You are on page 1of 5

See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.

net/publication/308315339

Parental Acceptance-Rejection Questionnaire (PARQ): Test Manual

Article · January 2005

CITATIONS READS

321 26,054

1 author:

Ronald Preston Rohner


University of Connecticut
190 PUBLICATIONS 9,374 CITATIONS

SEE PROFILE

All content following this page was uploaded by Ronald Preston Rohner on 13 July 2018.

The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file.


P

Parental Acceptance-Rejection the parent is cold, aggressive, or neglecting. Col-


Questionnaire (PARQ) lectively, the four scales constitute an overall mea-
sure of perceived or remembered parental
Ronald P. Rohner and Sumbleen Ali acceptance-rejection in childhood.
University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, USA

Introduction
Synonyms
Structure of the PARQ. Four versions of the
Adult Parental Acceptance-Rejection Question- PARQ are available: (1) Early Childhood PARQ,
naire; Child Parental Acceptance-Rejection Ques- (2) Child PARQ, (3) Adult PARQ, and (4) Parent
tionnaire; Early Childhood Parental Acceptance- PARQ. All versions are nearly identical except
Rejection Questionnaire; Parent Parental that the Early Childhood PARQ and Child
Acceptance-Rejection Questionnaire PARQ say “My mother [or father] does. . .,”
whereas the Adult PARQ says “My mother
[or father] did. . .,” and the Parent PARQ says “I
Definition do. . ..”
The Early Childhood PARQ (ECPARQ) is
The Parental Acceptance-Rejection Questionnaire designed to be used with children from about
(PARQ) is a self-report questionnaire designed to 4 years of age through about 7 years of age. The
assess children’s current perceptions and adults’ Child PARQ is designed to be used with children
retrospective remembrances of the degree to from about 7 through whatever age they continue
which they experienced parental (maternal and to be in more-or-less continuous or ongoing con-
paternal) acceptance or rejection in childhood. tact with their parents. The Adult PARQ is
The measure consists of four scales: (1) warmth designed to be used whenever researchers or prac-
and affection (or coldness and lack of affection, titioners want respondents to reflect back onto an
when reverse scored), (2) hostility and aggression, earlier time in childhood with parents. The Parent
(3) indifference and neglect, and (4) undiffer- PARQ is used when parents want to reflect on
entiated rejection. Undifferentiated rejection their current accepting-rejecting behaviors toward
refers to individuals’ feelings that the parent their child.
does not really love them, want them, appreciate All versions of the standard (i.e., long) form of
them, or care about them in some other way with- the measure contain 60 items, 20 in the warmth/
out necessarily having any objective indicator that affection scale, 15 in the hostility/aggression and
# Springer International Publishing AG 2016
V. Zeigler-Hill, T.K. Shackelford (eds.), Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences,
DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-28099-8_56-1
2 Parental Acceptance-Rejection Questionnaire (PARQ)

indifference/neglect scales, and 10 in the undiffer- Early Childhood PARQ (ECPARQ). The
entiated rejection scale. The short forms of the ECPARQ is slightly different from all other ver-
measure – including the Early Childhood sions of the PARQ because each item must be read
PARQ – contain 24 items, 8 in the warmth/affec- individually to young children. Though the same
tion scale, 6 in the hostility/aggression and indif- 4-point Likert scale is used as on all other versions
ference/neglect scales, and 4 in the of the measures, two flash cards are also used to
undifferentiated rejection scale. Sample items on help young children make a game (i.e., an enjoy-
the Mother version of the Child PARQ include the able experience) out of the process. After reading
following. My mother “lets me know she loves each item aloud to children, the test administrator
me” (warmth/affection), “yells at me when she is asks, “Would you say that’s true or not true about
angry” (hostility/aggression), “pays no attention your mother/father?”. If the child says “true,” the
to me” (indifference/neglect), and “does not really test administrator asks “Would you say she/he
love me” (undifferentiated rejection). (4) almost always does that or she/he (3) only
Response Options and Scoring the PARQ. sometimes does that?” If, on the other hand, the
On all versions of the measure except for the Early child initially said, “That’s not true about my
Childhood PARQ (described below), individuals mother/father,” then the test administrator asks
respond to items such as these on a 4-point Likert “Would you say she/he (2) rarely (not very
scale from (4) “almost always true” through often) does that or (1) almost never does that?”
(1) “almost never true.” Scores on these scales Children’s responses are marked on the test sheet
are summed after reverse scoring the entire by the administrator.
warmth/affection scale to create a measure of per-
ceived coldness and lack of affection (a form of
rejection) and after reverse scoring called-for Psychometric Properties of the PARQ
items on the indifference/neglect scale.
Possible scores on the long (standard) forms Psychometric Properties of the ECPARQ. The
range from a low of 60 (maximum perceived ECPARQ is a newly developed measure. As a
acceptance) through a high of 240 (maximum per- result, limited evidence exists about its reliability
ceived rejection). Possible scores on the short and validity – though research with approximately
forms range from a low of 24 (maximum per- 1,500 children in Greece, Bulgaria, and Turkey
ceived acceptance) through a high of 96 (maxi- shows promising results. More specifically, coef-
mum perceived rejection). On average it takes ficient alpha on the Mother version of the measure
about 10–15 min to complete the standard ver- in Greece (Giotsa and Theodoropoulos 2016)
sions of the PARQ. It takes about 5–10 min to was .87. In Bulgaria it was .71 (Koltcheva and
complete the short forms. Djalev 2016) and in Turkey it was .85 (Okur and
Though all versions of the PARQ are easy to Berument 2016). Alpha on the Father version of
score by hand, we strongly recommend that the the measure in Greece was .90. In Bulgaria it
researchers employ “PARScore6” (an online scor- was .72. The Turkish study did not use the Father
ing system specifically created to score the PARQ version of the ECPARQ.
and related measures, available from Rohner Reliability of the Child, Adult, and Parent
Research Publications, www.rohnerresearchpu PARQ. Khaleque and Rohner (2002) summarized
blications.com, or through the Rohner Center; the reliability of the Child, Adult, and Parent
www.csiar.uconn.edu). The program automati- versions of the PARQ in a meta-analysis of
cally performs all required steps including reverse 51 studies worldwide. The results strongly sug-
scoring, computation of scale scores (including gest that the measure is reliable for research and
missing data), as well as total-test scores. It for clinical and applied purposes internationally as
records scores in a data file that can be exported well as for use among ethnic groups within the
to statistical packages such as SPSS and SAS. United States. More specifically, the overall alpha
coefficient (mean weighted effect size) aggregated
Parental Acceptance-Rejection Questionnaire (PARQ) 3

across these three versions of the PARQ and IPARTheory. IPARTheory is an evidence-based
across all ethnic and sociocultural groups of the theory of socialization and lifespan development
world was .89. More particularly, the mean that aims to predict and explain major conse-
weighted alpha coefficient for the Child PARQ quences and other correlates of interpersonal
was .89, for the Adult PARQ it was .95, and for (especially parental) acceptance-rejection world-
the Parent PARQ it was .84. The Early Childhood wide (Rohner 1986, 2004, 2016). Apropos of that,
PARQ was not included in this analysis because it nearly six decades of international research in
was not developed at the time of that study. This every continent except Antarctica has shown that
evidence is especially compelling because no children and adults everywhere – regardless of
study anywhere in the world was found where differences in culture, language, race, gender, or
alpha coefficients were low and nonsignificant. other such defining conditions – experience them-
Moreover, there was no significant heterogeneity selves to be cared about (accepted) or not cared
in effect sizes (alphas) across the major geo- about (rejected) in the four ways measured on the
graphic regions of the world or within the Amer- PARQ (i.e., warmth/affection, hostility/aggres-
ican ethnic groups studied. Additionally, there sion, indifference/neglect, and undifferentiated
were no significant differences in effect sizes rejection).
across the three versions of the PARQ.
Validity of the Child, Adult, and Parent
PARQ. Extensive evidence about the convergent, Conclusion
discriminant, and construct validity of the PARQ
is provided in Rohner (2005). Additional evi- From the evidence presented here – as well as
dence about the international measurement invari- more detailed evidence available in the PARQ
ance of the questionnaire is provided in two Test Manual (Rohner 2015) and elsewhere – we
articles. One (Gomez and Rohner 2011) tested believe that researchers, clinicians, and other
the factor structure and invariance of the Adult practitioners in the United States and internation-
PARQ in the United States and Australia. The ally should have full confidence in using the mea-
other (Senese et al. 2016) did the same in the sure for applied and research purposes.
United States and Italy. Both studies show full
invariance of the measure across these two sets
of societies – thus providing strong evidence for Cross-References
the universality of a central postulate in interper-
sonal acceptance-rejection theory (IPARTheory), ▶ Personality Assessment Questionnaire (PAQ)
briefly described below.

References
Use of the PARQ
Giotsa, A., & Theodoropoulos, C. (2016). Psychometric
properties of the early childhood acceptance-rejection
The PARQ has been used for more than four
questionnaire (ECARQ) in Greece. Paper presented at
decades with tens of thousands of children, adults, the meeting of International Congress on Interpersonal
and parents in the United States and internation- Acceptance-Rejection, Madrid.
ally. It is used extensively in research, in clinical Gomez, R., & Rohner, R. P. (2011). Tests of factor structure
and measurement invariance in the US and Australia
setting, in schools, by the courts, and in other
using the adult version of the Parental Acceptance
applied contexts. Different versions of the mea- Rejection Questionnaire. Cross Cultural Research,
sure are available in up to 52 languages and dia- 45, 267–285.
lects (Rohner 2015). Very often the questionnaire Khaleque, A., & Rohner, R. P. (2002). Reliability of mea-
sures assessing the relation between perceived parental
is used in conjunction with the Personality
acceptance-rejection and psychological adjustment:
Assessment Questionnaire (PAQ) – in the context A meta-analysis of cross-cultural and intercultural stud-
of research and practice drawing from ies. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 33, 86–98.
4 Parental Acceptance-Rejection Questionnaire (PARQ)

Koltcheva, N., & Djalev, L. (2016). Scale structure and Rohner, R. P. (2005). Parental Acceptance-Rejection Ques-
reliability of Bulgarian version of early childhood tionnaire (PARQ): Test manual. In R. P. Rohner &
acceptance-rejection questionnaire (ECARQ). Paper A. Khaleque (Eds.), Handbook for the study of parental
presented at the meeting of International Congress on acceptance and rejection (4th ed., pp. 43–106). Storrs:
Interpersonal Acceptance-Rejection, Madrid. Rohner Research Publications.
Okur, S., & Berument, S. K. (2016). School readiness of 5- Rohner, R. P. (2016). Introduction to interpersonal
year old children living in poverty: The role of per- acceptance-rejection theory (IPARTheory), methods,
ceived parenting. Paper presented at the meeting of evidence, and implications. Retrieved from http://
International Congress on Interpersonal Acceptance- csiar.uconn.edu/
Rejection, Madrid. Senese, V. P, Bacchini, D., Miranda, M. C., Aurino, C., &
Rohner, R. P. (1986). The warmth dimension: Foundations Rohner, R. P. (2016). The Adult Parental Acceptance-
of parental acceptance-rejection theory. Beverly Hills: Rejection Questionnaire: A cross-cultural comparison
Sage. Available as an e-book from Rohner Research of Italian and American short forms. Parenting, 16,
Publications, Storrs. 219–236.
Rohner, R. P. (2004). The parental “acceptance-rejection
syndrome”: Universal correlates of perceived rejection.
American Psychologist, 59, 827–840.

View publication stats

You might also like