Professional Documents
Culture Documents
METHOD
REAGENTS-
All reagents used should be of recognised analytical quality.
2 :4-Dinitrophe~zylhydrasinesolution-Dissolve 0.25 g of the base in 100 ml of 30 per
cent. v/v perchloric acid.
Ethavzolic sodium hydroxide-A 0.1 N solution in absolute alcohol.
Carbon tetrachZoride-Wash the laboratory grade solvent three times with water. Further
purification is unnecessary.
Standard-Use pure acetaldehyde 2 :4-dinitrophenylhydrazone.
View Article Online
TABLEI
DETERMINATION
OF ACETALDEHYDE IN AQUEOUS SOLUTION BY THE PROPOSED METHOD
Aldehyde added, pg per 20 ml . . 6.5 12.8 13.0 25.1 31.5 32.6
Aldehyde found, pg per 20 ml . . 6-4 12.8 13-2 25.9 32.1 33.0
Calibration can also be effected with acetaldehyde as standard, but the 2:4-dinitro-
phenylhydrazone, being crystalline and stable, is more suitable.
The method is not specific for acetaldehyde, and could possibly be used also for the
determination of other carbonyl compounds.
Acetaldehyde can readily be determined in the presence of pyruvic acid because the
interfering keto-acid 2 :4-dinitrophenylhydrazone can be removed by extraction with aqueous
sodium carbonate. The carbon tetrachloride extracts are shaken with 10 ml of 10 per cent.
sodium carbonate, the organic layer is removed and then treated as described in the method.
It has been established that no acetaldehyde 2:4-dinitrophenylhydrazone is lost in the
sodium carbonate treatment.
The proposed method has been used successfully in a study of the effects of X-rays on
aqueous solutions of lactic acids and of ethan01,~when small quantities of acetaldehyde are
formed, together with other products. Lactic acid (0.2 M ) , pyruvic acid M ) , ethanol
(0.2 M ) and hydrogen peroxide M ) , present in the analysed solutions, did not interfere.
We wish to express our thanks to Dr. J. Weiss for his advice and encouragement during
this work and to the North of England Council of the British Empire Cancer Campaign for
financial assistance.
REFERENCES
1. Friedemann, T. E., and Haugen, G. E., J . Biol. Chem., 1943, 147, 415.
2. Greenberg, L. A., and Lester, D., Ibid., 1944, 154, 177.
3. Stein, G., and Weiss, J., J . Chem. SOC.,1949, 3262.
4. Lappin, G. R., and Clark, L. C., Anal. Chem., 1951, 23, 541.
5. Neuberg, C., Grauer, A., and Pischa, B. V., Anal. Chim. A d a , 1952, 7, 238.
6. Greenberg, L. A4.,and Lester, I).,J . Biol. Chem., 1948, 174, 903.
7. Snell, F. D., and Snell, C. T., “Colorimetric Methods of Analysis,” Van Nostrand Co. Inc., New
York, 1937, Volume 2, p. 64.
8. Johnson, G. R. A., Scholes, G., and Weiss, J., J . Chem. SOL, 1953, 3091.
9. Jayson, G., Scholes, G., and Weiss, J.] in preparation.
KIXG’SCOLLEGE
~JNIVERSITY OF DURHAM
NEWCASTLE UPON TYNE, 1 October 26th, 1953