You are on page 1of 1

January 2014 ORIGINAL ARTICLES

16. Haataja L, Mercuri E, Regev R, Cowan F, Rutherford M, Dubowitz V, 22. Bar-Shalita T, Vatine JJ, Parush S. Sensory modulation disorder: a risk
et al. Optimality score for the neurologic examination of the infant at factor for participation in daily life activities. Dev Med Child Neurol
12 and 18 months of age. J Pediatr 1999;135:153-61. 2008;50:932-7.
17. Department for Communities and Local Government. English Indices of 23. Bart O, Shayevits S, Gabis LV, Morag I. Prediction of participation and
Deprivation 2010. London; 2011. Available at: https://www.gov.uk/ sensory modulation of late preterm infants at 12 months: a prospective
government/publications/english-indices-of-deprivation-2010. [uploaded study. Res Dev Disabil 2011;32:2732-8.
March 24, 2011; cited February 16, 2013]. 24. Bishop SL, Richler J, Lord C. Association between restricted and
18. Cochran WG. Some methods for strengthening the common c2 tests. repetitive behaviors and nonverbal IQ in children with autism spectrum
Biometrics 1954;10:417-51. disorders. Child Neuropsychol 2006;12:247-67.
19. van Noort-van der Spek IL, Franken MC, Weisglas-Kuperus N. 25. Ozonoff S, Macari S, Young GS, Goldring S, Thompson M, Rogers SJ.
Language functions in preterm-born children: a systematic review and Atypical object exploration at 12 months of age is associated with autism
meta-analysis. Pediatrics 2012;129:745-54. in a prospective sample. Autism 2008;12:457-72.
20. Barre N, Morgan A, Doyle LW, Anderson PJ. Language abilities in 26. Johnson S, Marlow N. Positive screening results on the modified
children who were very preterm and/or very low birth weight: a checklist for autism in toddlers: implications for very preterm popula-
meta-analysis. J Pediatr 2011;158:766-74. tions. J Pediatr 2009;154:478-80.
21. Als H. A synactive model of neonatal behavioral organization: Frame- 27. Baron-Cohen S, Allen J, Gillberg C. Can autism be detected at 18 months?
work for the assessment and support of the neurobehavioral develop- The needle, the haystack, and the CHAT. Br J Psychiat 1992;161:839-43.
ment of the premature infant and his parents in the environment of 28. Angelidou A, Asadi S, Alysandratos KD, Karagkouni A, Kourembanas S,
the neonatal intensive care unit. Phys Occupational Ther Pediatr 1986; Theoharides TC. Perinatal stress, brain inflammation, and risk of
6:3-55. autism—review and proposal. BMC Pediatr 2012;12:89.

50 Years Ago in THE JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS


Central Nervous System Complications of Children with Acute Leukemia: An
Evaluation of Treatment Methods
Evans AE, D’Angio GJ, Mitus A. J Pediatr 1964;64:94-6

ifty years ago in The Journal, Evans et al reported an historical cohort study of 53 children symptomatic from intra-
F cranial leukemia, treated by either lumbar puncture alone, cranial irradiation, or intrathecal methotrexate. Today
the results are not surprising; 98% of the irradiated patients became symptom-free for 2.8 months, and 88% of the
methotrexate-treated patients were symptom-free 3.7 months (P = .07). Only 48% of the children undergoing simple
lumbar puncture became asymptomatic and even then for only about 2 weeks. Whether this study’s small sample size
would have survived today’s peer review process to merit publication is debatable.
Nonetheless, this paper presaged a landmark shift in the management and cure of childhood acute lymphoblastic
leukemia (ALL). Indeed, the authors mention in their last paragraph the “prophylactic” use of monthly intrathecal
methotrexate in 12 patients whose central nervous system leukemia had already been eradicated and their
symptom-free survival of 7 or more months. That success was unheralded! But, by the end of the 1960s, the “Total
Therapy” studies at St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital using prophylactic craniospinal irradiation and intrathecal
methotrexate reduced the rate of leukemia relapse into the central nervous system from more than 50% to approx-
imately 10%, and afforded cures in greater than 50% of children in an era when ALL took the lives of 80% or more.1
The next 50 years of advancing cures in ALL and other childhood cancers will be more challenging. Now that many
childhood cancers have 5-year survival rates in excess of 80%, clinical trials will be cumbersome, as much larger sizes
will be necessary to demonstrate increasingly smaller increments of success. Accumulating the larger samples sizes
required will be difficult because of cost as well as the increasing division of childhood cancers into smaller and smaller
diseases based upon molecular subtypes. Surely we will conceive new clinical trial designs to tackle these logistical
issues. However, we should never give short shrift to initial observations such as that of Evans et al, even when sample
size is small, if the findings are compelling and the impact potentially immense.

Paul Graham Fisher, MD


Departments of Neurology, Pediatrics, and Human Biology
Lucile Packard Children’s Hospital
Stanford University
Palo Alto, California
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpeds.2013.08.003
Reference

1. Simone J, Aur RJA, Hustu HO, Pinkel D. “Total therapy” studies of acute lymphocytic leukemia in children: current results and prospects for
cure. Cancer 1972;30:1488-94.

Evaluation of Early Childhood Social-Communication Difficulties in Children Born Preterm Using the Quantitative 33
Checklist for Autism in Toddlers

You might also like