You are on page 1of 126

Skill Building Session

Algebra 2.0
From Basics to Mastery using xPERT AI

© 2021 e-GMAT
Agenda

Get Feedback on your Current Conceptual Ability 15 mins

© 2021 e-GMAT
Agenda

Get Feedback on your Current Conceptual Ability 15 mins

Improve your Process Skills 60 mins

© 2021 e-GMAT
Agenda

Get Feedback on your Current Conceptual Ability 15 mins

Improve your Process Skills 60 mins

Apply on 700+ level questions 60 mins

© 2021 e-GMAT
Concept Related Questions

© 2021 e-GMAT
Concept Q.
Q1

What is the range of values of y if 4y + 10 > -y ?

A y < -2

B y > -2

C y<1

D y > -1

© 2021 e-GMAT
Concept Q.
Q2

What is the range of values of y if x – y > -3 and -2x + 3y > 4 ?

A y < -2

B y > -2

C y<1

D y > -1

© 2021 e-GMAT
Concept Q.
Q3

What is the range of x if 16x + 32 > 48x + 96 ?

A -2 < x < 0

B -2 < x < ∞

C -∞ < x < -2

D −∞ < x < 2

E None of the above

© 2021 e-GMAT
Concept Q.
Q4

What is the range of x for the inequality (x-2) (x-3) > 0?

A (2, 3)

B (−∞, 2)

C (−∞, 2) & (3, ∞)

D (−∞, −2) & (−3, ∞)

© 2021 e-GMAT
Concept Q.
Q5

(x −3)
What is the range of values of x if <0
(x+4)

A (3, ∞)

B (−∞,4)

C (−4, 3)

D (−∞, −4) & (3, ∞)

© 2021 e-GMAT
Concept Q.
Q6

Which of the following inequalities is equivalent to |x+3| ≤ 5?

A x≤2

B x ≥ −8

C −8 ≤ x ≤ 2

D −2 ≤ x ≤ 2

© 2021 e-GMAT
Concept Q.
Q7

What can be inferred if |p-q| = a - b

A a = p and q = b

B a<b

C a≥b

D None of the above

© 2021 e-GMAT
Concept Q.

Now get ready for

Feedback
on your CONCEPTUAL understanding.

© 2021 e-GMAT
Simple Linear Inequality

Two Linear Inequalities – with multiplication with


a negative sign → sign flip.

Simple Two Linear Inequalities


© 2021 e-GMAT
If 1 or more incorrect, then have major conceptual gaps
pertaining to linear inequalities.

© 2021 e-GMAT
If 1 or 2 incorrect, then
have major conceptual
Quadratic Inequality
gaps pertaining to
Quadratic Inequalities.

Quadratic Inequality with


multiplication with a negative
number

© 2021 e-GMAT
Absolute Value Inequality

If 1 or 2 incorrect, then
have major conceptual
gaps pertaining to
Absolute Values. Drawing inference from Absolute
Value Inequality

© 2021 e-GMAT
Get even more refined feedback in Quant 2.0
course using the fine-grained concept diagnostics
in the 3 modules dedicated to Linear Inequalities,
Quadratic Inequalities, and Absolute Values.

© 2021 e-GMAT
7 questions

© 2021 e-GMAT
6 questions

© 2021 e-GMAT
10 questions

© 2021 e-GMAT
Concept Recap

© 2021 e-GMAT
Concept Q.
Q1

What is the range of values of y Approach and working out

if 4y + 10 > -y ?
• 4y + 10 > -y
A y < -2
Moving “-y” to the Moving “+10” to Dividing both sides
B y > -2 left side the right side of the inequality by 5

C y<1 • 4y + 10 + y > 0 • 5y > -10 • y > -2

D y > -1 • 5y + 10 > 0

Concept • Basic knowledge of inequalities

© 2021 e-GMAT
Concept Q.
Q2

What is the range of values of y Approach and working out

if x - y > -3 and -2x + 3y > 4


• x – y > -3 ------- (1) • -2x + 3y > 4 ------- (2)
A y < -2
Multiply inequality (1) by 2 2x – 2y > -6 ------- (1)
B y > -2
Add to inequality (2) -2x + 3y > 4 ------- (2)
C y<1
2x and -2x cancel ⇒ y > -2
D y > -1 each other out

• Comfortable solving two inequalities.


Concept
• Inequalities with the same sign can be added together.

© 2021 e-GMAT
Concept Q.
Q3 Given 16x + 32 > 48x + 96

To find Range of x

Approach and working out


What is the range of x if
16x + 32 > 48x + 96 ?
16x + 32 > 48x + 96

A -2 < x < 0 1 Rearranging the terms: ⇒ 16x – 48x > 96 – 32

⇒ -32x > 64
B -2 < x < ∞ 1
Multiplying by -1 on Case if you don’t change
⇒ 32x < -64 1
the sign of the inequality
C -∞ < x < -2 both sides:
⇒ x < -2
⇒ 32x > -64
D −∞ < x < 2 Silly Mistake
⇒ x > -2
E None of the above -∞ -2 0 ∞

Concept 1. Always change the sign of the inequality whenever you multiply an inequality by a negative value

© 2021 e-GMAT
Concept Q.
Q4 Approach and working out

When (x-2) (x-3) can be > 0 or “Positive”

What is the range of x for the Both (x-2) & (x-3) are positive Both (x-2) & (x-3) are negative
inequality (x-2)(x-3) > 0?
1. (x-2) < 0
1. (x-2) > 0
A (2, 3) • x >2 • x<2
2. (x-3) < 0
B (−∞, 2) 2. (x-3) >0
• x>3 • x<3
C (−∞, 2) & (3, ∞)
Combining both the inequations
Combining both the inequations
D (−∞, −2) & (−3, ∞) • x>3 • x<2

• How to solve quadratic inequality


Concept

© 2021 e-GMAT
Concept Q.
Q4 Approach and working out Wavy-line method

Zero points
→ x–2=0→x=2
What is the range of x for the → x–3=0→x=3

inequality (x-2)(x-3) > 0?

A (2, 3)

B (−∞, 2)

C (−∞, 2) & (3, ∞)

D (−∞, −2) & (−3, ∞)

• How to solve quadratic inequality


Concept

© 2021 e-GMAT
Concept Q.
Q4 Approach and working out Wavy-line method

Zero points
→ x–2=0→x=2
What is the range of x for the → x–3=0→x=3

inequality (x-2)(x-3) > 0?

A (2, 3)
+ve +ve
B (−∞, 2)

C (−∞, 2) & (3, ∞) 2 -ve 3

D (−∞, −2) & (−3, ∞)

Since the inequality is >


x < 2 or x > 3
0, the region above the
• How to solve quadratic inequality x axis is the solution.
Concept

© 2021 e-GMAT
Concept Q.
Q5 Approach and working out

x+4 can be negative


• Can we multiply both sides by (x+4)
or positive.
What is the range of values of
(x −3) • Multiply by (x+4)2 (Sign will not change)
x if <0
(x+4)
(x+4)2(x−3)
• <0
(x+4)
A (3, ∞)
• (x+4)(x-3) < 0
B (−∞,4)

C (−4, 3) • Wavy-line method

+ve +ve
D (−∞, −4) & (3, ∞)
→ x is between
-4 -ve 3 -4 and 3

Concept • Apply understanding of multiplication with negative numbers.


• Apply wavy line method to solve quadratic inequality.
© 2021 e-GMAT
Concept Q.
Q6 Approach and working out

|x+3| ≤ 5
Number line
Substitute x+3 = z
Which of the following inequalities ⇒ |z| ≤ 5
is equivalent to |x+3| ≤ 5? ⇒ -5 ≤ z ≤ 5
-5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 5
Replace z = x+3
A x≤2
⇒ -5 ≤ x+3 ≤ 5
B x ≥ −8
Add (-3)
C −8 ≤ x ≤ 2
-5-3 ≤ x+3-3 ≤ 5-3
D −2 ≤ x ≤ 2
• -8 ≤ x ≤ 2
-8 -7 -6 -5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2

• Basic Absolute Value concept


Concept

© 2021 e-GMAT
Concept Q.
Q6 Approach and working out

• |x – (-3) | ≤ 5
• Distance less than or equal to 5 from -3
Which of the following inequalities
is equivalent to |x+3| ≤ 5?
5 units 5 units
A x≤2
-8 -3 2
B x ≥ −8

C −8 ≤ x ≤ 2

D −2 ≤ x ≤ 2

• Interpreting absolute value as distance between two points


Concept

© 2021 e-GMAT
Concept Q.
Q7 Approach and working out

|x| = y
a – b = absolute value of
What can be inferred if |p-q| = a - b some number
→a–b≥0 y is equal to absolute
→a≥b value of a number
A a = p and q = b

B a<b y is non-negative
number
C a≥b

D None of the above y≥0

• Basic understanding of absolute value of a number.


Concept

© 2021 e-GMAT
Infer Translate Visualize Manipulate
Build your

Process Skills
Simplify Apply Consider
Constraints All Cases

© 2021 e-GMAT
Process Skills
Q1

How many non-negative integral values of m do the two given inequalities satisfy:
-4m – n + 5 > 0 and n + 5 > 0 ?

A 1

B 2

C 3

D 4

© 2021 e-GMAT
Process Skills
Q1

How many non-negative integral values of m do the two given inequalities satisfy:
-4m – n + 5 > 0 and n + 5 > 0 ?

A 1

B 2
?
C 3

D 4
What all values can m take?
1. All integers
2. All integers > 0
3. All integers ≥ 0
4. All real numbers

© 2021 e-GMAT
Process Skills
Q1
m≥0

How many non-negative


integral values of m do the
two given inequalities satisfy:
-4m – n + 5 > 0 and n + 5 > 0 ?

A 1 C 3

B 2 D 4

© 2021 e-GMAT
Process Skills
Q1

m≥0

How many non-negative Approach and working out

integral values of m do the


Adding both the -4m – n + 5 > 0 ------- (1)
two given inequalities satisfy:
inequalities n + 5 > 0 ------- (2)
-4m – n + 5 > 0 and n + 5 > 0 ?
⇒ -4m > -10 4m > 10
A 1 C 3
Multiply by -1 ⇒ 4m < 10
B 2 D 4 10
⇒ m < 4 = 2.5

⇒ m = 0, 1, 2

Faltering Points
1. Did not apply the concept –
flipping the sign
2. Did not consider the constraint
© 2021 e-GMAT
Process Skills
Q1

m≥0

How many non-negative Approach and working out

integral values of m do the


Adding both the -4m – n + 5 > 0 ------- (1)
two given inequalities satisfy: Had you not considered the
inequalities n + 5 > 0 ------- (2)
-4m – n + 5 > 0 and n + 5 > 0 ?
“CONSTRAINTS”,⇒you would
-4m > -10 4m >have
10
A 1 C 3
⇒ 4m < 10
4
answered this question
Multiply by -1
incorrectly,
B 2 D 10
⇒ m < 4 = 2.5
despite knowing ⇒the CONCEPT.
m = 0, 1, 2

© 2021 e-GMAT
Process Skills
Q2

What is the minimum value of the integer x, if


16x + 32 > 48x + 96, and
17 + 3x ≥ x + 6

A -5.5

B -5.0

C -4.5

D -3

E -2

© 2021 e-GMAT
Process Skills
Q2 Given
16x + 32 > 48x + 96 ------- (1)
17 + 3x ≥ x + 6 ------- (2)
To find Minimum value of x
What is the minimum value of
the integer x, if Approach and working out
16x + 32 > 48x + 96, and
17 + 3x ≥ x + 6
A -5.5 Solving the inequalities x < -2 ------- (1)

x ≥ -5.5 ------- (2)


B -5.0

C -4.5

D -3

E -2

© 2021 e-GMAT
Process Skills
Q2 Given
16x + 32 > 48x + 96 ------- (1)
17 + 3x ≥ x + 6 ------- (2)
To find Minimum value of x
What is the minimum value of
the integer x, if Approach and working out
16x + 32 > 48x + 96, and
17 + 3x ≥ x + 6
A -5.5 Solving the inequalities x < -2 ------- (1)

x ≥ -5.5 ------- (2)


B -5.0

C -4.5 Number line


? representation -∞ -5.5 -5 -4 -3 -2 0 ∞
D -3

E -2
Can x = -5.5?
1. Yes
2. No
© 2021 e-GMAT
Process Skills
Q2 Given
16x + 32 > 48x + 96 ------- (1)
17 + 3x ≥ x + 6 ------- (2)
To find Minimum value of x
What is the minimum value of
the integer x, if Approach and working out
16x + 32 > 48x + 96, and
1 Constraint: x is an integer
17 + 3x ≥ x + 6
A -5.5 1 Solving the inequalities x < -2 ------- (1)

x ≥ -5.5 ------- (2)


B -5.0

C -4.5 Number line


representation -∞ -5.5 -5 -4 -3 -2 0 ∞
D -3

E -2

© 2021 e-GMAT
Process Skills
Q2 Given
16x + 32 > 48x + 96 ------- (1)
17 + 3x ≥ x + 6 ------- (2)
To find Minimum value of x
What is the minimum value of
the integer x, if Approach and working out
16x + 32 > 48x + 96, and
1 Constraint: x is an integer
17 + 3x ≥ x + 6
A -5.5 1 Solving the inequalities x < -2 ------- (1)

x ≥ -5.5 ------- (2)


B -5.0

C -4.5 Number line


representation -∞ -5.5 -5 -4 -3 -2 0 ∞
D -3
3 possible values of x → -5, -4, and -3
E -2

Faltering Points
1. Did not apply the concept –
flipping the sign
2. Did not consider the constraint © 2021 e-GMAT
Process Skills
Q2 Given
16x + 32 > 48x + 96 ------- (1)
17 + 3x ≥ x + 6 ------- (2)
To find Minimum value of x
What is the minimum value of
the integer x, if Approach and working out
16x + 32 > 48x + 96, and
1 Constraint: x is an integer
17 + 3x ≥ x + 6 Had you not considered the
A -5.5 1 Solving the inequalities x < -2 ------- (1)
“CONSTRAINTS”, youx ≥would have
-5.5 ------- (2)
B -5.0

C -4.5 answered
Number line
this question incorrectly,
representation -∞ -5.5 -5 -4 -3 -2 0 ∞
D -3
despite knowing the CONCEPT.
3 possible values of x → -5, -4, and -3
E -2

© 2021 e-GMAT
Process Skills
Q3

What is the range of values for z2 given that (z2 + 4) (z2 – 2) < 0?

A -4 < z2 < 2

B 0 ≤ z2 ≤ 2

C -∞ < z2 < 2

D 0 ≤ z2 < 2

E - √ 2 < z2 < √ 2

© 2021 e-GMAT
Process Skills
Q4

If z is an integer, how many values of z2 satisfy the inequality: (z2 + 4)(z2 – 2) < 0?

A 0

B 1

C 2

D 3

E 6

© 2021 e-GMAT
Process Skills
Q3

Given (z2 + 4)(z2 – 2) < 0


What is the range of values for z2
To find Range of values for z2
given that (z2 + 4) (z2 – 2) < 0?
Approach and working out

A -4 < z2 < 2

B 0 ≤ z2 ≤ 2

C -∞ < z2 < 2

D 0 ≤ z2 < 2
?
E - √ 2 < z2 < √ 2

What do you know about z2?


1. Nothing
2. It is ≥ 0.
© 2021 e-GMAT
Process Skills
Q3

Given (z2 + 4)(z2 – 2) < 0


What is the range of values for z2
To find Range of values for z2
given that (z2 + 4) (z2 – 2) < 0?
Approach and working out

A -4 < z2 < 2 z2 is non- negative z2 > 0

0 ≤ z2 ≤ 2 ⇒ z2 + 4 > 0
B

C -∞ < z2 < 2

D 0 ≤ z2 < 2

E - √ 2 < z2 < √ 2

© 2021 e-GMAT
Process Skills
Q3

Given (z2 + 4)(z2 – 2) < 0


What is the range of values for z2
To find Range of values for z2
given that (z2 + 4) (z2 – 2) < 0?
Approach and working out

A -4 < z2 < 2 z2 is non- negative z2 > 0

0 ≤ z2 ≤ 2 ⇒ z2 + 4 > 0
B

C -∞ < z2 < 2 (z2 + 4)(z2 – 2) < 0

D 0 ≤ z2 < 2

E - √ 2 < z2 < √ 2

© 2021 e-GMAT
Process Skills
Q3

Given (z2 + 4)(z2 – 2) < 0


What is the range of values for z2
To find Range of values for z2
given that (z2 + 4) (z2 – 2) < 0?
Approach and working out

A -4 < z2 < 2 z2 is non- negative z2 ≥ 0

0 ≤ z2 ≤ 2 ⇒ z2 + 4 > 0
B

C -∞ < z2 < 2 (z2 + 4)(z2 – 2) < 0

0 ≤ z2 < 2 Since z2 + 4 > 0

E - √ 2 < z2 < √ 2 ⇒ (z2 – 2) < 0


⇒ z2 < 2
⇒ 0 ≤ z2 < 2

© 2021 e-GMAT
Process Skills
Q3

Given (z2 + 4)(z2 – 2) < 0


Be cognizant of
What is the range of values for z2
To find Range of values for z2
given that (z2 + 4) (z2 – 2) < 0?
conceptual Approach and working out

A -4 < z2 < 2 z2 is non- negative z2 > 0


constraints
B 0≤z ≤2 2
as well. ⇒ z2 + 4 > 0

C Square
-∞ < z < 2of a number
2
(z2 + 4)(z2 – 2) < 0

0 ≤ z2 < 2 Since z2 + 4 > 0


is always non-
E - √ 2 < z2 < √ 2 ⇒ (z2 – 2) < 0
negative! ⇒ z2 < 2
⇒ 0 ≤ z2 < 2

© 2021 e-GMAT
Process Skills
Q4

Given
(z2 + 4)(z2 – 2) < 0
If z is an integer, how many values of z2
satisfy the inequality: (z2 + 4)(z2 – 2) < 0?
To find The number of values of z2
A 0
Approach and working out
B 1
z is an integer

C 2
Solving the inequality 0 ≤ z2 < 2
D 3
⇒ Since z is an integer, z2 could be 0 or 1
E 6

© 2021 e-GMAT
How do you achieve Excellence?

Concepts

Clarity Process Skills

GMAT Skills

© 2021 e-GMAT
Learn Concepts

Learn how to apply these


concepts using process skills.

© 2021 e-GMAT
Learn Concepts

Learn how to apply these


concepts using process skills.

© 2021 e-GMAT
Learn Concepts

Learn how to apply these


concepts using process skills.
© 2021 e-GMAT
Process Skills

Apply your enhanced skills on 700+ level questions.

© 2021 e-GMAT
700+ Level
Q1

x and y are positive integers such that x + 2y > 20 and 3x – 30 < -y. What is the positive
difference between the minimum possible value of x and minimum value of y?

A -6

B 0

C 1

D 4

E 6

© 2021 e-GMAT
700+ Level
Q1 Given
x + 2y > 20 ------- (1) 3x – 30 < -y ------- (2)
To find Positive difference between min. x and min. y
x and y are positive integers such that
x + 2y > 20 and 3x – 30 < -y. What is Approach and working out

the positive difference between the Constraint: x and y are +ve integers
minimum possible value of x and
minimum value of y? Standard form Solve the inequalities Find the answer
Inequality 1 Multiplying (1) by 3 x<8
A -6 x + 2y > 20 3x + 6y - 60 > 0 -- (3) But x > 0 (+ve int.)
x + 2y - 20 > 0 --- (1) Min x = 1
B 0 Took max value of x Adding (2) and (3)
5y – 30 > 0
C 1 Inequality 2 y>6
y – 6 > 0 -- (5)
3x – 30 < -y Min y =7
y > 6 -- (6)
D 4 3x + y – 30 < 0
Positive difference
-3x – y + 30 > 0 -- (2) Adding (6) and (2)
-3x + 24 > 0 =y–x
E 6
-x > -8 =7–1
x<8 =6

© 2021 e-GMAT
700+ Level
Q1 Given
x + 2y > 20 ------- (1) 3x – 30 < -y ------- (2)
To find Positive difference between min. x and min. y
x and y are positive integers such that
x + 2y > 20 and 3x – 30 < -y. What is Approach and working out

the positive difference between the Constraint: x and y are +ve integers
minimum possible value of x and
minimum value of y? Standard form Solve the inequalities Find the answer
Inequality 1 Multiplying (1) by 3 x<8
A -6 x + 2y > 20 3x + 6y - 60 > 0 -- (3) But x > 0 (+ve int.)
x + 2y - 20 > 0 --- (1) Min x = 1
B 0 Took max value of x Adding (3) and (4)
y – 6 > 0 -- (5)
C 1 Inequality 2 y>6
y > 6 -- (6)
3x – 30 < -y Min y =7
D 4 3x + y – 30 < 0
Adding (5) and (2) Positive difference
-3x – y + 30 > 0 -- (2)
-3x + 24 > 0 =y–x
E 6 -x > -8 =7–1
x<8 =6

© 2021 e-GMAT
700+ Level
Q1 x and y are positive integers such that
x + 2y > 20 and 3x – 30 < -y. What is
the positive difference between the
minimum possible value of x and
minimum value of y?

1. Mistake 1 – Conceptual – Not solving to arrive at x Corrective Action – Build concepts


< 8 and y > 6

2. Mistake 2 – Infer – Given the constraints that x and Corrective Action – Fix HABITS - Make note
y are positive integers, did not draw the inference of constraints and draw appropriate
that min x = 1 and min y = 7. inferences

3. Mistake 3 – Translate – Did not understand that the Corrective Action – Fix HABITS - Translate
question asked for positive difference between the the question statement correctly.
minimum values of x and y.

© 2021 e-GMAT
700+ Level
Q2
And apply DS process diligently.
z is an integer such that |z| < 6. Is z positive?

|z -thorough
1. Do 2|>3 question statement analysis. Know exactly what you want from the statements.
|z|=2
2. See if Statement 1 alone gets you your answer. If yes – eliminate BCE. If no – eliminate AD.
A Statement (1) ALONE is sufficient, but statement (2) alone is not sufficient.
3. Forget about Statement 1.
B Statement (2) ALONE is sufficient, but statement (1) alone is not sufficient.


C See
BOTHif Statement 2 alone getsare
statements TOGETHER you your answer.
sufficient, Eliminate
but NEITHER choices
statement appropriately.
ALONE is sufficient.

EACHstatements
4. IfDneither statement ALONE is sufficient.
give the answer alone, then try with both together. If yes, then C. If no, then E.
E Statements (1) and (2) TOGETHER are NOT sufficient.

© 2021 e-GMAT
700+ Level
Q2

z is an integer such that |z| < 6. Is z positive?

|z - 2| > 3

|z| = 2

A Statement (1) ALONE is sufficient, but statement (2) alone is not sufficient.

B Statement (2) ALONE is sufficient, but statement (1) alone is not sufficient.

C BOTH statements TOGETHER are sufficient, but NEITHER statement ALONE is sufficient.

D EACH statement ALONE is sufficient.

E Statements (1) and (2) TOGETHER are NOT sufficient.

© 2021 e-GMAT
700+ Level
Q2
Question Statement Analysis

Is z positive?

To find: Is z positive?
To find

Constraint: • z is an integer.
• |z |< 6 -6 < z < 6

11 possible values of z ranging from -5, -4…0, 1,…+5

© 2021 e-GMAT
700+ Level
Q2
z is an integer. Statement 1 Analysis
Is z positive?
-6 < z < 6

Statement 1: |z-2| > 3

|z-2| > 3

z-2>3 z - 2 < -3
o z>5 o z < -1 ?

Given that z is an integer between -6 and 6 and


z > 5 and z < -1, what can you infer about z?

1. z can be both positive and negative.


2. z can be only negative.
3. z can be only positive.

© 2021 e-GMAT
700+ Level
Q2
z is an integer. Statement 1 Analysis
Is z positive?
-6 < z < 6

Statement 1: |z-2| > 3

|z-2| > 3

z-2>3 z - 2 < -3
o z>5 o z < -1

No integral value
between 5 and 6

So, z can be both, positive and negative !!!

o -6 < z < -1

All values are negative

Statement 1 is sufficient © 2021 e-GMAT


700+ Level
Q2 z is an integer.
Is z positive?
-6 < z < 6 Statement 2 Analysis

Statement 2: |z|=2

z= +2 and -2

Statement 2 is NOT sufficient

© 2021 e-GMAT
700+ Level
Q2
z is an integer.
Is z positive?
-6 < z < 6

Statement 1: |z-2| > 3 Statement 2: |z|=2

|z-2| > 3 z= +2 and -2


z= +2 and -2
Statement 2 is not sufficient
z-2>3 z - 2 < -3
o z>5 o z < -1
Mistake – Infer
No integral value Could not combine 3 pieces of information to
between 5 and 6 infer that statement 1 is indeed sufficient.

Corrective Action
o -6 < z < -1 1. DS Process – Combine information from
question statement and statement in question.
All values are negative
2. Infer – Get in the habit of combining
information to draw inferences.
Statement 1 is sufficient © 2021 e-GMAT
700+ Level

© 2021 e-GMAT
e-GMAT

Three out of five


700+ scores reported1 on GMAT Club

1. Since 2021, scored verified by GMAT Club administrators using live score report link sent through mba.com
© 2021 e-GMAT
1. Verified based on real score reports by GMAT Club administrators

Verified 7001+ scores Reported

Three
out of
five 40%

700+ 60% e-GMAT

scores
reported
e-GMAT Everyone else
© 2021 e-GMAT
70% of Q49+ scores since 2021

*source of data – GC review

Q49+ Scores reported

224
Scores

55
14
9
8 7

Others

Crackverbal Experts Global GMATWhiz Target Test e-GMAT


Prep
Manhattan Prep

© 2021 e-GMAT
5 - Star Reviews

606
1850
e-GMAT
518

e-GMAT Target Test Prep Manhattan Prep Magoosh GMAT Whiz Experts Global CrackVerbal ScoreLeap

© 2021 e-GMAT
1 GMAT Success Stories 2 MBA Admits

253-Journeys
55-Journeys

3 MBA Scholarships 4 AI in GMAT Prep

Case studies - $15M+ Latest and greatest in GMAT Preparation


© 2021 e-GMAT
700+ Level
Q3

Is a < b?
I. |a – b| = b – a
𝐚
II. 𝐛
<1

A Statement (1) ALONE is sufficient, but statement (2) alone is not sufficient.

B Statement (2) ALONE is sufficient, but statement (1) alone is not sufficient.

C BOTH statements TOGETHER are sufficient, but NEITHER statement ALONE is sufficient.

D EACH statement ALONE is sufficient.

E Statements (1) and (2) TOGETHER are NOT sufficient.

© 2021 e-GMAT
700+ Level
Q3
Question Statement Analysis

Is a < b?

To find:
To find Is a < b?

Constraint: No constraint

Nothing much is given in the question statement.

© 2021 e-GMAT
700+ Level
Q3
Is a < b?
Statement 1 Analysis

Is a < b?

Statement 1: |a – b| = b – a

What can you infer about b – a?


1. Nothing much
2. b – a > 0
3. b – a ≥ 0

© 2021 e-GMAT
700+ Level
Q3
Is a < b?
Statement 1 Analysis

Is a < b?

Statement 1: |a – b| = b – a

b −a≥0

b ≥a

Two conditions possible

a=b

a<b

Statement 1 is NOT sufficient

© 2021 e-GMAT
700+ Level
Q3 Steps 4

Statement 2 Analysis
Is a < b? Is a < b?
𝑎
Statement 2: <1
𝑏

Case 1 : b > 0 a<b

Case 2 : b < 0 a>b

Statement 2 is NOT sufficient

© 2021 e-GMAT
700+ Level
Q3 Steps 5

Is a < b? Combining both Statements together


Is a < b?
𝑎
Statement 1 - |a – b| = b – a Statement 2: <1
𝑏

a=b a<b
a<b a>b

a<b

Both conditions together are sufficient


Correct Answer - C

© 2021 e-GMAT
700+ Level
Q3 Is a < b?
I. |a – b| = b – a
𝐚
II. 𝐛
<1

1. Mistake 1 – Conceptual – drawing inference from Corrective Action – Build concepts


absolute value equation when there are only
variables involved.

2. Mistake 2 – Consider All Cases – by applying the Corrective Action – Fix HABITS – Build
concept of “multiplication of –ve number on both conceptual clarity so that you always consider
sides of inequality requires flipping of sign” all cases.

3. Mistake 3 – DS Process – How to combine Corrective Action – Infer – Learn how to draw
information in multiple statements inferences by combining information.

© 2021 e-GMAT
What does it take to score Q50?

© 2021 e-GMAT
What does it take to score Q50?

Concepts 1

Clarity Process Skills 2

GMAT Skills 3

© 2021 e-GMAT
Conceptual Learning

© 2021 e-GMAT
Process Skills Learning

© 2021 e-GMAT
GMAT Skills Learning

© 2021 e-GMAT
Takeaway 1
Learning content in a progressive manner leads to success!

© 2021 e-GMAT
Quant 2.0
A solution to a Q49+ for both
novices & pros

© 2021 e-GMAT
© 2021 e-GMAT
70% of Q49+ scores since 2021

*source of data – GC review

Q49+ Scores reported

224
Scores

55
14
9
8 7

Others

Crackverbal Experts Global GMATWhiz Target Test e-GMAT


Prep
Manhattan Prep

© 2021 e-GMAT
What is your current quant score?

© 2021 e-GMAT
Each one of you needs a unique solution!

© 2021 e-GMAT
Algebra Course
84 Learning Activities = 40 hours of content

© 2021 e-GMAT
Algebra Course
84 Learning Activities = 40 hours of content

Q30 Student Q45 Student Q49 Student


Needs all 84 activities Needs just 35 activities Needs just 12 activities

© 2021 e-GMAT
Algebra Course
84 Learning Activities = 40 hours of content

Q30 Student Q45 Student Q49 Student


Needs all 84 activities Needs just 35 activities Needs just 12 activities

Different Different Different


Needs activities courses

© 2021 e-GMAT
Takeaway 2
Depending on your ability, you need different courses

© 2021 e-GMAT
Personalized Courses for ALL

© 2021 e-GMAT
2-layer fine grained diagnostics that
tell you exactly what you need to learn
and what you do not need to learn!

© 2021 e-GMAT
Algebra Course
84 Learning Activities = 40 hours of content

# of Modules

7 Modules

© 2021 e-GMAT
Algebra Course
76 Learning Activities = 40 hours of content

# of Modules Learning paths


per module
7 Modules 5 Learning Paths

© 2021 e-GMAT
Algebra Course
76 Learning Activities = 40 hours of content

# of Modules Learning paths Total Unique


per module Courses
7 Modules 5 Learning Paths 5X5X5X5x5x5x5 =
78,125 Courses

© 2021 e-GMAT
How do you know that
you have excelled?

© 2021 e-GMAT
How do you achieve Excellence?

Concepts

Evaluation
Clarity Process Skills and
Feedback
GMAT Skills

© 2021 e-GMAT
Takeaway 3
Every learning activity needs to provide personalized feedback

© 2021 e-GMAT
© 2021 e-GMAT
© 2021 e-GMAT
Learned Perfectly

Needs Selective
Revision

Need to Redo

© 2021 e-GMAT
“The xPERT architecture optimized the course for the very
short time I had. The diagnostics told me the activities I
had to focus on.

The feedback told me where I had to revise. I was able to


improve to Q49, even though I had no time to go through
Scholarnaium”
Click to watch
Varun Paul: GMAT 740, Q49

© 2021 e-GMAT
700+ Level

“In Quant, the diagnostics told me that that I needed to


focus on GMAT Skills and Process skills files in Algebra and
Geometry

With this architecture, it does not matter where you are


in your preparation. You start at the right point, and you
are able to track your improvement”

Click to watch
Anant: GMAT 750, Q49

© 2021 e-GMAT
700+ Level

“The Quant course cleared my concepts and taught me


how to apply them on GMAT Questions

In both the official and SIGma-X mocks, I consistently


scored Q50 after completing the course”

Click to watch

Dipinty Ghoshal: GMAT 760, Q50


Admitted to Tuck with $50K
Scholarship

© 2021 e-GMAT
Next Steps
Your path to a Q49+ Score

© 2021 e-GMAT
© 2021 e-GMAT
Quant 2.0 Students
Your path to a Q49+ Score

1 Go through the Quant


course

© 2021 e-GMAT
Quant 2.0 Students
Your path to a Q49+ Score

1 Go through the Quant


course

2 Follow the xPERT


recommended course str.

© 2021 e-GMAT
Quant 2.0 Students
Your path to a Q49+ Score

1 Go through the Quant


course

2 Follow the xPERT


recommended course str.

3 Master Process Skills

4 Excel in GMAT Skill Files

© 2021 e-GMAT
• 2-layer diagnostic tests
• Concept Files
• Process Skills Files
• GMAT Skills File

powered feedback

© 2021 e-GMAT
Free Trial Users
Make the most of this webinar

1 Take the Free trial

© 2021 e-GMAT
Free Trial Users
Make the most of this webinar

1 Take the Free trial

2 Evaluate whether this fits


your learning style

© 2021 e-GMAT
Free Trial Users
Make the most of this webinar

1 Take the Free trial

2 Evaluate whether this fits


your learning style

3 Consider purchasing the


full course.

© 2021 e-GMAT
Free Trial Users

© 2021 e-GMAT
© 2021 e-GMAT
700+ Level
Q4

Is z > 2?
1. |(z-2)2| > 4
2. |8x – 4k| = z, where x , k are variables

A Statement (1) ALONE is sufficient, but statement (2) alone is not sufficient.

B Statement (2) ALONE is sufficient, but statement (1) alone is not sufficient.

C BOTH statements TOGETHER are sufficient, but NEITHER statement ALONE is sufficient.

D EACH statement ALONE is sufficient.

E Statements (1) and (2) TOGETHER are NOT sufficient.

© 2021 e-GMAT
700+ Level
Q4
Question Statement Analysis

Is z > 2?

To find: Is z > 2?

Constraint: No constraint

Nothing much is given in the question statement.

© 2021 e-GMAT
700+ Level
Q4
Is z > 2? Statement 1 Analysis
Is z > 2?

Statement 1: |(z-2)2| > 4

|(z−2)2|
(z−2)2> 22

(z−2)2– 22 >0 A square of any number


Statement 1 is NOT sufficient is always non-negative
(z- 2- 2)(z- 2 + 2) > 0
(z - 4)(z) > 0 Modulus doesn’t impact

|(z-2)2| > 4 ➔ (z-2)2 > 4


z z

0 4
z<0 z>4

© 2021 e-GMAT
700+ Level
Q4 Steps 4

Statement 2 Analysis
Is z > 2? Is z > 2?
Statement 2: |8x – 4k| = z

z ≥0

Case 1 : z > 0

Case 2 : z = 0

Statement 2 is NOT sufficient

© 2021 e-GMAT
700+ Level
Q4 Steps 5

Combining both Statements together

Is z > 2?

Statement 1 - |(z-2)2| > 4 Statement 2: |8x – 4k| = z

z<0 z=0
z>4 z>0

z>4

Both conditions together are sufficient


Correct Answer - C

© 2021 e-GMAT

You might also like