Professional Documents
Culture Documents
• The industry firm solves maxq p⇤h q c(q) and supplies equilibrium output level
q ⇤ characterized by FOC p⇤h c0 (q ⇤ ) (with equality if q ⇤ > 0).
because then the condition (2) coincides with the condition for social optimum
P
when h⇤ = ho , i.e., 0i (ho ) + s⇤i = k 0k (ho ) c0 (ho ) for every i.
Now, consider the case that the social optimum is positive (h0 > 0), so that the
P
social optimum condition is k 0k (ho ) = c0 (ho ). Then, the condition (2) holds for
all i as an equality when h⇤ = h0 and si = s⇤i , regardless of how the total demand
P
h⇤ is divided into individual demands h⇤1 , h⇤2 , · · · , h⇤I (subject to k h⇤k = ho ). That
is, since the subsidy s⇤i incentivizes every consumer i to demand hi so that total
provision of pubic good is ho (when the price is p⇤h = c0 (ho )), in equilibrium each
consumer demands so that his demand and all others’ demands add up to ho . In
particular, it is an equilibrium that only one consumer, say i, demands h⇤i = ho and
all others demand zero, i.e., h⇤k = 0 for k 6= i.
From this, we further deduce that ho can be induced by o↵ering subsidy si = s⇤i
for one consumer i but sk = 0 for all others k 6= i, because then it is optimal for i to
demand h⇤i = ho as above and for k 6= i to demand h⇤k = 0 since equation (2) holds
as a strict inequality for i = k when h⇤ = ho and sk = 0. By the same token, ho can
be induced by o↵ering si = s⇤i for any subset of consumers and si = 0 for the rest.
27