Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Sustainability 15 04068
Sustainability 15 04068
Article
The Impact of Green Financial Policy on the Regional Economic
Development Level and AQI—Evidence from Zhejiang
Province, China
Min-Xing Wang 1,† , Lufei Huang 1, * and Zhen-Ming Chen 2, *,†
Abstract: To explore the impact of green financial policy on the regional economic development
level and the Air Quality Index (AQI), this paper selected two pilot regions of green financial reform
policy to construct a quasi-experiment in Zhejiang Province. The results show that green finance
reform can reduce AQI and pass the parallel trend test and placebo test, showing strong stability.
Mechanism analysis shows that green finance reform can improve environmental quality mainly
by increasing urban expenditure on science and technology, the level of urban innovation, and the
number of urban enterprise innovations. Then, from a more general perspective, this paper discusses
the internal relationship between green finance policy, environmental pollution and its control, and
enterprise development and puts forward suggestions for future green finance policy formulation
and policy implementation.
Keywords: regional economic development level; green financial policy; AQI; difference-in-
differences method
of the green financial reform pilot zone. According to our hypothesis, we are expecting
to observe an increase in the regional economic development level and a decrease in the
AQI. Additionally, it is factually proven that the regional economic development level and
related indicators have different degrees of influence on the AQI.
By the end of 2020, the outstanding loans related to green industries in the 6 provinces
(autonomous regions) and 6 localities had reached CNY 236.83 billion, accounting for
15.1 percent of the total outstanding loans in the 6 provinces (autonomous regions) and
9 localities, 4.3 percentage points higher than the national average. Meanwhile, the out-
standing green bonds reached CNY 135 billion, a year-on-year increase of 66% (Table 1).
From a global perspective, the two mainly recognized green financial policies are the
ISO Sustainable Finance Standards and the EU Sustainable Finance Classification Scheme.
The ISO Sustainable Finance Standard aims to promote the development of sustainable
finance through its formulation of the standard, transfer a large amount of capital to more
Sustainability 2023, 15, 4068 3 of 23
From a global perspective, the two mainly recognized green financial policies are the
ISO Sustainable Finance Standards and the EU Sustainable Finance Classification Scheme.
The ISO Sustainable Finance Standard aims to promote the development of sustainable
finance through its formulation of the standard, transfer a large amount of capital to more
sustainable low-carbon industries, and solve the problems of climate change, inequality,
and serious depletion of natural resources faced by the world. The EU Sustainable Finance
Classification Scheme is a specific measure to implement the EU’s carbon neutrality. For
67 economic activities, the technical screening criteria were formulated, and the future
application arrangements of the classification were proposed. Meanwhile, there are stan-
dards of other international organizations, such as the Equator Principles, which were
launched by the banking industry and provide a reference for commercial banks to effec-
tively prevent environmental and social risks. The Green Bond Principle (GBP) is intended
to enhance the transparency of green bond information disclosure and promote the healthy
development of the green bond market. The Climate Bond Standard (CBS) divides eight
categories of projects, mainly including energy, construction, industry, waste and pollution
control, transportation, information technology (Huang, Lufei et al. [1]), agriculture and
forestry, and climate adaptation. GBP and CBS are currently the most accepted green bond
standards in the international market and have played an important role in promoting the
transparency of the green bond market.
The main goal of the experimental zone can be summed up as follows: first, gradually
promote the green reform of financial systems, prepare a municipal (county) a balance
sheet and a special statistical system of natural resources, and provide institutional guar-
antee for green financial development; second, support the innovation of green financial
products, introduce direct financing models that serve the green economy, encourage green
and environmental protection enterprises to participate in direct financing and provide
them with preferential convenience, and promote the development of the green industry
from the supply side; third, support the green economy by means of transfer payment,
establish a number of green industry and green energy development funds, and encourage
the development of related green enterprises; and fourth, continuing to innovate new
insurance models in the context of sustainable development, actively explore the devel-
opment mode of green insurance represented by liability insurance, and try to introduce
several green insurance types, such as work safety and comprehensive liability insurance
for environmental pollution.
According to the research of Meng and Zhang [2], green finance can promote high-
quality economic development through environmental improvement effect. Take Huzhou
as an example; by the end of 2021, the balance of green loans in Huzhou was CNY
161.5 billion, with a year-on-year growth of 49.46% and a growth rate of 16.5 percent-
age points higher than the national average. There were 830 newly listed enterprises in the
Zhejiang Equity Trading Center, bringing the total number to 1113. In 2021, the new energy
industry chain Tianneng Shares and Microvast Holdings were listed on the Science and
Technology Innovation Board and NASDAQ. These data are consistent with the conclusion
of Lee and Lee [3], according to which the implementation of green finance policies can
improve the level of green economic development significantly.
The results show that environmental pollution has been effectively suppressed after
the implementation of the green finance policy. This conclusion still holds after a series
of robustness tests. Further mechanism analysis results showed that the green financial
policy, mainly through green innovation ability, can improve the overall enterprise urban
innovation ability; prompt the consciousness of high energy consumption and the high
pollution industry to increase production of environmental protection standard; transform
green production so as to guide the transformation and upgrading of industrial structure;
avoid policy intervention that may have a negative bias on the market economy; and at the
same time, in a micro and macro level, reduce the pollution of the environment to promote
ecological progress. Therefore, this research tends to reveal the transmission mechanism
and the average effect of green finance on the regional economy and environmental pollu-
Sustainability 2023, 15, 4068 4 of 23
tion, especially AQI. The possible conclusions provide firm support for the formulations of
green financial policies and the development of the green financial reform pilot zone, assist
in achieving peaking carbon dioxide emissions and carbon neutrality, as well as provide
references for green financial system improvement and global sustainable development.
2. Literature Review
At present, there are numerous and complex types of research on regional economic
development. This paper mainly discusses three literature clues directly related to this
study: the first is the factors influencing regional economic development; the second is the
possible causes of environmental pollution, especially AQI; and the third is the impact of
green finance policies. By sorting out the work of scholars in recent years, we can effectively
grasp the academic trends and hot topics in this research direction (Table 2).
Figure 2. FrameworkFigure
of research flow. of research flow.
2. Framework
cost as far as possible, one province should be selected from China’s green finance reform
and innovation pilot zone. Zhejiang is undoubtedly the most representative area and more
able to find typical problems.
Huzhou City and Quzhou City are both important representatives of the new economic
development and financial market construction in the eastern coastal areas of the first batch
of China’s green finance reform and innovation pilot zones, and the influence of their green
finance policies on regional economic development level and AQI is representative. Based
on the General Plan released on 23 June 2017 for setting up 5 green finance reforms and
innovation pilot zones, Huzhou and Quzhou of Zhejiang decided to take the first green
finance innovation pilot zone as a policy impact, construct a natural experiment, identify
the impact of green finance policies on urban pollution, and try to analyze the mechanism
behind it. This policy enables Huzhou and Quzhou to have more reliable data sources
when studying the influence of green finance policies on regional economic development
levels and AQI compared with other reform and innovation pilot areas. Therefore, Huzhou
and Quzhou in Zhejiang Province are selected as the experimental group in this study.
However, since the scope of policy influence in this paper involves nine regions in six
provinces, the spatial spillover effect is relatively low in this circumstance. At this time,
considering the spatial spillover effect, bringing the SDID model into use may cause greater
errors than the benchmark DID method. Meanwhile, in this study, the spatial spillover effect
is not clearly reflected in the indicators of AQI, such as city GDP, government spending,
household savings, and the number of industrial enterprises, so the DID method is used in
this study instead of SDID.
In addition, we obtained the annual data of each city in Zhejiang Province from the
China City Statistical Yearbook, including city GDP, government financial expenditure,
the industrial output value of each industry, total import and export volume, fixed asset
investment, household deposits, etc. The number of urban industrial enterprises in the
sample period is also obtained from the Database of China Industrial Enterprises. To further
carry out the mechanism analysis, we also obtained the number of patent applications by
urban enterprises from the State Intellectual Property Office during 2014–2018 and took
the urban innovation index into account. Table 3 shows the descriptive statistical results
obtained after data processing.
H1: There
series are no significant
stationary analysis,exogenous disturbances
there are no exogenousduring the policy
variables period aofsignificant
that cause green finance re-
impact.
form in Huzhou and Quzhou.
We present two hypotheses here:
H2:
H1:There
Thereare
areno
no significant endogenous
significant exogenous disturbances
disturbances during
during the the policy
policy period
period of green
of green finance
finance reform
reform in Huzhou
in Huzhou and Quzhou.
and Quzhou.
H2:Therefore, wesignificant
There are no drew theendogenous
annual average AQI during
disturbances trend chart of each
the policy perioddistrict
of greencity in
finance
Zhejiang
reform inProvince fromQuzhou.
Huzhou and 2014 to 2018 according to relevant data, as shown below in Figure
3.
Therefore, we drew the annual average AQI trend chart of each district city in Zhejiang
Province from 2014 to 2018 according to relevant data, as shown below in Figure 3.
Figure 3. Annual average AQI trend of each city in Zhejiang Province during 2014–2018.
Figure It
3. can
Annual average
be seen thatAQI trend
since of although
2014, each city inthe
Zhejiang Province
AQI level during remained
in Huzhou 2014–2018.high before
2015, it has shown a good trend since 2016. The overall air quality level in the sample
It can
period is be seenthe
about thatsame
sinceas
2014,
thatalthough the AQI
in Hangzhou, level in Huzhou
Shaoxing, remained
and Jiaxing, highpollution
and the before
2015, it has shown a good trend since 2016. The overall air quality level
level is not prominent. The air quality of Quzhou has been at a middle to upper level in thein the sample
period
wholeissample
about the same
period andaseven
that in Hangzhou,
ranked as one Shaoxing, and Jiaxing,
of the top three cities inand
the the pollution
province until
level is not prominent. The air quality of Quzhou has been at a middle
2016. It can be seen that the pilot selection of the reform pilot zone is not targeted to upper level
at in
the
the whole
level sample
of urban air period and even ranked as one of the top three cities in the province
pollution.
until 2016. It canfrom
Secondly, be seenthe that the pilotofselection
perspective of the reform
the development pilot zone
conditions is notfinance,
of green targetedpilot
at
the level of urban air pollution.
areas of reform generally need to have the following three systems: first, the inclusive
Secondly,
financial from the
institution perspective
system of the
with policy development
banks conditions of
and large commercial green
banks as finance,
the mainpilot
body;
areas of reform generally need to have the following three systems: first,
second, the green inclusive financial technology system represented by digital operations; the inclusive
third, the green financial infrastructure system with credit investigation and the legal system
as the core. In this paper, the level of urban financial development is measured by resident
deposits and urban GDP. The following figure (Figure 4) shows the financial development
of cities with districts in Zhejiang Province from 2014 to 2018. It can be seen that the
financial development level of Huzhou and Quzhou is basically between the provincial
average level and has no outstanding performance. Therefore, the implementation of green
finance policies in Huzhou and Quzhou may not be due to consideration of the financial
development level.
ured by resident deposits and urban GDP. The following figure (Figure 4) shows the fi-
nancial development of cities with districts in Zhejiang Province from 2014 to 2018. It can
be seen that the financial development level of Huzhou and Quzhou is basically between
the provincial average level and has no outstanding performance. Therefore, the imple-
mentation of green finance policies in Huzhou and Quzhou may not be due to considera-
Sustainability 2023, 15, 4068 11 of 23
tion of the financial development level.
where AQIit is the air quality index of city i on day t; treatit × postit is the interaction term
of the dummy variable of the experimental group and whether the policy occurs or not. If
city i is Huzhou or Quzhou, treatit is 1; if i is another city in Zhejiang Province, 0 is taken; if
time t is on and after 23 June 2017, postit is 1; otherwise, 0 is taken. XiT is a group of control
variables at the city level, and T is 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, and 2018, respectively. Since the
data at the city level are annual data, we multiply them by the time dummy variable (day)
dateit and turn it into a matrix. However, due to the reason of multiple collinearities, we
can only obtain (t − 1) units of α. In addition, in order to alleviate the problem of missing
variables as much as possible, city fixed effect γi and time fixed effect λt are added in this
paper, and all regression standard errors in this paper are clustered at the city level. ε it is
the error term.
In column (1) of Table 4, no control variables are added; only the city-fixed effect and
date-fixed effect are controlled. The results show that green finance reform policies are
significantly negatively correlated with the daily average AQI of cities. In column (2), a
series of urban control variables are added based on column (1), and the results are still
robust. The difference between column (3) and column (2) is that only the observation
values of December, January, and February of each year will be taken, in the hope that the
stable weather in winter can eliminate the interference of geographical reasons. From the
results, the difference between the estimated results of the coefficients is not large and is
at least at the significance level of 5%. Therefore, if column (2) is listed as the benchmark
Sustainability 2023, 15, 4068 13 of 23
column, we can say that the green finance reform makes the city AQI decrease by 1.463,
which explains 19.89% of the index change before and after the policy takes place.
The control variables selected in this paper remain basically significant, and the di-
rection of the coefficient is consistent with intuitive performance, which better avoids the
problem of “Bad Controls”. Among them, urban GDP, secondary and tertiary industries,
fixed investment, and the number of industrial enterprises are all negatively correlated with
AQI, which answers our long-term concern that economic development, urbanization, or
industrialization will indeed lead to the deterioration of environmental quality. Nowadays,
regional economics urgently needs to seek new environmental governance; therefore, we
also note that the financial development level (residents’ deposits and the ratio of GDP) and
urban air quality have a significant negative correlation, meaning that in addition to the
green financial policy related to the environment, a higher level of overall financial develop-
ment can also help improve air quality. In the sixth part, this paper discusses the influence
mechanism of the improvement of the enterprise financing environment on environmental
improvement in detail, and in the seventh part, it makes an extended discussion.
5. Robustness Test
5.1. Parallel Trend Test
An important mechanism of this paper is that the reform of green finance policy leads
to a change in urban enterprises’ behavior, thus affecting the level of urban air quality.
Moreover, the change in air quality can only be achieved through a change in green finance
policy rather than through other means. Therefore, it is necessary to study whether the
difference between the treatment group (cities affected by green finance policy reform) and
the control group (cities not affected by green finance policy reform) is significant before
the time point of departmental change. If the air quality changes in the two groups do
not meet the parallel trend, the results of this paper should not be valid. To this end, the
following regression model is set up:
1 1825
AQIit = ϕ ∑ year p × treatit × postit + ∑ αt (dateit × XiT ) + γi + λt + ε it (2)
−2 t =1
In which year p represents the time point dummy variable before and after the year
of the policy occurrence. For example, year−2 represents the second year before the policy
occurrence, and year1 represents the first year after the policy occurrence. The rest of the
settings are similar to the reference Equation (1).
Figure 5 draws vintage coefficient changes before and after the implementation of
the policy and its implementation with a relative time point of 0 in 2017. Before the
implementation of the policy, in the control group (Huzhou and Quzhou City), there was no
significant difference with a relatively consistent trend. After the policy’s implementation,
the control of AQI levels has dropped significantly, showing that the results of this paper
are still solid.
Probabilitydensity
Figure6.6.Probability
Figure densityfunction
functionofofplacebo
placebotest
testcoefficient.
coefficient.
Figure 6 reports
6. Mechanism Analysis the placebo inspection probability density function of the regression
coefficient, each scatters diagram represents every stochastic simulation. It is concluded that
6.1.
theReview of Mechanism
estimated coefficientAnalysis
is 0, the dark vertical lines state that visible estimated coefficients
obeyThis section
normal will studyand
distribution, the the
mechanism of green
red dashed finance reform
line represents affecting the
the benchmark environ-
return as the
ment. From a micro perspective, green finance affects the environment through
actual result. The estimated coefficient obtained in this paper is a small probability event, the fol-
lowing two mechanisms:
so the results are robust. the positive incentive to enterprises’ green innovation and the
inhibition of the investment of highly polluting enterprises. Incentives and constraints on
6. Mechanism
the financing side Analysis
are the core of these two mechanisms.
6.1. Enterprise
Review of Mechanism
innovation Analysis
requires a large amount of research and development invest-
ment,This
the risk
section will study environmental
is high, and the the mechanismbenefits brought
of green financebyreform
green innovation
affecting thecannot
envi-
be converted
ronment. Fromintoa corporate profits. Therefore,
micro perspective, under
green finance the assumption
affects of a rational
the environment through eco-
the
nomic person, as long as the cost of environmental regulation is lower than the benefits of
green technology innovation, green innovation behavior will not occur. In this case, en-
terprises lack the motivation to carry out green innovation and will only use low-cost
emission reduction technologies to avoid environmental regulations. Green finance, on
Sustainability 2023, 15, 4068 15 of 23
following two mechanisms: the positive incentive to enterprises’ green innovation and the
inhibition of the investment of highly polluting enterprises. Incentives and constraints on
the financing side are the core of these two mechanisms.
Enterprise innovation requires a large amount of research and development invest-
ment, the risk is high, and the environmental benefits brought by green innovation cannot
be converted into corporate profits. Therefore, under the assumption of a rational economic
person, as long as the cost of environmental regulation is lower than the benefits of green
technology innovation, green innovation behavior will not occur. In this case, enterprises
lack the motivation to carry out green innovation and will only use low-cost emission
reduction technologies to avoid environmental regulations. Green finance, on the one
hand, reduces green enterprise financing costs (such as lower interest) so as to increase the
expected return of green innovation; on the other hand, improving the environmental regu-
lation cost (which is dominated by the financing difficulty or policy of potential penalties)
further internalizes the cost of negative externalities, enabling enterprises to carry out green
innovation motivation enhancement. The existing literature supports this view from both
theoretical and empirical aspects. Through the principal-agent relationship between banks
and enterprises, considering the risks and market risks of enterprises’ green investment,
government subsidies for green credit enhance the motivation of enterprises to carry out
green innovation by increasing the expected returns of enterprises’ investment. The impact
mechanism of green innovation on the environment can be divided into the following three
stages: in the first stage, the technological progress of a single enterprise directly reduces
energy consumption and emissions by increasing energy utilization efficiency and reducing
pollutant emissions. In the second stage, the progress of single-factor technology promotes
the utilization rate of labor, capital, and other factors, which improves the total factor
productivity of the green industry. In the third stage, after the technological innovation
and upgrading of the green industry, along with the expansion of the scale of related indus-
tries, on the one hand, technological progress will flow to the upstream and downstream
industries through green investment and other forms, leading to the green transformation
of upstream and downstream enterprises; on the other hand, it will stimulate and promote
the green innovation activities of competitive enterprises and further expand the effect of
carbon emission reduction.
On the empirical level, from the environmental status of enterprises to the green
innovation caused by the change in financing costs, which leads to the improvement of
environmental quality, each node of this path is supported by the relevant literature. For
the first point, the disclosure of environmental information by enterprises can significantly
reduce their financing costs. Wang, Lei, Long, and Zhao [23] used the data from listed
companies to prove that the implementation of policies related to green credit reduced
the financing costs of green enterprises and increased the financing costs of high-polluting
enterprises. As for the promoting effect of green enterprise innovation, green credit made
the green innovation performance of related industries more active, which was manifested
by the significant increase in the number of green patents. Scholars used the data from
152 environmental protection enterprises to prove that the expansion of the green credit
scale can significantly promote the technological innovation of environmental protection
enterprises through the intermediary variable of R&D input.
Investment in highly polluting enterprises is inhibited by the following two mecha-
nisms: one is the direct effect of higher financing costs. Under the requirements of green
finance, highly polluting enterprises, especially state-owned enterprises that have had
easy access to loans in the past, will face higher financing costs. The increase in financing
costs reduces the available cash flow and reduces the returns on investment projects, thus
curbing excessive investment in polluting enterprises. Second, green finance has a stronger
supervision effect, thus effectively solving the principal-agent problem between banks and
enterprises. First, the supervision function of green finance has clear directivity. Taking the
securitization of green assets as an example, the securitization of green assets in mature
countries requires the rating and certification of third-party institutions. Secondly, the
Sustainability 2023, 15, 4068 16 of 23
green credit supervision function has long-term sustainability. Financial institutions are
required to track the progress of debtors’ projects over time and even have the power to
terminate credit. In this case, high-polluting enterprises are more motivated to change
the original investment mode, and the agency cost is significantly reduced. The existing
literature deals with both of these mechanisms. Wang, Qi, Zhou, Zhou, and Huang [24]
found that after the implementation of the Green Credit Guidelines, interest-bearing debt
financing and long-term liabilities of heavily polluting enterprises, especially state-owned
enterprises, decreased significantly, reflecting the direct effect of rising financing costs.
Others measured agency costs with the rate of management expenses and found that green
credit policies significantly reduced agency costs.
To sum up, green finance promotes green innovation and inhibits the investment of
highly polluting enterprises through financing constraints on micro-enterprises. From a
macro point of view, the proportion of low-polluting enterprises using green technologies
is increasing while the proportion of high-polluting enterprises is decreasing. At the same
time, the overall pollution level of the industry will decrease due to the spillover effect of
the technology.
Statistics, since regions in five provinces were designated as pilot zones for green finance in
2017, fiscal spending on science and technology has been on the rise and is higher than the
national level in the same period. Taking the data of Zhejiang Province as an example, the
fiscal expenditure on science and technology from 2016 to 2020 is CNY 269 billion, CNY
303.5 billion, CNY 380 billion, CNY 516 billion, and CNY 42.7 billion, respectively, with an
average annual growth rate of 12%; the proportion of government expenditure on science
and technology in the total government expenditure also increased year by year (except for
2020, which may be affected by the epidemic and decline), to 3.86%, 4.03%, 4.4%, 5.1%, and
4.2%, respectively, higher than the national figures of 3.5%, 3.58%, 3.77%, 3.96%, and 3.67%
in the same period. Columns (2), (3), and (4) all confirm that the green finance reform has
indeed promoted the innovation capacity of Huzhou and Quzhou and the improvement of
urban innovation output.
panies to adjust their production methods without distorting production in the market
economy. At the same time, charging for pollutants can promote green innovation by
enterprises through the “back forcing” mechanism, thus offsetting the negative impact of
higher production costs on enterprises. The existing works of literature have proven this
point from an empirical point of view. According to the study of Zhang, Liu, Wang, and
Zhou [25], with the gradual improvement of environmental regulation intensity, there is
an “inverted U-shaped” relationship between enterprise innovation degree and environ-
mental regulation intensity, and appropriate environmental regulation can indeed “force”
enterprises to carry out technological innovation.
Therefore, pollutant charging, such as green finance, can not only restrain the invest-
ment of high-polluting enterprises through economic constraints but also “force” enter-
prises to carry out technological innovation. However, in practice, this kind of environmen-
tal regulation faces two main problems: one is the phenomenon of pollution transfer to
the nearest place. Because the actual situation varies from place to place, the formulation
of environmental regulations is usually left to local governments. Therefore, the law en-
forcement strength of each regional administrative agency and the size of the pollutant tax
are bound to be different. This leads polluting companies to move from areas with high
environmental taxes to areas with low environmental taxes, which leads to a concentration
of pollution. Due to the objective needs of local governments to boost GDP and economic
growth, this phenomenon is widespread, and usually, backward areas have more incentives
to introduce high-polluting enterprises. Evidence have found that polluting enterprises
move to neighboring cities due to environmental regulations. They further point out that
the pollution transfer to nearby places intensifies the pollution level of industrial structures
in the places where the pollution is moved, thereby failing to improve the pollution at
the national level. Another problem with environmental regulation is that its implemen-
tation depends on laws and, therefore, on the degree of perfection of relevant laws and
the strength of local legal construction and enforcement. If local law enforcement and
judicial efficiency are low and the pollution behavior of enterprises cannot be effectively
improved, then the incentive effect of the policy will be greatly reduced. Research of
scholars shows that the construction of environmental protection courts can significantly
reduce local pollutant emission levels, so the effect of environmental regulation depends
on the construction of the rule of law to a certain extent.
Green finance and sustainable development policies may effectively solve the above
two problems. First of all, as environmental protection tax has been collected, the local
government cannot collect it effectively due to various objective reasons. There may even
be a situation where the local government acquiesces in the low payment of environmental
protection tax for the sake of the economic growth level. The central government actually
formulated a unified environmental protection tax for each administrative region and left
some local governments to play the subjective initiative combined with the objective reality
of the local economic environment to better balance the external compensation. The unified
tax target of the central government can help reduce the complexity of tax collection and
solve the problem of the transfer of production pollution emissions to different places. As a
common means to compensate for positive externalities and punish negative externalities
in many countries, the tax wedge has proven its good enforceability, high compensation
efficiency, and low interference with the operation of the market economy.
Environmental protection subsidies are similar to green finance, both of which provide
positive economic incentives to green enterprises to promote their emission reduction.
The big problem with environmental subsidies, however, is that they do not encourage
firms to innovate. Based on the “predatory hand” theory of government intervention, after
enterprises receive environmental protection subsidies, they need to meet the requirements
of the government and even allocate resources under the “domination” of the government,
thus crowding out the motivation and resources for enterprises to engage in technological
innovation. For example, the domestic policy “Several Provisions on Strengthening the
Management of Environmental Protection Subsidy Funds” points out that “the funds
Sustainability 2023, 15, 4068 19 of 23
of environmental protection subsidy shall be used for the management of key pollution
sources and comprehensive environmental management, and shall not be diverted to
other purposes” so that there is no incentive for technological innovation. On the contrary,
according to the above discussion, green finance plays a strong role in promoting the green
innovation of enterprises.
To sum up, compared with traditional environmental regulation tools, green finance
not only acts as a more direct incentive to solve the problem of the transfer of polluting enter-
prises but also positively stimulates the innovation of environmental protection enterprises.
This effectively solves some defects faced by traditional environmental regulation tools.
trading market, unify the national carbon market under the mix of planned indicators
and market economy, and try to establish an open carbon trading channel. Improve the
incentive mechanism to guide the transformation of social capital into green industries. We
will build platforms for big data financing and supervision and promote the integrated
development of fintech and green finance.
Second, we need to improve the risk management mechanism for green finance.
Short-term production losses on natural endowments caused by environmental protection,
systemic market risks caused by macroeconomic factors, and the transformation and
upgrading of the social and economic structure during the construction of a green finance
system are all sources or potential sources of green finance risks. Develop assessment and
practice areas with the ESG concept and responsible investment as the core, and enhance
corporate responsibility and awareness of environmental governance for risk prevention;
improve the risk management mechanism; establish a standard and unified mandatory
green finance information disclosure system; improve financial institutions’ ability to
analyze and manage climate and environmental risks; and make money by improving
financial institutions’ ability to avoid and disperse green finance risks. Administrative
support should be given to the green finance industry for risk control. If necessary, local
government credit guarantees or government purchase and transfer payments can be used
to compensate for the risks of the green finance industry.
Third, establish a sustainable green finance development model guided by the gov-
ernment and dominated by the market. Make full use of the advantages of China’s green
finance policy system, improve and optimize the market mechanism, and give play to the
government’s guiding role in resource allocation and other fields. The government will
encourage the participation of multiple entities. Through overall planning, the government
will integrate and invigorate the resources and strengths of multiple entities, including reg-
ulators, financial institutions, and enterprises, and actively explore a green transformation
path that combines social responsibility with economic benefits.
Fourth, we should promote the experience of pilot reforms, explore suitable devel-
opment directions for green finance, and complete the transformation and upgrade from
the original economic model to the green finance system. Drawing on the achievements
of the existing green finance reform and innovation pilot zones, local governments, under
the leadership of the central government, will give full play to their subjective initiative
to further explore the green finance development model and establish a green finance de-
velopment regional model with strong enforceability, sustainability, a complete industrial
chain, and distinctive features in each administrative region.
Fifth, promote the integration of green finance and the concept of sustainable devel-
opment to form a more natural, social, ecological, economic, and efficient use of natural
resources in the process of the basic relationship to ensure global sustainable development.
At the micro level, the sustainability of enterprise operations focuses on the formation
of a healthy, stable, and continuously growing business model and the formation of a
positive and mutually beneficial game between operators, capital owners, employees, and
other stakeholders. At the macro level, compared with the previous system, the economic
construction guided by the concept of sustainable development focuses more on the pre-
vention, avoidance, and dispersion of systemic and non-systemic risks, which is conducive
to the stability and prosperity of the social economy.
8. Conclusions
In this paper, the impact of green finance policy reform on urban air quality and the
transmission mechanism were studied by using the 2017 “General Plan on the Establish-
ment of Five Green Finance Reform and Innovation Pilot Zones” as a policy impact and
relying on the 2014–2018 Chinese Urban Air Quality Index. The research results show
that green financial reform can reduce the AQI by 1.463, which explains 19.89% of the
change in index before and after the policy. Green financial reform reduces AQI levels by
influencing important regional economy factors such as city GDP, government spending,
Sustainability 2023, 15, 4068 22 of 23
household savings, and the innovation index. There are positive correlations between
green financial reform and regional economic development. The parallel trend test and
placebo test showed strong stability. Therefore, we also note that the fact that the financial
development level (residents’ deposits and the ratio of GDP) and urban air quality have a
significant negative correlation means that, in addition to the green financial policy related
to the environment, a higher level of overall financial development can also help improve
air quality. Negative correlations exist between the regional economy and city AQI. Mecha-
nism analysis shows green finance promotes enterprises’ green innovation by changing the
incentives at the financing end.
Environmental pollution has been effectively curbed after the implementation of the
green financial policy. It mainly promotes the high energy consumption and high pollution
industries to consciously improve the production environmental protection standards and
transform green production by improving the green innovation ability of enterprises and
the overall innovation ability of cities, so as to guide the transformation and upgrading of
the industrial structure, avoid the possible negative bias impact of policy intervention on
the market economy, reduce environmental pollution at the micro and macro levels, and
promote the process of ecological civilization construction.
This study provides empirical support for green finance policies to effectively curb
environmental pollution and provides reference for green finance development, improve-
ment of the green finance system, and long-term ecological civilization construction for
developing countries under the goal of carbon neutrality. In domestic views, it will be
referential for the formation of green financial policies and the development of green fi-
nancial reform pilot zone. As for the global influences, the study will assist in peaking
carbon dioxide emissions and achieving carbon neutrality, as well as serve as a reference for
green financial system improvement and global sustainable development. Raising regional
economic development levels through the macroeconomic regulation of green financial
policies can be effective for controlling air quality such as the AQI. Developing countries
with similar statuses can draw on the experiences of the processing method, the results of
China’s green financial reform pilot zones, and the establishment of green financial policies.
This study could be further optimized by a comprehensive analysis of more indicators.
Additionally, both regions, which are just focused on the realization of green finance, could
be further expanded after being extended to more pilot regions that aim to explore the
support for modern agriculture and clean energy or the use of green resources.
Author Contributions: Conceptualization, M.-X.W. and Z.-M.C.; methodology, M.-X.W. and Z.-M.C.;
software, Z.-M.C.; validation, M.-X.W. and Z.-M.C.; formal analysis, M.-X.W.; investigation, L.H.;
resources, Z.-M.C.; data curation, M.-X.W.; writing—original draft preparation, M.-X.W. and Z.-M.C.;
writing—review and editing, L.H.; visualization, M.-X.W. and Z.-M.C.; supervision, L.H.; project
administration, L.H. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding: The project “iESG—an integrated green financial service platform for small and medium-
sized enterprises (The 8th China International College Students’ “Internet+” Innovation and En-
trepreneurship Competition 2022)”; The project “Analysis and empirical study on the transmission
mechanism of green financial reform on the ecological environment (the 18th “Challenge Cup” Na-
tional undergraduate curricular academic competition works 2023)”; the project “Digital inclusive
financial impact mechanism”.
Institutional Review Board Statement: Not applicable.
Informed Consent Statement: Not applicable.
Data Availability Statement: Not applicable.
Conflicts of Interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Sustainability 2023, 15, 4068 23 of 23
References
1. Huang, L.; Zhen, L.; Wang, J.; Zhang, X. Blockchain implementation for circular supply chain management: Evaluating critical
success factors. Ind. Mark. Manag. 2022, 102, 451–464. [CrossRef]
2. Meng, F.; Zhang, W. Digital finance and regional green innovation: Evidence from Chinese cities. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2022,
29, 89498–89521. [CrossRef]
3. Lee, C.-C.; Lee, C.-C. How does green finance affect green total factor productivity? Evidence from China. Energy Econ. 2022, 107,
105863. [CrossRef]
4. Koo, J. Technology spillovers, agglomeration, and regional economic development. J. Plan. Lit. 2005, 20, 99–115. [CrossRef]
5. Thomas, J.M.; Darnton, J. Social diversity and economic development in the metropolis. J. Plan. Lit. 2006, 21, 153–168. [CrossRef]
6. Klevas, V.; Streimikiene, D.; Kleviene, A. Sustainability assessment of the energy projects implementation in regional scale. Renew.
Sustain. Energy Rev. 2009, 13, 155–166. [CrossRef]
7. Yeung, H.W.-C. Transnational Corporations, Global Production Networks, and Urban and Regional Development: A Geographer’s
Perspective on Multinational Enterprises and the Global Economy. Growth Chang. 2009, 40, 197–226. [CrossRef]
8. Matejovsky, L.; Mohapatra, S.; Steiner, B. The Dynamic Effects of Entrepreneurship on Regional Economic Growth: Evidence
from Canada. Growth Chang. 2014, 45, 611–639. [CrossRef]
9. Lee, C.-C.; Lee, C.-C.; Chang, C.-P. Globalization, Economic Growth and Institutional Development in China. Glob. Econ. Rev.
2015, 44, 31–63. [CrossRef]
10. Su, Y.; An, X.-l. Application of threshold regression analysis to study the impact of regional technological innovation level on
sustainable development. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2018, 89, 27–32.
11. Gao, J.; Zhang, Y.-C.; Zhou, T. Computational socioeconomics. Phys. Rep. Rev. Sect. Phys. Lett. 2019, 817, 1–104.
12. Cvijanovic, D.; Ignjatijevic, S.; Tankosic, J.V.; Cvijanovic, V. Do Local Food Products Contribute to Sustainable Economic
Development? Sustainability 2020, 12, 2847. [CrossRef]
13. Duvivier, C. Do Protected Nature Reserves Enhance Local Economic Development? A Literature Review. Rev. D Econ. Polit. 2021,
131, 849–886.
14. Zhang, J.; Yang, G.; Ding, X.; Qin, J. Can green bonds empower green technology innovation of enterprises? Environ. Sci. Pollut.
Res. 2022, 1–13. [CrossRef]
15. Zhao, J.; Taghizadeh-Hesary, F.; Dong, K.; Dong, X. How green growth affects carbon emissions in China: The role of green
finance. Econ. Res. Ekon. Istraz. 2022, 36, 2090–2111. [CrossRef]
16. Monteiro, A.; Vieira, M.; Gama, C.; Miranda, A.I. Towards an improved air quality index. Air Qual. Atmos. Health 2017, 10,
447–455. [CrossRef]
17. Han, X.; Fang, W.; Li, H.; Wang, Y.; Shi, J. Heterogeneity of influential factors across the entire air quality spectrum in Chinese
cities: A spatial quantile regression analysis. Environ. Pollut. 2020, 262, 114259. [CrossRef]
18. Pu, H.; Luo, K.; Wang, P.; Wang, S.; Kang, S. Spatial variation of air quality index and urban driving factors linkages: Evidence
from Chinese cities. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2017, 24, 4457–4468. [CrossRef]
19. Xu, L.J.; Zhou, J.X.; Guo, Y.; Wu, T.M.; Chen, T.T.; Zhong, Q.J.; Ou, C.Q. Spatiotemporal pattern of air quality index and its
associated factors in 31 Chinese provincial capital cities. Air Qual. Atmos. Health 2017, 10, 601–609. [CrossRef]
20. Huang, W.; Wang, H.; Wei, Y. Endogenous or Exogenous? Examining Trans-Boundary Air Pollution by Using the Air Quality
Index (AQI): A Case Study of 30 Provinces and Autonomous Regions in China. Sustainability 2018, 10, 4220. [CrossRef]
21. Gu, J. Effects of Patent Policy on Outputs and Commercialization of Academic Patents in China: A Spatial Difference-in-Differences
Analysis. Sustainability 2021, 13, 13459. [CrossRef]
22. Kolak, M.; Anselin, L. A Spatial Perspective on the Econometrics of Program Evaluation. Int. Reg. Sci. Rev. 2020, 43, 128–153.
[CrossRef]
23. Wang, Y.; Lei, X.; Long, R.; Zhao, J. Green Credit, Financial Constraint, and Capital Investment: Evidence from China’s
Energy-intensive Enterprises. Environ. Manag. 2020, 66, 1059–1071. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
24. Wang, H.; Qi, S.; Zhou, C.; Zhou, J.; Huang, X. Green credit policy, government behavior and green innovation quality of
enterprises. J. Clean. Prod. 2022, 331, 129834. [CrossRef]
25. Zhang, W.; Liu, X.; Wang, D.; Zhou, J. Digital economy and carbon emission performance: Evidence at China’s city level. Energy
Policy 2022, 165, 112927. [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual
author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to
people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.