You are on page 1of 11

INTELLECTUAL

PROPERTY RIGHTS
IN MAURITIUS:
AN OVERVIEW
1. LEGISLATIONS 2.3 The Supreme Court

Main IP Legislations Any person who is dissatisfied with a determination of


the Tribunal as being erroneous in law may appeal to the
- The Industrial Property Act 2019 (IP Act 2019) Supreme Court within 21 days from the determination.

- The Industrial Property Regulations 2022


2.4 The Judicial Committee of the Privy Council
- Copyright Act 2014
- Protection Against Unfair Practices (Industrial The Judicial Committee of the Privy Council in the
Property Rights) Act 2022 United Kingdom is the ultimate appellate jurisdiction
for Mauritius.

2. INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK 3. INTERNATIONAL APPLICATIONS


2.1. The Industrial Property Office of Mauritius
3.1 The Patent Cooperation Treaty

The Industrial Property Office of Mauritius (“IPO”)


An international application designating Mauritius
receives applications for the registration of marks,
is treated as an application for a patent or utility
patents, utility models, layout-designs of integrated
model certificate filed under the IP Act 2019 and its
circuits, breeder’s rights, industrial designs and
filing date is the international filing date accorded
geographical indications. The IPO is under the
under the Patent Cooperation Treaty. An application
administrative control of the Director. On its own
is processed in accordance with the IP Act 2019, the
initiative or on receipt of a complaint, the Director
Patent Cooperation Treaty and regulations made under
may investigate any allegation of an offence under the
the Act and treaty.
Industrial Property Act 2019 (IP Act) or the Protection
against Unfair Practices (Industrial Property Rights Act).
3.2. The Madrid Protocol

Any person who feels aggrieved by a decision of the


An international application may be filed with the IPO
Director to reject his application for a certificate or to
for transmissions to the International Bureau.
reject his opposition to the registration of an industrial
property may appeal to the Industrial Property
3.3. The Hague Agreement
Tribunal.
An application for international design registration
2.2 The Industrial Property Tribunal
may be filed with the IPO. An international registration
that designates Mauritius as a Contracting Party has,
The Industrial Property Tribunal (“Tribunal”) hears
as from the date of the international registration, the
appeals by persons who are aggrieved by the decision
same effect as an application for registration filed
of the Director to reject an application or an opposition.
under the IP Act 2019.
It also has jurisdiction to hear an application for the
invalidation of a registration.
It is to be noted that as at the date of this publication,
Mauritius has not yet acceded to the above inter­
Any interested person may apply to the Tribunal to
national instruments.
invalidate the grant of a patent or the protection of
a plant variety, or the registration of a utility model,
a layout-design, an industrial design, a mark or a
4. APPLICATIONS FROM FOREIGN
geographical indication
APPLICANTS

Where an applicant’s ordinary residence or principal


place of business is outside Mauritius, the applicant

INTELLEC TUAL PROPERT Y RIGHTS IN MAURITIUS: AN OVERVIEW - OC TOBER 2022 2


must be represented by a law practitioner (e.g., a - where appropriate, the identity of any seal or
barrister, an attorney or a notary) who practises in stamp.
Mauritius or by an agent approved by the Minister
- If priority is claimed, a certified copy document
responsible for the subject of intellectual property.
establishing priority must be submitted. If the
document is not in English, a translated copy
must be submitted.
5. TRADE MARK

5.1 Trade mark search 5.2.2. Required information

Prior to filing the application, we recommend that a - Applicant’s details (i.e., name and address).
search is conducted at the IPO to check the availability - Identification and representation of the mark
of the proposed mark to be registered. It is to be trade mark.
noted that device searches are not available.
- List of goods and/or services under the Nice
Classification. Multi-class applications are
5.1.1. Required information
available.

- Details of the proposed mark, such as


identification and class list. 5.2.3. Timeframe

- Status search: full details of the mark, such


- Within 1 week of filing the application, the IPO
as application / registration number and
issues a filing receipt.
identification of the mark.
- Before proceeding with the substantive exam­
ination of the application, the IPO verifies if all
5.1.2. Timeframe to conduct the search and provide
the documents have been submitted.
full report
- The substantive examination may take up to 2
- Approximately 3-5 working days. weeks.

5.2. Trade mark registration 5.2.4. Acceptance of application

5.2.1.Documentary requirements for foreign - If there are no objections and the IPO accepts the
applicants application, a Notice of Acceptance is issued to
the applicant and the mark is published in the
- A foreign applicant must provide a Power of Government Gazette.
Attorney which must be notarised in accordance - Any person may oppose the registration of the
with the Convention of 5 October 1961 Abolishing proposed mark within a period of 2 months from
the Requirement of Legalisation for Foreign the date of publication of the application in the
Public Documents (“Apostille Convention”). Government Gazette.
- If the country where the Power of Attorney is - If there is no objection or opposition to the
drawn is not a member state of the Apostille application, a certificate of registration is issued
Convention, the document must be legalised within approximately 3 months from the filing
through the Mauritian diplomatic agents or date.
consular agents who certify:
- the authenticity of the signature. 5.2.5. Refusal of application
- the capacity in which the person signing the
document has acted. - If the IPO issues an objection following the
substantive examination of the application, the

INTELLEC TUAL PROPERT Y RIGHTS IN MAURITIUS: AN OVERVIEW - OC TOBER 2022 3


Director will notify the applicant in writing that 5.2.7. Application for renewal
the proposed application has been refused.
- An application for renewal of the registration of
- The applicant may make written representations
a mark must made within 6 months of the expiry
to the Director to reconsider the application
of the registration.
within 6 months from the date of receipt of the
refusal notice. - The registration of a mark may be renewed for
consecutive periods of 10 years.
- If the applicant is aggrieved by the Director’s
decision to reject his proposed application, he may - Where the renewal has not been made within
appeal to the Tribunal and if he unsatisfied with 6 months before the expiry of the registration,
the determination of the Tribunal, he may appeal the Director may grant a grace period/ delay of 6
to the Supreme Court. The ultimate appellate of months to the trade mark owner for the payment
the jurisdiction is the Judicial Committee of the of the renewal fee with a surcharge.
Privy Council.
- Where the renewal has not been made, the
- Where the applicant fails to make any written registration of the mark lapses.
representations within the prescribed time,
the application will be deemed to have been
5.2.8. Duration of a trade mark registration
abandoned.
A registration is valid for 10 years from the filing
5.2.6. Opposition to application date of the application for registration and may be
renewed for consecutive periods of 10 years.
- Any person may, within a period of 2 months
from the date of publication of an application 5.2.9. Removal on grounds of non-use
for the registration of a mark lodge a Notice
of Opposition together with any supporting An interested person may request the Director
evidence. to remove from the relevant register a mark in
respect of any goods or services in respect of which
- The Director forwards a copy of the Notice of
it is registered on the ground that up to 1 month
Opposition containing the grounds of opposition
before the filing of the request, the mark had, after
and supporting evidence to the applicant.
its registration, not been in use by the registered
- The applicant must within 2 months of receipt owner or a licensee during a continuous period of
of the Notice of Opposition file its counter- not less than 3 years.
statement to the opposition together with any
supporting documents at the IPO and provide a 5.2.9.1. Procedure
copy of same to the opponent.
- If the applicant does not send a counter- - A request to remove a mark from the register
statement, the applicant is deemed to have must be made on the prescribed form and
abandoned the application. must be accompanied by a statement setting
out all the facts in support of the request.
- Where the applicant sends a counter-statement,
the Director shall, after hearing the parties, - Upon receipt of the request, the Director
where he considers appropriate, decide whether notifies the owner of the registered mark and
the mark may be registered. provides him with a copy of the request.

- If the Director rejects the opposition, the - The owner of the registered mark may, within
opponent may appeal to the Tribunal and if the 2 months from the date of receipt of the
applicant or opponent is dissatisfied with the notification, provide his reply to the Director
determination of the Tribunal, they may appeal who then decides whether the mark should
to the Supreme Court, and ultimately to the be removed.
Judicial Committee of the Privy Council.

INTELLEC TUAL PROPERT Y RIGHTS IN MAURITIUS: AN OVERVIEW - OC TOBER 2022 4


5.2.10. Invalidation 5.2.11.2.4. Recordal of licences

- An interested person may apply to the Tribunal Required documents: Legalised Licence
for the invalidation of the registration of a Agreement.
mark, totally or partially.
5.2.11.3. Timeframe for Recordals
- The decision of the Tribunal shall be notified
to the Director who shall record it and
If all the documents are in order, it takes
forthwith give notice of the decision in the
approximately 2-3 weeks for the IPO to issue
Government Gazette.
the certificate of change.

5.2.11. Recordals: Change in address, application


and ownership 6. PATENTS

Prior to issuing the Certificate for the Recordal 6.1. Criteria


of Licence, the Director records the licence and
publish the non-confidential information of the - The invention must be new, involves an inventive
licence in the Government Gazette. step and is capable of industrial application.
- An invention is new where it is not anticipated by
5.2.11.1. Procedure
prior art.
- An application for a change in address,
application or ownership is made to the 6.2. Procedure
Director on a prescribed form.
- An application for a patent must be made on the
prescribed form and filed at the IPO.
5.2.11.2. Documentary requirement
- If all documents submitted for the application are
5.2.11.2.1. Recordal of change of name or in order, the IPO issues a notification of filing date
address within 1 week of the application date.
- If the Director refuses to grant a filing date to an
- Document evidencing the change of name:
application, he must notify the applicant, in writing,
Certificate of Change of Name.
specifying the reasons for the refusal.
- Required documents for Recordal of
- The Director may conduct additional searches and
Change of Address: None.
request additional information.
- The Director must, after 18 months from the filing
5.2.11.2.2. Recordal of assignments
date:

Required documents: Deed of Assignment - open an application for a patent for public
signed both the Assignor and Assignee. inspection, and
- give notice in the Government Gazette.
5.2.11.2.3. Recordal of mergers

6.3. Opposition in relation to Patents


Required documents: Legalised Certificate of
Merger.
- An interested person may file a Notice of Opposition
within a period of 3 months from the date an
application for a patent is open for public inspection.

INTELLEC TUAL PROPERT Y RIGHTS IN MAURITIUS: AN OVERVIEW - OC TOBER 2022 5


- The Notice of Opposition must identify the abstract and drawings.
opponent and specify the grounds and include all
- Priority documents must be furnished within 3
relevant evidence, which the opponent considers
months if Priority is claimed.
relevant in support of the opposition.
- The Director must give a copy of the Notice of
Opposition to the applicant.
7. INDUSTRIAL DESIGNS
- The Applicant for a patent may, within 3 months from
the date of receiving the Notice of Opposition, file 7.1. Criteria
a counter-statement stating the grounds on which
he relies together with any supporting evidence. - An industrial design is protected where it is new and
original.
6.4. Duration of a patent
7.2. Procedure
- The patent expires 20 years after the filing date of
the application. - An application for an industrial design must be
made on the prescribed form and filed at the IPO.
- An annuity fee is paid yearly as from the 3rd
anniversary (i.e., 3 years after the filing date) for - The application must contain a graphic repres­
maintaining a patent or patent application. entation of the industrial design.
- The annual fee must be paid not less than 2 weeks
before the expiry of every period of one year. 7.3. Required information
- The Director may grant a grace period/ delay of 6
- The title of the industrial design.
months for the payment of the annual fee with a
surcharge. - Name, address and nationality of the applicant.
- If the annual fee is not paid, the application for - Name and address of the creator (if the applicant is
the patent is considered to have been withdrawn/ not the creator).
lapses.
- Indication of the article which constitutes the
- It is possible for the patent owner to make an industrial design or in relation to which the industrial
application to the Director for the restoration of a design is to be used (I.e., statement of features/
lapsed patent. description).
- Four graphic representations/ drawings of each of
6.5. Required information for the filing of a patent the different sides of the design.
application
7.4. Documentary requirement
- Applicants’ details (Name, address and nationality).
- Inventors’ details (Name and address). - Power of Attorney.
- Title of the invention. - Deed of Assignment if the applicant is not the
creator: i.e., Statement justifying applicant’s right to
registration of the industrial design.
6.5.1. Documentary requirement
- Priority documents must be furnished within 3
- Power of Attorney. months if priority is claimed.
- Deed of Assignment (if Applicant is not the Inventor).
- Specifications including the description, claims,

INTELLEC TUAL PROPERT Y RIGHTS IN MAURITIUS: AN OVERVIEW - OC TOBER 2022 6


7.5. Duration - The suspension is for a period of 10 working days
and may be extended by another 10 working
- The registration of an industrial design is valid days.
for a period of 5 years from the filing fate of the
- The rights holder must then assess whether the
application for registration.
suspect goods infringe his intellectual property
- The registration of an industrial design may be rights, inform in writing the Director-General,
renewed for 3 further consecutive periods of 5 years. MRA Customs confirming the infringement and
take the necessary legal action.
- The Director may grant a grace period/ delay of 6
months for the payment of the annual fee with a - If no written objection is submitted within the
surcharge. statutory delays, MRA Customs may release the
detained goods.
- Where the renewal is not made, the registration of
the industrial design lapses. - The registration for border control is valid for 2
years, and may be renewed.

8. OTHER IP RIGHTS UNDER THE IP ACT 9.2.2. Documentary requirement

- Certification mark. - Power of Attorney.


- Layout-designs of integrated circuits. - Certified copies of the registration certificates
from the IPO.
- Protection of new plant varieties.
- A security in the form of a bank guarantee of a
- Geographical Indications.
minimum amount of 20,000 rupees (approx. £ 225
GBP) must also be provided per mark/application.

9. ENFORCEMENT
9.3. Civil remedies
9.1. Parallel imports
A party may apply to the Supreme Court for the
following remedies or reliefs in relation to infringement
- A person cannot use a registered mark without the
of IP rights:
written agreement of the registered owner.
- Putting genuine products on the market in Mauritius - Injunction to prevent unfair practice or unlawful act
without the registered owner’s consent constitutes
- Damages
trade mark infringement.
- Forfeiture and destruction of any article or thing
that were used in, or gave rise to, an act of unfair
9.2. Border protection measures
practice as the court thinks fit
9.2.1. Application for border protection
9.4. Criminal actions
- Once the particulars of the Mauritian
representative are registered with the Customs - IP Act 2019: Fine not exceeding 250 000 rupees and
department, every time there is an import to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 5 years.
of products bearing the registered mark,
- Protection Against Unfair Practices (Industrial
the Customs department will suspend the
Property Rights) Act 2002: Fine not exceeding
release of the goods and inform the Mauritian
Rs. 250,000 and to imprisonment for a term not
representative.
exceeding 5 years.

INTELLEC TUAL PROPERT Y RIGHTS IN MAURITIUS: AN OVERVIEW - OC TOBER 2022 7


10. RECENT CASE LAWS/ MAJOR IP
DEVELOPMENTS

10.1. The Hugo Boss Trade Mark Management GmbH


& Co KG v Eadally Mahmade Tasleem i.p.o The
Mauritius Revenue Authority & The Polo/Lauren
Company, L.P v Eadally Mahmade Tasleem i.p.o
The Mauritius Revenue Authority [2020 SCJ 84]:
The Supreme Court found that the defendant, not
being the registered owner of the relevant marks
had, by importing the infringed products without
the consent of the owner’s agreement, infringed
the provisions of the Patents, Industrial Designs and
Trademarks Act (repealed by the IP Act 2019). The
Court authorised the destruction of the infringed
products by the plaintiff.

10.2. Eureka E.C. Oxenham & CY Ltd v Alexander E.


Oxenham & Domaines et Terroirs Ltee [2020 SCJ 92]:
The Judge held that there can be no infringement
of a trademark right when a first name is added
to a surname already registered as trademark
provided that there is no likelihood of any
mistake or confusion in the mind of the public be it
visually, phonetically or aurally. She found that the
respondents’ bottles of wine are distinguishable
from those of the applicants on which the mark
“OXENHAM” is written in capital and bold
characters. The Judge further found that when the
two marks are compared, there is no likelihood of
people being confused about the products coming
from the same entity.

INTELLEC TUAL PROPERT Y RIGHTS IN MAURITIUS: AN OVERVIEW - OC TOBER 2022 8


TEAM PROFILE

André Robert is a Senior Attorney and a Partner at BLC Robert


& Associates, where he co-heads, with Senior Counsel Iqbal
Rajahbalee, the Dispute Resolution team of the firm.

He is known to provide expert advice to commercial firms, banks,


insurance companies, sugar estates, petroleum, hotels and textile
companies, as well as para-statal bodies. In addition to his
works at the firm, he is very often approached by senior lawyers
in the private practice to assist in international arbitration and
trademark litigation and complex contentious disputes.

During his professional journey, André was a lecturer in Civil Law


at the Council of Legal Education and was part of the panel for
Attorneys’, Barristers’ and Notaries’ examinations. He was the
former Vice-Chairman of the Mauritius Law Society.
ANDRE ROBERT SA
PA R T N E R André holds a Diplôme d’Etudes Universitaires Générales (DEUG),
a Licence and Maitrise en Droit from Aix-Marseille University
(France).

Andre.Robert@blc.mu

Ammar Oozeer is a Senior Associate and a privacy, technology and


telecoms specialist at BLC Robert & Associates. Prior to joining the
firm, he was a senior law officer in the Attorney-General’s Office.

He advises on privacy related issues, advising global technology


companies, payments service providers, retail businesses, hotels,
entertainment, luxury brands and pharmaceutical companies
on cybersecurity, data protection, data security and electronic
commerce.

Ammar has also a significant amount of litigation experience


with a focus on tax litigation, IPR litigation and judicial review
litigation. In addition to his advisory and litigation experience,
Ammar has a solid legislative drafting experience.

AMMAR OOZEER Ammar holds an LL.M (Computer and Communications Law) from
C O U N S E L / S E N I O R A S S O C I AT E the University of London (UK), an LL.B (Hons) from the University
of Mauritius and completed his Barrister Vocational Course at the
Council of Legal Education (Mauritius).

Ammar.Oozeer@blc.mu

INTELLEC TUAL PROPERT Y RIGHTS IN MAURITIUS: AN OVERVIEW - OC TOBER 2022 9


TEAM PROFILE

Satyanraj Ramdoo is a Senior Associate and advises primarily


on mergers & acquisitions, corporate restructuring deals, and
other business law matters. He also regularly advises on tax, data
protection, and regulatory & compliance matters. In addition, he
provides support on banking & finance transactions.

Much of Satyanraj’s works has a cross-border or international


focus. He has significant experience in advising clients on complex
transactions in a range of sectors, including retail, hospitality
and leisure. His clients include private equity firms and blue-chip
companies.

Satyan holds an LL. B (Hons) from Oxford Brookes University (UK)


and completed his Barrister Vocational Course at the University of
West of England (UK).
SATYANRAJ RAMDOO
S E N I O R A S S O C I AT E satyan.ramdoo@blc.mu

Phalkirti Maharahaje joined BLC Robert in January 2018 and is


a member of the Intellectual Property team. Phalkirti regularly
conducts searches at the Industrial Property Office with respect
to trademark registrations, brand clearance and the availability
of marks and corporate names to assess the registrability of the
marks. She also helps clients to overcome refusals regarding the
application for the registration of their marks and assists with
objections and oppositions.

She also regularly writes and reviews legal IPR documentation


for submissions to the Industrial Property office and assists in
trademarks use investigation. She recently assisted the owners
of famous brands in dealing with the illegal importation and
distribution in Mauritius of counterfeit goods.

PHALKIRTI MAHARAHAJE Phalkirti holds a Higher Diploma in Paralegal Practice from the
IN T ELLEC T UA L PRO PERT Y E X ECU T I V E National Association of Licensed Paralegals Training, UK. She
read law at the University of Sunderland, and went on to obtain
a Postgraduate Certificate in Law Practice from the University of
Northumbria (UK)

phalkirti.maharahaje@blc.mu

INTELLEC TUAL PROPERT Y RIGHTS IN MAURITIUS: AN OVERVIEW - OC TOBER 2022 10


CONTACT

2nd Floor, The AXIS


26, Bank Street
Cybercity Ebene
Mauritius

+230 403 2400

+230 403 2401

chambers@blc.mu

www.blc.mu

OUR SERVICES

Banking & Finance


Capital Markets
Corporate & Commercial
Dispute Resolution
Employment
Financial Services
Intellectual Property & Technology
Mergers & Acquisitions
Real Estate & Hospitality
Restructuring & Insolvency
Taxation

You might also like