Should Young Offenders Be Tried

As Adults?

People below 18 years old are managed different to a regular

adult? Is this the right form of jurisdiction?
Juvenile court was established in 1908, where people below the age of 18 who had committed
a crime were put on trial and oversaw by a legal administrator. However, juvenile punishment
in evidently different to a person above the age of 18. Management in juvenile court is
significantly less intense, as the court aims to provide the child for a better future, rather than
forcing them straight to face regular punishment. They are potentially treated with better
therapy or rehabilitation, and the recovery process is focused notably more on the child, than
an adult. However, under legal directives, the child often does not receive a sentence, instead
they could be commissioned in something such as community service work. But are juveniles
being treated too softly?
Juvenile court exists in some form in almost every country, however it could possibly be
better for the child to be treated the same way as an adult if they committed an offence. Some
argue that juveniles should be tried so that they could be held accountability for their actions
and so it would teach them to avoid making the same mistake in the future. A crime is a
crime under law, and the same action should be carried out no matter who committed the
offence, as the severity does not change because you are younger. Sometimes it can be
beneficial if the community has power to influence this decision, rather than one being set for
the child. In regular court, hearings are open to the public, unlike juvenile court, where one
judge has the jurisdiction over the offender. This means a larger proportion can have their say
and take into consideration on what they may make of the case.
Juvenile court, however, is established for a reason. The purpose is to manage crimes
committed by young offenders. A child who has not fully matured and could perhaps be
unaware of many things they could do and so it may not be justified for a child to receive the
same punishment as an adult. A child will also most likely suffer more intensely than an
adult, if given a sentence. Placing children in the same imprisoned area with fully matured
adults could increase the risk of the child being physically assaulted by others. Juveniles are
often not able to withstand some of the mental pain being inside a cell gives, which could
lead to illness, or even suicide.
Are juveniles getting the easy way out, or should they be taught that they hold the
responsibility for their actions?

Comprehension Questions

1. What is the purpose of juvenile court?

2. Why is it important to treat juveniles differently than adults in the criminal justice system?

3. What are some of the benefits of juvenile court?

4. What are some of the challenges of juvenile court?

5. What are some of the arguments for and against trying juveniles as adults?

6. Do you think juveniles should be given the same punishments as adults for the same crimes?
Why or why not?

1. The purpose of juvenile court is to rehabilitate juvenile offenders and help them
become productive members of society. Juvenile courts are designed to be less
punitive than adult criminal courts, and they focus on providing juveniles with the
resources and support they need to succeed.
 2. It is important to treat juveniles differently than adults in the criminal justice system
because juveniles are still developing physically, mentally, and emotionally. They are
also more likely to be rehabilitated than adults, and they are less likely to commit
crimes again in the future.
3. Some of the benefits of juvenile court include:
o Juvenile courts are more likely to focus on rehabilitation than punishment.
o Juvenile courts are less likely to detain juveniles than adult criminal courts.
o Juvenile courts provide juveniles with access to a variety of resources and
support services, such as counseling, education, and job training.
4. Some of the challenges of juvenile court include:
o Juvenile courts can be overwhelmed with cases.
o Juvenile courts may not have enough resources to provide juveniles with all of
the services they need.
o Juvenile courts may face pressure from the public to punish juveniles more
harshly.
5. Some of the arguments for trying juveniles as adults include:
o Juveniles should be held accountable for their actions.
o Trying juveniles as adults would deter them from committing crimes again.
o Trying juveniles as adults would protect the public from dangerous offenders.
6. Some of the arguments against trying juveniles as adults include:
o Juveniles are still developing and are more likely to be rehabilitated than
adults.
o Trying juveniles as adults would expose them to adult criminals, which could
increase their risk of becoming re-involved in crime.
o Trying juveniles as adults could have a negative impact on their future
employment and education opportunities.

I think rising violence and rising gun crimes and particularly both of those thing in youth
population crime tracker 10 has been following a rise in teens involved with violent crimes in
Columbus and throughout. Franklin country for nearly now years now when a teen is arrested
a judge has to decide will this kid be charged as an adult crime tracker tense lacie crips went
to the head juvenile judge to ask what goes into that decision.
This is 15 year old Avonte Solomon. This is video of him allegedly shooting into a crowd at
the glenwood community center in June