Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Nations and
Contemporary
Global
Governance
Global governance is how countries and international groups work
together to make rules and organizations that handle global problems
and promote worldwide peace and cooperation.
UN or institutions such as the IMF and the World Bank are usually called
INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS (IOs). This term is commonly used to refer
international intergovernmental organizations or groups that are primarily made
up of member-states.
International relations scholars Michael N. Barnett and
Martha FInnermore listed the Following powers of IOs.
POWER OF CLASSIFICATION
ABILITY TO CHANGE THE MEANING OF THE WORDS
POWER TO DIFFUSE NORMS
IOs can be the sources of great good and great harm. They have the
ability to promote important standards such as environmental
conservation and human rights. However, they can become closed
communities that refuse to question their views.
The United Nations
The most prominent IO in the contemporary world, the United Nations (UN).
After the collapse of the League of Nations at the end of World War II,
countries that worried about another global war began to push for the
formation of a more lasting international league. The result was the creation
of UN.
The UN is divided into five active organs.The General Assembly
(GA) is UN’s “main deliberative policymaking and representative
organ.” According to the UN charter.
All member states (currently at 193) have seats in the GA. The
Philippines played a prominent role in the GA’s early years when
Filipino diplomat Carlos P. Romulo was elected GA president from
1949-1950.
The third UN organ is the Economic and Social Council (ECOSOC), which is
“The principal body for coordination, policy review, policy dialogue, and
recommendations on social and environmental issues, as well as the
implementation of internationally agreed development goals.”
The fourth is the the International Court of Justice whose task “is to
settle, in accordance with international law, legal disputes submitted to
it by states and to give advisory opinions referred to it by authorized
United Nations organs and specialized agencies.”
Despite these problems, it remains important for the SC to place a high bar on military
intervention. The UN Security Council has been wrong on issues of intervention, but it has
also made right decisions.