This document contains instructions for a final exam on legal technique and logic. It provides details on the format, submission process, and grading criteria. The exam consists of multiple choice and essay questions. For the multiple choice section, students must identify arguments as valid or invalid, and logical fallacies used. The essay questions require distinguishing between inductive and deductive arguments, arguing from truth vs. sound reasoning, and defending the importance of logic for law. The document emphasizes this is a timed exam and strict deadlines apply.
This document contains instructions for a final exam on legal technique and logic. It provides details on the format, submission process, and grading criteria. The exam consists of multiple choice and essay questions. For the multiple choice section, students must identify arguments as valid or invalid, and logical fallacies used. The essay questions require distinguishing between inductive and deductive arguments, arguing from truth vs. sound reasoning, and defending the importance of logic for law. The document emphasizes this is a timed exam and strict deadlines apply.
This document contains instructions for a final exam on legal technique and logic. It provides details on the format, submission process, and grading criteria. The exam consists of multiple choice and essay questions. For the multiple choice section, students must identify arguments as valid or invalid, and logical fallacies used. The essay questions require distinguishing between inductive and deductive arguments, arguing from truth vs. sound reasoning, and defending the importance of logic for law. The document emphasizes this is a timed exam and strict deadlines apply.
1942 Donada Street corner San Juan Street, Pasay City
FINAL EXAMS IN LEGAL TECHNIQUE AND L
OGIC SUMMER SEMESTER AY 2022-2023 BY: CHRISTOPHER EDWARD DE VEYRA
A. THIS IS A TIME PRESSURED EXAM. READ
ALL OF THE QUESTIONS/INSTRUCTIONS FIRST AND FOL LOW ACCORDINGLY BEFORE ANSWERING. B. SUBMIT YOUR EXAMS INDIVIDUALLY IN P DF FORMAT ON OR BEFORE 8:30 PM, 22 AUGUST 2023, GOOGLE/GMAIL TIME. LATE SUBMISSION WILL MERIT A FAILING GRAD E. C. IF YOUR TOTAL SCORE IS ABOVE THE HIG HEST GRADE FOR THIS EXAMS (DUE TO BONUS POINTS), YOUR EXC ESS POINTS WILL BE ADDED TO YOUR TWO LOWEST RECITATION SCORES. D. RULES ON HONESTY APPLY. E. WRITE YOUR ANSWERS IN A SEPARATE A NSWER SHEET, PUT YOUR NAME ON TOP OF THE ANSWER SHEET AND SAVE IT AS PDF FILE WITH YOUR FULL NAME + “FINAL EXAMS – LE GAL TECH AND LOGIC - PLS”. EXAMPLE: JUAN DELA CRUZ – FINAL EXA MS – LEGAL TECH AND LOGIC - PLS
1 – 10. Identify whether the following argum
ents are VALID or INVALID. Write “VALID” or “INVALID” as your answer.
1. Politicians are holy.
Hon. Tamad is a politician. Therefore, he is holy.
2. All natural disasters are man-made.
Climate change is man-made. Therefore, climate change is a natural disaster.
3. All Humans can breather underwater.
Nate is a human. Therefore, Nate can breathe underwater.
4. All cats can fly.
The Sphynx is a cat. Therefore, the Sphynx can fly. 1942 Donada Street corner San Juan Street, Pasay City
5. If it’s raining outside, the ground will be wet.
The ground is wet. Therefore, it’s raining outside.
6. If I top the bar exams, I am very intelligent.
I did not top the bar exams. Therefore, I am not very intelligent.
7. If I pass the bar exams, I would be the lucki
est person in the world. I did not pass the bar exams. Therefore, I am not lucky.
8. All law students are diligent.
Charm is a law student. Therefore, Charm is diligent.
9. All licensed law practitioners have to pass th
e bar exams. Mr. Smith passed the bar exams. Therefore, Mr. Smith is a licensed law practitio ner.
10. Law school is never easy.
Ms. Par Ty is in law school. Therefore, life must be hard for Ms. Par Ty.
11 – 20. Identify what type of Fallacy was us
ed. Select from below. Write the corresponding Letters only:
A. Ad hominem B. Appeal to Emotions C. Red Herring D. Missing the Point E. Appeal to Populace
11. The accusations of police cover ups are
unfair and unjust. Clearly, the persons being accused are those with outst anding record and multiple accomplishments.
12. "You want to implement a curfew for teen
agers? What about the fact that we have high rates of teenage obesity in thi s country?" 1942 Donada Street corner San Juan Street, Pasay City
13. Critic A: "The movie lacked coherent s
torytelling and had weak character development." Critic B: "You've never made a movie yourself , so your opinion doesn't matter."
14. Law Student A: "I think we should reco
nsider our stance on the TRAIN LAW." Friend B: "You're just saying that to sound s ophisticated and impress others."
15. "Do not refuse to give even just a little to b
eggars on the streets. How could you live with yourself knowing that s ome of our citizens are suffering?"
16. It is high time that the Metro Manila Devel
opment Authority (MMDA) should be dissolved because they are abusi ve and overlap with local government unit jurisdictions.
17. "Addressing climate change is unnecessa
ry. After all, we have more pressing economic concerns that demand our a ttention."
18. "We should vote for MNM. For the past si
x months heading into the election, he has been leading in all the reliable s urveys."
19. Law Student A: "I think the exams in law
school are always fare." Student B: "You always say that about exams. It’s easy for you to say that because your parents are both lawyers. "
20. The transportation modernization prog
ram must be upheld. Old jeepneys should be removed from the streets, aft er all they are the number one traffic law violators.
II. ESSAY (5 points each)
INSTRUCTIONS: Write an essay based on instr uctions below. (5 points each) 21. What are the differences between Inducti ve and Deductive Arguments?
22. Differentiate Arguing from Truth and Arg
uing from Sound Reasoning. 1942 Donada Street corner San Juan Street, Pasay City
23. Your professor tells you: “Mr. _____, we d
o not need your logic. What we need is the law!” Make a defense that l ogic is as important as the law.