Professional Documents
Culture Documents
__
measure, such as the number of units produced, could be used effectively only in a
single-product enterprise. If multiple, heterogeneous products are produced, it
would not be meaningful to base the flexible budget on an output measure
__
___
aggregated across highly different types of products.
11-7 The interpretation of the variable-overhead spending variance is that a different total
amount was spent on variable overhead than should have been spent in accordance
with the variable-overhead rate, given the actual level of the cost driver upon which
the variable-overhead budget is based. For example, if direct labor hours are used to
budget variable overhead, an unfavorable spending variance means that a greater
total amount was spent on variable overhead than should have been spent, after
nt
adjusting for how much actual direct-labor time was used. The spending variance is
the control variance for variable overhead.
11-10 The interpretations of the direct-labor and variable-overhead efficiency variances are
very different. The direct-labor efficiency variance does convey information about
the efficiency with which direct labor was used, relative to the standards. In contrast,
the variable-overhead efficiency variance conveys no information w about the
efficiency with which variable-overhead items were used.
11-13 A common but misleading interpretation of the fixed-overhead volume variance is
that it is a measure of the cost of underutilizing or overutilizing production capacity.
For example, when budgeted fixed overhead exceeds applied fixed overhead, the
fixed-overhead volume variance is positive. Some people interpret this positive
variance to be unfavorable and claim that it is a measure of the cost of not having
utilized production capacity to the level that was anticipated. However, this
interpretation is misleading, because the real cost of underutilizing capacity lies in
PART B
EXERCISE 10-26
Direct Direct
Labor Material
Standard price or rate per unit of input ............................ $20 per hre $8 per lb
Standard quantity per unit of output ................................ 4 hrs per unitf 2.75 lbs per unitc
Actual quantity used per unit of output ........................... 3.5 hrs 3 lbs per unita
Actual price or rate per unit of input ................................ $21 per hr $7 per lb
Actual output ...................................................................... 10,000 units 10,000 units
Direct-material price variance ........................................... — $30,000 F
Direct-material quantity variance ...................................... — $20,000 Ub
Total of direct-material variances ..................................... — $10,000 F
Direct-labor rate variance .................................................. $ 35,000 Ud —
Direct-labor efficiency variance ........................................ $100,000 F —
Total of direct-labor variances .......................................... $ 65,000 F —
Explanatory notes:
PQ = 30,000 lbs.
AQ = PQ = 30,000 lbs.
30,000 lbs.
Actual quantity per unit of output = = 3 lbs. per unit
10,000 units
SQ = 27,500 lbs.
27,500 lbs.
Standard quantity per unit = = 2.75 lbs. per unit
10,000 units
SH = 40,000 hrs
Standard hrs per unit = 40,000 hrs/10,000 units
= 4 hrs per unit
**Consistent with the discussion in the text, we choose not to interpret the volume
variance as either favorable or unfavorable. Some accountants would designate a
positive volume variance as "unfavorable" and a negative volume variance as
"favorable."
unit_
ø
æ $120,000 ö and
= ç ÷ ´ (9,000 ´ 4)
è 10,000 ´ 4 ø
Thdgmi
= $108,000
**Consistent with the discussion in the text, we choose not to interpret the volume
variance as either favorable or unfavorable. Some accountants would designate a
positive volume variance as "unfavorable" and a negative volume variance as
"favorable."
hnf
Variable-overhead efficiency variance ....................................................................
$192,000 F
Fixed-overhead budget variance .............................................................................
$15,000 U
Fixed-overhead volume variance .............................................................................
$2,000g (positive)
Total actual overhead................................................................................................
$713,000
Total budgeted overhead (flexible budget) .............................................................
$818,000e
iAQLSIAuzsu hn
Total budgeted overhead (static budget) ................................................................
$850,000f
Total applied overhead .............................................................................................
$816,000
Explanatory Notes:
噐 ⾄
rate per machine hour = ⼆
actual hours
$648,000
= = $9 per hour
72,000
9Mon
The University of Sydney 7
EXERCISE 11-30 (CONTINUED)
Total applied overhead = total standard hours ´ total standard overhead rate
$816,000 = X ´ $8.50
X = 96,000 = total standard hrs.
total standard hrs.
Actual production =
standard hrs. per unit
96,000
= = 24,000 units
4
3how
9 neunǖǚ
_wig_可 ⼆72000 U
65
ooo
enemy
SVRCAH SM.no
no
⼆
8xl7zow 4X
The University of Sydney 8xlfmo8 loo.mg
EXERCISE 11-30 (CONTINUED)
*Consistent with the discussion in the text, we choose not to interpret the volume
variance as either favorable or unfavorable. Some accountants would designate a
positive volume variance as "unfavorable" and a negative volume variance as
"favorable."
PART C
PROBLEM 11-41
4. Maxwell spent more than anticipated. Actual fixed overhead amounted to $100,460
($155,900 - $55,440) when the budget was set at $80,000. The fixed-overhead budget
variance is $20,460 unfavorable ($100,460 - $80,000). ⼀
5. Variable overhead is underapplied by $42,065:
Actual overhead: Actual quantity x actual rate
23,100 hours x $2.40………………………………………….. $55,440
Applied overhead: Standard quantity allowed x standard
rate
5,350 hours x $2.50……………………………………………. 13,375
Underapplied variable overhead………………………………... $42,065