You are on page 1of 4

See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.

net/publication/312385230

Personality Assessment Questionnaire (PAQ)

Chapter · January 2016


DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-28099-8_55-1

CITATIONS READS

12 5,562

2 authors:

Ronald Preston Rohner Sumbleen Ali


University of Connecticut University of Connecticut
184 PUBLICATIONS   7,609 CITATIONS    14 PUBLICATIONS   211 CITATIONS   

SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE

Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:

Loneliness in adulthood predicted by remembrances of childhood acceptance/rejection View project

Affective Coping and Remembrances of Acceptance-Rejection in Childhood View project

All content following this page was uploaded by Sumbleen Ali on 04 January 2018.

The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file.


P

Personality Assessment Introduction


Questionnaire (PAQ)
Structure of the PAQ. Two versions of the
Ronald P. Rohner and Sumbleen Ali PAQ are available: the Adult PAQ and the Child
University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, USA PAQ. Both are written in the present tenses and
ask respondents to reflect on their true – not their
ideal or wished-for – feelings about themselves.
The two versions are almost identical except that
Synonyms
the adult version contains 63 items (nine items per
scale), whereas the child version contains 42 items
Adult personality assessment questionnaire; Child
(six items per scale). The standard 63-item adult
personality assessment questionnaire
version of the PAQ is also available in a short form
of 42 items.
Sample items on the Child PAQ include the
Definition following:

The Personality Assessment Questionnaire (PAQ) “I think about fighting or being mean” (hostility/
is a self-report questionnaire designed to assess aggression).
seven personality dispositions known to be asso- “I like my parents to make a fuss over me when
ciated worldwide with the experience of interper- I am hurt or sick” (dependence).
sonal acceptance and rejection. These dispositions “I like myself” (positive self-esteem).
include: (1) hostility and aggression, including “I can compete successfully for the things I want”
physical aggression, verbal aggression, passive (positive self-adequacy).
aggression, and problems with the management “It is easy for me to show my friends that I really
of hostility and aggression, (2) dependence, like them” (emotional responsiveness).
(3) self-esteem, (4) self-adequacy, (5) emotional “I am cheerful and happy one minute and gloomy
responsiveness, (6) emotional stability, and or unhappy the next” (emotional instability).
(7) worldview. Collectively the seven PAQ scales “I think the world is a good, happy place”
constitute a composite measure of respondents’ (positive worldview).
overall psychological adjustment.
Sample items on the Adult PAQ include the
following:

# Springer International Publishing AG 2016


V. Zeigler-Hill, T.K. Shackelford (eds.), Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences,
DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-28099-8_55-1
2 Personality Assessment Questionnaire (PAQ)

“I feel resentment against people” (hostility/ overall mean-weighted effect size of coefficient
aggression). alpha on the Child PAQ was .83. On the Adult
“I like to be given encouragement when I have PAQ, it was .86 (Khaleque and Rohner 2002).
trouble with something” (dependence). Test–retest reliability across time periods ranging
“I get disgusted with myself” (negative self- from 1 to 18 months for the Child PAQ was shown
esteem). to be .61; test–retest reliability across time periods
“I think I am a failure” (negative self-adequacy). of 6 to 12 months for the Adult PAQ was shown to
“I feel I have trouble making and keeping close, be .76. Additional reliability and validity evidence
intimate friends” (emotional responsiveness). is summarized in Rohner and Chaki-Sircar
“Small set backs upset me a lot” (emotional (1988), Rohner and Khaleque (2005), and
instability). elsewhere.
“I view the universe as a threatening, dangerous
place” (negative worldview).
Use of the PAQ
Response Options and Scoring the PAQ
The PAQ has been used for more than four
decades with tens of thousands of children and
Individuals respond to items on a 4-point Likert-
adults in the USA and internationally. It is avail-
type scale ranging from (4) “almost always true of
able in 37 different languages and dialects
me” to (1) “almost never true of me.” A profile of
(Rohner 2016). Most often it is used in conjunc-
an individual’s overall self-reported psychologi-
tion with the Parental Acceptance-Rejection
cal adjustment is achieved by summing the seven
Questionnaire (PARQ, described in this volume
scale scores. Both versions of the PAQ utilize the
in the context of research drawing from interper-
same response options and scoring system, thus
sonal acceptance-rejection theory (IPARTheory).
maximizing direct comparability between ver-
IPARTheory is an evidence-based theory of
sions. It is easy to hand score the PAQ following
socialization and lifespan development that aims
these instructions, but it is even easier, much less
to predict and explain major consequences and
time-consuming, and often more accurate to use
other correlates of interpersonal (especially paren-
the software program PARScore 6 (an online scor-
tal) acceptance-rejection worldwide (Rohner
ing system available from Rohner Research Pub-
1986, 2004, 2016). It is used extensively in
lications or through the Rohner Center; csiar.
research, clinical settings, schools, and in other
uconn.edu) to score the PAQ. Typically,
applied contexts.
researchers and practitioners find it useful to
make an overall assessment of the psychological
adjustment of respondents. This is achieved by
summing the seven scale scores to form an overall Conclusion
or composite test score. For details refer to the
PAQ Test Manual, in Rohner and Khaleque 2005. The PAQ (both child and adult versions) is the
Computerized scoring procedures can streamline product of a long tradition of research and devel-
the process to a considerable degree. opment efforts to maintain and enhance the empir-
ical foundations of the instrument. The measures
have been translated and used across a broad
Psychometric Properties of the PAQ range of cultures throughout the world, including
the USA, and they have proven to be effective
Extensive evidence shows that both versions of with individuals of various ethnic backgrounds.
the PAQ are reliable and valid for use in national The measures are widely used for research, mental
and international research. For example, a meta- health screening, and policy implications.
analysis of 51 studies worldwide revealed that the
Personality Assessment Questionnaire (PAQ) 3

Cross-References Sage (Available as e-book from Rohner Research Pub-


lications, Storrs).
Rohner, R. P. (2004). The parental “acceptance-rejection
▶ Parental Acceptance-Rejection Questionnaire syndrome”: Universal correlates of perceived rejection.
(PARQ) American Psychologist, 59, 827–840.
Rohner, R. P. (2016). Introduction to interpersonal accep-
tance rejection theory (IPARTheory), methods, evi-
dence, and implications. Retrieved from http://csiar.
References uconn.edu/
Rohner, R. P., & Chaki-Sircar, M. (1988). Women and
Khaleque, A., & Rohner, R. P. (2002). Reliability of mea- children in a Bengali village. Hanover: University
sures assessing the relation between perceived parental Press of New England.
acceptance-rejection and psychological adjustment: Rohner, R. P., & Khaleque, A. (Eds.). (2005). Handbook
Meta-analysis of cross-cultural and intracultural stud- for the study of parental acceptance and rejection
ies. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 33, 87–99. (4th ed.). Storrs: Rohner Research Publications.
Rohner, R. P. (1986). The warmth dimension: Foundations
of parental acceptance-rejection theory. Beverly Hills:

View publication stats

You might also like