ Sharing personal stories or ❑ Re-enacting various roles when with a partner (e.g., in the home
different phenomena based on groups experiences with others (e.g., in 4. The student can explain by: interacting in pairs or in small language and in English)
observations and experiences (e.g., ❑ Giving reasons for content-related multiple languages) ❑ Comparing sizes of familiar groups
pull/push, sink/float) phenomena (e.g., bigger than/ ❑ Rehearsing and acting out key steps
information when modeled (e.g. in procedures or classroom routines
“These animals go together because 5. The student can explain by: smaller than, longer/ wider) 4. The student can explain by:
following models (e.g., “Put away
4. The student can argue by: they have spots.”) ❑ Describing classroom routines (e.g., ❑ Stating reasons for classroom ❑ Describing uses of everyday objects
or roles of familiar people (e.g., toys. Get in line.”)
❑ Agreeing or disagreeing with putting away puzzles) routines or procedures with a
reasons for categorizing content- partner (e.g., expected behaviors) “Teacher reads.”)
4. The student can discuss by ❑ Comparing and contrasting
related information with a partner ❑ Asking questions to extend placement of real-life objects and ❑ Stating attributes and classifying
❑ Stating personal opinions with conversations phenomena (e.g., “on the table,” v. objects into illustrated categories to
“under the table”) show how they go together (e.g.,
justification for content-related ❑ Demonstrating active listening to
ideas or topics shapes, colors, sizes)
show respect to the speaker
Continued on next page Continued on next page
Continued on next page Continued on next page Continued on next page
Based on LAS Links Proficiency Level Descriptors and WIDA Can Do Descriptors
5. The student can discuss by: 6. The student can argue by: 5. T5. The student can argue by: 5. The student can argue by: 5. The student can argue by:
❑ Sustaining conversations on a topic ❑ Expressing likes, dislikes, or ❑ Stating personal preferences or ❑ Stating personal preferences (e.g., ❑ Stating personal likes from oral
❑ Building on comments/ responses preferences with reasons (e.g., “I opinions (e.g., “Recess is best.”) “I like this) prompts (e.g., sports, food,
of others like ___ because___.”) ❑ Predicting everyday situations or ❑ Agreeing or disagreeing with animals)
❑ Giving reasons for classifying events from illustrations familiar questions (e.g., “Are you ❑ Naming choices from models (e.g.,
familiar objects with classmates ready?” “Yes, I am.”) “Apples or bananas?”)
(e.g., in open sorts) 6. The student can discuss by 6. The student can discuss by
❑ Working together collaboratively 6. The student can discuss by ❑ Attending to the speaker to
7. The student can discuss by (e.g., taking turns, listening to ❑ Addressing others according to demonstrate understanding
❑ Proposing ideas to contribute to others) relationship (e.g., student-student, ❑ Following routines, chants, and
conversations ❑ Using language and body student-teacher) songs
❑ Asking questions to request movement to include others in ❑ Participating in exchanges
clarification conversations between peers (e.g., thumb buddies,
turn and talk)
8. Minor errors 7. The student provides
❑ Do not interfere with ❑ Mostly clear information although 7. Errors
communication errors interfere with Frequently impede communication
communication
Additional comments:
Based on LAS Links Proficiency Level Descriptors and WIDA Can Do Descriptors
EL Progress Checklist (Listening Kindergarten)
Please provide feedback for domain specific skills for this EL student. Student Name _________________________________________________
Teacher(s) completing this form_________________________________ Subject(s) you teach/taught this student _____________________________
Based on LAS Links Proficiency Level Descriptors and WIDA Can Do Descriptors
4. The students can process 3. The students can process 4. The students can process 4. The students can process 4. The students can process
arguments by: arguments by: arguments by: arguments by: arguments by:
❑ Interpreting which side to take ❑ Agreeing or disagreeing with oral ❑ Drawing to make predictions ❑ Acting out opposites using ❑ Discriminating between words
and why from dialogs or short claims using gestures (e.g., from illustrated stories read aloud gestures (e.g., through songs or and phrases related to personal
conversations “Tomorrow will be hotter than (e.g., “What happens next?”) chants) choices (e.g., “The park or the
❑ Identifying details of stories or today.”) ❑ Classifying fact from fiction in ❑ Responding non-verbally to zoo?”)
scenarios read aloud that ❑ Identifying reasons for choices in oral discourse (e.g., through show agreement or disagreement ❑ Identifying oral preferences
represent different points of view real life scenarios read aloud physical responses or sorting with opinions of others (e.g., stated by others (e.g., choosing
(e.g., by circling pictures) pictures) thumbs up, thumbs down) pictures or objects)
Additional comments:
Based on LAS Links Proficiency Level Descriptors and WIDA Can Do Descriptors
EL Progress Checklist (Reading Kindergarten)
Please provide feedback for domain specific skills for this EL student. Student Name _________________________________________________
Teacher(s) completing this form_________________________________ Subject(s) you teach/taught this student _____________________________
Based on LAS Links Proficiency Level Descriptors and WIDA Can Do Descriptors
4. The student can process 4. The student can process 4. The student can process 4. The student can process
arguments by: arguments by: arguments by: arguments by:
❑ Identifying different points of ❑ Interpreting pictures in ❑ Predicting next steps, actions, or ❑ Classifying labeled pictures of
view from illustrated text with informational text as true or false events in informational text and personal choices from stories
prompting and support in small groups stories read aloud (e.g., by according to different character
❑ Identifying similarities in and ❑ Comparing choices of different pointing to pictures) traits
differences between two texts on characters in illustrated text read ❑ Indicating agreement or ❑ Making choices from illustrated
the same topic (e.g., pasting or aloud (e.g., using T charts) disagreement with authors’ descriptions read aloud and
matching words found in both points of view of text read aloud sharing with peers (e.g., based on
sources) with a partner “or” phrases)
Additional comments:
Based on LAS Links Proficiency Level Descriptors and WIDA Can Do Descriptors
EL Progress Checklist (Writing Kindergarten)
Please provide feedback for domain specific skills for this EL student. Student Name _________________________________________________
Teacher(s) completing this form_________________________________ Subject(s) you teach/taught this student _____________________________
Based on LAS Links Proficiency Level Descriptors and WIDA Can Do Descriptors
4. The student can explain by: 4. The student can argue by: 5. The student typically 5. The student typically
❑ Stating steps of familiar routines ❑ Producing statements about communicates in a way that: communicates in a way that:
or events by drawing, dictating, choices using different models as ❑ produces errors that interfere ❑ produces errors that frequently
and writing examples (e.g., “I want to…”) with communication impede communication
❑ Responding to “how” questions ❑ Building short sentences from
and suggestions from peers, with personal preferences using
guidance from adults, to add pictures or photos with partners
details to text
5. The student typically
5. The student can argue by: communicates in a way that:
❑ Composing opinion pieces using ❑ produces errors that do not
content-related language with interfere with communication
prompting and support
❑ Making claims using content-
related language about topics or
books (e.g., dictated to adults)
Additional comments:
Based on LAS Links Proficiency Level Descriptors and WIDA Can Do Descriptors
EL Progress Checklist (Speaking Grade 1)
Please provide feedback for domain specific skills for this EL student. Student Name _________________________________________________
Teacher(s) completing this form_________________________________ Subject(s) you teach/taught this student _____________________________
Based on LAS Links Proficiency Level Descriptors and WIDA Can Do Descriptors
6. The student argues by: 5. The student discusses by: 4. The student argues by: 5. The student argues by:
❑ Defending solutions to simple ❑ Using intonation appropriate for ❑ Describing characters or objects ❑ Responding to short statements
problems the purposes of communication using pictures or actions or questions about choices (e.g.,
❑ Elaborating reasons to justify ❑ Restating statements to clarify ❑ Stating choices of materials or “I am sure. I am not sure.”)
content-related ideas ideas supplies and reasons for their ❑ Stating likes and dislikes to
selection participate in conversations with
The student discusses by: 5. Produces errors that peers
❑ Sustaining conversations by ❑ do not interfere with 5. The student discusses by:
responding to comments made in communication ❑ Asking clarifying questions 6. The student discusses by:
multiple exchanges ❑ Inviting others to participate ❑ Following along familiar routines
❑ Asking and answering questions of small and large groups
about key details in social and 6. The student typically: ❑ Recognizing different types of
academic contexts ❑ produces errors which interfere intonation used by speakers
with communication
7. The student typically:
❑ produces errors that frequently
impede communication
Additional comments:
Based on LAS Links Proficiency Level Descriptors and WIDA Can Do Descriptors
EL Progress Checklist (Listening Grade 1)
Please provide feedback for domain specific skills for this EL student. Student Name _________________________________________________
Teacher(s) completing this form_________________________________ Subject(s) you teach/taught this student _____________________________
Based on LAS Links Proficiency Level Descriptors and WIDA Can Do Descriptors
4. The student can process
arguments by:
❑ Evaluating options to make
personal choices from oral simple
sentences
❑ Signaling agreement or
disagreement with short oral
statements using gestures (e.g.,
“Today is Monday. Clap one
time for yes. Clap two times for
no.”)
5. Produces errors
❑ which frequently impede
communication
Additional comments:
Based on LAS Links Proficiency Level Descriptors and WIDA Can Do Descriptors
EL Progress Checklist (Reading Grade 1)
Please provide feedback for domain specific skills for this EL student. Student Name _________________________________________________
Teacher(s) completing this form_________________________________ Subject(s) you teach/taught this student _____________________________
Additional comments:
Based on LAS Links Proficiency Level Descriptors and WIDA Can Do Descriptors
EL Progress Checklist (Writing Grade 1)
Please provide feedback for domain specific skills for this EL student. Student Name _________________________________________________
Teacher(s) completing this form_________________________________ Subject(s) you teach/taught this student _____________________________
Based on LAS Links Proficiency Level Descriptors and WIDA Can Do Descriptors
5. Produces errors which 6. The student can argue by: 5. The student can argue by:
❑ do not interfere with ❑ Participating in interactive ❑ Producing simple sentences from
communication journals with peers models about likes, wants, and
❑ Stating preferences related to needs (e.g., “I like…,” “I don’t
social and academic topics (e.g., like…”)
“I want to go…”) ❑ Supplying facts about topics
Additional comments:
Based on LAS Links Proficiency Level Descriptors and WIDA Can Do Descriptors
EL Progress Checklist Speaking (Grades 2-3)
Please provide feedback for domain specific skills for this EL student. Student Name _________________________________________________
Teacher(s) completing this form_________________________________ Subject(s) you teach/taught this student _____________________________
Based on LAS Links Proficiency Level Descriptors and WIDA Can Do Descriptors
5. The student discusses by: 5. The student argues by: 5. The student argues by: 6. The student discusses by: 5. The student discusses by:
❑ Sharing topic-related information ❑ Defending claims or opinions to ❑ Describing organizing categories ❑ Asking yes or no questions to ❑ Expressing own ideas through
❑ Building on remarks of others by content-related topics for content-related information request clarification drawings, gestures, words and
linking comments ❑ Posing different solutions to (e.g., fish/birds, forests/ deserts) ❑ Recognizing how different phrases
❑ Maintaining audience content-related issues or ❑ Asking and answering questions intonation conveys different ❑ Expressing agreement/
engagement through specific problems in collaborative groups meanings disagreement nonverbally (e.g.,
language and body movement thumbs up or down)
6. The student discusses by: 6. The student discusses by: 7. The student typically:
❑ Expressing own ideas and ❑ Negotiating agreement in small ❑ produces errors which frequently
supporting ideas of others groups impede communication
❑ Proposing new solutions to ❑ Expressing own ideas consistent
resolve conflict in small groups with the topic discussed
Additional comments:
Based on LAS Links Proficiency Level Descriptors and WIDA Can Do Descriptors
EL Progress Checklist (Listening Grades 2-3)
Please provide feedback for domain specific skills for this EL student. Student Name _________________________________________________
Teacher(s) completing this form_________________________________ Subject(s) you teach/taught this student _____________________________
Based on LAS Links Proficiency Level Descriptors and WIDA Can Do Descriptors
5. The student can process 4. The student can process 4. The student can process
arguments by: arguments by: arguments by:
❑ Identifying evidence to support ❑ Identifying similarities and ❑ Distinguishing opinions from
claims/ opinions from differences from oral content- facts from peers’ oral
multimedia related materials or equipment presentations
❑ Following agreed-upon rules for ❑ Identifying different points of ❑ Categorizing content-based
discussions around differing view in short oral dialogues pictures or objects from oral
opinions descriptions (e.g., “animals that
5. The student typically produces form groups to help members
errors which interfere with: survive”)
❑ communication
❑ comprehension 5. Produces errors which
❑ frequently impede
communication
Additional comments:
Based on LAS Links Proficiency Level Descriptors and WIDA Can Do Descriptors
EL Progress Checklist (Reading 2-3)
Please provide feedback for domain specific skills for this EL student. Student Name _________________________________________________
Teacher(s) completing this form_________________________________ Subject(s) you teach/taught this student _____________________________
Based on LAS Links Proficiency Level Descriptors and WIDA Can Do Descriptors
6. The student processes arguments 6. The student processes arguments 6. Produces errors that
6. The student processes arguments by: by: ❑ frequently impede
by: ❑ Sorting content-related ❑ Identifying different ideas or comprehension
❑ Identifying authors’ point of view information according to specific opinions in written texts
in texts criteria (e.g., pros and cons) ❑ Identifying general academic
❑ Evaluating characters, settings, ❑ Identifying reasons to strengthen and content-related words and
and events from a variety of arguments phrases in text relevant to the
media genre/key use (e.g., “once upon a
time” indicates a fairy tale)
7. Produces errors that
❑ do not interfere with 7. Produces errors that
comprehension ❑ interfere with comprehension
Additional comments:
Based on LAS Links Proficiency Level Descriptors and WIDA Can Do Descriptors
EL Progress Checklist (Writing 2-3)
Please provide feedback for domain specific skills for this EL student. Student Name _________________________________________________
Teacher(s) completing this form_________________________________ Subject(s) you teach/taught this student _____________________________
Based on LAS Links Proficiency Level Descriptors and WIDA Can Do Descriptors
4. The student can argue by: 6. The student can argue by: 6. The student typically:
6. The student typically produces: ❑ Supporting main ideas or ❑ Communicating different ❑ produces errors which frequently
❑ responses which contain few opinions with evidence from content-related ideas or opinions impede communication
digressions or repetitions texts ❑ Describing pros and cons related
❑ communication that is clear and ❑ Providing evidence to support or to social issues or familiar topics
complete refuse peers’ ideas
❑ communication that though may
contain minor errors 5. Produces errors that 7. Produces errors that
❑ do not interfere with ❑ interfere with communication
communication
Additional comments:
Based on LAS Links Proficiency Level Descriptors and WIDA Can Do Descriptors
EL Progress Checklist (Speaking Grades 4-5)
Please provide feedback for domain specific skills for this EL student. Student Name _________________________________________________
Teacher(s) completing this form_________________________________ Subject(s) you teach/taught this student _____________________________
1. The student typically produces 1. The student can recount by: 1. The student typically produces 1. The student typically uses 1. The student typically uses basic 1. The student is starting to develop:
sentences with sophisticated ❑ Conveying personal and content- complete sentences when: appropriate words and phrases and vocabulary and grammar and simple ❑ receptive skills in English
vocabulary and correct grammar related experiences in a team ❑ providing information, complete sentences when: sentences to: ❑ productive skills in English
when: ❑ asking questions, ❑ making requests, ❑ identify common objects and
❑ providing information, ❑ Using technical and specific ❑ explaining a process, ❑ expressing opinions or describe their function, 2. The student can recount by:
❑ describing situations, vocabulary when sharing content ❑ expressing an preferences, ❑ provide basic information,
information ❑ Stating key words and phrases
❑ asking questions, ❑ opinion, and ❑ providing information, and ❑ make requests, associated with the content using
❑ expressing opinions and subtle ❑ narrating a story ❑ describing locations ❑ ask questions, and visual or graphic support
nuances of meanings, and 2. The student can explain by: ❑ express opinions or preferences
❑ explaining processes and their ❑ Elaborating by adding precision 2. The student can: 2. The student can: ❑ Communicating personal
reasoning and details to content-related ❑ organize responses in logical and 2. The student can: experiences orally
sequence or causal phenomena sequential order ❑ construct a narrative from a ❑ construct a narrative from a
2. The student: ❑ accurately identify and compare sequence of pictures and sequence of pictures about 3. The student can explain by
❑ Describing relationships of
❑ creates detailed and structured and contrast features of less ❑ compare and contrast information familiar events and school- ❑ Naming components of
components within systems (e.g.,
narratives common objects found in texts and graphic related activities and phenomena using illustrations,
ecosystems, government)
organizers using mostly accurate, ❑ compare and contrast information photographs, or diagrams
3. The student can recount by: 3. The student can recount by: although limited, vocabulary found in texts and graphic
3. The student can argue by: ❑ Demonstrating procedures using
❑ Summarizing discussions on ❑ Giving content-related oral organizers using basic
❑ Supporting claims with evidence realia
content-related topics reports 3. The student can recount by: vocabulary
from various sources
❑ Expanding on topics with ❑ Sequencing steps to solve a ❑ Presenting detailed content- 4. The student can argue by:
❑ Using claims and evidence to related information that has been 3. The student can recount by:
descriptive details using varied problem ❑ Stating reasons for choices using
vocabulary
persuade an audience rehearsed ❑ Retelling short stories or content-
words or phrases
4. The student can explain by: ❑ Stating main ideas in classroom related events
4. The student can discuss by: ❑ Answering yes/no or choice
4. The student can explain by: ❑ Connecting the sequential, conversations on social and ❑ Stating procedural steps across
❑ Recognizing how language can be questions across content or
❑ Analyzing how variables cyclical, or causal relationships academic topics content areas
used to express bias and influence personal preferences
contribute to events or outcomes of content-related issues and
others 4. The student can explain by: 4. The student can explain by:
❑ Maintaining a formal register concepts 5. The student can discuss by:
❑ Challenging ideas respectfully ❑ Stating clear sequential ❑ Giving reasons why or how
❑ Presenting detailed information ❑ Expressing own ideas in a variety
Continued on next page ❑ Managing conversations to stay in small groups procedures to peers something works using diagrams,
of ways (e.g., drawing, using
focused on a topic ❑ Comparing data or information charts or images
gestures, graphing)
Continued on next page ❑ Stating key words or phrases in
processes in a sequential order ❑ Tracking the person speaking
Continued on next page
❑ Sharing own work (e.g., graphic
Continued on next page organizers, drawings) to
contribute to the conversation
Based on LAS Links Proficiency Level Descriptors and WIDA Can Do Descriptors
5. The student can argue by: 5. The student can argue by: 5. The student can argue by: 5. The student can argue by:
❑ Countering with a different point ❑ Stating relevant evidence for ❑ Expressing opinions using ❑ Stating opinions based on
of view claims content-area specific language experiences
❑ Stating conclusions based on a ❑ Responding to opinion ❑ Presenting content-based facts ❑ Responding to opinion
summary of information from the statements of others with reasons that support a position statements of others with
various sides or evidence personal preferences
6. The student can discuss by:
6. The student can discuss by: 6. The student can discuss by: ❑ Asking clarifying questions to 6. The student can discuss by:
❑ Examining the value of examples ❑ Elaborating on statements of demonstrate engagement ❑ Taking turns and applying
to bring clarity to statements others to extend ideas conventions specific to particular
❑ Extend conversations by ❑ Using examples to clarify
❑ Presenting creative solutions to statements conversations
developing topics with clear
examples and information resolve communication issues ❑ Answering questions to ❑ Addressing others according to
❑ Contributing ideas to co-create contribute to a topic relationship (e.g., student-peers,
group responses student-teacher)
7. Errors
7. Errors ❑ interfere with communication 7. Errors
❑ are minor that do not interfere ❑ frequently impede
with communication communication
Additional comments:
Based on LAS Links Proficiency Level Descriptors and WIDA Can Do Descriptors
EL Progress Checklist (Listening Grades 4-5)
Please provide feedback for domain specific skills for this EL student. Student Name _________________________________________________
Teacher(s) completing this form_________________________________ Subject(s) you teach/taught this student _____________________________
1. The student typically: 1. The student can process recounts 1. The student typically: 1. The student typically: 1. The student typically: 1. The student is starting to develop:
❑ follows directions that use verb by: ❑ follows multistep directions ❑ follows oral directions and ❑ follows some simple oral ❑ receptive skills in English
phrases and ❑ Conveying personal and content- using academic vocabulary, ❑ interprets both basic vocabulary directions and ❑ productive skills in English
❑ determines key information to related experiences in a team ❑ recalls details, identifies main and idiomatic expressions ❑ understands common vocabulary
summarize a task ideas, and and idiomatic expressions
❑ Using technical and specific ❑ determines sequence of steps in 2. The student can: 2. The student can process recounts
2. The student can: vocabulary when sharing content classroom discussions and lesson ❑ identify some main ideas and 2. The student can: by:
❑ recall subtle details, identify information ❑ make simple inferences from ❑ identify details ❑ matching oral words and phrases
main ideas and speaker purpose 2. The student can: passages to content-related pictures or
❑ The student can: 2. The student can process ❑ make inferences from more 3. The student can process recounts objects
❑ make sophisticated inferences explanations by: complex oral stories 3. The student can: by: ❑ identify the topic in oral
from classroom discussions and ❑ Recognizing language used to ❑ understand details within graphic ❑ Classifying time-related language statements
lessons enhance the specificity of 3. The student can: organizers in oral statements (e.g., present,
phenomena in class discussions ❑ interpret tables and other graphic past, future)
3. The student can process recounts organizers 4. The student can process recounts 3. The student can process recounts
❑ Identifying components of ❑ Connecting the context of by:
by: by:
systems (e.g., ecosystems, narratives (e.g., the who, what,
❑ Identifying the overall structure branches of government) in small
4. The student can process recounts ❑ Identifying the beginning, middle ❑ Matching oral words and phrases
by: when, & where) to illustrations to content-related pictures or
(e.g., chronology) of events, ideas, group interactions and end in oral retelling of a text
concepts, or information in oral ❑ Sequencing events or steps based objects
❑ Following tasks and directions 4. The student can process
presentations 3. The student can process on oral reading of informational retold by peers explanations by: ❑ Identifying the topic in oral
❑ Differentiating similarities and arguments by: text statements
❑ Organizing routine causal or
differences of information ❑ Distinguishing certainty from ❑ Recognizing the language of 5. The student can process sequential relationships described
presented through multimedia uncertainty of spoken words or related genres (e.g., news reports, explanations by: orally 4. The student can process
and written text phrases in context historical accounts) ❑ Interpreting cause and effect ❑ Following oral directions to show explanations by:
❑ Identifying the degree of relationships in conversations recurring steps in cycles or ❑ Sequencing oral procedures or
4. The student can process 5. The student can process
formality in oral presentations ❑ Recognizing relationships in a problem-solving cycles with images
explanations by: explanations by:
series of oral statements
❑ Interpreting the specific language ❑ Identifying precise details, ❑ Distinguishing key words and
Continued on next page
used to enhance descriptions of descriptions, or comparisons that phrases related to phenomena
Continued on next page
phenomena support conversation
❑ Attending to the language related ❑ Following oral information on Continued on next page
to events or phenomena in peer how or why phenomena occur
presentations
Continued on next page Continued on next page
Based on LAS Links Proficiency Level Descriptors and WIDA Can Do Descriptors
5. The student can process 6. The student can process 6. The student can process 5. The student can process 5. The student can process
arguments by: arguments by: arguments by: arguments by: arguments by:
❑ Recognizing the strength of the ❑ Identifying evidence that ❑ Identifying different ❑ Sorting evidence and claims from ❑ Matching illustrations with oral
quality of evidence presented in supports predictions or perspectives, stances, or points of oral descriptions points of view
oral discourse hypotheses view ❑ Distinguishing words and phrases ❑ Identifying language related to
❑ Identifying the purpose of ❑ Differentiating between multiple ❑ Recognizing reasons for related to opinions or facts from facts or opinions from oral
arguments points of view in class positions in oral presentations oral statements presentations
discussions
7. Errors 6. Errors
❑ interfere with communication ❑ frequently impede
and comprehension communication and
comprehension
Additional comments:
Based on LAS Links Proficiency Level Descriptors and WIDA Can Do Descriptors
EL Progress Checklist (Reading Grades 4-5)
Please provide feedback for domain specific skills for this EL student. Student Name _________________________________________________
Teacher(s) completing this form_________________________________ Subject(s) you teach/taught this student _____________________________
Based on LAS Links Proficiency Level Descriptors and WIDA Can Do Descriptors
4. The student can process 4. The student can process 5. The student can process 4. The student can process
explanations by: explanations by: arguments by: arguments by:
❑ Identifying how text presents ❑ Identifying the different words or ❑ Identifying evidence from ❑ Identifying language indicative
information in a factual or neutral phrases that are used to describe multiple places within text of points of view
manner the same topic or phenomena ❑ Identifying different ❑ Organizing evidence based on
❑ Evaluating the specific language ❑ Organizing information on how perspectives, stances, or points of sequential language in texts
used to enhance descriptions of or why phenomena occur view ❑ Differentiating between claims
phenomena and evidence
5. The student can process 5. The student can process 6; Errors
arguments by: arguments by: ❑ interfere with comprehension 5. Errors
❑ Evaluating claims and evidence ❑ Hypothesizing or predicting ❑ frequently impede
by drawing from multiple print based on evidence comprehension
sources ❑ Comparing multiple points of
❑ Differentiating from the strength view on a topic
of different pieces of evidence as
support for claims 6. Errors
❑ do not interfere with
comprehension
Additional comments:
Based on LAS Links Proficiency Level Descriptors and WIDA Can Do Descriptors
EL Progress Checklist (Writing Grades 4-5)
Please provide feedback for domain specific skills for this EL student. Student Name _________________________________________________
Teacher(s) completing this form_________________________________ Subject(s) you teach/taught this student _____________________________
Additional comments:
Based on LAS Links Proficiency Level Descriptors and WIDA Can Do Descriptors
EL Progress Checklist (Speaking Grades 6-8)
Please provide feedback for domain specific skills for this EL student. Student Name _________________________________________________
Teacher(s) completing this form_________________________________ Subject(s) you teach/taught this student _____________________________
Based on LAS Links Proficiency Level Descriptors and WIDA Can Do Descriptors
4. The student can explain by: 5. The student can recount by: 5. The student can explain by: 5. The student can argue by: 5. The student can discuss by:
❑ Adapting speech to a variety of ❑ Paraphrasing and summarizing ❑ Demonstrating how to conduct ❑ Answering simple questions ❑ Using appropriate nonverbal
contexts and tasks (e.g., use of content-related ideas presented experiments, engage in related to claims behaviors to show engagement
register) orally processes, or solve problems with ❑ Stating evidence to support and listening
❑ Posing questions that connect ❑ Connecting ideas with supporting supports claims (in home language and ❑ Contributing to conversations by
several speakers’ ideas and details in a variety of oral venues ❑ Stating why events occur, English) sharing own work (e.g., pictures,
responding to others’ ideas phenomena exist, or some things posters, graphics)
6. The student can explain by: happen 6. The student can discuss by:
5. The student can argue by: ❑ Comparing content-related ❑ Inviting others to participate
❑ Paraphrasing new information concepts 6. The student can argue by:
❑ Answering Wh-questions in
expressed by others and, when ❑ Connecting ideas with supporting ❑ Critiquing opposing claims conversations
warranted, modifying views or details to show relationships ❑ Evaluating the value of options in
positions ❑ Connecting ideas to one’s
(e.g., characters’ actions to their content-based situations experiences
❑ Making presentations with feelings)
multimedia components to clarify 7. The student can discuss by: 7. Errors
claims and emphasize salient 7. The student can argue by: ❑ Supporting ideas with examples ❑ frequently impede
points ❑ Connecting ideas with supporting communication
❑ Asking clarifying questions to
details or evidence demonstrate engagement
6. The student can discuss by:
❑ Taking stances and summarizing ❑ Generating new questions to
❑ Presenting organized ideas and ideas supporting them
information on content topics maintain conversations
including the use of graphics and 8. The student can discuss by:
multimedia
❑ Recognizing purposes of
❑ Synthesizing ideas of several contributions in conversations
speakers, posing questions, and
responding with evidence, ❑ Demonstrating awareness of
examples, and ideas personal bias when defending
one’s point of view
Additional comments:
Based on LAS Links Proficiency Level Descriptors and WIDA Can Do Descriptors
EL Progress Checklist Listening (Grades 6-8)
Please provide feedback for domain specific skills for this EL student. Student Name _________________________________________________
Teacher(s) completing this form_________________________________ Subject(s) you teach/taught this student _____________________________
Based on LAS Links Proficiency Level Descriptors and WIDA Can Do Descriptors
4. The student can process 4. The student can process 5. The student can process 5. The student can process
explanations by: explanations by: explanations by: arguments by:
❑ Evaluating main ideas and ❑ Identifying relationships between ❑ Matching main ideas of familiar ❑ Identifying claims from a series
supporting details presented in people, ideas, or events in oral text read aloud with visuals of oral statements
diverse media and oral formats discourse ❑ Showing differences between or ❑ Identifying evidence to support
❑ Developing models from oral ❑ Matching complex oral among content-related claims from charts and tables
discourse and multimedia (e.g., descriptions to images, graphs, or phenomena described orally (e.g.,
YouTube videos) formulas descriptive statistics) 6. Errors
6. The student can process ❑ frequently impede
5. The student can process 5. The student can process arguments by: communication and comprehension
arguments by: arguments by: ❑ Illustrating claims or reasons
❑ Evaluating the soundness of ❑ Matching evidence to claims in from oral narratives
opposing claims presented orally oral discourse ❑ Identifying opposing perspectives
❑ Identifying bias within claims in ❑ Formulating opinions based on from oral text (e.g., sides in wars,
oral discourse evidence presented within oral regimes, or revolutions)
discourse
7. Errors
❑ interfere with communication
and comprehension
Additional comments:
Based on LAS Links Proficiency Level Descriptors and WIDA Can Do Descriptors
EL Progress Checklist (Reading Grades 6-8)
Please provide feedback for domain specific skills for this EL student. Student Name _________________________________________________
Teacher(s) completing this form_________________________________ Subject(s) you teach/taught this student _____________________________
Based on LAS Links Proficiency Level Descriptors and WIDA Can Do Descriptors
5. The student can process 5. The student can process 5. The student can process 5. The student can process
explanations by: explanations by: arguments by: arguments by:
❑ Comparing and contrasting ❑ Matching content-related cause ❑ Identifying claims and the ❑ Distinguishing facts from
information from experiments, to effect in graphically supported reasons for each claim opinions in text
simulations, videos, or text ❑ Identifying opposing points of ❑ Identifying features associated
multimedia sources with that of ❑ Highlighting text evidence that view with content-related claims
text on the same topics points to how systems function
❑ Identifying factors that contribute (e.g., different forms of 6. Errors 6. Errors
to phenomena in explanations government) ❑ interfere with comprehension ❑ frequently impede
comprehension
6. The student can process 6. The student can process
arguments by: arguments by:
❑ Identifying specific evidence to ❑ Identifying evidence to support
support analyses of content area analysis of what texts say (e.g.,
text position papers)
❑ Distinguishing among facts, ❑ Classifying pros and cons of
reasoned judgment, and claims and evidence presented
speculation in text within written texts
7. Errors
❑ do not interfere with
comprehension
Additional comments:
Based on LAS Links Proficiency Level Descriptors and WIDA Can Do Descriptors
EL Progress Checklist (Writing Grades 6-8)
Please provide feedback for domain specific skills for this EL student. Student Name _________________________________________________
Teacher(s) completing this form_________________________________ Subject(s) you teach/taught this student _____________________________
Based on LAS Links Proficiency Level Descriptors and WIDA Can Do Descriptors
4. The student can explain by: 5. The student can explain by: 6. The student can explain by: 6. Errors in organization, grammar,
❑ Determining two or more central ❑ Describing relationships between ❑ Comparing and contrasting word choice, and mechanics
ideas in text and tracing their details or examples and information, events, or characters ❑ frequently impede
development supporting ideas communication
❑ Producing descriptive paragraphs
❑ Evaluating the interactions ❑ Connecting content-related around a central idea
between individuals, events, and themes or topics to main ideas 7. The student can argue by:
ideas in text (e.g., how ideas 6. The student can argue by: ❑ Substantiating opinions with
influence individuals or events ❑ Crafting persuasive pieces (e.g., content-related examples and
and the converse) editorials) with a series of evidence
substantiated content-related ❑ Providing feedback to peers on
5. The student can argue by: claims language used for claims and
❑ Introducing claims and opposing ❑ Composing scripts with evidence
claims, along with their protagonists and antagonists
associated reasons and evidence 8. Errors in organization, grammar,
❑ Closing with concluding 7. Errors word choice, and mechanics
statements or paragraphs that ❑ do not interfere with ❑ interfere with communication
support claims communication
6. Minor errors
❑ are possible, but generally
negligible
Additional comments:
Based on LAS Links Proficiency Level Descriptors and WIDA Can Do Descriptors
EL Progress Checklist (Speaking Grades 9-12)
Please provide feedback for domain specific skills for this EL student. Student Name _________________________________________________
Teacher(s) completing this form_________________________________ Subject(s) you teach/taught this student _____________________________
Based on LAS Links Proficiency Level Descriptors and WIDA Can Do Descriptors
4. The student can explain by: 4. The student can discuss by: 6. The student can explain by: 6. The student can explain by: 4. The student can argue by: 5. The student can discuss by:
❑ Providing precision and accuracy ❑ Co-creating novel perspectives on ❑ Describing components of ❑ Connecting causes to effects in a ❑ Responding to oral or written ❑ Representing one’s ideas using
in classifications, procedures, issues systems in small groups and class series of statements claims various media
processes, and accounts using ❑ Responding to diverse discussions ❑ Sequencing processes, cycles, or ❑ Offering facts or opinion ❑ Responding to yes and no
abstraction, technical language, perspectives and recognizing bias ❑ Providing precise words and procedures in short extended statements as appropriate to questions posed by the group
and a variety of active/passive in one’s own view phrases to provide details, discourse discussion
verb forms ❑ Using nonverbal signals to
❑ Generating new ideas or descriptions, classifications, demonstrate engagement in
❑ Following discipline-specific questions to sustain comparisons, causes/effects, or 7. The student can argue by: 5. The student can discuss by: conversations
organization (e.g., orienting the conversations procedures ❑ Stating claims matched to ❑ Asking and answering questions
reader, details, conclusion) and evidence using a series of related
supporting presentations with 7. The student can argue by: ❑ Communicating need for clarity of
sentences messages
graphs, formulas, quotes or other ❑ Taking stances and defending
media ❑ Suggesting details or reasons to ❑ Recognizing intonation used to
them with evidence (e.g., using reinforce points of view
data or citations) achieve various purposes of
5. The student can argue by: communication
❑ Comparing and contrasting 8. The student can discuss by:
❑ Organizing claims and counter different points of view
claims in debates with evidence ❑ Suggesting creative ways to 6. Errors frequently impede
from multiple sources resolve communication issues communication due to:
8. The student can discuss by: ❑ minimal English vocabulary and
❑ Negotiating differing cultural ❑ Clarifying one’s own ideas using a
❑ Demonstrating stamina when variety of strategies (e.g., ❑ minimal English grammar
perspectives in pairs or small building ideas in a small group knowledge
groups analogies or metaphors,
❑ Validating ideas of others paraphrasing)
6. The student can discuss by: ❑ Sorting through one’s own ideas to ❑ Asking clarifying questions in a
❑ Identifying and reacting to subtle determine relevant ones respectful manner
differences in speech and register ❑ Providing and receiving
(e.g., hyperbole, satire, comedy) constructive feedback from 9. Grammatical or vocabulary errors
others tactfully ❑ interfere with communication,
❑ Producing coherent oral discourse but the intended meaning is
appropriate to task, purpose, and somewhat clear
audience
❑ Synthesizing and sharing
information from a variety of
sources and perspectives
Additional comments:
Based on LAS Links Proficiency Level Descriptors and WIDA Can Do Descriptors
EL Progress Checklist (Listening Grades 9-12)
Please provide feedback for domain specific skills for this EL student. Student Name _________________________________________________
Teacher(s) completing this form_________________________________ Subject(s) you teach/taught this student _____________________________
Based on LAS Links Proficiency Level Descriptors and WIDA Can Do Descriptors
5. The student can process 5. The student can process
explanations by: arguments by:
❑ Recognizing specific language ❑ Organizing information related to
used to enhance clarity and different perspectives presented
precision orally
❑ Recognizing and following ❑ Identifying language choices that
language related to the same represent specific points of view
event or phenomenon from a series of oral statements
throughout presentations
6. Errors
6. The student can process ❑ interfere with communication
arguments by: and comprehension
❑ Identifying strengths, limitations,
and potential biases from oral
presentations
❑ Organizing claims and counter
claims presented in debates
Additional comments:
Based on LAS Links Proficiency Level Descriptors and WIDA Can Do Descriptors
EL Progress Checklist (Reading Grades 9-12)
Please provide feedback for domain specific skills for this EL student. Student Name _________________________________________________
Teacher(s) completing this form_________________________________ Subject(s) you teach/taught this student _____________________________
1. The student 1. The student can recount by: 1. The student typically: 1. The student typically 1. The student: 1. The student is starting to develop:
❑ recognizes uncommon ❑ Identifying how authors connect ❑ draws complex conclusions from ❑ uses knowledge of high- ❑ recalls simple information from ❑ receptive skills in English
synonyms, subtle gradations of related ideas across paragraphs lengthy passages and frequency affixes and context text, ❑ productive skills in English
meanings using context clues, with abstraction, complex ❑ distinguishes nuances of meaning clues to determine word ❑ identifies main ideas and
and unfamiliar idioms sentences, and technical terms meanings and identify synonyms supporting details, and 2. The student can recount by:
2. The student: of high-frequency social and ❑ makes simple inferences ❑ Matching key content-related
2. The student uses prediction to: ❑ Tracing the central idea of text ❑ interprets alternate expressions of academic vocabulary
and how it develops, including terms and ideas to images,
❑ read fluently, ideas, 2. The student can: graphs, icons, or diagrams
❑ make inferences from how it is shaped by specific ❑ analyzes the organization of 2. From a simple narrative, the ❑ identify common idiomatic
challenging texts, details, extended definitions, passages, and student can: expressions and ❑ Sequencing illustrated text of
❑ synthesize text, facts, quotes, or examples ❑ identifies theme, tone, and ❑ recall stated and implicit details, ❑ paraphrases passages narrative or informational events
❑ recognize literary techniques, and author’s purpose ❑ distinguish main ideas,
❑ uses self-monitoring techniques 2. The student can explain by: ❑ compare and contrast information 3. The student can recount by: 3. The student can explain by:
to check for understanding ❑ Identifying how authors connect 3. The student can recount by: ❑ draw conclusions, and ❑ Identifying patterns specific to ❑ Identifying key words and
related ideas across paragraphs ❑ Identifying how the authors make ❑ make some inferences narrative or informational text phrases that describe the topics or
3. The student can recount by: with abstraction, complex language choices and adjusts for (e.g., orientation, presentation of phenomena
❑ Analyzing and comparing how sentences, and technical terms 3. The student can recount by:
audience and purpose events, conclusion) ❑ Recognizing sequence statements
authors use language for specific ❑ Tracing the central idea of text ❑ Reflecting on various accounts of ❑ Recognizing lexical chains that ❑ Locating main ideas in a series of and illustrations that describe
purposes and audiences and how it develops, including a subject told in different media show how characters and ideas related sentences phenomena
❑ Identifying how authors develop how it is shaped by specific (e.g., print and multimedia) are labeled across the text
and maintain cohesion by details, extended definitions, ❑ Identifying detailed descriptions, 4. The student can explain by: 4. The student can argue by:
connecting ideas or events in facts, quotes, or examples 4. The student can explain by: procedures, and information in ❑ Matching media (e.g., posters,
❑ Identifying different types of
extended texts ❑ Identifying the interdependence paragraphs connectors that show photos, banners) with point of
3. The student can argue by: view words and phrases
of parts of systems (e.g., relationships between topics and
Continued on next page ❑ Recognizing multiple technical, government, chemical) 4. The student can explain by: phenomena ❑ Connecting characters/historical
perspectives and points of view ❑ Identifying how language figures with positions or stances
on any given issue ❑ Comparing information on ❑ Differentiating between technical
phenomena across a variety of provides clarity and precision in and everyday vocabulary that on various issues
❑ Identifying evidence of bias and multimedia sources describing topics or phenomena describe phenomena
credibility of sources ❑ Summarizing information with
Continued on next page diagrams, models, flow charts, or Continued on next page
illustrations
Based on LAS Links Proficiency Level Descriptors and WIDA Can Do Descriptors
4. The student can explain by: 5. The student can argue by: 5. The student can argue by: 5. The student can argue by:
❑ Recognizing discipline-specific ❑ Identifying persuasive language ❑ Identifying their purposes and ❑ Making connections between
patterns (e.g., orienting the across content areas audiences statements that make claims and
reader, part-whole classification, ❑ Following the progression of ❑ Evaluating the strength of those providing evidence
neutral/ authoritative tone) logical reasoning evidence statements ❑ Distinguishing language that
❑ Identifying authors’ precision identifies facts and opinions
and accuracy in classifications, 6. Errors
comparisons, accounts, or 6. Errors ❑ interfere with comprehension 6. Errors
procedures as a result of clear ❑ do not interfere with ❑ frequently impede
language choices comprehension comprehension
Additional comments:
Based on LAS Links Proficiency Level Descriptors and WIDA Can Do Descriptors
EL Progress Checklist (Writing Grades 9-12)
Please provide feedback for domain specific skills for this EL student. Student Name _________________________________________________
Teacher(s) completing this form_________________________________ Subject(s) you teach/taught this student _____________________________
Based on LAS Links Proficiency Level Descriptors and WIDA Can Do Descriptors
4. The student can argue by: 4. The student can recount by: 6. The student can argue by: 6. The student can argue by:
❑ Evaluating positive and negative ❑ Creating narrative or informational ❑ Justifying reasons or opinions ❑ Expressing claims with evidence
implications associated with extended text of past events or with evidence (e.g., “Socialism is a good
various positions (e.g., historical experiences (e.g., lab reports, ❑ Summarizing opposing positions government system because...”)
events, scientific discoveries, current events) with evidence ❑ Listing content-related ideas that
individuals) ❑ Connecting main points, events, represent different points of view
❑ Organizing information logically and central ideas to conclusions 7. Errors on issues
and coherently to represent 7. Errors in organization, grammar,
contrasting views 5. The student can explain by: ❑ interfere with communication word choice, and mechanics
❑ Presenting information ❑ frequently impede
5. Minor errors objectively by using a neutral communication
❑ are possible, but generally tone appropriate to the content
negligible area
❑ Integrating images, diagrams,
formulas, or charts to describe
phenomena
Additional comments:
Based on LAS Links Proficiency Level Descriptors and WIDA Can Do Descriptors
References:
1. LAS Links Proficiency Level Descriptors http://laslinks.com/PDFs/PLDs_LAS_Links_English_FormA_Interpretation_Guide.pdf
2. WIDA Can Do Descriptors https://wida.wisc.edu/teach/can-do/descriptors
Based on LAS Links Proficiency Level Descriptors and WIDA Can Do Descriptors