Professional Documents
Culture Documents
‘
up polluting the wider environment. It is hard to grasp just how small
This is not a problem confined to Everyday examples nanomaterials are, and so just
Should nanoproducts be labelled? nanotechnology of course, and a number Factories and research laboratories how different nanotechnology
of chemicals that we know to be toxic could release nanoparticles in their is. If you look at one of the fine
In November 2009, the European the nano-ingredients pose any risk. are used in everyday products such as waste streams. Many international hairs on the back of your hand, that
Union passed a law that will soon force Without context, such labels could be light bulbs and batteries. Consumers bodies are looking at ways in which is one of the smallest structures we
manufacturers of cosmetics to state misinterpreted as warnings, they say. are asked to dispose of these products accidental release of nanoparticles can can see with the naked eye, and yet it
on the label if their products contain carefully, but there is no way to be sure be monitored and prevented. is perhaps 10,000 times bigger than a
nanoparticles. Will more products Everyday examples that they will do so. And some escapes nanoparticle.
follow? The issue of labelling has Lipsticks and face creams that contain are impossible to prevent – for example, Potential risks Because nanotechnology operates
divided campaigners and politicians, nanoparticles will soon be labelled as much of the mercury in the atmosphere Toxic particles could pollute the natural at the smallest scales of our bodies,
just as it has with whether foods such. Perhaps “nano-free” could then comes from the cremation of dead environment and kill wildlife. it is immensely powerful. We could,
should be labelled as containing start to appear on products too? for example, design nanoparticles
genetically modified ingredients. to infiltrate cancer cells and destroy
Supporters of labels on nanotech say Potential risks them, or reengineer the capabilities of
they will encourage consumer choice. Labels might be a shortcut for industry diseased livers and kidneys from the
Opponents say they will be meaningless to appear “transparent” without really inside, cell by cell. Of course there are
without extra information on whether informing the public. dangers with this approach, but when Mark Miodownik is a materials scientist
we talk about risk we have to consider at University College London Linda Nylind
the risks of not developing and using
nanotechnology. Talk to anyone on the century in which we apply
dialysis or waiting for a transplant nanotechnology to ourselves and
and you start to realise that there are make it possible to reengineer the
millions of ill people for whom this human body. This, of course, ‘
technology is their best hope of a has massive social and ethical
normal life. implications that we must
The 21st century is likely to be not ignore.