Chapter 1 3 - Merged

CERTIFICATE OF STRUCTURAL STABILITY
This is to certify the structural stability of the Six-meter (6-m.) Bi-pod pole tower (**Note:
Measured from the finished elevation up to the highest pole mounting frame), structural connection
between the Bi-pod pole tower and the building framing through post constructed pedestal and
concrete anchorage.
Structural appraisal involves site visit and/or visual inspection to ensure that the added structures by
Globe Telecoms Network Inc. have no visual damage that might affect its longevity and its users. Also, the
location of the said additions was identified to measure the “As-built” structural elements as well as the
existing concrete elements of the structure directly affected by the added loadings for structural investigation
purposes.
Estimation or calculation needed to produce this output are all based on the standard and code
mandated by the law and by the profession of Civil Engineering in the Philippines. Here lies the references
used for the analysis extracted from the National Structural code of the Philippines 2015 (NSCP2015,
SEVENTH EDITION, VOLUME I):
• American Concrete Standard (ACI-318M)

For anchorage through concrete elements.
• American Institute for Steel Construction (AISC360-16)
For steel adequacy checking under different mode of failures.
• American National Standard Institute (ANSI EIA/TIA-222-H-2017)
For Wind Analysis procedure for Tower structures.
Based on the results of the provided structural stability checking, the Bi-pod pole tower setup is adequate
for its intended use. The connection of the said structure to the existing concrete framed building is deemed
safe as it is analyzed within the most conservative approach due to detail/data insufficiency. Moreover, no
load combination that is checked separately/iterated throughout different mode of failure that is represented
by utilization ratio, for anchorage through concrete element exceeded the maximum utilization ratio of 100%.
Thus, different base supports are adequate for its intended use.
However, additional loadings due to alteration of the structure and improper usage outside the
jurisdiction of the code/s stated above are beyond the scope and responsibility of the undersigned. Moreover,
poor workmanship, modification, and construction are beyond the jurisdiction of the engineer involved with
the assessment of the structural stability of the existing building and outsidethe scope of this report.
Note: This structural investigation report shall not be construed as part of the construction
documents. This is prepared for information purposes only. This report contains the results of
the investigation into the structure.
AVAILABLE DATA
The engineers have gathered available data which will be used for analysis such as
As-built architectural and structural drawings of the building provided by the owner, and
actual conditions based on ocular inspection. The material properties and other design
considerations have been provided by the client and have been used as the basis for the
structural investigation.
Commentary: Owner of the building and Owner of the post constructed tower did
not provide any data regarding their building due to internal issues. Engineers in-charge
with this analysis went to the site to conduct evaluation and measurements for the Globe
equipment or structure/s. When no material properties indicated or observed for a specific
material, the engineer in-charge of this analysis make use of what is the most readily
available and widely used in the Philippines market and in practice.

LIMITATION OF THIS DOCUMENT
This review presented herein is intended for the project entitled PROJECT
UNIVERSE (PROJECT U.) by Globe Telecoms Network. The existing structure is
located at CITYLAND CONDO III, 105 V.A. RUFINO ST., COR. ESTEBAN ST.
SAN LORENZO MAKATI CITY. owned by CITYLAND CORP. This document shall
be read in conjunction with the following documents:
a. As-built drawings signed by the engineer in charge of the project
construction.
b. Structural and or soil investigation results
c. National Structural Code of the Philippines, 7th Ed. 2015
d. Other building codes specified in the design criteria
Should there be any inconsistencies; the precedence shall be as follows:
a. As-built drawings of the structure
b. National Structural Code of the Philippines, 7th Ed. 2015
c. The structural investigation results.

I. INTRODUCTION
This report covers the structural investigation analysis for the elements of a post-
constructed Six-meter (6-m.) Bi-pod pole tower setup (Measured from the roof deck floor
level up to the upper most pole mounting frame) carrying antennas/equipment necessary
for telecommunication use. The whole post constructed/installed structure tower is
connected to the existing concrete framed building through pedestal, anchor bolts, and base
plates. The main pole is assumed to be fixedly connected; thus, it resists axial forces and
rotation for all possible plains and axes. The strut supports are assumed to be pin connected
as the purpose of this said element is to resist horizontal forces such as earthquakes and
wind loadings.
The structural steel framing setup is measured in actual and was found out that it was
confirming with the standard section properties of ASTM (American Society for Testing
and Materials). The reinforced concrete pedestal is measured in actual as well, though we
cannot determine the structural design of the concrete pedestal, geometrical dimension of
the concrete pedestal was obtained through actual measurements and analyzed
conservatively.
The Bi-pod pole tower is located at an accessible roof deck for a suggested feasible
height clearance avoiding blockages reaching further coverage. The self-weight of
equipment inclinedly attached, appurtenances, and other attachments that are not part of
the main framing system of the steel structure are extracted from the manufacturer’s
provided mechanical property manual.

For the performance of the analysis, the dimension of the concerned structural
members is measured upon the day of inspection and made sure that there are no early
indications of failure such as hairline cracking for concrete elements, improper weld of two
adjoining steel members, and heavily corroded steel members.
For the computation of dead-load due to self-weight of the attached equipment,
extracted mechanical data from the manufacturer’s manual was used and is converted into
desired units and load of transfer going through the main framing system of the floor
mounted setup.
For the computation of lateral load, Wind load, directional procedure of ANSI/TIA-
222-H (2017) was used because of having commentaries, and explanations for the
procedural approaches for wind loadings that are more specific, descriptive, and updated
for the ANSI/TIA-222-H-2017 than our local code, thus, combination of the two are
justified. The said governing codes and procedural approaches are manually deciphered by
the engineer in-charge of this analysis and was computed through the help of Microsoft
office (excel) software. Formulas used, and criteria for judgement will be discussed further
in this report. Also, it is stated in our local code that for tower structures, it is not prohibited
to use other references through which our code referred to ANSI/TIA-222. However,
parameters that are provided and more suited for our geographical location were obtained
from our local code that is NSCP 2015.

AISC360-16 (LRFD METHOD) was used as method of adequacy checking for the
steel members for failures such as slenderness checking, compression failure, tension
failure, bending, torsional, and combination of each failure.
AISI-16 (LRFD METHOD) was used as method of adequacy checking for the cold
formed steel members for failures such as slenderness checking, compression failure,
tension failure, bending, torsional, and combination of each failure.
From STAAD pro connect edition v22 update 6, the said design checking was
performed as well as extraction of base support loadings due to different load combination.
This reaction is necessary to provide checking for adequacy for other design elements
considering different possibilities.
ACI318-19M was used as method of adequacy of checking for concerned concrete
elements such as concrete breakout, concrete side face breakout, concrete edge breakout;
as well as for the anchor bolts, whether it can carry out tension failure, anchor pull out,
shear failure, and pry-out. Finite element analysis was performed through structural
software, HILTI PROFIS ENGINGEERING, for checking of weld adequacy, stiffener
plate checking, and base plate adequacy checks.
The aim of the report was to provide adequate theoretical justification to ensure
that the added structure is safe for its intended usage, ensuring the safety of its users, and
the vicinity around the existing structure.

Thus, provided analysis vastly considers the estimated reaction due to possible loadings
due to different factors. It may be caused by the wind forces, self-weight, or combination
of such said forces. All assumptions and factors used for the computation of said forces are
extracted from the National Structural Code of the Philippines (NSCP 2015, volume 7)
and other references that is bounded by the said code.To fulfil the objective, step by step
procedure in chronological order are carried out:
1. Inspection and gathering of data.
2. Computer Aided Design (CAD) for layout
3. Load computation with the aid of Microsoft office software
4. Structural Aided analysis of the framing and recommendation

II. INPUTS
On this part of the report, the inputs such as code-based parameters, engineering
judgement or computation, would be discussed and certify with the assurance and justification
that each structural member would or would not meet the desired requirements. Regarding the
structural steel members, Load and Resistance Factor Design (AISC LRFD) was deemed
efficient and up to date as a method of design adequacy checking as it provides more adequacy
checking than Allowable stress design (ASD) based on the design software use for the base
plates and concrete pedestal (HILTI PROFIS ENGINEERING).
MATERIAL PROPERTIES (Reinforced Concrete Members)
• Compressive strength at 28th day, Fc’ = 2500 psi (17.24 MPa) in 6-in-diameter (150-mm-
diameter) cores at 28 days.
CONSERVATIVE ASSUMPTION SINCE THERE IS NO DATA PROVIDED BY THE OWNER
MATERIAL PROPERTIES (Structural steel members – TOWER)
• Yield strength of Structural steel, Fy = 248 Mpa (ASTM - A36) for all Prefabricated steel
members except anchor bolts. CONSERVATIVE ASSUMPTION SINCE THERE IS NO
ASSURANCE WITH THE MATERIAL SPECIFICATIONS USED.
• Ultimate strength of Structural steel, Fu = 400 Mpa (ASTM - A36) CONSERVATIVE
ASSUMPTION SINCE THERE IS NO ASSURANCE WITH THE MATERIAL
SPECIFICATIONS USED.
• Tensile strength of Weld electrode, Fyw = 413 Mpa (E70XX) CONSERVATIVE
ASSUMPTION SINCE THERE IS NO ASSURANCE WITH THE MATERIAL

SPECIFICATIONS USED.
• Hex head, Fy = 400 Mpa (HIT-V-F-5.8) CONSERVATIVE ASSUMPTION SINCE THERE
IS NO ASSURANCE WITH THE MATERIAL SPECIFICATIONS USED.
• Hex head, Fu = 500 Mpa (HIT-V-F-5.8) CONSERVATIVE ASSUMPTION SINCE THERE
IS NO ASSURANCE WITH THE MATERIAL SPECIFICATIONS USED.
II.I. PARAMETER FOR WIND ANALYSIS (FOR MAIN
FRAMING SYSTEM OF THE TOWER)
Figure 1. Wind force distribution of towers situated on top of a building.
Main wind force resisting system (Tower)

Governing
structural
Number Description Constant Values Units Remarks
code
provisions
1 Basic Wind speed NSCP 2015 V 270 kmph
2 Wind NSCP 2015 Kd 0.95 -
Directionality
Factor
3 Exposure NSCP - C -
Category 2015/ANSI/TIA-
222-H
4 Nominal height of NSCP Zg 274 m Needs
atmospheric 2015/ANSI/TIA- clarification
boundary layer 222-H
5 3-second gust NSCP α' 9.5 -
wind speed power 2015/ANSI/TIA-
law exponent 222-H
6 Height above NSCP Z 25.31 m Needs
ground level at 2015/ANSI/TIA- clarification
the base of the 222-H especially if the
structure structure is
located at the
roofdeck
7 Minimum value NSCP 2015 Kzmin 0.85 -
for Velocity
Pressure
Coefficient
8 Velocity Pressure NSCP 2015 Kz 1.217349658 -
Coefficient
9 Topographic NSCP Kzt 1 Method 1.
Factor 2015/ANSI/TIA- Category 1 **No
222-H abrupt changes in
general
topography, e.g.
flat or rolling
terrain
10 Horizontal ANSI/TIA-222-H Xb 0.4 m
Distance from
windward face to
center of the
structure
11 Parapet Height ANSI/TIA-222-H Hp 0 m
12 Parapet Height + ANSI/TIA-222-H H1 0.08 m
(Xb/5)
13 Width of the ANSI/TIA-222-H Ws 6.5 m
windward face of
the building
14 Height of the ANSI/TIA-222-H Hs 19 m
windward of the
building
15 Height above roof ANSI/TIA-222-H Zr 6.31 m
16 Parapet Height + ANSI/TIA-222-H H2 6.5 m
Lesser of Hs or
Ws
17 - - Ws/Hs 0.342105263 -
18 Rooftop wind ANSI/TIA-222-H Ks 1 - Zr < H1
speed-up factor
from Hs to H1
19 Rooftop wind ANSI/TIA-222-H Ks 1.102631579 - H1 < Zr </= H2
speed-up factor
from H1 to H2
20 Rooftop wind ANSI/TIA-222-H Ks 1 - Zr > H2
speed-up factor
for >H2 to Zr
21 Ground elevation NSCP Ke 1 1.0 Shall be
factor 2015/ANSI/TIA- permitted for any
222-H ground elevation
22 Gust effect factor NSCP 2015 Gh 1.1 For pole structures
the gust effect
factor shall be
1.10
23 Velocity Pressure ANSI/TIA-222-H qz 0 N/sq.m. Zr < H1
24 Velocity Pressure ANSI/TIA-222-H qz 17.53022502 N/sq.m. H1 < Zr <= H2
25 Velocity Pressure ANSI/TIA-222-H qz 0 N/sq.m. Zr > H2
26 Design wind force ANSI/TIA-222-H Fst 0 N Zr < H1
on structure,
27 Design wind force ANSI/TIA-222-H Fst 18.6074053 N H1 < Zr <= H2
on structure,
28 Design wind force ANSI/TIA-222-H Fst 0 N Zr > H2
on structure,
Table 2-4: Exposure Category Coefficients (ANSI/TIA-222-H)
Exposure Category Zg (m.) α' Kzmin Kc
B 366 7 0.7 0.9
C 274 9.5 0.85 1
D 213 11.5 1.03 1.1
Table 2-2: Wind Direction Probability Factor

Structure Type Wind Direction Probability Factor, Kd
Latticed structures with triangular, square, or rectangular cross sections 0.85
All other latticed structures with other than triangular, square, or rectangular cross
0.95
sections
Tubular Pole Structures supporting exposed appurtenances and for the strength design
0.95
of appurtenances
Tubular pole structures supporting antennas enclosed within cylindrical shroud, with or
1
without a flag or tubular structures which do not support appurtenances
II.II. PARAMETER FOR WIND ANALYSIS (FOR SIMPLE
MOUNTING FRAMES)
Figure 2. Sample figure of a multiple simple mounting frames based on ANSI/TIA-222-H-2017

Design Wind Force on Mounting Frames
Governing
Number Description structural code Constant Values Units Remarks
provisions
Wind Directionality
2 NSCP 2015 Kd 0.95 -
Factor
NSCP
3 Exposure Category 2015/ANSI/TIA- - C -
222-H
Nominal height of NSCP
Needs
4 atmospheric boundary 2015/ANSI/TIA- Zg 274 m
clarification
layer 222-H
3-second gust wind NSCP
5 speed power law 2015/ANSI/TIA- α' 9.5 -
exponent 222-H
Needs
clarification
Height above ground NSCP
especially if the
6 level at the base of the 2015/ANSI/TIA- Z 24.485 m
structure is
structure 222-H
located at the
roofdeck
Minimum value for
7 Velocity Pressure NSCP 2015 Kzmin 0.85 -
Coefficient
Velocity Pressure
8 NSCP 2015 Kz 1.208886243 -
Coefficient
Method 1.
Category 1 **No
NSCP abrupt changes
9 Topographic Factor 2015/ANSI/TIA- Kzt 1 in general
222-H topography, e.g.
flat or rolling
terrain
Horizontal Distance
ANSI/TIA-222-
10 from windward face to Xb 0.4 m
H
center of the structure
ANSI/TIA-222-
11 Parapet Height Hp 0 m
H
Parapet Height + ANSI/TIA-222-
12 H1 0.08 m
(Xb/5) H
Width of the windward ANSI/TIA-222- 6.5
13 Ws m
face of the building H
Height of the windward ANSI/TIA-222- 19
14 Hs m
of the building H
ANSI/TIA-222- 5.485
15 Height above roof Zr m
H
16 H2 6.5 m
Lesser of Hs or Ws H
17 - - Ws/Hs 0.342105263 -
Rooftop wind speed-up ANSI/TIA-222-
18 Ks 1 - Zr < H1
factor from Hs to H1 H
19 Ks 1.102631579 - H1 < Zr </= H2
factor from H1 to H2 H
20 Ks 1 - Zr > H2
factor for >H2 to Zr H
1.0 Shall be
NSCP
permitted for
21 Ground elevation factor 2015/ANSI/TIA- Ke 1
any ground
222-H
elevation
22 Gust effect factor NSCP 2015 Gh 0.85
ANSI/TIA-222-
23 Velocity Pressure qz 17.40834914 N/sq.m.
H
Sumation of the
Projected Areas of flat ANSI/TIA-222-
24 ∑Af 0.2667
components of the H
mounting frame
Summation of the
Projected Area of ANSI/TIA-222-
25 ∑Ar 0
round components of H
the mounting frame
Gross area of the frame
as if it were solid
defined by the largest ANSI/TIA-222-
26 Ag 0.2667 sq.m. One face only
outside dimensions of H
the elements included
in Af and Ar
Solidity ratio of
NSCP
mounting frame (Af+Ar)/Ag of
27 2015/ANSI/TIA- ε 1 -
without antennas and one face
222-H
mounting pipes
28 Shielding Factor Ka 1 -
Relative angle between
azimuth associated
with the normal face of ANSI/TIA-222-
29 θ 0 degrees
the H (Figure 2-6)
appurtenances/framing
and the wind direction
For square and
triangular truss
mounting frames
(refer to Figure
ANSI/TIA-222-
Force coefficient for a 2-7), Cas shall be
30 H (Section Cas 2.0008 -
mounting frame equal to Cf in
2.6.11.2.2)
accordance with
2.6.11.1
(ANSI/TIA-222-
H)
Geometric type of ANSI/TIA-222-
31 Rrf 1
mounting frame H
Effective projected area
ANSI/TIA-222-
32 of the frame (Mounting (EPA)MN 0.53361336
H
Frame)
Projected area of flat
components supporting ANSI/TIA-222-
33 Afs -
the mounting frame H
without regard to
shielding or
overlapping members.
Projected area of round

components supporting
the mounting frame ANSI/TIA-222-
34 Ars -
without regard to H
shielding or
overlapping members
in a plane parallel to
the face of the ANSI/TIA-222-
35 (EPA)FN 0.0804672
mounting frame of all H
members supporting
mounting frame
It shall be
Effective projected area permissible to
associated with the use the larger
ANSI/TIA-222-
36 windward face normal (EPA)N 0.61408056 value of (EPA)N
H
to the azimuth of the or (EPA)T for
appurtenance (EPA)A for all
wind directions
The effective projected
area in a plane
transverse to the face of
the mounting frame of
a frame/truss ANSI/TIA-222-
37 (EPA)FT 0.0402336
supporting the H
mounting frame (the
larger frame/truss when
more than one is
present)
area in a plane
tranverse to the face of
the mounting frame of ANSI/TIA-222-
38 Σ(EPA)Fti 0.0402336
any additional H
frames/trusses
supporting the
mounting frame
area, in a plane
transverse to the face of
the mounting frame, of
all mounting frame
members and all other
miscellaneous suppport
ANSI/TIA-222-
39 members (i.e. tiebacks) Σ(EPA)MT 0.4809744
H
without regard to
shielding or
overlapping members
determined using a
drag factor 2.0 appied
to flat members and a
drag factor of 1.2
applied to round
members
associated with the
windward side face of ANSI/TIA-222-
40 (EPA)T 0.3008376
the H
appurtenance/mounting
frame
Effective projected area ANSI/TIA-222-
41 (EPA)A 0.91491816
of the mounting frames H
ANSI/TIA-222-
42 Design wind pressure P 14.79709677 N/sq.m.
H
ANSI/TIA-222-
43 Design wind force FA 0.013538133 kN
H
II.III. PARAMETER FOR WIND ANALYSIS (FOR
ANTENNAS/APPURTENANCES)
Figure 3. Wind direction on Appurtenances/Antennas.

Design Wind Force on Appurtenances
Governing
structural
Number Description Constant Values Units Remarks
code
provisions
Tubular pole
structures
supporting
exposed
Wind Directionality
2 NSCP 2015 Kd 0.95 - appurtenances
Factor
and for the
strength
design of
appurtenances.
NSCP
3 Exposure Category 2015/ANSI/TIA- - C -
222-H
Nominal height of NSCP
Needs
4 atmospheric boundary 2015/ANSI/TIA- Zg 274 m
clarification
layer 222-H
3-second gust wind NSCP
5 speed power law 2015/ANSI/TIA- α' 9.5 -
exponent 222-H
Needs
clarification
Height above ground NSCP
especially if
6 level at the base of the 2015/ANSI/TIA- Z 21 m
the structure is
structure 222-H
located at the
roofdeck
Minimum value for
7 Velocity Pressure NSCP 2015 Kzmin 0.85 -
Coefficient
Velocity Pressure
8 NSCP 2015 Kz 1.170435187 -
Coefficient
Method 1.
Category 1
**No abrupt
NSCP
changes in
9 Topographic Factor 2015/ANSI/TIA- Kzt 1
general
222-H
topography,
e.g. flat or
rolling terrain
Horizontal Distance
ANSI/TIA-222-
10 from windward face to Xb 0.4 m
H
center of the structure
ANSI/TIA-222-
Parapet Height Hp 0 m
H
11 H1 0.08 m
(Xb/5) H
Width of the
ANSI/TIA-222-
12 windward face of the Ws 6.5 m
H
building
Height of the
ANSI/TIA-222-
13 windward of the Hs 19 m
H
building
Measured at
ANSI/TIA-222- the centerline
14 Height above roof Zr 2 m
H of the
Appurtenance
15 H2 6.5 m
Lesser of Hs or Ws H
16 - - Ws/Hs 0.342105263 -
Rooftop wind speed-
ANSI/TIA-222-
17 up factor from Hs to Ks 1 - Zr < H1
H
H1
Rooftop wind speed-
ANSI/TIA-222- H1 < Zr </=
18 up factor from H1 to Ks 1.102631579 -
H H2
H2
Rooftop wind speed-
ANSI/TIA-222-
19 up factor for >H2 to Ks 1 - Zr > H2
H
Zr
1.0 Shall be
NSCP
Ground elevation permitted for
20 2015/ANSI/TIA- Ke 1
factor any ground
222-H
elevation
The horizontal
dessign wind
force for the
strength
design of
appurtenances
and their
connections to
supporting
structures shall
be determined
using a gust
21 Gust effect factor NSCP 2015 Gh 1
factor of 1.0
and a wind
direction
probability
factor
determined
from Table 2-
2. No
shielding from
the structure
shall be
considered.
ANSI/TIA-222-
21 Velocity Pressure qz 0 N/sq.m. Zr < H1
H
ANSI/TIA-222- H1 < Zr </=
22 Velocity Pressure qz 16.85464161 N/sq.m.
H H2
ANSI/TIA-222-
22 Velocity Pressure qz 0 N/sq.m. Zr > H2
H
Use 1.0 for
antennas and
antenna
mounting
ANSI/TIA-222-
23 Shielding Factor Ka - - pipes under
H
transitional or
supercritical
flow
conditions.
Relative angle
between azimuth
associated with the ANSI/TIA-222-
23 θ - degrees -
normal face of the H (Figure 2-6)
appurtenances/framing
and the wind direction
Equivalent flat
plate areas
based on
revision C of
this standard
shall be
multiplied by
a force
coefficient,
ANSI/TIA-222- Ca, equal to
24 Force Coefficient Ca - -
H (Table 2-9) 2.0 except
when the
appurtenance
is made up of
round
members only,
a force
coefficient of
1.8 may be
applied.
The effective
projected area
of a mounting
pipe above
and below the
shielded
Projected area of a portion of the
component of the mounting pipe
appurtenance. The in accordance
additional projected with 2.6.11.4
24 area of ice shall be - Aa - - shall be
considered as a round inclued in the
component for loading term
combinations that Σ(CaAa)N
include ice. with Ca equal
to 1.0. The
effective
projected area
of the entire
mounting pipe
shall be
included in the
term
Σ(CaAa)T
with Ca
determined
from Table 2-
9.
ANSI/TIA-222-
25 Design wind force Fst - N
H
II.IV. LOAD COMPUTATION
Figure 4. Actual picture of the Bi-pod pole tower located at the roof deck of the residential building (Dated: MM/DD/YR 06/08/2023)
II.IV.I. Dead Load
Density of steel = 7850 kg/m3 → The software used has its own way to compute the
weight of the structure by simply clicking self-weight on the design analysis. However,
this is the density of steel used multiplied to the volume of the structural elements used.
DEAD LOAD
Length of
Pole
Weight Staad the Pin Start End
Pole No. Description Units Remarks Units Remarks length
(kG) inputs Connection (m) (m)
(m)
(m)
TOP
34.78 - - 0.3411918 kN - 0.825 - 0 0
SUPPORT
BOTTOM
31.68 - - 0.3107808 kN - 1.35 - 0.4895 0
SUPPORT
ASI4517R3v06
(CLAMPS 52.8 1 - - - - - 1.273 - -
INCLUDED)
DOWNTILT 3.1 1 - - - - - - - -
P1 WIRINGS 10.56 - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - -
TOP
32.9 - - 0.322749 kN - 1.35 - - -
SUPPORT
- - - - - - - - - - -
RRU 3268 25 1 - - - - - - - -
CLAMPS 2.9 1 - - - - - - - -
WIRINGS 5 - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - -
TOP
34.78 - - 0.3411918 kN - 0.825 - 0 0
SUPPORT
BOTTOM
31.68 - - 0.3107808 kN - 1.35 - 0.4895 0
SUPPORT
ASI4517R3v06
(CLAMPS 52.8 1 - - - - - 1.273 - -
INCLUDED)
DOWNTILT 3.1 1 - - - - - - - -
WIRINGS 10.56 - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - -
TOP
35.4 - - 0.347274 kN - 1.35 - 1.0725 0
SUPPORT
BOTTOM
32.3 - - 0.316863 kN - 1.35 - 0.2775 0
SUPPORT
AAU 5613 45 1 - - - - - 0.795 - -
DOWNTILT 3.1 1 - - - - - - - -
P2 CLAMPS 5.3 2 - - - - - - - -
WIRINGS 9 - - - - - - - - -
TOP
32.9 - - 0.322749 kN - 1.35 - 0.55 -
SUPPORT
- - - - - - - - - - -
RRU 5502 25 1 - - - - - - - -
CLAMPS 2.9 1 - - - - - - - -
WIRINGS 5 - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - -
TOP
32.9 - - 0.322749 kN - 1.35 - - -
SUPPORT
- - - - - - - - - - -
RRU 3268 25 1 - - - - - - - -
CLAMPS 2.9 1 - - - - - - - -
WIRINGS 5 - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - -
TOP
34.78 - - 0.3411918 kN - 0.825 - 0 0
SUPPORT
BOTTOM
31.68 - - 0.3107808 kN - 1.35 - 0.4895 0
SUPPORT
ASI4517R3v06
P3 (CLAMPS 52.8 1 - - - - - 1.273 - -
INCLUDED)
DOWNTILT 3.1 1 - - - - - - - -
WIRINGS 10.56 - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - -
TOP
32.9 - - 0.322749 kN - 1.35 - - -
SUPPORT
- - - - - - - - - - -
RRU 3268 25 1 - - - - - - - -
CLAMPS 2.9 1 - - - - - - - -
WIRINGS 5 - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - -
TOP
24.6 - - 0.241326 kN - 0.6 - 0.1 0
SUPPORT
BOTTOM
21.5 - - 0.210915 kN - 1.8 - 1.105 0
SUPPORT
AAU5639W
27 1 - - - - - 0.795 - -
(3700 MHZ)
DOWNTILT 3.1 1 - - - - - - - -
CLAMPS 5.3 2 - - - - - - - -
P4 WIRINGS 5.4 - - - - - - - - -
TOP
32.9 - - 0.322749 kN - 0.6 - 0.4 -
SUPPORT
- - - - - - - - - - -
RRU 5502 25 1 - - - - - - - -
CLAMPS 2.9 1 - - - - - - - -
WIRINGS 5 - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - -
TOP
24.6 - - 0.241326 kN - 0.6 - 0.1 0
SUPPORT
BOTTOM
21.5 - - 0.210915 kN - 1.8 - 1.105 0
SUPPORT
AAU5639W
27 1 - - - - - 0.795 - -
(3700 MHZ)
DOWNTILT 3.1 1 - - - - - - - -
CLAMPS 5.3 2 - - - - - - - -
P5 WIRINGS 5.4 - - - - - - - - -
TOP
32.9 - - 0.322749 kN - 0.6 - 0.4 -
SUPPORT
- - - - - - - - - - -
RRU 5502 25 1 - - - - - - - -
CLAMPS 2.9 1 - - - - - - - -
WIRINGS 5 - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - -
TOP
24.6 - - 0.241326 kN - 0.6 - 0.1 0
SUPPORT
BOTTOM
21.5 - - 0.210915 kN - 1.8 - 1.105 0
SUPPORT
P6 AAU5639W
27 1 - - - - - 0.795 - -
(3700 MHZ)
DOWNTILT 3.1 1 - - - - - - - -
CLAMPS 5.3 2 - - - - - - - -
WIRINGS 5.4 - - - - - - - - -
TOP
32.9 - - 0.322749 kN - - - - -
SUPPORT
- - - - - - - - - - -
RRU 3959 25 1 - - - - - - - -
CLAMPS 2.9 1 - - - - - - - -
WIRINGS 5 - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - -
HP1
TOP
32.9 - - 0.322749 kN - - - - -
SUPPORT
- - - - - - - - - - -
RRU 3959 25 1 - - - - - - - -
CLAMPS 2.9 1 - - - - - - - -
WIRINGS 5 - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - -
TOP
32.9 - - 0.322749 kN - - - - -
HP2 SUPPORT
- - - - - - - - - - -
RRU 3959 25 1 - - - - - - - -
CLAMPS 2.9 1 - - - - - - - -
WIRINGS 5 - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - -
MAIN POLE
JOINT NODAL 20 - - 0.1962 kN NODAL - - - -
CONNECTION
POLE TO
POLE JOINT NODAL 5 - - 0.04905 kN NODAL - - - -
CONNECTION
CABLE MEMBER LINE
20 - - 0.1962 Kn/m - - - -
LADDER LOAD LOAD
II.IV. II. LOAD COMBINATIONS
1. 1.4DL
2. 1.2DL + 1.0 WL (+X)
3. 1.2DL + 1.0 WL (-X)
4. 1.2DL + 1.0 WL (+Z)
5. 1.2DL + 1.0 WL (-X)
Where:
DL = Dead Loads
WL = Wind Loads
III. OUTPUTS
In this part of the analysis report, values obtained from running the analysis from
Staad Pro connect edition 6 V22, would be provided and indication whether each
concerned structural steel framing element would be adequate for its intended purpose.
Loads combination, consideration for base support, resisting factor such as releases for
end supports of each steel element, would also be shown for the reader to check the
correctness of the analysis. Aside from providing adequacy checks, Staad Pro connect
edition 6 V22 provided the base reaction of the concerned Bi-pod pole tower setup and
is imported to another structural software for design checking of the base support
element such as base plate, anchor bolts, base plate, stiffener plate, and other adequacy
checking for concrete previously mention (HILTI PROFIS ENGINEER). The
purpose of the multiplier is to transpose the sign convention to change the direction of
the loading reaction.
Figure 5. Shown above is the three-dimensional axis for modeling in STAAD PRO connect
V6. This is important to show the face/s of the whole structure.
Figure 6. Shown above is the three-dimensional (3d) orientation used for HILTI Profis.
Job No Sheet No Rev
1
Software licensed to only @ ::LAVTeam:: (R) Part
CONNECTED User: User is not logged in to CONNECTION Client.
Job Title Ref
By Date17-Nov-23 Chd
Client File Date/Time 24-Nov-2023 15:53

6-M. BI-POD POLE TOWER.STD
3D Rendered View
Job Information
Engineer Checked Approved
Name:
Date: 17-Nov-23
Project ID
Project Name
Structure Type SPACE FRAME
Number of Nodes 36 Highest Node 47

Number of Elements 44 Highest Beam 54
Number of Basic Load Cases 18

Number of Combination Load Cases 5
Included in this printout are data for:

All The Whole Structure
Print Time/Date: 24/11/2023 15:59 STAAD.Pro CONNECT Edition 22.06.00.138 Print Run 1 of 8
Job No Sheet No Rev
2
Job Title Ref

Job Information Cont...

Included in this printout are results for load cases:
Type L/C Name
Primary 1 DL
Primary 2 WL - FACE 1
Combination 6 1.4DL
Combination 7 1.2DL+1.0WL(+X)
Combination 8 1.2DL+1.0WL(-X)
Combination 9 1.2DL+1.0WL(+Z)
Combination 10 1.2DL+1.0WL(-Z)
Beams
Beam Node A Node B Length Property 
(m) (degrees)
1 1 11 2.000 1 0
2 11 34 0.400 1 0
3 8 16 1.350 1 0
12 16 2 0.150 1 0
13 8 17 0.600 4 0
14 16 18 0.600 4 0
15 8 19 0.600 4 0
16 16 20 0.600 4 0
17 8 21 0.600 4 0
18 16 22 0.600 4 0
19 17 18 1.350 4 0
20 21 22 1.350 4 0
21 19 20 1.350 4 0
22 18 23 0.825 4 0
23 20 24 0.825 4 0
24 22 25 0.825 4 0
26 27 19 0.825 4 0
27 28 21 0.825 4 0
28 29 35 0.200 1 0
29 9 32 2.074 2 0
30 10 33 2.074 2 0
31 11 32 0.550 3 0
32 11 33 0.550 3 0
33 32 29 2.074 2 0
34 33 29 2.074 2 0
35 33 32 0.778 3 0
36 34 29 1.600 1 0
37 35 8 0.300 1 0
Job No Sheet No Rev
3
Job Title Ref

Beams Cont...
Beam Node A Node B Length Property 
(m) (degrees)
38 34 36 0.600 5 0
40 35 37 0.600 5 0
41 26 17 0.825 4 0
42 36 37 1.800 4 0
43 37 38 0.600 4 0
44 39 36 0.600 4 0
45 34 40 0.600 5 0
46 35 41 0.600 5 0
47 40 41 1.800 4 0
48 41 42 0.600 4 0
49 43 40 0.600 4 0
50 34 44 0.600 5 0
51 35 45 0.600 5 0
52 44 45 1.800 4 0
53 45 46 0.600 4 0
54 47 44 0.600 4 0
Section Properties
Prop Section Area Iyy Izz J Material
(m2) (in4) (in4) (in4)
1 PIPS60 0.003 26.500 26.500 52.924 STEEL_36_KSI
2 Round 0.1X0.1X0.0 0.003 4.283 4.283 8.566 STEEL
3 PIPS15 0.000 0.293 0.293 0.586 STEEL_36_KSI
4 PIPS30 0.001 2.850 2.850 5.689 STEEL_36_KSI
5 250CU150-27 0.000 0.037 0.181 0 STEEL_36_KSI
Materials
Mat Name E  Density 
(kN/mm2) (kg/m3) (/°C)
1 STEEL 205.000 0.300 7.83E+3 12E -6
2 CONCRETE 21.718 0.170 2.4E+3 10E -6
3 ALUMINUM 68.948 0.330 2.71E+3 23E -6
4 STAINLESSSTEEL 197.930 0.300 7.83E+3 18E -6
5 STEEL_36_KSI 199.948 0.300 7.83E+3 11.7E -6
6 STEEL_50_KSI 199.948 0.300 7.83E+3 11.7E -6
7 STEEL_275_NMM2 205.000 0.300 7.85E+3 12E -6
8 STEEL_355_NMM2 205.000 0.300 7.85E+3 12E -6
Job No Sheet No Rev
4
Job Title Ref

Supports
Node X Y Z rX rY rZ
(kN/mm) (kN/mm) (kN/mm) (kN-m/deg) (kN-m/deg) (kN-m/deg)
1 Fixed Fixed Fixed Fixed Fixed Fixed
9 Fixed Fixed Fixed - - -
10 Fixed Fixed Fixed - - -
Y
X
Z
Load 5
Whole Structure
Releases
Beam ends not shown in this table are fixed in all directions.
Beam Node x y z rx ry rz
13 8 Fixed Fixed Fixed Fixed Fixed Fixed

Job No Sheet No Rev
5
Job Title Ref

Releases Cont...
Beam Node x y z rx ry rz

Reference Load Cases

Number Name Type
R1 DL (APPURTENANCES) Dead
R2 WL - FACE 1 - MAINPOLE Wind
R6 WL - FACE 1 - MOUNTINGFRAME Wind
R10 WL - FACE 1 - APPURTENANCES Wind
Primary Load Cases

Number Name Type
1 DL Dead
2 WL - FACE 1 Wind
3 WL - FACE 2 Wind
4 WL - FACE 3 Wind
5 WL - FACE 4 Wind
Job No Sheet No Rev
6
Job Title Ref

Combination Load Cases

Comb. Combination L/C Name Primary Primary L/C Name Factor
6 1.4DL 1 DL 1.40
7 1.2DL+1.0WL(+X) 1 DL 1.20
2 WL - FACE 1 1.00
8 1.2DL+1.0WL(-X) 1 DL 1.20
3 WL - FACE 2 1.00
9 1.2DL+1.0WL(+Z) 1 DL 1.20
4 WL - FACE 3 1.00
10 1.2DL+1.0WL(-Z) 1 DL 1.20
5 WL - FACE 4 1.00
Reactions
Horizontal Vertical Horizontal Moment
Node L/C FX FY FZ MX MY MZ
(kN) (kN) (kN) (kN-m) (kN-m) (kN-m)
1 1:DL -0.124 4.477 -0.056 -0.079 -0.000 0.164
2:WL - FACE 1 0.026 0.520 -0.021 -0.027 -0.008 -0.031
3:WL - FACE 2 0.000 0.761 0.019 0.021 0.011 0.002
4:WL - FACE 3 -0.023 -0.454 0.014 0.019 0.007 0.028
5:WL - FACE 4 0.014 -0.481 -0.022 -0.027 0.009 -0.020
6:1.4DL -0.174 6.268 -0.079 -0.111 -0.000 0.229
7:1.2DL+1.0WL(+X) -0.123 5.893 -0.088 -0.122 -0.008 0.165
8:1.2DL+1.0WL(-X) -0.149 6.134 -0.049 -0.074 0.010 0.198
9:1.2DL+1.0WL(+Z) -0.173 4.919 -0.054 -0.076 0.007 0.224
10:1.2DL+1.0WL(-Z) -0.135 4.891 -0.090 -0.122 0.009 0.176
9 1:DL -0.002 0.363 0.058 0 0 0
2:WL - FACE 1 0.001 0.101 0.026 0 0 0
3:WL - FACE 2 0.001 -0.590 -0.160 0 0 0
4:WL - FACE 3 0.001 -0.118 -0.032 0 0 0
5:WL - FACE 4 -0.002 0.600 0.162 0 0 0
6:1.4DL -0.003 0.508 0.081804 0 0 0
7:1.2DL+1.0WL(+X) -0.002 0.537 0.096 0 0 0
8:1.2DL+1.0WL(-X) -0.002 -0.155 -0.090 0 0 0
9:1.2DL+1.0WL(+Z) -0.002 0.317 0.038 0 0 0
10:1.2DL+1.0WL(-Z) -0.005 1.036 0.232 0 0 0
10 1:DL 0.127 0.631 -0.002 0 0 0
2:WL - FACE 1 -0.168 -0.622 0.000 0 0 0
3:WL - FACE 2 -0.047 -0.171 0.001 0 0 0
4:WL - FACE 3 0.154 0.572 -0.002 0 0 0
5:WL - FACE 4 -0.032 -0.119 0.001 0 0 0
6:1.4DL 0.178 0.883 -0.003 0 0 0
7:1.2DL+1.0WL(+X) -0.016 0.135 -0.002 0 0 0
8:1.2DL+1.0WL(-X) 0.106 0.586 -0.001 0 0 0
9:1.2DL+1.0WL(+Z) 0.306 1.329 -0.005 0 0 0
Job No Sheet No Rev
7
Job Title Ref

Reactions Cont...
10:1.2DL+1.0WL(-Z) 0.120 0.638 -0.002 0 0 0
Reaction Summary
Max FX 10 9:1.2DL+1.0WL(+Z) 0.306 1.329 -0.005 0 0 0
Min FX 1 6:1.4DL -0.174 6.268 -0.079 -0.111 -0.000 0.229
Max FY 1 6:1.4DL -0.174 6.268 -0.079 -0.111 -0.000 0.229
Min FY 10 2:WL - FACE 1 -0.168 -0.622 0.000 0 0 0
Max FZ 9 10:1.2DL+1.0WL(-Z) -0.005 1.036 0.232 0 0 0
Min FZ 9 3:WL - FACE 2 0.001 -0.590 -0.160 0 0 0
Max MX 1 3:WL - FACE 2 0.000 0.761 0.019 0.021 0.011 0.002
Min MX 1 7:1.2DL+1.0WL(+X) -0.123 5.893 -0.088 -0.122 -0.008 0.165
Max MY 1 3:WL - FACE 2 0.000 0.761 0.019 0.021 0.011 0.002
Min MY 1 7:1.2DL+1.0WL(+X) -0.123 5.893 -0.088 -0.122 -0.008 0.165
Max MZ 1 6:1.4DL -0.174 6.268 -0.079 -0.111 -0.000 0.229
Min MZ 1 2:WL - FACE 1 0.026 0.520 -0.021 -0.027 -0.008 -0.031
Utilization Ratio
Beam Analysis Design Actual Allowable Ratio Clause L/C Ax Iz Iy Ix
Property Property Ratio Ratio (Act./Allow.) (m2) (in4) (in4) (in4)
1 PIPS60 PIPS60 0.013 1.000 0.013 Eq.H1-1b 6 0.003 26.500 26.500 53.001
2 PIPS60 PIPS60 0.008 1.000 0.008 Eq.H1-1b 6 0.003 26.500 26.500 53.001
3 PIPS60 PIPS60 0.006 1.000 0.006 Eq.H1-1b 9 0.003 26.500 26.500 53.001
12 PIPS60 PIPS60 0.000 1.000 0.000 Cl.E3 6 0.003 26.500 26.500 53.001
13 PIPS30 PIPS30 0.011 1.000 0.011 Eq.H1-1b 6 0.001 2.850 2.850 5.700
14 PIPS30 PIPS30 0.011 1.000 0.011 Eq.H1-1b 6 0.001 2.850 2.850 5.700
15 PIPS30 PIPS30 0.011 1.000 0.011 Eq.H1-1b 6 0.001 2.850 2.850 5.700
16 PIPS30 PIPS30 0.011 1.000 0.011 Eq.H1-1b 6 0.001 2.850 2.850 5.700
17 PIPS30 PIPS30 0.011 1.000 0.011 Eq.H1-1b 6 0.001 2.850 2.850 5.700
18 PIPS30 PIPS30 0.011 1.000 0.011 Eq.H1-1b 8 0.001 2.850 2.850 5.700
19 PIPS30 PIPS30 0.009 1.000 0.009 Eq.H1-1b 6 0.001 2.850 2.850 5.700
20 PIPS30 PIPS30 0.012 1.000 0.012 Eq.H1-1b 6 0.001 2.850 2.850 5.700
21 PIPS30 PIPS30 0.009 1.000 0.009 Eq.H1-1b 6 0.001 2.850 2.850 5.700
22 PIPS30 PIPS30 0.001 1.000 0.001 Eq.H1-1b 7 0.001 2.850 2.850 5.700
23 PIPS30 PIPS30 0.001 1.000 0.001 Eq.H1-1b 10 0.001 2.850 2.850 5.700
24 PIPS30 PIPS30 0.001 1.000 0.001 Eq.H1-1b 7 0.001 2.850 2.850 5.700
26 PIPS30 PIPS30 0.000 1.000 0.000 Cl.D2 6 0.001 2.850 2.850 5.700
27 PIPS30 PIPS30 0.000 1.000 0.000 Cl.D2 6 0.001 2.850 2.850 5.700
28 PIPS60 PIPS60 0.010 1.000 0.010 Eq.H1-1b 9 0.003 26.500 26.500 53.001
Job No Sheet No Rev
8
Job Title Ref

Utilization Ratio Cont...

Beam Analysis Design Actual Allowable Ratio Clause L/C Ax Iz Iy Ix
Property Property Ratio Ratio (Act./Allow.) (m2) (in4) (in4) (in4)
29 Round 0.1X0.1X0.0
Round 0.1X0.1X0.0
0.004 1.000 0.004 Eq.H1-1b 8 0.003 4.283 4.283 8.566
30 Round 0.1X0.1X0.0
Round 0.1X0.1X0.0
0.004 1.000 0.004 Eq.H1-1b 9 0.003 4.283 4.283 8.566
31 PIPS15 PIPS15 0.002 1.000 0.002 Eq.H1-1b 6 0.000 0.293 0.293 0.586
32 PIPS15 PIPS15 0.002 1.000 0.002 Eq.H1-1b 6 0.000 0.293 0.293 0.586
33 Round 0.1X0.1X0.0
Round 0.1X0.1X0.0
0.004 1.000 0.004 Eq.H1-1b 8 0.003 4.283 4.283 8.566
34 Round 0.1X0.1X0.0
Round 0.1X0.1X0.0
0.003 1.000 0.003 Eq.H1-1b 9 0.003 4.283 4.283 8.566
35 PIPS15 PIPS15 0.003 1.000 0.003 Eq.H1-1b 6 0.000 0.293 0.293 0.586
36 PIPS60 PIPS60 0.011 1.000 0.011 Eq.H1-1b 9 0.003 26.500 26.500 53.001
37 PIPS60 PIPS60 0.009 1.000 0.009 Eq.H1-1b 9 0.003 26.500 26.500 53.001
38 250CU150-27 250CU150-27 0.553 1.000 0.553 Eq. H1.2-1 6 0.000 0.181 0.037 0.000
40 250CU150-27 250CU150-27 0.521 1.000 0.521 Eq. H1.2-1 6 0.000 0.181 0.037 0.000
41 PIPS30 PIPS30 0.000 1.000 0.000 Cl.D2 6 0.001 2.850 2.850 5.700
42 PIPS30 PIPS30 0.010153 1.000 0.010153 Eq.H1-1b 6 0.001 2.850 2.850 5.700
43 PIPS30 PIPS30 0.000 1.000 0.000 Cl.E3 6 0.001 2.850 2.850 5.700
44 PIPS30 PIPS30 0.000 1.000 0.000 Cl.D2 6 0.001 2.850 2.850 5.700
45 250CU150-27 250CU150-27 0.544 1.000 0.544 Eq. H1.2-1 6 0.000 0.181 0.037 0.000
46 250CU150-27 250CU150-27 0.546 1.000 0.546 Eq. H1.2-1 6 0.000 0.181 0.037 0.000
47 PIPS30 PIPS30 0.010 1.000 0.010 Eq.H1-1b 6 0.001 2.850 2.850 5.700
48 PIPS30 PIPS30 0.000 1.000 0.000 Eq.H1-1b 8 0.001 2.850 2.850 5.700
49 PIPS30 PIPS30 0.000 1.000 0.000 Cl.D2 6 0.001 2.850 2.850 5.700
50 250CU150-27 250CU150-27 0.485 1.000 0.485 Eq. H1.2-1 6 0.000 0.181 0.037 0.000
51 250CU150-27 250CU150-27 0.643 1.000 0.643 Eq. H1.2-1 7 0.000 0.181 0.037 0.000
52 PIPS30 PIPS30 0.008 1.000 0.008 Eq.H1-1b 6 0.001 2.850 2.850 5.700
53 PIPS30 PIPS30 0.000 1.000 0.000 Eq.H1-1b 8 0.001 2.850 2.850 5.700
54 PIPS30 PIPS30 0.000 1.000 0.000 Cl.D2 6 0.001 2.850 2.850 5.700
Failed Members
There is no data of this type.
Hilti PROFIS Engineering 3.0.89
www.hilti.com.ph
Company: Power Acts Network Inc. Page: 1
Address: Upper Ground 6 Cityland Herrera Towers, V.A. Rufin Specifier: Aldrin Jonas
Phone I Fax: 09175602146 | E-Mail: ajdeduarte.poweracts@gmail.com
Design: Concrete - Nov 27, 2023 Date: 11/27/2023
Fastening point:
Specifier's comments:
1 Anchor Design
1.1 Input data
Anchor type and diameter: HIT-RE 100 + HIT-V-F (5.8) M16

Item number: 409560 HIT-V-F-5.8 M16x150 (element) / 2123386
HIT-RE 100 (adhesive)
Effective embedment depth: hef,opti = 8.00 cm (hef,limit = 25.40 cm)
Material: 5.8
Evaluation Service Report: ESR-3829
Issued I Valid: 2/1/2023 | 4/1/2024
Proof: Design Method ACI 318-19 / Chem
Stand-off installation: eb = 0.00 cm (no stand-off); t = 2.00 cm
Anchor plate
CBFEM
: lx x ly x t = 30.00 cm x 30.00 cm x 2.00 cm;
Profile: Round HSS (AISC), ; (L x W x T) = 16.84 cm x 16.84 cm x 0.66 cm

Base material: cracked concrete, 2500, fc' = 2,500 psi; h = 29.00 cm, Temp. short/long: 40/24 °C
Installation: hammer drilled hole, Installation condition: Dry
Reinforcement: tension: not present, shear: not present; no supplemental splitting reinforcement present
edge reinforcement: none or < No. 4 bar
CBFEM
- The anchor calculation is based on a component-based Finite Element Method (CBFEM)
Geometry [cm] & Loading [kN, kNm]
Input data and results must be checked for conformity with the existing conditions and for plausibility!
PROFIS Engineering ( c ) 2003-2023 Hilti AG, FL-9494 Schaan Hilti is a registered Trademark of Hilti AG, Schaan
1
www.hilti.com.ph
Fastening point:
1.1.1 Load combination and design results

Case Description Forces [kN] / Moments [kNm] Seismic Max. Util. Anchor [%]
1 DL N = 0.056; Vx = 0.124; Vy = 0.056; no 10
Mx = 0.079; My = -0.164; Mz = 0.000;
Nsus = 0.000; Mx,sus = 0.000; My,sus = 0.000;
2 WL - FACE 1 N = 0.023; Vx = -0.023; Vy = 0.023; no 3

Mx = 0.030; My = 0.028; Mz = 0.012;
Nsus = 0.000; Mx,sus = 0.000; My,sus = 0.000;
3 WL - FACE 2 N = -0.017; Vx = 0.021; Vy = -0.017; no 2

Mx = -0.020; My = -0.027; Mz = 0.009;
Nsus = 0.000; Mx,sus = 0.000; My,sus = 0.000;
4 WL - FACE 3 N = -0.013; Vx = 0.020; Vy = -0.013; no 2

Mx = -0.018; My = -0.025; Mz = -0.012;
Nsus = 0.000; Mx,sus = 0.000; My,sus = 0.000;
5 WL - FACE 4 N = 0.018; Vx = -0.014; Vy = 0.018; no 2

Mx = 0.022; My = 0.019; Mz = -0.006;
Nsus = 0.000; Mx,sus = 0.000; My,sus = 0.000;
6 1.4DL N = 0.079; Vx = 0.174; Vy = 0.079; no 13

Mx = 0.111; My = -0.229; Mz = 0.000;
Nsus = 0.000; Mx,sus = 0.000; My,sus = 0.000;
7 1.2DL+1.0WL(+X) N = 0.090; Vx = 0.126; Vy = 0.090; no 12

Mx = 0.125; My = -0.169; Mz = 0.012;
Nsus = 0.000; Mx,sus = 0.000; My,sus = 0.000;
8 1.2DL+1.0WL(-X) N = 0.055; Vx = 0.169; Vy = 0.055; no 14

Mx = 0.077; My = -0.221; Mz = -0.012;
Nsus = 0.000; Mx,sus = 0.000; My,sus = 0.000;
9 1.2DL+1.0WL(+Z) N = 0.051; Vx = 0.170; Vy = 0.051; no 14

Mx = 0.075; My = -0.223; Mz = 0.010;
Nsus = 0.000; Mx,sus = 0.000; My,sus = 0.000;
10 1.2DL+1.0WL(-Z) N = 0.086; Vx = 0.136; Vy = 0.086; no 12

Mx = 0.117; My = -0.177; Mz = -0.006;
Nsus = 0.000; Mx,sus = 0.000; My,sus = 0.000;
2
www.hilti.com.ph
Fastening point:
1.2 Load case/Resulting anchor forces y

Controlling load case: 9 1.2DL+1.0WL(+Z)
3 4
Anchor reactions [kN]

Tension force: (+Tension, -Compression)
Anchor Tension force Shear force Shear force x Shear force y
1 0.000 0.056 0.056 -0.002 x
2 0.639 0.063 0.057 0.028
3 0.000 0.029 0.029 -0.001
4 0.991 0.038 0.028 0.025
1 2
resulting tension force in (x/y)=(0.00/0.00): 0.000 [kN]

resulting compression force in (x/y)=(0.00/0.00): 0.000 [kN]
Anchor forces are calculated based on a component-based Finite Element Method (CBFEM)
1.3 Tension load
Load Nua [kN] Capacity f Nn [kN] Utilization bN = Nua/f Nn Status

Steel Strength* 0.991 51.025 2 OK
Bond Strength** 1.629 12.505 14 OK
Sustained Tension Load Bond Strength* N/A N/A N/A N/A
Concrete Breakout Failure** 1.629 20.686 8 OK
* highest loaded anchor **anchor group (anchors in tension)
1.3.1 Steel Strength
Nsa = ESR value refer to ICC-ES ESR-3829

f Nsa ³ Nua ACI 318-19 Table 17.5.2
Variables
2 2
Ase,N [mm ] futa [N/mm ]
157 500.00
Calculations
Nsa [kN]
78.500
Results
Nsa [kN] f steel f Nsa [kN] Nua [kN]
78.500 0.650 51.025 0.991
3
www.hilti.com.ph
Fastening point:
1.3.2 Bond Strength
Nag = (AA ) y
Na
Na0
ec1,Na y ec2,Na y ed,Na y cp,Na Nba ACI 318-19 Eq. (17.6.5.1b)
f Nag ³ Nua ACI 318-19 Table 17.5.2
ANa see ACI 318-19, Section 17.6.5.1, Fig. R 17.6.5.1(b)
2
ANa0 = (2 cNa) ACI 318-19 Eq. (17.6.5.1.2a)
t uncr
cNa = 10 da √ 1100
ACI 318-19 Eq. (17.6.5.1.2b)
( )
1
'
y ec,Na = eN £ 1.0 ACI 318-19 Eq. (17.6.5.3.1)
1+
cNa
y ed,Na = 0.7 + 0.3 (cc ) £ 1.0 a,min
Na
ACI 318-19 Eq. (17.6.5.4.1b)
= MAX(
c ) £
c c a,min Na
y cp,Na , 1.0 ACI 318-19 Eq. (17.6.5.5.1b)
c ac ac
Nba = l a · t k,c · p · da · hef ACI 318-19 Eq. (17.6.5.2.1)
Variables
t k,c,uncr [N/mm ]
2
da [cm] hef [cm] ca,min [cm] aoverhead 2
t k,c [N/mm ]
8.30 1.60 8.00 18.00 1.000 4.10
ec1,N [cm] ec2,N [cm] cac [cm] la

0.00 1.95 10.87 1.000
Calculations
cNa [cm] ANa [mm ]
2
ANa0 [mm ]
2
y ed,Na
16.66 171,039 111,055 1.000
y ec1,Na y ec2,Na y cp,Na Nba [kN]

1.000 0.895 1.000 16.487
Results
Nag [kN] f bond f Nag [kN] Nua [kN]
22.737 0.550 12.505 1.629
4
www.hilti.com.ph
Fastening point:
1.3.3 Concrete Breakout Failure
Ncbg = (AA ) y
Nc
Nc0
ec,N y ed,N y c,N y cp,N Nb ACI 318-19 Eq. (17.6.2.1b)
f Ncbg ³ Nua ACI 318-19 Table 17.5.2
ANc see ACI 318-19, Section 17.6.2.1, Fig. R 17.6.2.1(b)
2
ANc0 = 9 hef ACI 318-19 Eq. (17.6.2.1.4)
( )
1
'
y ec,N = 2 eN £ 1.0 ACI 318-19 Eq. (17.6.2.3.1)
1+
3 hef
y ed,N = 0.7 + 0.3 (1.5h

c
) £ 1.0 a,min
ef
ACI 318-19 Eq. (17.6.2.4.1b)
= MAX(
c ) £
c 1.5h a,min ef
y cp,N , 1.0 ACI 318-19 Eq. (17.6.2.6.1b)
c ac ac
1.5
Nb = kc l a √ '
fc hef ACI 318-19 Eq. (17.6.2.2.1)
Variables
hef [cm] ec1,N [cm] ec2,N [cm] ca,min [cm] y c,N
8.00 0.00 1.95 18.00 1.000
'
cac [cm] kc la fc [psi]
10.87 17 1.000 2,500
Calculations
ANc [mm ]
2
ANc0 [mm ]
2
y ec1,N y ec2,N y ed,N y cp,N Nb [kN]
100,800 57,600 1.000 0.860 1.000 1.000 21.134
Results
Ncbg [kN] f concrete f Ncbg [kN] Nua [kN]
31.824 0.650 20.686 1.629
5
www.hilti.com.ph
Fastening point:
1.4 Shear load
Load Vua [kN] Capacity f Vn [kN] Utilization bV = Vua/f Vn Status

Steel failure (with lever arm)* N/A N/A N/A N/A
Pryout Strength (Bond Strength controls)** 0.177 37.694 1 OK
Concrete edge failure in direction x+** 0.178 18.346 1 OK
* highest loaded anchor **anchor group (relevant anchors)
Vsa = ESR value refer to ICC-ES ESR-3829

f Vsteel ³ Vua ACI 318-19 Table 17.5.2
Variables
2 2
Ase,V [mm ] futa [N/mm ]
157 500.00
Calculations
Vsa [kN]
47.000
Results
Vsa [kN] f steel f Vsa [kN] Vua [kN]
47.000 0.600 28.200 0.063
6
www.hilti.com.ph
Fastening point:
1.4.2 Pryout Strength (Bond Strength controls)
Vcpg =kcp [(AA ) y

Na
Na0
ec1,Na y ec2,Na y ed,Na y cp,Na Nba ] ACI 318-19 Eq. (17.7.3.1b)
f Vcpg ³ Vua ACI 318-19 Table 17.5.2
2
ANa0 = (2 cNa) ACI 318-19 Eq. (17.6.5.1.2a)
t uncr
cNa = 10 da √ 1100
ACI 318-19 Eq. (17.6.5.1.2b)
( )
1
'
y ec,Na = eN £ 1.0 ACI 318-19 Eq. (17.6.5.3.1)
1+
cNa
y ed,Na = 0.7 + 0.3 (cc ) £ 1.0 a,min
Na
ACI 318-19 Eq. (17.6.5.4.1b)
= MAX(
c ) £
c c a,min Na
y cp,Na , 1.0 ACI 318-19 Eq. (17.6.5.5.1b)
c ac ac
Variables
kcp aoverhead t k,c,uncr [N/mm ]
2
da [cm] hef [cm] ca,min [cm]
2
t k,c [N/mm ]
2 1.000 8.30 1.60 8.00 18.00 4.10

1.62 5.40 10.87 1.000
Calculations
cNa [cm] ANa [mm ]
2
ANa0 [mm ]
2
y ed,Na
16.66 263,424 111,055 1.000

0.911 0.755 1.000 16.487
Results
Vcpg [kN] f concrete f Vcpg [kN] Vua [kN]
53.848 0.700 37.694 0.177
7
www.hilti.com.ph
Fastening point:
1.4.3 Concrete edge failure in direction x+
Vcbg = (AA ) y
Vc
Vc0
ec,V y ed,V y c,V y h,V y parallel,V Vb ACI 318-19 Eq. (17.7.2.1b)
f Vcbg ³ Vua ACI 318-19 Table 17.5.2
AVc see ACI 318-19, Section 17.7.2.1, Fig. R 17.7.2.1(b)
2
AVc0 = 4.5 ca1 ACI 318-19 Eq. (17.7.2.1.3)
( )
1
'
y ec,V = ev £ 1.0 ACI 318-19 Eq. (17.7.2.3.1)
1+
1.5ca1
y ed,V = 0.7 + 0.3

ca2
1.5ca1 £ ( 1.0 ) ACI 318-19 Eq. (17.7.2.4.1b)
y h,V = √1.5ca1
h ³ 1.0
a
ACI 318-19 Eq. (17.7.2.6.1)
(7 (dl ) )l
0.2
Vb = e
√ da a √f'c c1.5
a1 ACI 318-19 Eq. (17.7.2.2.1a)
a
Variables
ca1 [cm] ca2 [cm] ecV [cm] y c,V ha [cm]
18.00 18.00 2.82 1.000 29.00
'
le [cm] la da [cm] fc [psi] y parallel,V
8.00 1.000 1.60 2,500 1.000
Calculations
AVc [mm ]
2
AVc0 [mm ]
2
y ec,V y ed,V y h,V Vb [kN]
145,800 145,800 0.905 0.900 1.000 32.162
Results
Vcbg [kN] f concrete f Vcbg [kN] Vua [kN]
26.209 0.700 18.346 0.178
1.5 Combined tension and shear loads, per ACI 318-19 section 17.8
bN bV z Utilization bN,V [%] Status

0.130 0.010 5/3 4 OK
z z
bNV = bN + bV <= 1
8
www.hilti.com.ph
Fastening point:
1.6 Warnings
• The anchor design methods in PROFIS Engineering require rigid anchor plates as per current regulations (ETAG 001/Annex C, EOTA TR029,
etc.). This means load re-distribution on the anchors due to elastic deformations of the anchor plate are not considered - the anchor plate is
assumed to be sufficiently stiff, in order not to be deformed when subjected to the design loading. PROFIS Engineering calculates the minimum
required anchor plate thickness with CBFEM to limit the stress of the anchor plate based on the assumptions explained above. The proof if the
rigid base plate assumption is valid is not carried out by PROFIS Engineering. Input data and results must be checked for agreement with the
existing conditions and for plausibility!
• Condition A applies where the potential concrete failure surfaces are crossed by supplementary reinforcement proportioned to tie the potential
concrete failure prism into the structural member. Condition B applies where such supplementary reinforcement is not provided, or where pullout
or pryout strength governs.
• Design Strengths of adhesive anchor systems are influenced by the cleaning method. Refer to the INSTRUCTIONS FOR USE given in the
Evaluation Service Report for cleaning and installation instructions.
• For additional information about ACI 318 strength design provisions, please go to https://submittals.us.hilti.com/PROFISAnchorDesignGuide/
• Installation of Hilti adhesive anchor systems shall be performed by personnel trained to install Hilti adhesive anchors. Reference ACI 318-19,
Section 26.7.
• The anchor design methods in PROFIS Engineering require rigid anchor plates, as per current regulations (AS 5216:2021, ETAG 001/Annex C,
EOTA TR029 etc.). This means that the anchor plate should be sufficiently rigid to prevent load re-distribution to the anchors due to elastic/plastic
displacements. The user accepts that the anchor plate is considered close to rigid by engineering judgment."
9
www.hilti.com.ph
Fastening point:
1.7 Installation data

Anchor type and diameter: HIT-RE 100 + HIT-V-F (5.8)
M16
Profile: Round HSS (AISC), ; (L x W x T) = 16.84 cm x 16.84 cm x 0.66 cm Item number: 409560 HIT-V-F-5.8 M16x150 (element) /
2123386 HIT-RE 100 (adhesive)
Hole diameter in the fixture: df = 1.80 cm Maximum installation torque: 80 Nm
Plate thickness (input): 2.00 cm Hole diameter in the base material: 1.80 cm
Hole depth in the base material: 8.00 cm
Drilling method: Hammer drilled Minimum thickness of the base material: 11.60 cm
Cleaning: Compressed air cleaning of the drilled hole according to instructions
for use is required
Hilti HAS-U threaded rod with HIT-RE 100 injection mortar with 8 cm embedment h_ef, M16, Hot dip galvanized, Hammer drilled installation per
ESR-3829
1.7.1 Recommended accessories
Drilling Cleaning Setting

• Suitable Rotary Hammer • Compressed air with required accessories • Dispenser including cassette and mixer
• Properly sized drill bit to blow from the bottom of the hole • For deep installations, a piston plug is
• Proper diameter wire brush necessary
• Torque wrench
y
15.00 15.00
6.00
3 4
15.00
18.00
x
15.00
1 2
6.00
6.00 18.00 6.00
Coordinates Anchor [cm]

Anchor x y c-x c+x c-y c+y
1 -9.00 -9.00 18.00 36.00 18.00 36.00
2 9.00 -9.00 36.00 18.00 18.00 36.00
3 -9.00 9.00 18.00 36.00 36.00 18.00
4 9.00 9.00 36.00 18.00 36.00 18.00
10
www.hilti.com.ph
Fastening point:
2 Anchor plate design
2.1 Input data

Anchor plate: Shape: Rectangular
lx x ly x t = 30.00 cm x 30.00 cm x 2.00 cm
Calculation: CBFEM
Material: ASTM A36; Fy = 248.21 N/mm²; εlim = 5.00%
Anchor type and size: HIT-RE 100 + HIT-V-F (5.8) M16, hef = 8.00 cm
Anchor stiffness: The anchor is modeled considering stiffness values determined from load displacement curves tested in an
independent laboratory. Please note that no simple replacement of the anchor is possible as the anchor
stiffness has a major impact on the load distribution results.
Design method: AISC and LRFD-based design using component-based FEM
Stand-off installation: eb = 0.00 cm (No stand-off); t = 2.00 cm
Profile: Custom; (L x W x T x FT) = 16.84 cm x 16.84 cm x 0.66 cm x -
Eccentricity x: 0.00 cm
Eccentricity y: 0.00 cm
Base material: Cracked concrete; 2500; fc,cyl = 17.24 N/mm²; h = 29.00 cm
Welds (profile to anchor plate): Type of redistribution: Plastic
Material: E70xx
Stiffeners: Geometry: Chamfered; size = lx x ly x t = 12.00 cm x 6.50 cm x 1.00 cm
Welds (stiffeners to profile/anchor Type of redistribution: Plastic
plate): Material: E70xx
Mesh size: Number of elements on edge: 8
Min. size of element: 1.00 cm
Max. size of element: 5.00 cm
2.2 Summary
Description Profile Stiffeners Anchor plate Welds [%] Concrete [%]
sEd [N/mm²] ePl [%] sEd [N/mm²] ePl [%] sEd [N/mm²] ePl [%] Hole bearing
[%]
1 DL 2.28 0.00 1.26 0.00 1.87 0.00 1 2 1
2 WL - FACE 1 0.45 0.00 0.23 0.00 0.44 0.00 1 1 1
3 WL - FACE 2 0.42 0.00 0.21 0.00 0.34 0.00 1 1 1
4 WL - FACE 3 0.36 0.00 0.19 0.00 0.32 0.00 1 1 1
5 WL - FACE 4 0.32 0.00 0.17 0.00 0.31 0.00 1 1 1
6 1.4DL 3.19 0.00 1.76 0.00 2.62 0.00 1 2 1
7 1.2DL+1.0WL 2.26 0.00 1.28 0.00 2.25 0.00 1 2 1
(+X)
8 1.2DL+1.0WL 3.15 0.00 1.73 0.00 2.29 0.00 1 2 1
(-X)
9 1.2DL+1.0WL 3.21 0.00 1.73 0.00 2.29 0.00 1 2 1
(+Z)
10 1.2DL+1.0WL 2.39 0.00 1.36 0.00 2.26 0.00 1 2 1
(-Z)
2.3 Anchor plate classification
Results below are displayed for the decisive load combinations: 1.4DL
Anchor tension forces Equivalent rigid anchor plate (CBFEM) Component-based Finite Element Method
(CBFEM) anchor plate design
Anchor 1 0.000 kN 0.000 kN
11
www.hilti.com.ph
Fastening point:
Anchor 2 0.181 kN 0.604 kN
Anchor 3 0.000 kN 0.064 kN
Anchor 4 1.233 kN 1.136 kN
User accepted to consider the selected anchor plate as rigid by his/her engineering judgement. This means the anchor design guidelines can be
applied.
2.4 Profile/Stiffeners/Plate
Profile and stiffeners are verified at the level of the steel to concrete connection. The connection design does not replace the steel design for critical
cross sections, which should be performed outside of PROFIS Engineering.
2.4.1 Equivalent stress and plastic strain

Part Load Material fy [N/mm²] elim [%] sEd [N/mm²] ePl [%] Status
combination
Plate 1.4DL ASTM A36 248.21 5.00 2.62 0.00 OK
Profile 1.4DL ASTM A36 248.21 5.00 3.21 0.00 OK
Stiffener 1.4DL ASTM A36 248.21 5.00 1.76 0.00 OK
2.4.1.1 Equivalent stress

Results below are displayed for the decisive load combination: 6 - 1.4DL
248.21 N/mm²
0.00 N/mm²
12
www.hilti.com.ph
Fastening point:
2.4.1.2 Plastic strain

Results below are displayed for the decisive load combination: 1 - DL
5.00%
0.00%
2.4.2 Plate hole bearing resistance, AISC 360-16 Section J3
Decisive load combination: 6 - 1.4DL
Equations
Rn = min(1.2 lc t Fu , 2.4 d t Fu) (AISC 360-16 J3-6a, c)
FRn = 0.75 Rn
V ≤ FRn
Variables
lc [cm] t [cm] Fu [N/mm²] d [cm] Rn [kN]
Anchor 1 5.67 2.00 399.90 1.60 307.120
Anchor 2 13.04 2.00 399.90 1.60 307.120
Anchor 3 5.72 2.00 399.90 1.60 307.120
Anchor 4 25.20 2.00 399.90 1.60 307.120
Results
V [kN] FRn [kN] Utilization [%] Status
Anchor 1 0.047 230.340 1 OK
Anchor 2 0.049 230.340 1 OK
Anchor 3 0.048 230.340 1 OK
13
www.hilti.com.ph
Fastening point:

Anchor 4 0.047 230.340 1 OK
2.5 Welds
Profiles are modeled without taking the corner radius into account. Special rules for welding (e.g. for cold-formed profiles ...) are not taken into
account by the software.
2.5.1 Anchor plate to profile

Decisive load combination: 1 - DL
Equations
Fnw = 0.6 FEXX (1.0 + 0.5sin1.5 Q)
FRn = F Fnw Aw
Fn
Utilization =
F Rn
Variables
Edge Xu Th [cm] Ls [cm] L [cm] Lc [cm] FEXX [N/mm²] Q [°] Aw [mm²]
Member 1 E70xx 0.34 0.48 50.75 1.59 482.63 79.2 54
Results
Edge Fn [kN] FRn [kN] Utilization [%] Status
Member 1 0.187 17.412 2 OK
2.5.2 Stiffeners to profile/anchor plate

Equations
Fnw = 0.6 FEXX (1.0 + 0.5sin1.5 Q)
FRn = F Fnw Aw
Fn
Utilization =
F Rn
Variables
Stiffenera E70xx 0.34 0.48 6.44 1.07 482.63 28.6 36
(Anchor plate)
Stiffenera E70xx 0.34 0.48 6.44 1.07 482.63 7.7 36
(Anchor plate) 1
Stiffenerb E70xx 0.34 0.48 6.47 1.08 482.63 68.5 36
(Anchor plate)
Stiffenerb E70xx 0.34 0.48 6.47 1.08 482.63 59.8 36
(Anchor plate) 1
Stiffenerc E70xx 0.34 0.48 6.44 1.07 482.63 30.1 36
(Anchor plate)
Stiffenerc E70xx 0.34 0.48 6.44 1.07 482.63 9.5 36
(Anchor plate) 1
14
www.hilti.com.ph
Fastening point:

Stiffenerd E70xx 0.34 0.48 6.44 1.07 482.63 65.0 36
(Anchor plate)
Stiffenerd E70xx 0.34 0.48 6.44 1.07 482.63 43.0 36
(Anchor plate) 1
Stiffenera E70xx 0.34 0.48 11.94 1.00 482.63 21.7 34
(Member 1-arc
1)
Stiffenera E70xx 0.34 0.48 11.94 1.00 482.63 29.5 34
(Member 1-arc
1) 1
Stiffenerb E70xx 0.34 0.48 11.94 1.00 482.63 24.5 34
(Member 1-arc
9)
Stiffenerb E70xx 0.34 0.48 11.94 1.00 482.63 27.5 34
(Member 1-arc
9) 1
Stiffenerc E70xx 0.34 0.48 11.94 1.00 482.63 22.4 34
(Member 1-arc
17)
Stiffenerc E70xx 0.34 0.48 11.94 1.00 482.63 29.8 34
(Member 1-arc
17) 1
Stiffenerd E70xx 0.34 0.48 11.94 1.00 482.63 23.6 34
(Member 1-arc
25)
Stiffenerd E70xx 0.34 0.48 11.94 1.00 482.63 25.8 34
(Member 1-arc
25) 1
Results
Stiffenera (Anchor plate) 0.045 9.160 1 OK
Stiffenera (Anchor plate) 1 0.025 8.050 1 OK
Stiffenerb (Anchor plate) 0.037 11.436 1 OK
Stiffenerb (Anchor plate) 1 0.041 11.065 1 OK
Stiffenerc (Anchor plate) 0.034 9.253 1 OK
Stiffenerc (Anchor plate) 1 0.020 8.121 1 OK
Stiffenerd (Anchor plate) 0.031 11.244 1 OK
Stiffenerd (Anchor plate) 1 0.040 10.066 1 OK
Stiffenera (Member 1-arc 1) 0.040 8.103 1 OK
Stiffenera (Member 1-arc 1) 0.036 8.540 1 OK
1
Stiffenerb (Member 1-arc 9) 0.076 8.255 1 OK
Stiffenerb (Member 1-arc 9) 0.080 8.427 1 OK
1
Stiffenerc (Member 1-arc 17) 0.034 8.140 1 OK
Stiffenerc (Member 1-arc 17) 0.028 8.560 1 OK
1
Stiffenerd (Member 1-arc 25) 0.063 8.206 1 OK
Stiffenerd (Member 1-arc 25) 0.065 8.328 1 OK
1
15
www.hilti.com.ph
Fastening point:
2.6 Concrete
Decisive load combination: 6 - 1.4DL
2.6.1 Compression in concrete under the anchor plate

0.10 N/mm²
0.00 N/mm²
2.6.2 Concrete block compressive strength resistance check, AISC 360-16 Section J8
Equations
Fp = F fp,max
A A
2 2
fp,max = 0.85 fc' √( ) ≤ 1.7 fc; √( )≤2
A A
1 1
N
s = A
1
Utilization =
s
Fp
Variables
N [kN] fc' [N/mm²] F A1 [mm²] A2 [mm²]
1.249 17.24 0.65 50,070 219,404
16
www.hilti.com.ph
Fastening point:
Results
Load combination Fp [N/mm²] s [N/mm²] Utilization [%] Status
DL 19.05 0.02 1 OK
2.7 Symbol explanation

A1 Loaded area of concrete
A2 Supporting area
Aw Effective area of weld critical element
d Nominal diameter of the bolt
elim Limit plastic strain
ePl Plastic strain from CBFEM results
fc Concrete compressive strength
fc' Concrete compressive strength
FEXX Electrode classification number, i.e. minimum specified tensile strength
Fu Specified minimum tensile strength of the connected material
Fn Force in weld critical element
Fnw Nominal stress of the weld material
Fp Concrete block design bearing strength
fp,max Concrete block design bearing strength maximum
fy Yield strength
lc Clear distance, in the direction of the force, between the edge of the hole and the edge of the adjacent hole or edge of
the material
L Length of weld
Lc Length of weld critical element
Ls Leg size of weld
N Resulting compression force
s Average stress in concrete
sEd Equivalent stress
F Resistance factor
FRn Factored resistance
Rn Resistance
t Thickness of the anchor plate
Q Angle of loading measured from the weld longitudinal axis
Th Throat thickness of weld
V Resultant of shear forces Vy, Vz in bolt.
Xu Filler metal tensile strength
2.8 Warnings
● By using the CBFEM calculation functionality of PROFIS Engineering you may act outside the applicable design codes and your specified
anchor plate may not behave rigid. Please, validate the results with a professional designer and/or structural engineer to ensure suitability and
adequacy for your specific jurisdiction and project requirements.
● The anchor is modeled considering stiffness values determined from load displacement curves tested in an independent laboratory. Please
note that no simple replacement of the anchor is possible as the anchor stiffness has a major impact on the load distribution results.
17
www.hilti.com.ph
Fastening point:
3 Summary of results
Design of the anchor plate, anchors, welds and other elements are based on CBFEM (component based finite element method) and AISC.
Load combination Max. utilization Status
Anchors 1.2DL+1.0WL(+Z) 14% OK
Anchor plate 1.4DL 2% OK
Welds DL 2% OK
Stiffeners 1.4DL 1% OK
Concrete DL 1% OK
Profile 1.2DL+1.0WL(+Z) 2% OK
Fastening meets the design criteria!
18
www.hilti.com.ph
Fastening point:
4 Remarks; Your Cooperation Duties

● Any and all information and data contained in the Software concern solely the use of Hilti products and are based on the principles, formulas
and security regulations in accordance with Hilti's technical directions and operating, mounting and assembly instructions, etc., that must be
strictly complied with by the user. All figures contained therein are average figures, and therefore use-specific tests are to be conducted prior to
using the relevant Hilti product. The results of the calculations carried out by means of the Software are based essentially on the data you put
in. Therefore, you bear the sole responsibility for the absence of errors, the completeness and the relevance of the data to be put in by you.
Moreover, you bear sole responsibility for having the results of the calculation checked and cleared by an expert, particularly with regard to
compliance with applicable norms and permits, prior to using them for your specific facility. The Software serves only as an aid to interpret
norms and permits without any guarantee as to the absence of errors, the correctness and the relevance of the results or suitability for a
specific application.
● You must take all necessary and reasonable steps to prevent or limit damage caused by the Software. In particular, you must arrange for the
regular backup of programs and data and, if applicable, carry out the updates of the Software offered by Hilti on a regular basis. If you do not
use the AutoUpdate function of the Software, you must ensure that you are using the current and thus up-to-date version of the Software in
each case by carrying out manual updates via the Hilti Website. Hilti will not be liable for consequences, such as the recovery of lost or
damaged data or programs, arising from a culpable breach of duty by you.
19
www.hilti.com.ph
Design: Concrete - Nov 27, 2023 (1) Date: 11/27/2023
Fastening point:
Specifier's comments:
1 Anchor Design
1.1 Input data
Anchor type and diameter: HIT-RE 100 + HIT-V-F (5.8) M16

Item number: 409560 HIT-V-F-5.8 M16x150 (element) / 2123386
HIT-RE 100 (adhesive)
Effective embedment depth: hef,opti = 8.00 cm (hef,limit = 25.40 cm)
Material: 5.8
Evaluation Service Report: ESR-3829
Issued I Valid: 2/1/2023 | 4/1/2024
Proof: Design Method ACI 318-19 / Chem
Stand-off installation: eb = 0.00 cm (no stand-off); t = 2.00 cm
Anchor plate
CBFEM
: lx x ly x t = 25.00 cm x 20.00 cm x 2.00 cm;
Profile: Flat bar, ; (L x W x T) = 20.00 cm x 2.00 cm

Base material: cracked concrete, 2500, fc' = 2,500 psi; h = 29.00 cm, Temp. short/long: 40/24 °C
Installation: hammer drilled hole, Installation condition: Dry
Reinforcement: tension: not present, shear: not present; no supplemental splitting reinforcement present
edge reinforcement: none or < No. 4 bar
CBFEM
- The anchor calculation is based on a component-based Finite Element Method (CBFEM)
Geometry [cm] & Loading [kN, kNm]
1
www.hilti.com.ph
Fastening point:
1.1.1 Load combination and design results

Case Description Forces [kN] / Moments [kNm] Seismic Max. Util. Anchor [%]
1 DL N = -0.631; Vx = -0.127; Vy = 0.002; no 2
Mx = 0.000; My = 0.000; Mz = 0.000;
Nsus = 0.000; Mx,sus = 0.000; My,sus = 0.000;
2 WL - FACE 1 N = 0.633; Vx = 0.171; Vy = 0.000; no 8

Mx = 0.000; My = 0.000; Mz = 0.000;
Nsus = 0.000; Mx,sus = 0.000; My,sus = 0.000;
3 WL - FACE 2 N = -0.090; Vx = -0.023; Vy = 0.000; no 1

Mx = 0.000; My = 0.000; Mz = 0.000;
Nsus = 0.000; Mx,sus = 0.000; My,sus = 0.000;
4 WL - FACE 3 N = -0.584; Vx = -0.157; Vy = 0.002; no 2

Mx = 0.000; My = 0.000; Mz = 0.000;
Nsus = 0.000; Mx,sus = 0.000; My,sus = 0.000;
5 WL - FACE 4 N = 0.136; Vx = 0.036; Vy = -0.002; no 2

Mx = 0.000; My = 0.000; Mz = 0.000;
Nsus = 0.000; Mx,sus = 0.000; My,sus = 0.000;
6 1.4DL N = -0.883; Vx = -0.178; Vy = 0.003; no 2

Mx = 0.000; My = 0.000; Mz = 0.000;
Nsus = 0.000; Mx,sus = 0.000; My,sus = 0.000;
7 1.2DL+1.0WL(+X) N = -0.124; Vx = 0.019; Vy = 0.002; no 1

Mx = 0.000; My = 0.000; Mz = 0.000;
Nsus = 0.000; Mx,sus = 0.000; My,sus = 0.000;
8 1.2DL+1.0WL(-X) N = -1.341; Vx = -0.310; Vy = 0.005; no 3

Mx = 0.000; My = 0.000; Mz = 0.000;
Nsus = 0.000; Mx,sus = 0.000; My,sus = 0.000;
9 1.2DL+1.0WL(+Z) N = -0.847; Vx = -0.175; Vy = 0.003; no 2

Mx = 0.000; My = 0.000; Mz = 0.000;
Nsus = 0.000; Mx,sus = 0.000; My,sus = 0.000;
10 1.2DL+1.0WL(-Z) N = -0.621; Vx = -0.116; Vy = 0.001; no 2

Mx = 0.000; My = 0.000; Mz = 0.000;
Nsus = 0.000; Mx,sus = 0.000; My,sus = 0.000;
2
www.hilti.com.ph
Fastening point:
1.2 Load case/Resulting anchor forces

Controlling load case: 2 WL - FACE 1 y
3 4
Anchor reactions [kN]

Tension force: (+Tension, -Compression)
Anchor Tension force Shear force Shear force x Shear force y
1 0.200 0.043 0.043 0.000 x
2 0.201 0.043 0.043 0.000
3 0.200 0.043 0.043 -0.000
4 0.201 0.043 0.043 -0.000
1 2
resulting tension force in (x/y)=(0.00/0.00): 0.000 [kN]

resulting compression force in (x/y)=(0.00/0.00): 0.000 [kN]
Anchor forces are calculated based on a component-based Finite Element Method (CBFEM)
1.3 Tension load
Load Nua [kN] Capacity f Nn [kN] Utilization bN = Nua/f Nn Status

Bond Strength** 0.802 10.873 8 OK
Sustained Tension Load Bond Strength* N/A N/A N/A N/A
Concrete Breakout Failure** 0.802 27.393 3 OK
* highest loaded anchor **anchor group (anchors in tension)
Nsa = ESR value refer to ICC-ES ESR-3829

f Nsa ³ Nua ACI 318-19 Table 17.5.2
Variables
2 2
Ase,N [mm ] futa [N/mm ]
157 500.00
Calculations
Nsa [kN]
78.500
Results
Nsa [kN] f steel f Nsa [kN] Nua [kN]
78.500 0.650 51.025 0.201
3
www.hilti.com.ph
Fastening point:
1.3.2 Bond Strength
Nag = (AA ) y
Na
Na0
ec1,Na y ec2,Na y ed,Na y cp,Na Nba ACI 318-19 Eq. (17.6.5.1b)
f Nag ³ Nua ACI 318-19 Table 17.5.2
2
ANa0 = (2 cNa) ACI 318-19 Eq. (17.6.5.1.2a)
t uncr
cNa = 10 da √ 1100
ACI 318-19 Eq. (17.6.5.1.2b)
( )
1
'
y ec,Na = eN £ 1.0 ACI 318-19 Eq. (17.6.5.3.1)
1+
cNa
y ed,Na = 0.7 + 0.3 (cc ) £ 1.0 a,min
Na
ACI 318-19 Eq. (17.6.5.4.1b)
= MAX(
c ) £
c c a,min Na
y cp,Na , 1.0 ACI 318-19 Eq. (17.6.5.5.1b)
c ac ac
Variables
t k,c,uncr [N/mm ]
2
da [cm] hef [cm] ca,min [cm] aoverhead 2
t k,c [N/mm ]
8.30 1.60 8.00 9.22 1.000 4.10

0.02 0.00 10.87 1.000
Calculations
cNa [cm] ANa [mm ]
2
ANa0 [mm ]
2
y ed,Na
16.66 154,001 111,055 0.866

0.999 1.000 1.000 16.487
Results
Nag [kN] f bond f Nag [kN] Nua [kN]
19.770 0.550 10.873 0.802
4
www.hilti.com.ph
Fastening point:
1.3.3 Concrete Breakout Failure
Ncbg = (AA ) y
Nc
Nc0
ec,N y ed,N y c,N y cp,N Nb ACI 318-19 Eq. (17.6.2.1b)
f Ncbg ³ Nua ACI 318-19 Table 17.5.2
ANc see ACI 318-19, Section 17.6.2.1, Fig. R 17.6.2.1(b)
2
ANc0 = 9 hef ACI 318-19 Eq. (17.6.2.1.4)
( )
1
'
y ec,N = 2 eN £ 1.0 ACI 318-19 Eq. (17.6.2.3.1)
1+
3 hef
y ed,N = 0.7 + 0.3 (1.5h

c
) £ 1.0 a,min
ef
ACI 318-19 Eq. (17.6.2.4.1b)
= MAX(
c ) £
c 1.5h a,min ef
y cp,N , 1.0 ACI 318-19 Eq. (17.6.2.6.1b)
c ac ac
1.5
Nb = kc l a √ '
fc hef ACI 318-19 Eq. (17.6.2.2.1)
Variables
hef [cm] ec1,N [cm] ec2,N [cm] ca,min [cm] y c,N
8.00 0.02 0.00 9.22 1.000
'
cac [cm] kc la fc [psi]
10.87 17 1.000 2,500
Calculations
ANc [mm ]
2
ANc0 [mm ]
2
y ec1,N y ec2,N y ed,N y cp,N Nb [kN]
123,695 57,600 0.998 1.000 0.930 1.000 21.134
Results
Ncbg [kN] f concrete f Ncbg [kN] Nua [kN]
42.144 0.650 27.393 0.802
5
www.hilti.com.ph
Fastening point:
1.4 Shear load
Load Vua [kN] Capacity f Vn [kN] Utilization bV = Vua/f Vn Status

Steel failure (with lever arm)* N/A N/A N/A N/A
Pryout Strength (Bond Strength controls)** 0.171 27.719 1 OK
Concrete edge failure in direction x+** 0.171 11.169 2 OK
* highest loaded anchor **anchor group (relevant anchors)
Vsa = ESR value refer to ICC-ES ESR-3829

f Vsteel ³ Vua ACI 318-19 Table 17.5.2
Variables
2 2
Ase,V [mm ] futa [N/mm ]
157 500.00
Calculations
Vsa [kN]
47.000
Results
Vsa [kN] f steel f Vsa [kN] Vua [kN]
47.000 0.600 28.200 0.043
6
www.hilti.com.ph
Fastening point:
1.4.2 Pryout Strength (Bond Strength controls)
Vcpg =kcp [(AA ) y

Na
Na0
ec1,Na y ec2,Na y ed,Na y cp,Na Nba ] ACI 318-19 Eq. (17.7.3.1b)
f Vcpg ³ Vua ACI 318-19 Table 17.5.2
2
ANa0 = (2 cNa) ACI 318-19 Eq. (17.6.5.1.2a)
t uncr
cNa = 10 da √ 1100
ACI 318-19 Eq. (17.6.5.1.2b)
( )
1
'
y ec,Na = eN £ 1.0 ACI 318-19 Eq. (17.6.5.3.1)
1+
cNa
y ed,Na = 0.7 + 0.3 (cc ) £ 1.0 a,min
Na
ACI 318-19 Eq. (17.6.5.4.1b)
= MAX(
c ) £
c c a,min Na
y cp,Na , 1.0 ACI 318-19 Eq. (17.6.5.5.1b)
c ac ac
Variables
kcp aoverhead t k,c,uncr [N/mm ]
2
da [cm] hef [cm] ca,min [cm]
2
t k,c [N/mm ]
2 1.000 8.30 1.60 8.00 9.22 4.10

0.00 0.00 10.87 1.000
Calculations
cNa [cm] ANa [mm ]
2
ANa0 [mm ]
2
y ed,Na
16.66 154,001 111,055 0.866

1.000 1.000 1.000 16.487
Results
Vcpg [kN] f concrete f Vcpg [kN] Vua [kN]
39.599 0.700 27.719 0.171
7
www.hilti.com.ph
Fastening point:
1.4.3 Concrete edge failure in direction x+
Vcbg = (AA ) y
Vc
Vc0
ec,V y ed,V y c,V y h,V y parallel,V Vb ACI 318-19 Eq. (17.7.2.1b)
f Vcbg ³ Vua ACI 318-19 Table 17.5.2
AVc see ACI 318-19, Section 17.7.2.1, Fig. R 17.7.2.1(b)
2
AVc0 = 4.5 ca1 ACI 318-19 Eq. (17.7.2.1.3)
( )
1
'
y ec,V = ev £ 1.0 ACI 318-19 Eq. (17.7.2.3.1)
1+
1.5ca1
y ed,V = 0.7 + 0.3

ca2
1.5ca1 £ ( 1.0 ) ACI 318-19 Eq. (17.7.2.4.1b)
y h,V = √1.5ca1
h ³ 1.0
a
ACI 318-19 Eq. (17.7.2.6.1)
(7 (dl ) )l
0.2
Vb = e
√ da a √f'c c1.5
a1 ACI 318-19 Eq. (17.7.2.2.1a)
a
Variables
ca1 [cm] ca2 [cm] ecV [cm] y c,V ha [cm]
19.33 9.22 0.00 1.000 29.00
'
le [cm] la da [cm] fc [psi] y parallel,V
8.00 1.000 1.60 2,500 1.000
Calculations
AVc [mm ]
2
AVc0 [mm ]
2
y ec,V y ed,V y h,V Vb [kN]
94,250 168,200 1.000 0.795 1.000 35.801
Results
Vcbg [kN] f concrete f Vcbg [kN] Vua [kN]
15.956 0.700 11.169 0.171
1.5 Combined tension and shear loads, per ACI 318-19 section 17.8
bN bV z Utilization bN,V [%] Status

0.074 0.015 5/3 2 OK
z z
bNV = bN + bV <= 1
8
www.hilti.com.ph
Fastening point:
1.6 Warnings
• The anchor design methods in PROFIS Engineering require rigid anchor plates as per current regulations (ETAG 001/Annex C, EOTA TR029,
etc.). This means load re-distribution on the anchors due to elastic deformations of the anchor plate are not considered - the anchor plate is
assumed to be sufficiently stiff, in order not to be deformed when subjected to the design loading. PROFIS Engineering calculates the minimum
required anchor plate thickness with CBFEM to limit the stress of the anchor plate based on the assumptions explained above. The proof if the
rigid base plate assumption is valid is not carried out by PROFIS Engineering. Input data and results must be checked for agreement with the
existing conditions and for plausibility!
• Condition A applies where the potential concrete failure surfaces are crossed by supplementary reinforcement proportioned to tie the potential
concrete failure prism into the structural member. Condition B applies where such supplementary reinforcement is not provided, or where pullout
or pryout strength governs.
• Design Strengths of adhesive anchor systems are influenced by the cleaning method. Refer to the INSTRUCTIONS FOR USE given in the
Evaluation Service Report for cleaning and installation instructions.
• For additional information about ACI 318 strength design provisions, please go to https://submittals.us.hilti.com/PROFISAnchorDesignGuide/
• Installation of Hilti adhesive anchor systems shall be performed by personnel trained to install Hilti adhesive anchors. Reference ACI 318-19,
Section 26.7.
• The anchor design methods in PROFIS Engineering require rigid anchor plates, as per current regulations (AS 5216:2021, ETAG 001/Annex C,
EOTA TR029 etc.). This means that the anchor plate should be sufficiently rigid to prevent load re-distribution to the anchors due to elastic/plastic
displacements. The user accepts that the anchor plate is considered close to rigid by engineering judgment."
9
www.hilti.com.ph
Fastening point:
1.7 Installation data

Anchor type and diameter: HIT-RE 100 + HIT-V-F (5.8)
M16
Profile: Flat bar, ; (L x W x T) = 20.00 cm x 2.00 cm Item number: 409560 HIT-V-F-5.8 M16x150 (element) /
2123386 HIT-RE 100 (adhesive)
Hole diameter in the fixture: df = 1.80 cm Maximum installation torque: 80 Nm
Plate thickness (input): 2.00 cm Hole diameter in the base material: 1.80 cm
Hole depth in the base material: 8.00 cm
Drilling method: Hammer drilled Minimum thickness of the base material: 11.60 cm
Cleaning: Compressed air cleaning of the drilled hole according to instructions
for use is required
Hilti HAS-U threaded rod with HIT-RE 100 injection mortar with 8 cm embedment h_ef, M16, Hot dip galvanized, Hammer drilled installation per
ESR-3829
1.7.1 Recommended accessories
Drilling Cleaning Setting

• Suitable Rotary Hammer • Compressed air with required accessories • Dispenser including cassette and mixer
• Properly sized drill bit to blow from the bottom of the hole • For deep installations, a piston plug is
• Proper diameter wire brush necessary
• Torque wrench
y
12.50 12.50
2.97
3 4
10.00
14.06
x
10.00
1 2
2.97
5.47 14.06 5.47
Coordinates Anchor [cm]

Anchor x y c-x c+x c-y c+y
1 -7.03 -7.03 21.97 36.03 9.22 23.28
2 7.03 -7.03 36.03 21.97 9.22 23.28
3 -7.03 7.03 21.97 36.03 23.28 9.22
4 7.03 7.03 36.03 21.97 23.28 9.22
10
www.hilti.com.ph
Fastening point:
2 Anchor plate design
2.1 Input data

Anchor plate: Shape: Rectangular
lx x ly x t = 25.00 cm x 20.00 cm x 2.00 cm
Calculation: CBFEM
Anchor type and size: HIT-RE 100 + HIT-V-F (5.8) M16, hef = 8.00 cm
Anchor stiffness: The anchor is modeled considering stiffness values determined from load displacement curves tested in an
independent laboratory. Please note that no simple replacement of the anchor is possible as the anchor
stiffness has a major impact on the load distribution results.
Design method: AISC and LRFD-based design using component-based FEM
Stand-off installation: eb = 0.00 cm (No stand-off); t = 2.00 cm
Profile: Custom; (L x W x T x FT) = 20.00 cm x 2.00 cm x - x -
Eccentricity x: 0.00 cm
Eccentricity y: 0.00 cm
Base material: Cracked concrete; 2500; fc,cyl = 17.24 N/mm²; h = 29.00 cm
Welds (profile to anchor plate): Type of redistribution: Plastic
Material: E70xx
Mesh size: Number of elements on edge: 8
Min. size of element: 1.00 cm
Max. size of element: 5.00 cm
2.2 Summary
Description Profile Anchor plate Welds [%] Concrete [%]
sEd [N/mm²] ePl [%] sEd [N/mm²] ePl [%] Hole bearing [%]
1 DL 0.46 0.00 0.35 0.00 1 1 1
2 WL - FACE 1 0.51 0.00 0.99 0.00 1 1 1
3 WL - FACE 2 0.07 0.00 0.05 0.00 1 1 1
4 WL - FACE 3 0.51 0.00 0.33 0.00 1 1 1
5 WL - FACE 4 0.15 0.00 0.21 0.00 1 1 1
6 1.4DL 0.65 0.00 0.49 0.00 1 1 1
7 1.2DL+1.0WL(+ 0.11 0.00 0.07 0.00 1 1 1
X)
8 1.2DL+1.0WL(-X 1.07 0.00 0.75 0.00 1 1 1
)
9 1.2DL+1.0WL(+ 0.63 0.00 0.47 0.00 1 1 1
Z)
10 1.2DL+1.0WL(-Z 0.42 0.00 0.35 0.00 1 1 1
)
2.3 Anchor plate classification
Results below are displayed for the decisive load combinations: WL - FACE 1
Anchor 1 0.158 kN 0.200 kN
Anchor 2 0.159 kN 0.201 kN
Anchor 3 0.158 kN 0.200 kN
Anchor 4 0.159 kN 0.201 kN
User accepted to consider the selected anchor plate as rigid by his/her engineering judgement. This means the anchor design guidelines can be
11
www.hilti.com.ph
Fastening point:
applied.
2.4 Profile/Stiffeners/Plate
Profile and stiffeners are verified at the level of the steel to concrete connection. The connection design does not replace the steel design for critical
cross sections, which should be performed outside of PROFIS Engineering.
2.4.1 Equivalent stress and plastic strain

Part Load Material fy [N/mm²] elim [%] sEd [N/mm²] ePl [%] Status
combination
Plate WL - FACE 1 ASTM A36 248.21 5.00 0.99 0.00 OK
Profile WL - FACE 1 ASTM A36 248.21 5.00 1.07 0.00 OK
2.4.1.1 Equivalent stress

Results below are displayed for the decisive load combination: 2 - WL - FACE 1
248.21 N/mm²
0.00 N/mm²
12
www.hilti.com.ph
Fastening point:
2.4.1.2 Plastic strain

Results below are displayed for the decisive load combination: 1 - DL
5.00%
0.00%
2.4.2 Plate hole bearing resistance, AISC 360-16 Section J3
Decisive load combination: 2 - WL - FACE 1
Equations
Rn = min(1.2 lc t Fu , 2.4 d t Fu) (AISC 360-16 J3-6a, c)
FRn = 0.75 Rn
V ≤ FRn
Variables
lc [cm] t [cm] Fu [N/mm²] d [cm] Rn [kN]
Anchor 1 4.57 2.00 399.90 1.60 307.120
Anchor 2 12.26 2.00 399.90 1.60 307.120
Anchor 3 4.57 2.00 399.90 1.60 307.120
Anchor 4 12.26 2.00 399.90 1.60 307.120
Results
Anchor 1 0.043 230.340 1 OK
Anchor 2 0.043 230.340 1 OK
Anchor 3 0.043 230.340 1 OK
13
www.hilti.com.ph
Fastening point:

Anchor 4 0.043 230.340 1 OK
2.5 Welds
Profiles are modeled without taking the corner radius into account. Special rules for welding (e.g. for cold-formed profiles ...) are not taken into
account by the software.
2.5.1 Anchor plate to profile

Equations
Fnw = 0.6 FEXX (1.0 + 0.5sin1.5 Q)
FRn = F Fnw Aw
Fn
Utilization =
F Rn
Variables
Member 1-bfl 1 E70xx 0.40 0.57 19.94 1.53 482.63 55.0 61
Member 1-bfl E70xx 0.40 0.57 19.94 1.53 482.63 55.3 61
Results
Member 1-bfl 1 0.045 18.257 1 OK
Member 1-bfl 0.045 18.287 1 OK
2.6 Concrete
Decisive load combination: 8 - 1.2DL+1.0WL(-X)
14
www.hilti.com.ph
Fastening point:
2.6.1 Compression in concrete under the anchor plate

0.05 N/mm²
0.00 N/mm²
2.6.2 Concrete block compressive strength resistance check, AISC 360-16 Section J8
Equations
Fp = F fp,max
A A
2 2
fp,max = 0.85 fc' √( ) ≤ 1.7 fc; √( )≤2
A A
1 1
N
s = A
1
Utilization =
s
Fp
Variables
N [kN] fc' [N/mm²] F A1 [mm²] A2 [mm²]
0.635 17.24 0.65 48,969 118,629
Results
Load combination Fp [N/mm²] s [N/mm²] Utilization [%] Status
DL 14.82 0.01 1 OK
15
www.hilti.com.ph
Fastening point:
2.7 Symbol explanation

A1 Loaded area of concrete
A2 Supporting area
Aw Effective area of weld critical element
d Nominal diameter of the bolt
elim Limit plastic strain
ePl Plastic strain from CBFEM results
fc Concrete compressive strength
fc' Concrete compressive strength
FEXX Electrode classification number, i.e. minimum specified tensile strength
Fu Specified minimum tensile strength of the connected material
Fn Force in weld critical element
Fnw Nominal stress of the weld material
Fp Concrete block design bearing strength
fp,max Concrete block design bearing strength maximum
fy Yield strength
lc Clear distance, in the direction of the force, between the edge of the hole and the edge of the adjacent hole or edge of
the material
L Length of weld
Lc Length of weld critical element
Ls Leg size of weld
N Resulting compression force
s Average stress in concrete
sEd Equivalent stress
F Resistance factor
FRn Factored resistance
Rn Resistance
t Thickness of the anchor plate
Q Angle of loading measured from the weld longitudinal axis
Th Throat thickness of weld
V Resultant of shear forces Vy, Vz in bolt.
Xu Filler metal tensile strength
2.8 Warnings
● By using the CBFEM calculation functionality of PROFIS Engineering you may act outside the applicable design codes and your specified
anchor plate may not behave rigid. Please, validate the results with a professional designer and/or structural engineer to ensure suitability and
adequacy for your specific jurisdiction and project requirements.
● The anchor is modeled considering stiffness values determined from load displacement curves tested in an independent laboratory. Please
note that no simple replacement of the anchor is possible as the anchor stiffness has a major impact on the load distribution results.
16
www.hilti.com.ph
Fastening point:
3 Summary of results
Design of the anchor plate, anchors, welds and other elements are based on CBFEM (component based finite element method) and AISC.
Load combination Max. utilization Status
Anchors WL - FACE 1 8% OK
Anchor plate WL - FACE 1 1% OK
Welds DL 1% OK
Concrete DL 1% OK
Profile 1.2DL+1.0WL(-X) 1% OK
Fastening meets the design criteria!
17
www.hilti.com.ph
Fastening point:
4 Remarks; Your Cooperation Duties

● Any and all information and data contained in the Software concern solely the use of Hilti products and are based on the principles, formulas
and security regulations in accordance with Hilti's technical directions and operating, mounting and assembly instructions, etc., that must be
strictly complied with by the user. All figures contained therein are average figures, and therefore use-specific tests are to be conducted prior to
using the relevant Hilti product. The results of the calculations carried out by means of the Software are based essentially on the data you put
in. Therefore, you bear the sole responsibility for the absence of errors, the completeness and the relevance of the data to be put in by you.
Moreover, you bear sole responsibility for having the results of the calculation checked and cleared by an expert, particularly with regard to
compliance with applicable norms and permits, prior to using them for your specific facility. The Software serves only as an aid to interpret
norms and permits without any guarantee as to the absence of errors, the correctness and the relevance of the results or suitability for a
specific application.
● You must take all necessary and reasonable steps to prevent or limit damage caused by the Software. In particular, you must arrange for the
regular backup of programs and data and, if applicable, carry out the updates of the Software offered by Hilti on a regular basis. If you do not
use the AutoUpdate function of the Software, you must ensure that you are using the current and thus up-to-date version of the Software in
each case by carrying out manual updates via the Hilti Website. Hilti will not be liable for consequences, such as the recovery of lost or
damaged data or programs, arising from a culpable breach of duty by you.
18
IV. DISCUSSION OF THE RESULTS
The used of utilization ratio is to compare the actual designed computation to the criteria bind by the code,
when the value for utilization ratio for different mode of failure/s reaches 1.00 that signifies that the designed
actual computation are already at 100% designed capacity of the material that was examined. It is safe to assume
that the utilization ratio should not be equal to or greater than the obtained design capacity for a certain design
criterion. During the design stage it is advisable to have less than or equal to 10% of utilization ratio for the strength
capacity of anchor bolts. This consideration is based on the judgement of the designer. However, since the structure
is already built, the analysis is performed after the tower is designed, based on pages. 29-65, it exceeds the usual
10% utilization rate, but it is still safe as it is below the safe value as stated. This is considered safe as we
conservatively analyzed the concrete pedestal through the criteria of Condition B for provisions of ACI 318-14
(Chapter 17 – ANCHORING TO CONCRETE) wherein it is stated in this conditional analysis that “where
supplementary reinforcement is not present, and for pullout or pry out strength. Also, there is a safety factor of
0.70 (Multiplier for the design capacity) for shear and tension loads when considering the said condition.
As shown from the given data from pages. 28, the Prefabricated steel members were analyzed to resist
axial failure, torsional failure, and slenderness ratio adequacy throughout carrying different load cases/load
combination inputs. The maximum slenderness ratio for compression members is at 200 and 300 for tension
members. The governing mode of failure would be provided and written as “Ref:” along with the governing
equation for mode of failure. The word “ratio: “indicates the design checking ratio for a particular governing mode
of failure for a particular steel member. “Track 2” on page. 21 indicates that LRFD method are used.
Based on the results, the structure is deemed SAFE, AND ADEQUATE to carry out the loads imposed
on it and would not post danger to the users of the building for its original intended purpose.
APPENDICES
This part of the report shows the actual imagery of the equipment, pole tower, as well as
the Computed Aided Drawn (CAD) plans, that are obtained from ocular inspection. Only what
is shown in this part and can be obtained measured in-site are analyzed owners of the building as
well as the pole framing structures cannot provide the as-built plans of the affected areas and
concerned structural members. Analysis and justification provided in the analysis are bind by the
National Structural Code of the Philippines (NSCP 2015) as well as the references that the
said code permits. Whatever is shown and highlighted in this part of the report are what is only
part of the analysis and whatever changes, iterations, and addition of equipment that took place
after the time the ocular inspection is performed are not part of the extent of the certification
provided and is not under the responsibility of the undersigned.
Figure 7. As shown above, the highlighted structure is the pole framing structure that is mainly
focused on this report. The ocular inspection took place at the day when the photo is captured
that is June.9,2023.
Figure 8. Shown above are the Figure 9. Shown above and highlighted are
antennas/appurtenances installed at the pole the anchorage through concrete element of the
infrastructure at the day of the ocular Pole infrastructure.
inspection that is June.9,2023. Weight of the
equipment that are installed in the tower are
considered by the engineer in-charge of this
report, thus, shall not have any additional
equipment to validate the provided deadload
computations.

Chapter 1 3 - Merged

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Chapter 1 3 - Merged

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

CERTIFICATE OF STRUCTURAL STABILITY

• American Concrete Standard (ACI-318M)

equipment or structure/s. When no material properties indicated or observed for a specific

available and widely used in the Philippines market and in practice.

a. As-built drawings signed by the engineer in charge of the project

b. Structural and or soil investigation results

c. National Structural Code of the Philippines, 7th Ed. 2015

d. Other building codes specified in the design criteria

Should there be any inconsistencies; the precedence shall be as follows:

a. As-built drawings of the structure

b. National Structural Code of the Philippines, 7th Ed. 2015

c. The structural investigation results.

for telecommunication use. The whole post constructed/installed structure tower is

height clearance avoiding blockages reaching further coverage. The self-weight of

provided mechanical property manual.

adjoining steel members, and heavily corroded steel members.

For the computation of dead-load due to self-weight of the attached equipment,

from our local code that is NSCP 2015.

failure, bending, torsional, and combination of each failure.

tension failure, bending, torsional, and combination of each failure.

considering different possibilities.

ACI318-19M was used as method of adequacy of checking for concerned concrete

software, HILTI PROFIS ENGINGEERING, for checking of weld adequacy, stiffener

plate checking, and base plate adequacy checks.

the vicinity around the existing structure.

procedure in chronological order are carried out:

1. Inspection and gathering of data.

2. Computer Aided Design (CAD) for layout

3. Load computation with the aid of Microsoft office software

4. Structural Aided analysis of the framing and recommendation

plates and concrete pedestal (HILTI PROFIS ENGINEERING).

MATERIAL PROPERTIES (Reinforced Concrete Members)

diameter) cores at 28 days.

CONSERVATIVE ASSUMPTION SINCE THERE IS NO DATA PROVIDED BY THE OWNER

MATERIAL PROPERTIES (Structural steel members – TOWER)

members except anchor bolts. CONSERVATIVE ASSUMPTION SINCE THERE IS NO

ASSURANCE WITH THE MATERIAL SPECIFICATIONS USED.

• Ultimate strength of Structural steel, Fu = 400 Mpa (ASTM - A36) CONSERVATIVE

ASSUMPTION SINCE THERE IS NO ASSURANCE WITH THE MATERIAL

• Tensile strength of Weld electrode, Fyw = 413 Mpa (E70XX) CONSERVATIVE

ASSUMPTION SINCE THERE IS NO ASSURANCE WITH THE MATERIAL

• Hex head, Fy = 400 Mpa (HIT-V-F-5.8) CONSERVATIVE ASSUMPTION SINCE THERE

IS NO ASSURANCE WITH THE MATERIAL SPECIFICATIONS USED.

• Hex head, Fu = 500 Mpa (HIT-V-F-5.8) CONSERVATIVE ASSUMPTION SINCE THERE

IS NO ASSURANCE WITH THE MATERIAL SPECIFICATIONS USED.

II.I. PARAMETER FOR WIND ANALYSIS (FOR MAIN

FRAMING SYSTEM OF THE TOWER)

Figure 1. Wind force distribution of towers situated on top of a building.

Main wind force resisting system (Tower)

Table 2-2: Wind Direction Probability Factor

II.II. PARAMETER FOR WIND ANALYSIS (FOR SIMPLE

Figure 2. Sample figure of a multiple simple mounting frames based on ANSI/TIA-222-H-2017

22 Gust effect factor NSCP 2015 Gh 0.85

Projected area of round

II.III. PARAMETER FOR WIND ANALYSIS (FOR

Figure 3. Wind direction on Appurtenances/Antennas.

II.IV. LOAD COMPUTATION

II.IV.I. Dead Load

II.IV. II. LOAD COMBINATIONS

Client File Date/Time 24-Nov-2023 15:53

Structure Type SPACE FRAME

Number of Nodes 36 Highest Node 47