Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Lamp Iran

    Uploaded by

    ashvini
    1 views18 pages
    The document contains tables showing the results of statistical tests (Cohen's Kappa and Friedman tests) analyzing different sinus areas (maxillary, sphenoid, ethmoid, frontal) and other nasal areas (septum nasi, mastoid) across different heat levels (30°C, 50°C, 70°C). The Cohen's Kappa tests show agreement between raters, with some heat levels showing almost perfect agreement and others fair agreement. The Friedman tests compare mean ranks across heat levels for each area, finding some areas have significant differences while others do not.

    Original Description:

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The document contains tables showing the results of statistical tests (Cohen's Kappa and Friedman tests) analyzing different sinus areas (maxillary, sphenoid, ethmoid, frontal) and other nasal areas (septum nasi, mastoid) across different heat levels (30°C, 50°C, 70°C). The Cohen's Kappa tests show agreement between raters, with some heat levels showing almost perfect agreement and others fair agreement. The Friedman tests compare mean ranks across heat levels for each area, finding some areas have significant differences while others do not.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    1 views18 pages

    Lamp Iran

    Uploaded by

    ashvini
    The document contains tables showing the results of statistical tests (Cohen's Kappa and Friedman tests) analyzing different sinus areas (maxillary, sphenoid, ethmoid, frontal) and other nasal areas (septum nasi, mastoid) across different heat levels (30°C, 50°C, 70°C). The Cohen's Kappa tests show agreement between raters, with some heat levels showing almost perfect agreement and others fair agreement. The Friedman tests compare mean ranks across heat levels for each area, finding some areas have significant differences while others do not.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 18

    Lampiran

    JADWAL TENTATIF PENELITIAN

    Uraian Des Jan Feb Mar April Mei Jun


    No
    Kegiatan 2021 2022 2022 2022 2022 2022 2022
    Penyusunan
    1 ☑️
    Topik
    Penyusunan
    2 ☑️ ☑️
    proposal
    Pengumpulan
    3 ☑️
    Proposal
    Seminar
    4 ☑️ ☑️
    Proposal
    Pengajuan
    5 Surat Izin ☑️
    Penelitian
    Pengambilan
    6 ☑️ ☑️ ☑️
    Data
    Penyusunan
    7 ☑️ ☑️
    Hasil
    Pengumpulan
    8 ☑️
    Skripsi
    Pelaksanaan
    9 ☑️ ☑️
    Ujian Skripsi
    Lampiran
    Lampiran
    Lampiran
    Lampiran
    Lampiran
    Lampiran
    Lampiran
    Lampiran
    Lampiran
    Lampiran
    Lampiran

    Hasil Uji Statistik

    A. Uji Cohen’s Kappa


    Symmetric Measures
    Asymptotic
    Standardized Approximate
    Value Errora Approximate Tb Significance
    Measure of Agreement Kappa .615 .225 2.108 .035
    N of Valid Cases 10
    a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.
    b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

    Symmetric Measures
    Asymptotic
    Standardized Approximate
    a b
    Value Error Approximate T Significance
    Measure of Agreement Kappa .630 .321 2.799 .005
    N of Valid Cases 10
    a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.
    b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

    Symmetric Measures
    Asymptotic
    Standardized Approximate
    Value Errora Approximate Tb Significance
    Measure of Agreement Kappa .833 .158 3.686 .000
    N of Valid Cases 10
    a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.
    b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

    Symmetric Measures
    Asymptotic
    Standardized Approximate
    a b
    Value Error Approximate T Significance
    Measure of Agreement Kappa .444 .263 1.690 .091
    N of Valid Cases 10
    a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.
    b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.
    Lampiran

    Symmetric Measures
    Asymptotic
    Standardized Approximate
    a b
    Value Error Approximate T Significance
    Measure of Agreement Kappa 1.000 .000 4.300 .000
    N of Valid Cases 10
    a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.
    b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

    Symmetric Measures
    Asymptotic
    Standardized Approximate
    Value Errora Approximate Tb Significance
    Measure of Agreement Kappa 1.000 .000 4.300 .000
    N of Valid Cases 10
    a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.
    b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

    Symmetric Measures
    Asymptotic
    Standardized Approximate
    a b
    Value Error Approximate T Significance
    Measure of Agreement Kappa .866 .168 3.283 .001
    N of Valid Cases 10
    a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.
    b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.
    Lampiran

    B. Uji Firedman
    Ranks Ranks
    Mean Rank Mean Rank
    Sinus Maxillaris H30 4.90 Sinus Sphenoidalis H30 5.15
    Sinus Maxillaris H50 2.70 Sinus Sphenoidalis H50 5.60
    Sinus Maxillaris H70 4.65 Sinus Sphenoidalis H70 5.50
    Sinus Maxillaris H30 4.90 Sinus Sphenoidalis H30 5.75
    Sinus Maxillaris H50 6.40 Sinus Sphenoidalis H50 5.10
    Sinus Maxillaris H70 6.85 Sinus Sphenoidalis H70 3.90
    Sinus Maxillaris H30 3.35 Sinus Sphenoidalis H30 3.50
    Sinus Maxillaris H50 5.55 Sinus Sphenoidalis H50 3.45
    Sinus Maxillaris H70 5.70 Sinus Sphenoidalis H70 5.05
    Test Statisticsa
    Test Statisticsa N 10
    N 10
    Chi-Square 27.328 Chi-Square 10.807
    df 8 df 8
    Asymp. Sig. .001
    Asymp. Sig. .213
    a. Friedman Test
    a. Friedman Test

    Ranks
    Mean Rank Ranks
    Sinus Ethmoidalis H30 4.10 Mean Rank
    Sinus Ethmoidalis H50 5.55
    Sinus Ethmoidalis H70 5.15 Sinus Frontalis H30 3.60
    Sinus Ethmoidalis H30 5.55 Sinus Frontalis H50 5.35
    Sinus Ethmoidalis H50 6.35 Sinus Frontalis H70 5.80
    Sinus Ethmoidalis H70 4.70 Sinus Frontalis H30 4.45
    Sinus Ethmoidalis H30 2.90 Sinus Frontalis H50 5.75
    Sinus Ethmoidalis H50 5.30 Sinus Frontalis H70 6.25
    Sinus Ethmoidalis H70 5.40 Sinus Frontalis H30 3.55
    Sinus Frontalis H50 4.90
    Sinus Frontalis H50 5.35

    Test Statisticsa Sinus Frontalis H70

    N 10 N 10

    Chi-Square 14.449 Chi-Square 17.689

    df 8 df 8

    Asymp. Sig. .071 Asymp. Sig. .024

    a. Friedman Test a. Friedman Test


    Lampiran

    Ranks
    Mean Rank Ranks
    Septum Nasi H30 3.55 Mean Rank
    Septum Nasi H50 5.60 Mastoid H30 3.25
    Septum Nasi H70 5.80 Mastoid H50 5.55
    Septum Nasi H30 4.60 Mastoid H70 4.60
    Septum Nasi H50 5.00 Mastoid H30 5.00
    Septum Nasi H70 5.30 Mastoid H50 5.90
    Septum Nasi H30 4.60 Mastoid H70 5.05
    Septum Nasi H50 5.20 Mastoid H30 3.70
    Septum Nasi H70 5.35 Mastoid H50 6.50
    Mastoid H70 5.45
    Ranks
    Test Statisticsa
    N 10
    Chi-Square 6.504 Test Statisticsa

    df 8 N 10
    Asymp. Sig. .591 Chi-Square 16.152

    a. Friedman Test df 8
    Asymp. Sig. .040

    Ranks
    Mean Rank
    Concha Nasalis H30 5.15
    Concha Nasalis H50 6.30
    Concha Nasalis H70 4.75
    Concha Nasalis H30 3.15
    Concha Nasalis H50 6.55
    Concha Nasalis H70 4.75
    Concha Nasalis H30 3.15
    Concha Nasalis H50 6.20
    Concha Nasalis H70 5.00

    Test Statisticsa
    N 10
    Chi-Square 26.863
    df 8
    Asymp. Sig. .001
    a. Friedman Test
    Lampiran
    Lampiran

    You might also like