Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Freud described the personality structures as having three components, the id, the ego and the
superego. For each person, the first to emerge is the id, followed by the ego, and last to develop is
the superego.
The id. Freud says that, a child is born with the id. The id plays a vital role in one’s personality
because as a baby, it works so that the baby’s essential needs are met. The id operates on the
pleasure principle. It focuses on immediate gratification or satisfaction of its needs. So whatever
feels good now is what it will pursue with no consideration for the reality. Logicality or practicality
of the situation. For example, a baby is hungry. It’s id wants food or milk… so the baby will cry.
When the child needs to be changed, the id cries. When the child is uncomfortable, in pain, too
hot, too cold, or just wants attention, the id speaks up until his or her needs are met.
The ego. As the baby turns into a toddler and then into a preschooler. He/she relates more with the
environment, the ego slowly begins to emerge. The ego operates using the reality principle. It is
aware that others also have needs to be met. It is practical because it knows that being impulsive
or selfish can result to negative consequences later, so it reasons and considers the best response
to situations. As such, it is the deciding agent of the personality. Although it functions to help the
id meet its needs, it always takes into account the reality of the situation.
The superego. Near the end of the preschool years, or the end of the phallic stage, the superego
develops. The superego embodies person’s moral aspect. This develops from what the parents.
Teachers and other persons who exert influence impart to be good or moral The superego is likened
to conscience because it exerts influence on what one considers right and wrong.
Topographical Model
The Unconscious. Freud said that most what we go through in our lives, emotions, beliefs,
feelings, and impulses deep within are not available to us at a conscious level. He believed that
most of what influence us is our unconscious. The Oedipus and Electra Complex mentioned earlier
were both buried down into the unconscious, out of our awareness due to the extreme anxiety they
caused. While these complexes are in our unconscious, they still influence our thinking. Feeling
and doing in perhaps dramatic ways.
The Conscious. Freud also said that all that we are aware of is stored in our conscious mind. Our
conscious mind only comprises a very small part of who we are so that, in our everyday life, we
are only aware of a very small part of what makes up our personality; most of what we are is
hidden and out of reach.
The Subconscious. The last part is the preconscious or subconscious. This is the part of us that we
can reach if prompted. But is not in our active conscious. Its right below the surface, but still
“hidden” somewhat unless we search for it. Information such as our telephone number, some
childhood memories, or the name of your best. Childhood friend is stored in the preconscious.
Jean Piaget’s Cognitive Theory of Development is truly a classic in the field of educational
psychology. This theory fueled other researches and theories of development and learning. Its
focus is on how individuals, construct knowledge. For sixty years, Jean Piaget conducted research
on cognitive development. His research method involved observing a small number of individuals
as they responded to cognitive tasks that he designed. These tasks were later known as Piagetian
tasks.
Piaget called his general theoretical framework “genetic epistemology” because he was
interested in how knowledge developed in human organisms. Piaget was initially into biology and
he also had a background in philosophy. Knowledge from both these disciplines influenced his
theories and research of child development. Out of his researches, Piaget came up with the stages
of cognitive development.
Schema. Piaget used the term “schema” to refer to the cognitive structures by which individuals
intellectually adapt to and organize their environment. It is an individual’s way to understand or
create meaning about a thing or experience. It is like the mind has a filing cabinet and each drawer
has folders that contain files of things he has had an experience with. For instance, if a child sees
a dog for the first time, he creates his own schema of what a dog is. It has four legs and a tail. It
barks. It’s furry. The child then “puts this description of a dog “on file” in his mind. When he sees
another similar dog, he “pulls” out the file (his schema of a dog) in his mind, looks at the animal,
and says “four legs, tail, barks, furry…. That’s a dog!”
Assimilation. This is the process of fitting a new experience into an existing or previously created
cognitive structure or schema. If the child sees another dog, this time a little smaller one, he would
make sense of what he is seeing by adding this new information (a different- looking dog) into his
schema of a dog.
Accommodation. This is the process of creating a new schema If the same child now sees another
animal that looks a little bit like a dog, but somehow different. He might try to fit it into his schema
of a dog, and say, “Look mommy, what a funny looking dog. Its bark is funny too!” Then the
mommy explains. “That’s not a funny looking dog. That’s a goat!” With mommy’s further
descriptions, the child will now create a new schema, that of a goat. He now adds a new file in his
filing cabinet.
Equilibration. Piaget believed that that people have the natural need to understand how the world
works and to find order, structure. And predictability in their life. Equilibration is achieving proper
balance between assimilation and accommodation. When our experiences do not match our
schemata (plural of schema) or cognitive structures, we experience cognitive disequilibrium.
Erikson’s ‘psychosocial’ term is derived from the two source words. Namely psychological
(or the root, ‘psycho’ relating to the mind, brain, personality, etc) and social (external relationships
and environment). Both at the heart of Erikson’s theory. Occasionally you’ll see the term extended
to biopsychosocial, in which “bio” refers to life, as in biological.
Erikson’s theory was largely influenced by Sigmund Freud. But Erikson extended the
theory and incorporated cultural and social aspects into Freud’s biological and sexually-oriented
theory. It’s also interesting to see how his ideas developed over time, perhaps aided by his own
journey through the ‘psychosocial crisis’ stages model that underpinned his work.
Erikson’s eight stages theory is a tremendously powerful model. It is very accessible and
obviously relevant to modern life, from several different perspectives for understanding and
explaining how personality and behavior develops in people.
During the preschool years, children begin to assert their power and control over the world
through directing play and other social interactions. Children who are successful at this stage feel
capable and able to lead others. Those who fail to acquire these skills are left with a sense of guilt,
self-doubt, and lack of initiative. When an ideal balance of individual Initiative and a willingness
to work with others is achieved, the ego quality known as purpose emerges.
Lawrence Kohlberg adopted and built on Piaget’s work, and set the groundwork for the present
debate within psychology on moral development. Like Piaget, he believed that children form ways
of thinking through their experiences which include understandings of moral concepts such as
justice, rights, equality and human welfare. Kohlberg followed the development of moral judgment
and extended the ages covered by Piaget, and found out that the process of attaining moral maturity
took longer and occurred slower than Piaget had thought..
If Piaget designed specific tasks (Piagetian tasks) to learn about the cognitive development of
children, Kohlberg utilized moral dilemmas (Kohlberg dilemmas). The case you read in the
Activity part of this module was written for this module but was based on how Kohlberg wrote his
dilemmas. Like Piaget, he presented these dilemmas to the individuals in his research and asked
for their responses. He did not aim to judge whether the responses were right or wrong. He was
interested in analyzing the moral reasoning behind the responses.
From his research, Kohlberg identified six stages of moral reasoning grouped into three major
levels. Each level represents a significant change in the social-moral reasoning or perspective of
the person. Kohlberg’s Theory of Moral Development According to Kohlberg, moral development
occurs in six stages
Level 1 (Pre- conventional) Moral reasoning is based on the consequence/result of the act,
not on the whether the act itself is good or bad.
1. Obedience and punishment orientation
(How can I avoid punishment?)
Punishment/Obedience. One motivated by fear of punishment He will act in order to avoi
punishment.
2. Self- interest orientation/Mutual benefit
(What’s in it for me?)
Mutual Benefit. One is motivated to act by the benefit that one may obtain later. You
scratch my back, scratch yours.
Level 2 (Conventional) Moral reasoning is based on the conventions or “norms” of society.
This may include approval of others, law and order.
3. Social approval
(The good boy/girl attitude)
Social Approval. One is motivated by what others expect in behavior- good boy, good girl.
The person acts because he/she values how he she will appear to others. He/sh gives
importance on what people will think or say.
Level 3 (Post- conventional) Moral reasoning is based on enduring or consistent
principles. Is not just recognizing the law, but the principles behind the law.
a. Imitative learning
b. Instructed learning
c. Collaborative learning
Principles
a. Cognitive development is limited to a certain range at any given age.
b. Full cognitive development requires social interaction.
Social Interaction. Piaget’s theory was more individual, while Vygotsky was more social. Piaget’s
work on Piagetian’s tasks focused heavily on how an individual’s cognitive development became
evident through the individual’s own processing of the tasks. Vygotsky, other hand gave more
weight on the social interactions that contributed to the cognitive development of individuals. For
him, the social environment or the community takes on a major role in one’s development on the
Vygotsky emphasized that effective learning happens through participation in social activities,
making the social context of learning crucial. Parents, teachers and other adults in the learners’
environment all contribute to the process. They explain, model, assist, give directions and provide
feedback to the learner. Peers, on the other hand, cooperate and collaborate and enrich the learning
experience,
Cultural factors. Vygotsky believed in the crucial role that culture played on the cognitive
development of children. Piaget believed that as the child develops and matures, he goes through
universal stages of cognitive development that allows him to move from simple explorations with
senses and muscles to complex reasoning. Vygotsky, on the other hand. Looked into the wide range
of experiences that a culture would give to a child. For instance, one culture’s view about
education, how children are trained early in life all can contribute to the cognitive development of
the child.
Language. Language opens the door for learners to acquire knowledge that others already have.
Learners can use language to know and understand the world and solve problems. Language serves
a social function but it also has an important individual function. It helps the learner regulate and
reflect on his own thinking.
Vygotsky believed in the essential role of activities in learning. Children learn best through hands-
on activities than when listening passively. Learning by doing is even made more fruitful when
children interact with knowledgeable adults and peers.
Bronfenbrenner’s model also known as the Bioecological Systems theory presents child
development within the context of relationship systems that comprise the child’s environment. It
describes multipart layers of environment that has an effect on the development of the child. Each
layer is further made up of different structures. The term “bioecological” points out that a child’s
own biological make-up impacts as a key factor in one’s development.
Through the child’s growing and developing body and the interplay between his immediate
family/community environment, and the societal landscape fuels and steers his development.
Changes or conflict in any one layer will ripple throughout other layers. To study a child’s develop
ment then, we must look not only at the child and her immediate environment, but also at the
interaction of the larger environment as well.
MICROSYSTEM – The Microsystems Is the layer nearest the child. It comprises structure which
the child directly Interacts with. They are called immediate environment Example: one’s family,
school and neighborhood Question: Does the child have strong and nurturing relationships with
the parents and the family? Question: Are his/her needs met?
MESOSYSTEM – This layer serve as the relationships between two or more microsystems such
as what is learned at home culturally. They are called connections. Example: Interactions between
the parents and teachers The parents and health services The community and the church. The
mesosytem involves the relationships between the microsystems in one’s life. This means that your
family experience may be related to your school experience.
EXOSYSTEM – is the setting In which there is a link between the context where in the person
does not have any active role, and the context where in is actively participating. Suppose a child
is more attached to his father than his mother. If the father goes abroad to work for several months,
there may be a conflict between the mother and the child’s social relationship, or on the other hand,
this event may result to a tighter bond between the mother and the child.
MACROSYSTEM – The Macrosystem is a large cultural and social structural elements of the
environment that shape human development. They are called social and cultural values. Example:
marriage ceremonies, outbreak of Mers-Cov or Aids. The setting is the actual culture of an
individual. The cultural contexts Involve the socioeconomic status of the person and/or his family,
his ethnicity or race and living in a still developing or a third world country. For example, being
born to a poor family makes a person work harder every day.
CHRONOSYSTEM- includes the transitions and shifts In one’s lifespan. This may also Involve
the sociohistorical contexts that may influence a person. One classic example of this is how
divorce, as a major life transition, may affect not only the couple’s relationship but also their
children’s behavior. According to a majority of research, children are negatively affected on the
first year after the divorce. The next years after it would reveal that the interaction within the family
becomes more stable and agreeable.