Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Access to this document was granted through an Emerald subscription provided by emerald-srm:203778 []
For Authors
If you would like to write for this, or any other Emerald publication, then please use our Emerald for
Authors service information about how to choose which publication to write for and submission guidelines
are available for all. Please visit www.emeraldinsight.com/authors for more information.
About Emerald www.emeraldinsight.com
Emerald is a global publisher linking research and practice to the benefit of society. The company
manages a portfolio of more than 290 journals and over 2,350 books and book series volumes, as well as
providing an extensive range of online products and additional customer resources and services.
Emerald is both COUNTER 4 and TRANSFER compliant. The organization is a partner of the Committee
on Publication Ethics (COPE) and also works with Portico and the LOCKSS initiative for digital archive
preservation.
Pennsylvania, USA
Abstract
Purpose – As the number of women businesses owners grows worldwide, it is increasingly
important to understand the factors which contribute to their success. While entrepreneurship
research identifies access to human and financial capital as being important, fewer studies explore the
role of sociocognitive factors such as self-efficacy or confidence in one’s abilities to perform a
particular task. This paper aims to examine gender-related attitudes toward financial management
drawing from existing studies education, cognitive psychology, and entrepreneurship.
Design/methodology/approach – The empirical study creates a measure of financial self-efficacy
(FSE) and highlights the importance of age and racial differences among experienced, nascent and
aspiring women entrepreneurs. Firm and individual-level data were obtained from a web survey and
subsequent factor analysis and analysis of variance statistical methods utilized.
Findings – Empirical findings only partially attest to the lack of confidence combined with anxiety
about dealing with financial management. Age and racial differences are significantly related to FSE.
Research limitations/implications – Sample size is relatively small and geographically
concentrated.
Practical implications – The paper suggests the need for more research regarding women
entrepreneurs and their confidence with regard to financial management. It also suggests the need for
possible interventions for women entrepreneurs to increase FSE.
Social implications – This research examines gender differences with regard to learning
math/financial management subjects and the potential need for single-gender entrepreneurial
training programs that focus on finance-related activities.
Originality/value – The paper developed a construct for FSE that is robust and significantly related
to age and racial differences.
Keywords Women, Gender, Entrepreneurs, Financial management, Skills training, Self esteem
Paper type Research paper
I. Introduction
Women are increasingly turning to entrepreneurship and small business ownership as a
path to economic empowerment and personal growth. In 2008, there were an estimated
10.1 million firms in the USA that were women majority owned (50 percent or more), up International Journal of Gender and
from 7.7 million in 2006; they employ 13 million people, generate $1.9 trillion in Entrepreneurship
Vol. 3 No. 1, 2011
pp. 23-37
q Emerald Group Publishing Limited
The authors would like to gratefully acknowledge the comments provided by the journal 1756-6266
reviewers and Dr Susan Coleman, Professor of Finance, University of Hartford. DOI 10.1108/17566261111114962
IJGE revenues, and represent 40 percent of all US firms. According to the Center for Women’s
3,1 Business Research (2008), women own 20 percent of all firms exceeding $1 million in
revenues.
A number of researchers have addressed the success factors for small firms; typically
these include a combination of human/social and financial capital (Caputo and Dolinsky,
1998; Chandler and Hanks, 1998; Carter et al., 1997). Successful entrepreneurs tend to
24 have education, training or work experience in their target industry, and are able to
secure sufficient capital for start-up and for ongoing operations. However, less
frequently mentioned is the role of sociocognitive factors in the success of small firms.
Attitudinal factors include such things as a willingness to embrace the entrepreneurial
lifestyle with all its attendant risks, persistence and drive, and probably most important,
self-efficacy, i.e. confidence in oneself and one’s own abilities. These are characteristics
Downloaded by UNIVERSITY OF OTAGO At 02:20 21 February 2016 (PT)
that emerge in almost any case study of a successful entrepreneur, yet the literature does
very little in the way of defining or measuring these characteristics. This research
focuses on one of these characteristics – the role of self-efficacy with regard to financial
management – and explores prior research that may provide insights. Possibly one of
the less glamorous aspects of entrepreneurship, financial management is necessary for
the successful launch and operation of a small firm. Weakness or discomfort in this area
of management may translate into neglect of key areas or errors in judgment that can be
fatal to the firm. Thus, the key research question addressed in this paper is:
RQ1. How does self-efficacy, as related to financial management, influence
entrepreneurial success among women entrepreneurs?
The article is organized as follows: first, we examine existing research in education,
cognitive psychology, and entrepreneurship that may reveal evidence of self-efficacy
and achievement in math-related subjects and/or financial management. Second, we
describe an exploratory empirical study examining women entrepreneurs and their
attitudes towards math-related topics and financial management. Finally, we discuss
the conclusions from this analysis and implications for future research.
about the course. This was true even controlling for the students’ level of math ability
and college major. Benedict and Hoag (2002) also found that women earned lower grades
than men in the course on average, possibly a self-fulfilling prophecy. They postulated
that women may be more anxious because they lack confidence in their technical
abilities, fear that they will not do well in the course, or experience a less welcoming
environment in the classroom.
Ballard and Johnson (2005) surveyed undergraduates enrolled in an introductory
microeconomics course at another large US university. They found that women in the
course were less optimistic about their ability to succeed, even controlling for family
background, academic experience, and mathematics experience. Men anticipated
significantly higher grades in the course than women. When performance was compared
to expectations, however, women actually scored higher than men controlling for the
factors noted above. The authors observed that women’s negative expectations may
influence their willingness to take additional courses in economics and their ultimate
career selection.
Other studies have focused on the ways in which women’s discomfort with
quantitative material influences their career choices, in some instances closing them out
of potentially rewarding career opportunities. Turner and Bowen (1999) noted that within
the science and engineering fields, differences between men and women in terms of
choice of major have not lessened in the past two decades. Rather, the gap between men
and women majoring in math, engineering, or the physical sciences has actually
widened. In response to this, Turner and Bowen (1999) conducted a study of students
from 12, highly selective, undergraduate institutions. They found that women were
over-represented in fields such as nursing and education, while men were over-represented
in math, engineering, and the physical sciences. Additionally, the higher the math
SAT score, the greater the probability that the student would major in some field other
than the humanities. For women, however, those with high math SAT scores were still
much more likely than men to choose a major in either life sciences or the humanities.
Turner and Bowen concluded that differences in SAT scores account for only part of the
gap between women and men in choice of major. The rest is due to other factors which may
include personal preferences, labor market expectations, and cultural and societal factors.
Using data from the National Educational Longitudinal Study initiated in 1988,
Correll (2001) obtained a sample of 25,000 eighth-grade students who were reassessed
every two years through high school and into college. After surveying these students in
college, she found that males were more likely than females to believe that they were
IJGE competent in math in spite of the fact that math grades and test scores for the two groups
3,1 were similar. Also, there was a large gap between the number of men and women
selecting a quantitative major with only 4 percent of the women majored in engineering,
math, or science, compared to 12 percent of males. Correll (2001) noted, however, that
women who had enrolled in calculus had a significantly higher likelihood of enrolling in
a quantitative major. It may be that having taken calculus raised the women’s level of
26 self-confidence in their math abilities. Alternatively, it may be that women with higher
levels of math ability to begin with self-selected into calculus and quantitative majors.
Correll (2001) hypothesized that women and men take different career paths, not due to
differences in ability, but rather due to cultural beliefs about gender and mathematics,
with mathematical tasks and competence often being stereotyped as masculine. She
noted that this is a particular problem for women, since mathematics is a critical
gateway to careers in math, science, and engineering.
Downloaded by UNIVERSITY OF OTAGO At 02:20 21 February 2016 (PT)
Also using the National Educational Longitudinal Study, Staniec (2004) investigated
choice of college major and, like Correll (2001), he found that female students were
significantly less likely than males to enroll in science, engineering, or math majors, even
controlling for other factors such as math ability and other individual, family, and school
characteristics. He noted, however, that students who excelled in math and science were
significantly more likely to choose majors in those fields. Women are less likely to
receive degrees in engineering, the physical sciences, math, and computer sciences. The
percentage of women receiving advanced degrees in those fields is even lower. This, in
turn, affects the earning power of women graduates.
Catalyst’s survey of MBA graduates found significant differences between women
and men’s perception regarding the impact of math abilities and confidence on
entrance into MBA programs. Women respondents were more likely to indicate that a
lack of confidence in their math abilities deter women from entering MBA programs,
whereas only 19 percent of male respondents indicated that a lack of math ability
confidence deters men from entering MBA programs (Catalyst, 2000).
Building on the Altman et al. (2007) study described earlier, recently there has been
a strong push toward single-sex classrooms. Based on scientific evidence concluding
that boys and girls learn differently, advocates propose that single-sex settings can
help break down stereotyping at early ages. The goal is to help girls improve their
academic performance in math and science and help boys improve their reading and
writing (Weil, 2008; Perlman, 2008; Sax, 2005). However, a separate and contradictory
study funded by the national science foundation (NSF) tested seven million students in
ten states in the USA in 2000 and concluded that the gap between boys and girls
regarding math scores had closed, although the stereotype prevails (Hyde et al., 2008).
The research in education on gender and performance in math-related subjects is
deeply rooted in two related concepts from cognitive psychology – stereotype threat
and self-efficacy. In this article, we examine more closely the role of self-efficacy with
regard to financial management.
Self-efficacy
The term “self-efficacy” was first introduced by Bandura (1977) in social learning theory
and refers to one’s confidence in ability to perform a particular task. Ten years later, it was
introduced to the organizational behavior literature and was found to be associated with
work-related performance, faculty research productivity, career choice, and learning and
achievement (Gist and Mitchell, 1992; Gist, 1987). Self-efficacy and stereotype threat are Financial
related in that negative stereotypes may erode confidence (perception of self-efficacy) and self-efficacy
create a self-fulfilling prophecy that an individual is incapable of performing a task. In a
study of US teens, Marlino and Wilson (2003) found that girls had lower confidence
(self-efficacy) in math and finance than boys. In entrepreneurship research,
“entrepreneurial self-efficacy (ESE)” has been examined and is described in the next
section. 27
Entrepreneurship
This phenomenon may be particularly salient as the number of women entrepreneurs
continues to grow. While these numbers continue to rise, women-owned business are
still faced with obstacles such as start-up capital and access to networks. Many
Downloaded by UNIVERSITY OF OTAGO At 02:20 21 February 2016 (PT)
researchers question whether or not these obstacles are real or simply negative myths
surrounding women entrepreneurs.
A small number of studies have focused specifically on the attitudes of women
entrepreneurs toward quantitative tasks, and, in particular, financial skills and
financial management. Pellegrino and Reece (1982) did extensive interviews with
20 women small business owners in Norfolk, Virginia to find that financial management
was one of the greatest areas of concern. About 60 percent of the women perceived that
controlling expenses, cash-flow planning, and forecasting were major problems. In
general, these business owners expressed the belief that financial management was an
area of weakness and indicated that they wished they had more skill in that area. Hisrich
and Brush (1984) conducted a study of over 1,000 women entrepreneurs in 18 states to find
that they also considered financial skills to be their greatest area of weakness. Lack of
financial training was one of the biggest problems cited during the start-up phase, and
even after the business was established, women entrepreneurs continued to cite lack of
experience with financial planning as a major problem.
Based on an extensive review of prior research, Brush (1992) found that women
entrepreneurs typically had different educational backgrounds than men entrepreneurs.
They were much more likely to have undergraduate degrees in liberal arts as opposed to
business, engineering, or more technical subjects. Brush also observed that the financial
aspects of starting a venture were the biggest obstacles for women. These include
obtaining financing and credit, cash flow management, and financial planning. Finally,
women’s self-assessed competence in their own financial skills was lower than that of men.
Investigating the behaviors of Anglo and Hispanic men and women aspiring to
entrepreneurship, Jones and Tullous (2002) surveyed 133 clients of a regional small
business development center who participated in a training program in 1995. Findings
revealed that both Anglo and Hispanic males perceived that they needed less help in
the financial area than Anglo and Hispanic females. When the consultants who worked
with these pre-venture entrepreneurs were surveyed, however, it was their perception
that women actually needed less assistance in the financial area than men. Thus, the
women had a lower estimation of their financial abilities than the consultants who
worked with them to help them establish their businesses.
In a follow-up to the Diana Project, Brush et al. (2004) address the question “Do women
(business owners) have the requisite financial knowledge, skills and experience?” They
acknowledge that historically women were less likely to study mathematics, finance,
and accounting but, contrary to the aforementioned research, they assert that times have
IJGE changed. Citing 1998 statistics from the NSF, there is evidence that female high-school
3,1 graduates were more likely than males to have taken geometry, algebra II, and
trigonometry, and almost as likely to have taken calculus. They state “the math skills
hurdle is one of perception (emphasis added) rather than reality, yet its persistence
continues to plague women seeking capital.”
Several studies in entrepreneurship have investigated the relationship between ESE
28 and the intention to start a new venture (Wilson et al., 2007, 2009; Barbosa et al., 2007;
Zhao et al., 2005; Boyd and Vozikis, 1994). ESE is a measure of the confidence an
individual has in one’s ability to be an entrepreneur. Wilson et al. (2007) examined the
relationships between gender, ESE and entrepreneurial intentions among adolescents
and MBA students. ESE was measured with a six-item self-assessment five-point Likert
scale that included “being able to solve problems,” “making decisions,” “managing
money,” “being creative,” “getting people to agree with you,” and “being a leader.”
Downloaded by UNIVERSITY OF OTAGO At 02:20 21 February 2016 (PT)
$50,000-$100,000 9 24.3
Over $100,000 10 27.0
When you subtract all expenses from revenues, is the firm profitable?
No 15 42.9
Yes 20 57.1
Prior to owning this business, how many years of experience did you have working in a business?
0 years 4 8.0
, 5 years 7 14.0
5-10 years 16 32.0
More than 10 23 46.0
How would you rate your skills in financial management?
I do not have any financial management skills 3 5.9
This is an area of weaknesses for me 15 29.4
Adequate skills for my business 17 33.3
Very good 13 25.5
Excellent 3 5.9
How confident do you feel about your skills in financial management?
No confidence 1 2.0
Not very confident 9 17.6
Somewhat confident 23 45.1
Confident 14 27.5
Very confident 4 7.8
How confident do you feel about your abilities to undertake the successful financial management of
your company?
Not very confident 2 3.9
Somewhat confident 18 35.3
Confident 20 39.2
Very confident 11 21.6
Have you ever encountered the perception that women entrepreneurs are not proficient regarding
financial matters?
No 15 46.9
Yes 17 53.1
If yes, to what extent do you agree with that perception
No extent 14 36.8
Table I. A little extent 4 10.5
Sample size and Some extent 15 39.5
percentage of A large extent 4 10.5
respondents on study A great extent 1 2.6
variables (continued)
Variable n %
Financial
self-efficacy
What is your highest level of education?
Completed high school or equivalent 5 9.8
Some college 8 15.7
College degree 18 35.3
Graduate degree 20 39.2 31
What was your attitude regarding courses which were quantitative or math oriented in high school
and/or college
I tried to avoid them 6 12.2
I did not like them but took them because they
were required 18 36.7
I was indifferent 8 16.3
I enjoyed them very much 14 28.6
Downloaded by UNIVERSITY OF OTAGO At 02:20 21 February 2016 (PT)
I grew to enjoy math in high school once I had a teacher who really took the time with me.
And then in college, as a science major, I took more math and often enjoyed it. Somehow this
doesn’t translate positively into financial management. I have a bookkeeper. The survival of
my store depends on better fiscal management.
I did not do very well in Math in HS and College, (I was an average student) but I understand
it enough to be confident in my ability to run my company.
In the anecdotal comments, it is noteworthy that many respondents had difficulty with
math-related subjects in school, but enjoys the bookkeeping function for their firms.
This suggests a disconnect between women’s experience with math-related academic
subjects and financial management within the context of their companies. Although
several consider finance to be uninteresting and boring, they are confident that they
have the ability to learn what they need to know and, if not, they will get outside
assistance. The Center for Business Women’s Research states that two-thirds of all
women business owners with firms with over $1 million in revenues seek outside
assistance for financial advice (Center for Women’s Business Research, 2006).
With regard to rating their skills in financial management, the sample was almost
evenly divided into three groups; about a third indicated that this was an area of
weakness for them (29.4 percent), a third indicated that they had adequate skills
(33.3 percent) and slightly less than a third perceived their skills as very good or
excellent (31.4 percent). In evaluating confidence in their financial management skills,
about a fifth of the women had no confidence or little confidence (19.6 percent), while
more than a third (35.3 percent) were confident or very confident, and the majority being
somewhat confident (45.1 percent). Moreover, when asked about their confidence
IJGE regarding their abilities to undertake the successful financial management of their
3,1 company, slightly over a third of respondents (35.3 percent) were somewhat confident in
their abilities, with the majority (60.8 percent) either confident or very confident in their
financial management skills. When asked to describe their attitudes towards quantitative
subjects in high school or college, almost half of the respondents (48.9 percent) said they
avoided them or did not like them. Conversely, over a third (34.7 percent) stated that they
32 enjoyed quantitative subjects and/or took as many as possible. Of the 51 respondents, over
half (68.0 percent) took care of their family finances alone. Additionally, over a fifth
(22.0 percent) participated in this activity with a spouse or partner. Almost two-thirds of
the women business owners (60.8 percent) said they were confident or very confident
about their ability to undertake the tasks related to the successful management of their
firms.
Downloaded by UNIVERSITY OF OTAGO At 02:20 21 February 2016 (PT)
Confidence
Level of Years of Confidence successful
firms’ experience Financial in financial financial
annual prior to owning management management management
sales business skills skills of business Age
Level of firms’
annual sales 1.0
Years of
experience
prior to owning
business 0.090 1.0
Financial
management
skills 0.085 0.325 * 1.0
Confidence
in financial
management
skills 0.184 0.193 0.750 * * 1.0
Confidence
successful
financial
management
of business 2 0.067 20.057 0.509 * * 0.516 * *
Age 2 0.185 0.380 * * 0.330 * 0.320 * 0.196 1.0
Education 0.089 20.076 2 0.179 20.168 2 0.235 2 0.259
Table II.
Correlations Notes: *p , 0.05; * *p , 0.01
their business (r ¼ 0.380; p , 0.01). Additionally, all three of the variables asking Financial
respondents to comment on their financial management skills were highly correlated
with each other.
self-efficacy
Factor analysis
An exploratory factor analysis was conducted on the variables assessing respondents
perception of the financial management skills (i.e. how would you rate your financial 33
skills; how confident do you feel about your skills in financial management; how confident
do you feel regarding your ability to undertake the tasks related to the successful financial
management of your company) to determine if the observed correlations could be
explained by a smaller number of factors. A principal components extraction was used
with a varimax rotation. A one factor solution accounting for 73 percent of the variance
was obtained. Table III lists the factor analysis results.
Downloaded by UNIVERSITY OF OTAGO At 02:20 21 February 2016 (PT)
Reliability
Reliability analysis conducted on the three variables indicated a Cronbach’s alpha of
0.81. Given this strong measure of internal consistency, we created a financial
self-efficacy (FSE) scale where high numbers indicate that the respondents express
confidence in their financial management skills.
Comparison of means
One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed to test whether there is a
meaningful difference between respondent’s race and their FSE. Results indicated a
significant difference between respondents on the financial management skills variable.
White women entrepreneurs were more likely to rate their financial management skills
higher than respondents of color (F (1, 49) ¼ 1.744, p , 0.10). Additionally, there was a
significant difference between FSE and age. Older respondents were more likely to rate
their FSE higher than younger respondents (F (2, 48) ¼ 3.747, p , 0.05). Table IV lists
the ANOVA results.
Race
Between groups 1.637 5 1.637 1.744 0.104
Within groups 39.243 49 0.597
Age
Between groups 4.170 2 2.085 3.747 0.031 * *
Within groups 26.710 48 0.556
Table IV.
Note: Significance at: *0.10 and * *0.05 levels (two-tailed) ANOVA results
IJGE V. Discussion
3,1 The results in the previous section present several noteworthy findings. First, we
developed a robust measure of a FSE construct which is more task specific than
broadly aggregated constructs of general self-efficacy and ESE. Additionally, results
suggest that age and racial differences are significantly related to FSE with Caucasians
and older respondents reporting higher levels. The differences related to race are
34 consistent with earlier research on self-efficacy and entrepreneurial intentions among
teenage girls (Marlino and Wilson, 2003; Wilson et al., 2009, 2004).
Taken together, the empirical findings discussed above only partially attest to a lack
of confidence combined with anxiety about dealing with financial management on the
part of women entrepreneurs. However, this sample represents a limited group of women
entrepreneurs participating in an entrepreneurial training program or already owning a
Downloaded by UNIVERSITY OF OTAGO At 02:20 21 February 2016 (PT)
Bandura, A. (1997), Self-efficacy: The Exercise of Control, Freeman, New York, NY.
Barbosa, S., Gerhardt, M. and Kickul, J. (2007), “The role of cognitive style and risk preference on
entrepreneurial self-efficacy and entrepreneurial intentions”, Journal of Leadership and
Organizational Studies, Vol. 13 No. 4, pp. 86-104.
Benedict, M. and Hoag, J. (2002), “Who’s afraid of their economics classes? Why are students
apprehensive about introductory economics courses? An empirical investigation”,
American Economist, Vol. 46 No. 2, pp. 21-44.
Boyd, N. and Vozikis, G. (1994), “The influence of self-efficacy on the development of
entrepreneurial intentions and actions”, Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice, Vol. 18 No. 4,
pp. 63-77.
Brush, C.G. (1992), “Research on women business owners: past trends, a new perspective, and
future directions”, Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice, Vol. 16 No. 4, pp. 5-31.
Brush, C.G., Carter, N., Gatewood, E., Greene, P. and Hart, M. (2004), Clearing the Hurdles:
Women Building High-growth Businesses, FT/Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
Caputo, R.K. and Dolinsky, A. (1998), “Women’s choice to pursue self-employment: the role of
financial and human capital of household members”, Journal of Small Business
Management, Vol. 36 No. 3, pp. 8-18.
Carter, N., Williams, M. and Reynolds, P. (1997), “Discontinuance among new firms in retail: the
influence of initial resources, strategy, and gender”, Journal of Business Venturing, Vol. 12,
pp. 125-45.
Catalyst (2000), Women and the MBA: Gateway to Opportunity, Center for Education of Women
at the University of Michigan and University of Michigan Business School, available at:
www.catalystwomen.org/ (accessed February 22, 2007).
Center for Women’s Business Research (2008), “Women-owned businesses in the United States
2008”, Fact Sheet, Center for Women’s Business Research, available at: www.
womensbusinessresearch.org (accessed January 8, 2009).
Chandler, G. and Hanks, S.H. (1998), “An examination of the substitutability of founders’ human
and financial capital in emerging business ventures”, Journal of Business Venturing,
Vol. 13, pp. 353-69.
Correll, S.J. (2001), “Gender and the career choice process: the role of biased self-assessments”,
The American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 106 No. 6, pp. 1691-730.
Dhaliwal, S. (2010), “A practical perspective on the training needs of women entrepreneurs”,
International Journal of Gender and Entrepreneurship, Vol. 2 No. 3, pp. 287-90.
IJGE Dillman, D.A. (2000), Mail and Internet Surveys: The Tailored Design Method, 2nd ed., Wiley,
New York, NY.
3,1
Gist, M.E. (1987), “Self-efficacy: implications for organizational behavior and human resource
management”, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 12 No. 3, pp. 472-85.
Hisrich, R.D. and Brush, C. (1984), “The woman entrepreneur: management skills and business
problems”, Journal of Small Business Management, Vol. 22 No. 1, pp. 30-7.
36 Hyde, J.S., Lindberg, S.M., Linn, M.C., Ellis, A.B. and Williams, C.C. (2008), “Gender similarities
characterize math performance”, Science, Vol. 321, July 25.
Jones, K. and Tullous, R. (2002), “Behaviors of pre-venture entrepreneurs and perceptions of their
financial needs”, Journal of Small Business Management, Vol. 40 No. 3, pp. 233-49.
Kirkwood, J. (2009), “Is a lack of self-confidence hindering women entrepreneurs?”, International
Journal of Gender and Entrepreneurship, Vol. 1 No. 2, pp. 118-33.
Downloaded by UNIVERSITY OF OTAGO At 02:20 21 February 2016 (PT)
McGee, J.E., Peterson, M., Mueller, S.L. and Sequeira, J.M. (2009), “Entrepreneurial self-efficacy:
refining the measure”, Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice, Vol. 33 No. 4, pp. 965-88.
Marlino, D. and Wilson, F. (2003), Teen Girls on Business: Are They Empowered?, Simmons
School of Management and The Committee of 200, Chicago, IL.
Mueller, S.L. and Goic, S. (2003), “East-west differences in entrepreneurial self-efficacy:
implications for entrepreneurship education in transition economies”, International
Journal of Entrepreneurship Education, Vol. 1 No. 4, pp. 613-32.
Pellegrino, E.T. and Reece, B.L. (1982), “Perceived formative and operational problems
encountered by female entrepreneurs in retail and service firms”, Journal of Small Business
Management, Vol. 20 No. 2, pp. 15-24.
Perlman, B. (2008), “One classroom, one gender”, Pittsburgh Post Gazette, February 10.
Sax, L. (2005), Why Gender Matters: What Parents and Teachers Need to Know about the
Emerging Science of Sex Differences, Doubleday, New York, NY.
Turner, S.E. and Bowen, W.G. (1999), “Choice of major: the changing (unchanging) gender gap”,
Industrial & Labor Relations Review, Vol. 52 No. 2, pp. 214-89.
Weil, E. (2008), “Teaching boys and girls separately”, New York Times Magazine, March 2.
Wilson, F., Kickul, J. and Marlino, D. (2007), “Gender, entrepreneurial self-efficacy, and
entrepreneurial career intentions: implications for entrepreneurship education”,
Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice, Vol. 31 No. 3, pp. 387-406.
Wilson, F., Kickul, J., Marlino, D., Barbosa, S.D. and Griffiths, M.D. (2009), “An analysis of the
role of gender and self-efficacy in developing female entrepreneurial interest and
behavior”, Journal of Developmental Entrepreneurship, Vol. 14 No. 2, pp. 105-19.
Zhao, H., Seibert, C. and Hills, C. (2005), “The mediating role of self-efficacy in the development of
entrepreneurial intentions”, Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 90 No. 2, pp. 1265-72.
Further reading
Anna, A., Chandler, G., Jansen, E. and Mero, N. (2000), “Women business owners in traditional
and non-traditional industries”, Journal of Business Venturing, Vol. 15 No. 3, pp. 279-303.
Brush, C., Carter, N., Gatewood, E., Greene, P. and Hart, M. (2001), The Diana Project Women
Business Owners and Equity Capital: The Myths Dispelled, Kauffman Center for
Entrepreneurial Leadership, Kansas City, MO.
Carter, S. and Rosa, P. (1998), “The financing of male- and female-owned businesses”,
Entrepreneurship & Regional Development., Vol. 10, pp. 225-41.
Cooper, A.C., Gimeno-Gascon, J. and Woo, C.Y. (1994), “Initial human and financial capital as Financial
predictors of new venture performance”, Journal of Business Venturing, Vol. 9, pp. 371-95.
Marx, D. and Roman, J. (2002), “Female role models: protecting women’s math test performance”,
self-efficacy
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 28, pp. 1183-93.
Verheul, I., Uhlaner, L. and Thurik, R. (2005), “Business accomplishments, gender and
entrepreneurial self-image”, Journal of Business Venturing, Vol. 20, pp. 483-518.
37
About the authors
Frances M. Amatucci, PhD (University of Pittsburgh), is an Associate Professor in the School of
Business at Slippery Rock University where she teaches undergraduate courses in strategic
management and entrepreneurship. She is an Adjunct Professor at the H. Wayne Huizenga School
of Business and Entrepreneurship at Nova Southeastern University where she teaches graduate
courses related to global strategy and entrepreneurship. Her current research interests are women
Downloaded by UNIVERSITY OF OTAGO At 02:20 21 February 2016 (PT)
1. Ethne M Swartz, Frances Amatucci, Susan Coleman. 2016. Using a multiple method and mixed
mode approach to examine women entrepreneur negotiating styles. International Journal of Gender and
Entrepreneurship 8:1. . [Abstract] [PDF]
2. Lisa Farrell, Tim R.L. Fry, Leonora Risse. 2015. The significance of financial self-efficacy in explaining
women’s personal finance behaviour. Journal of Economic Psychology . [CrossRef]
3. Christopher R. Reutzel, Carrie A. Belsito. 2015. Female directors and IPO underpricing in the US.
International Journal of Gender and Entrepreneurship 7:1, 27-44. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
4. Susan Coleman, Dafna Kariv. 2014. ‘Deconstructing’ entrepreneurial self-efficacy: a gendered perspective
on the impact of ESE and community entrepreneurial culture on the financial strategies and performance
of new firms. Venture Capital 16, 157-181. [CrossRef]
5. Julie Logan. 2014. An exploration of the challenges facing women starting business at fifty. International
Downloaded by UNIVERSITY OF OTAGO At 02:20 21 February 2016 (PT)
Journal of Gender and Entrepreneurship 6:1, 83-96. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]