Professional Documents
Culture Documents
SCHOOL OF BUSINESS
CHITI MWAMBA 19140041
KUNDA NG’ANDWE 19137215
MARTHA MOONGA 19137773
PETER MWILA 19133977
SNATRA NKANDU 19135749
MUNKOMBWE KAFUPI 19134847
STANSLOUS MULENGA 17116169
ZALIWE BANDA 19135872
JOSHUA MWENYA 19134683
SHANSOWA SHANZAMBWA 19137107
PROGRAM: BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION
COURSE: INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS
CODE: BS 416
LECTURER: DR EDNA LITANA
TASK: GROUP ASSIGNMENT 1
DUE DATE: 24TH JULY 2023
QUESTION: IDENTIFY THE STRATEGY OF THE FIRM AND
ACCOUNT FOR A POLITICAL ECONOMY OF
INTERNATIONAL TRADE.
Table of Contents
1.0 Introduction ............................................................................................................. 1
2.0 Understanding the Firm's Strategy ........................................................................ 1
2.1 The two-value chain ............................................................................................... 1
2.1.1 Primary Activities ............................................................................................. 2
2.1.2 Supportive Activities ........................................................................................ 2
3.0 Types of Strategies ................................................................................................. 3
3.1 Global Standardization Strategy ............................................................................ 3
3.2 Localization Strategy .............................................................................................. 4
4.0 Analyzing the Political Economy of International Trade ...................................... 5
4.1 Administrative Policies ........................................................................................... 5
4.2 Anti-dumping Policies ............................................................................................ 6
4.3 Subsidies ............................................................................................................... 6
4.3.1 Direct Cash Subsidies ..................................................................................... 7
4.3.2 Tax Subsidies .................................................................................................. 8
4.3.3 Price Subsidies ................................................................................................ 8
4.3.4 Production Subsidies ....................................................................................... 8
4.3.5 Export Subsidies .............................................................................................. 8
4.3.6 Research and Development (R&D) Subsidies ................................................. 9
4.4 Tariffs ..................................................................................................................... 9
4.4.1 Import Tariffs.................................................................................................... 9
4.4.2 Export Tariffs ................................................................................................... 9
4.4.3 Specific Tariffs ............................................................................................... 10
4.4.4 Ad Valorem Tariffs ......................................................................................... 10
5.0 political economy and shaping international trade ............................................ 10
5.1 Import Quotas ...................................................................................................... 11
5.2 Voluntary Export Restraints (VERs) ..................................................................... 11
5.3 Local Content Restrictions ................................................................................... 11
6.0 The Case for Government Intervention ............................................................... 12
6.1 Political Arguments for Intervention ..................................................................... 12
6.2 Protecting Jobs and Industries ............................................................................. 13
6.3 Protecting National Security ................................................................................. 13
6.4 Retaliating ............................................................................................................ 13
6.5 Protecting Consumers.......................................................................................... 14
6.6 Furthering Foreign Policy Objectives ................................................................... 14
6.7 Protecting Human Rights ..................................................................................... 14
6.8 Economic Arguments for Intervention .................................................................. 14
6.8.1 The Infant Industry Argument ........................................................................ 15
6.8.2 Strategic Trade Policy .................................................................................... 15
7.0 Arguments Against Government Intervention .................................................... 15
7.1 Free Market Efficiency ......................................................................................... 15
7.2 Individual Freedom and Liberty ............................................................................ 16
7.3 Innovation and Entrepreneurship ......................................................................... 16
7.4 Moral Hazard ....................................................................................................... 16
7.5 Inefficiency and Bureaucracy ............................................................................... 16
7.6 One-Size-Fits-All Solutions .................................................................................. 16
7.7 Regulatory Capture .............................................................................................. 16
8.0 Conclusion ............................................................................................................. 17
9.0 References ............................................................................................................. 18
1.0 Introduction
International business looks at firms that have business activities operations and
transactions that are spread over several countries. It is an important concept of the
global economy allowing companies to specialise in producing goods and services
while assessing products and services they lack. International business is facilitated
by imports and exports between countries, leading to increased economic
interdependence and cooperation on a global scale (Johnson et al., 2017).
The firm's strategy refers to the comprehensive plan and set of actions undertaken
by an organization to achieve its goals and objectives. It involves making choices
about resource allocation, market positioning, and competitive advantage.
Simultaneously, the political economy of international trade encompasses the
interplay between political and economic factors that shape the global trading
environment.
To analyze the firm's strategy and its account for the political economy of international
trade, we must consider how the firm's strategic decisions align with the external
factors that influence international trade.
Understanding the firm's strategy is crucial for its success and long-term
sustainability. A firm's strategy refers to the set of actions and decisions taken by the
organization to achieve its goals and objectives, considering the internal strengths
and weaknesses, as well as external opportunities and threats in the business
environment. For most firms a long-term goal means maximizing profits and for them
to maximise profits there are operations that firms undertake. A firms operation can
be broken down into two distinct value creation activities known as the two value
chains.
The concept of a firm as a value chain was introduced by Michael Porter, a renowned
economist and professor at Harvard Business School (Mind Tools, 2023). The
1|Page
operations of a firm can be thought of as a value chain composed of a series of
distinct value creation activities including production, marketing and sales, materials
management, Research and Development (R&D), human resources, information
system, and the firm infrastructure (Golden and Powell, 1999). A firm's operations
can be broken down into a series of distinct value-creation activities, which can be
categorized into two main types: primary activities and supportive activities.
Primary activities are the core activities directly involved in the creation, production,
and delivery of a product or service. These activities are essential for adding value
to the final product (Mind Tools, 2023). There are several primary activities in the
value chain the following are some of them:
Supportive activities, also known as secondary or enabling activities, are not directly
involved in production but play a crucial role in supporting and enhancing primary
activities. Some of the supportive activities in the value chain are as follows:
By analyzing the primary and supportive activities in a firm's value chain, managers
can identify areas where value is added and where costs can be optimized, leading
to improved overall performance and competitive advantage (Madamba, 2023).
Among various strategies, there are two main strategies that a firm can use these
are global standardization and localization strategy.
The primary goal of this strategy is to achieve cost efficiencies, enhance product
consistency, and create a unified brand image worldwide. By standardizing key
aspects of their business, companies can reduce complexities, simplify operations,
and facilitate international expansion.
Product Standardization: This involves offering the same or similar products across
various markets with minimal adaptions. Companies design products that can meet
3|Page
the needs of a broad range of customers globally, avoiding costly customization for
different regions.
4|Page
Marketing Localization: Businesses tailor their marketing and advertising
campaigns to resonate with the local audience. This includes using culturally relevant
messages, languages, imagery, and promotional channels that are popular and
effective in the specific region.
Distribution Channels: Companies may adapt their distribution and sales channels
to align with the local market’s infrastructure and consumer behaviours. This might
involve partnering with local retailers or e-commerce platforms or adjusting the
supply chain to meet local demands efficiently.
5|Page
Governments can protect domestic industries by setting a limit on the number of
goods that can be imported into a country (Administration, 2023). This restriction
aims to protect domestic industries from foreign competition and encourage the
consumption of locally produced goods. For instance, China imposed import quotas
on automobiles to protect its domestic automobile industry.
Dumping refers to the practice of selling goods in a foreign market at a price below
their production cost or below the price in the domestic market. Anti-dumping policies
are designed to protect domestic industries from the negative effects of unfair
competition.
4.3 Subsidies
According to IMF et al., (2022), Subsidies are often implemented to achieve specific
policy goals, such as stimulating economic growth, promoting domestic industries,
ensuring food security, reducing poverty, fostering innovation, or addressing
externalities like environmental concerns. However, subsidies can also have
unintended consequences, such as distorting markets, creating inefficiencies, or
favouring certain groups over others.
6|Page
Subsidies are financial or other forms of support given by the government or an
organization to individuals, businesses, or industries to encourage or assist them in
achieving certain goals or outcomes. These goals can vary and may include
promoting economic growth, supporting specific industries, encouraging innovation,
or addressing social or environmental concerns.
Subsidies are typically provided in the form of direct payments, tax breaks, reduced
interest rates on loans, price supports, grants, or other forms of financial assistance.
The purpose of subsidies is to make certain goods or services more affordable,
incentivize production or consumption, or provide a competitive advantage to
recipients (Georgetown Law, 2023).
While subsidies can be beneficial in achieving specific objectives, they can also have
drawbacks. They can create market distortions, promote inefficiencies, and lead to
unintended consequences. The allocation of subsidies may be subject to debate and
scrutiny, as different stakeholders may have different views on their necessity,
effectiveness, and fairness.
Types of subsidies
Several types of subsidies can be categorized based on their purpose and how they
are provided (Clements and Parry, 2018). Here are some common types of
subsidies:
This type of subsidy involves the direct transfer of cash from the government to
individuals, businesses, or organizations. It can be in the form of grants, allowances,
7|Page
or income support. Direct cash subsidies are often provided to low-income
individuals, families, or specific sectors to alleviate financial burdens or promote
certain activities.
Tax subsidies are granted through the tax system by allowing deductions,
exemptions, or credits that reduce the amount of taxes owed. These subsidies can
be used to incentivize certain behaviours, such as investment in research and
development, energy efficiency, or job creation. Tax breaks for specific industries or
activities are also a common form of subsidy.
Price subsidies involve the government providing financial assistance to reduce the
cost of goods or services for consumers. This can be done by subsidizing the
production, distribution, or consumption of certain products. For example,
governments may subsidize essential commodities like food, fuel, or housing to make
them more affordable for the general population.
8|Page
4.3.6 Research and Development (R&D) Subsidies
These are just a few examples of the types of subsidies that exist. Subsidies can
vary widely depending on the country, sector, and specific policy objectives. The
design and implementation of subsidies are influenced by the priorities and goals of
the government or organization providing them.
4.4 Tariffs
Tariffs are taxes or duties imposed on goods and services when they are imported or
exported between countries (IMF et al., 2022). They are a form of trade barrier and
are typically levied by the government to regulate international trade, protect
domestic industries, generate revenue, or address other policy objectives.
These are taxes imposed on goods and services that are imported into a country.
Import tariffs increase the cost of imported goods, making them more expensive for
domestic consumers and businesses. The purpose of import tariffs is often to protect
domestic industries from foreign competition by making imported goods less
competitive or to generate revenue for the government.
Export tariffs are taxes imposed on goods and services that are exported out of a
country. These tariffs are less common than import tariffs and are usually
implemented to control the export of certain products, protect domestic supply, or
9|Page
generate revenue. Export tariffs can be used to promote domestic production,
discourage the export of critical resources, or influence international prices.
Specific tariffs are fixed amounts of tax imposed on a particular unit of a product. For
example, a specific tariff might be $10 per unit of a specific product regardless of its
price. Specific tariffs are less common and can result in higher relative tax rates on
cheaper goods compared to expensive ones.
Ad valorem tariffs are taxes imposed as a percentage of the value of the imported or
exported goods. For example, an ad valorem tariff of 10% would result in a tax equal
to 10% of the value of the goods being imported or exported. Ad valorem tariffs can
vary depending on the price and value of the products involved.
Tariffs are often used as a tool in trade policy to protect domestic industries,
safeguard national security interests, correct trade imbalances, or address unfair
trade practices. However, they can also have negative consequences. Tariffs can
increase prices for consumers, limit consumer choices, reduce international trade,
and potentially lead to retaliatory measures from other countries, resulting in trade
disputes or trade wars (Wang et al., 2023).
It's important to note that the implementation and regulation of tariffs vary across
countries and are subject to international trade agreements, such as those
established by the World Trade Organization (WTO).
The political economy plays a significant role in shaping international trade, and
various policy measures can be implemented by governments to influence trade
flows. Three common policy measures in international trade are import quotas,
voluntary export restraints (VERs), and local content restrictions. Let's explore each
of these measures:
10 | P a g e
5.1 Import Quotas
Import quotas are trade restrictions that limit the quantity of a particular good that can
be imported into a country during a specified period. These quotas are typically set
below the level of domestic demand to protect domestic industries from foreign
competition and promote local production. Import quotas are often implemented as
a means of safeguarding domestic jobs and industries, especially in sectors that are
considered strategically important (Takacs, 1977).
While import quotas can help shield domestic industries from foreign competition,
they may also lead to negative consequences. Reduced competition may result in
higher prices for consumers, reduced product diversity, and potential inefficiencies in
domestic production. Moreover, trade partners may respond with retaliatory
measures, leading to trade tensions and conflicts.
VERs are usually negotiated to address concerns about a particular industry's impact
on the importing country's domestic market. For example, an exporting country may
agree to limit the volume of its exports of a certain product to a specific destination
to prevent protectionist measures from being imposed by the importing country.
Local content restrictions, also known as "local content requirements," are policies
that require a certain percentage of a final product to be produced domestically.
These requirements aim to promote local industries and employment by encouraging
the use of domestic inputs in manufacturing processes. This is often done with the
11 | P a g e
intent of boosting domestic production and supporting local suppliers and
manufacturers.
While local content restrictions aim to foster domestic industries, they can also face
criticism and challenges. These policies may lead to increased costs for businesses,
reduced competitiveness, and potential inefficiencies if domestic inputs are more
expensive or of lower quality than imported alternatives. Moreover, local content
requirements can be perceived as protectionist measures and may lead to trade
disputes with other countries.
Arguments for government intervention take two paths: political and economic.
Political arguments for intervention are concerned with protecting the interests of
certain groups within a nation (normally producers), often at the expense of other
groups (normally consumers), or with achieving some political objective that lies
outside the sphere of economic relationships, such as protecting the environment or
human rights. Economic arguments for intervention are typically concerned with
boosting the overall wealth of a nation (to the benefit of all, both producers and
consumers).
12 | P a g e
advancing foreign policy objectives, and advancing the human rights of people in
exporting nations.
The need to preserve employment and businesses from unfair foreign competition is
arguably the most popular political justification for government action. When
exporting nations' governments in some manner subsidise their producers, it is most
frequently seen as unfair competition (Mazzucato, 2013). However, detractors
contend that allegations of unfair competition are frequently exaggerated for political
purposes.
The European Union established the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) with a
political goal in mind. By limiting imports and securing prices, the CAP was created
to safeguard the livelihoods of Europe's politically influential farmers. However, the
CAP's higher costs have come at a significant cost to European consumers. This is
valid for numerous efforts by the government to safeguard industries and jobs (Autor
et al., 2016). For instance, the introduction of steel tariffs in 2002 increased the cost
of steel for American customers, including automakers, reducing their ability to
compete on the world market.
Some nations contend that because some industries are crucial to national security,
they must be protected (Autor et al., 2016). The defence sector frequently receives
this kind of scrutiny (e.g., aerospace, advanced electronics, and
semiconductors). This argument is still made, even though it isn't as frequent as it
formerly was.
6.4 Retaliating
Some contend that to assist open international markets and compel trading partners
to "play by the rules of the game," governments should threaten to meddle in trade
policy (Bown and Crowley, 2013).
13 | P a g e
Such a politically driven justification for government involvement could, if it succeeds,
liberalise trade and result in economic gains. It's a hazardous tactic, though. When
under pressure, a nation could refuse to give in and instead impose its trade barriers
in retaliation for the application of punitive tariffs.
Regulations protecting consumers from dangerous items have long been in place in
many jurisdictions (Kaplow and Shapiro, 2007) The importation of such products is
frequently restricted or prohibited as a result of such regulations.
Governments occasionally use trade policy to further their goals in foreign policy. A
government may offer favourable trading conditions to a nation with which it hopes
to forge close ties (Irwin, 2017). Additionally, trade policy has frequently been used
to put pressure on or penalise "rogue states" that disregard international law and
standards.
Many democracies prioritise defending and advancing human rights in other nations
as part of their foreign policy. Governments occasionally use trade policy to influence
trading partners' human rights practices for the better. Government can intervene in
international trade by imposing import bans or restrictions on goods produced with
forced labour or modern slavery. Such measures prevent the perpetuation of human
rights abuses in global supply chains (Davidson, 2018).
Recent years have seen a revival of the economic justifications for government
involvement due to the advent of new trade theories and strategic trade strategies
(Richardson et al., 2014).
14 | P a g e
6.8.1 The Infant Industry Argument
The economic justification for government intervention is by far the oldest in the infant
industry argument. In 1792, Alexander Hamilton made the suggestion. This theory
holds that many emerging nations may have a manufacturing comparative
advantage, but new manufacturing sectors initially cannot compete with well-
established sectors in wealthy nations. The concept is that governments should
temporarily support nascent industries through tariffs, import restrictions, and
subsidies until they have grown robust enough to compete internationally to give
manufacturing a foothold. Over the past 50 years, this justification has found
considerable favour with the governments of developing countries, and the GATT
has acknowledged the infant industry justification as a valid justification for
protectionism.
Some new trade theorists have proposed the strategic trade policy argument. We
reviewed the basic argument when we considered the new trade theory (Paul, 1986).
The new trade theory argues that in industries in which the existence of substantial
economies of scale implies that the world market will profitably support only a few
firms, countries may predominate in the export of certain products simply because
they have firms that were able to capture first-mover advantages.
Various aspects of society and the economy are often based on principles of limited
government, individual freedom, and market efficiency. Here are some common
arguments against government intervention:
Free markets, as opposed to rules and regulations imposed by the government, are
often more effective at allocating resources, according to supporters of limited
government intervention. They think that without excessive involvement, competition
and supply-demand dynamics can produce the best results.
15 | P a g e
7.2 Individual Freedom and Liberty
Many argue that governmental intervention limits people's freedom and agency. They
hold that everyone has the freedom to make their own decisions, even if those
decisions may not line up with what the government deems to be the best course of
action.
Moral hazard is the theory that when the government intervenes, it can have
unexpected consequences by protecting people or businesses from the full
repercussions of their conduct. Bailouts of failed businesses, for instance, may
encourage risky behaviour because the businesses know they will be saved if they
run into financial difficulties.
Critics also raise concerns about regulatory capture, which occurs when industries
or special interest groups gain excessive influence over the government agencies
16 | P a g e
that are supposed to regulate them. This can lead to policies that favour these groups
rather than the broader public interest.
8.0 Conclusion
As international trade is not only an economic phenomenon but also a political one.
The interplay between economic interests, political decisions and global dynamics
shape trade policies and can significantly impact the prosperity and stability of a
nation. A firm's strategy in the context of international trade should be informed by
critically analysing the market conditions and competitive advantages it should be
flexible and adaptable to respond to changing market environment. Additionally, firms
need to consider the political economy of international trade including trade policies
to navigate the complex landscape and seize opportunities.
17 | P a g e
9.0 References
Autor, D. H., Dorn, D., & Hanson, G. H. (2016). The China Shock: Learning from
Labor Market Adjustment to Large Changes in Trade.
http://www.nber.org/papers/w21906
BENEDICT CLEMENTS, & IAN PARRY. (2018). What Are Subsidies_ – IMF
Finance & Development Magazine. International Monetary Fund.
https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/fandd/issues/2018/09/what-are-subsidies-
basics
Bown, C. P., & Crowley, M. A. (2013). Import protection, business cycles, and
exchange rates: Evidence from the Great Recession. Journal of International
Economics, 90(1), 50–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinteco.2012.12.001
IMF, OECD, World Bank, & WTO. (2022). Subsidies, Trade, and International
Cooperation (Vol. 001).
Kaplow, L., & Shapiro, C. (2007). Chapter 15 Antitrust. In Handbook of Law and
Economics (Vol. 2, pp. 1073–1225). https://doi.org/10.1016/S1574-
0730(07)02015-4
Mind Tools Content. (2023). Porter’s Value Chain - Understanding How Value is
Created Within Organizations.
https://www.investopedia.com/terms/v/valuechain.asp
Richardson, J. D., Cohen, S. S., & Zysman, J. (2014). The political economy of
strategic trade policy.
18 | P a g e
Santoni, G. J., Norman, T., & Cott, V. (1980). Import Quotas: The Quality
Adjustment Problem. In Source: Southern Economic Journal (Vol. 46, Issue 4).
http://www.jstor.orgURL:http://www.jstor.org/stable/1057255
Wang, K., Reimer, M. N., & Wilen, J. E. (2023). Fisheries subsidies reform in
China. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas
19 | P a g e