Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Ten years after the initiative was launched, life expectancy Aboriginal health is placed in Aboriginal hands. The AMA
at birth is 71·6 years for Indigenous men and 75·6 years also called out institutional racism as being a main im-
for Indigenous women, a massive gap of 8·6 years and pediment to Aboriginal health. “More Indigenous health
7·8 years, respectively, compared with non-Indigenous studies are also needed, as argued in a Comment by
See Comment page 728
Australians. The report overall is utterly disappointing. Geraint Rogers and colleagues. Without all these elements,
The response this week by the ruling government in- poor progress on inequalities in Australia will continue.
cludes commitments that should have been made a dec- On the heels of failure, disappointment must give way
ade ago: partnerships with Aboriginal groups; a whole of to determined resolve. Successive Australian Govern
For the Closing the Gap report
see https://closingthegap.pmc. government approach; more accountability and transpar- ments’ repeated lip service to Aboriginal health is a clear
gov.au/ ency; providing space for Aboriginal voices. Only now has hypocrisy in light of the failings of their Closing the Gap
For the AMA 2018 Indigenous
Health Report Card see https://
the Government committed to partner with Aboriginal initiative. Australian people must hold the Government
ama.com.au/article/2018-ama- and Torres Strait Islander peoples to develop a strategy. to account for meaningful and dedicated engagement
report-card-indigenous-health-
rebuilding-closing-gap-health-
But broader social changes are also needed—ones with Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples and to
strategy-and-review that the Australian Medical Association (AMA) has called health for all. n The Lancet
multivitamins. That translates into an exceedingly partnership called the Botanical Safety Consortium to
lucrative industry, with an estimated US$40 billion improve safety and toxicology testing, actions that align
market in the USA alone. with what Gottlieb suggests is the balance of the twin
Pointing to the dramatic market growth and widening goals of the FDA: protecting the public from unsafe
scope of available products, Scott Gottlieb, head of products and preserving consumer access.
the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), in a written The proliferation of supplements available to consumers
statement on Feb 11, 2019, announced a plan to highlights the crucial need to improve oversight. However,
modernise regulation of dietary supplements. Notably, for any radical transformation of DHSEA legislation, bipar-
the last major legislation to strengthen regulatory tisan Congressional support would be necessary, which
oversight by the FDA, the Dietary Supplement Health and is unlikely because the law has long been criticised as a
For the Consumer Survey on
Dietary Supplements see Education Act (DSHEA), was enacted 25 years ago. DSHEA vehicle for manufacturers to sell products with no proven
https://www.crnusa.org/ provided a formal definition of dietary supplements and benefit and without any risk assessment. A more sceptical
CRNConsumerSurvey
For the statement by Scott
required the labelling and listing of ingredients, including interpretation of the announcement is that the FDA has
Gottlieb see https://www.fda. the disclaimer that the FDA had not evaluated any claims shifted further in its pro-industry stance, continuing to
gov/NewsEvents/Newsroom/
PressAnnouncements/
about benefits of the product. The proposed updates prioritise unfettered consumerism at the expense of in-
ucm631065.htm outlined by Gottlieb, however, indicate less of an overhaul creasing safety and accountability. n The Lancet